Book contents
- Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- Cambridge Ocean Technology Series
- Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- 1Introduction to Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- 2Structural Steel Selection and Construction
- 3Ocean Environmental Conditions
- 4Site-Specific Wave-Induced Hull Girder Loads
- 5Serviceability Limit States
- 6Fatigue Limit States
- 7Ultimate Limit States
- 8Accidental Limit States
- 9Mooring System Engineering
- 10Sloshing Impact Engineering
- 11Seismic Impact Engineering
- 12Aircraft Impact Engineering
- 13Quantitative Risk Assessment and Management
- 14Life-Cycle Corrosion Assessment and Management
- 15Lifetime Healthcare and Safe Decommissioning
- Book part
- Index
- References
4 - Site-Specific Wave-Induced Hull Girder Loads
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2022
Book contents
- Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- Cambridge Ocean Technology Series
- Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- 1Introduction to Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- 2Structural Steel Selection and Construction
- 3Ocean Environmental Conditions
- 4Site-Specific Wave-Induced Hull Girder Loads
- 5Serviceability Limit States
- 6Fatigue Limit States
- 7Ultimate Limit States
- 8Accidental Limit States
- 9Mooring System Engineering
- 10Sloshing Impact Engineering
- 11Seismic Impact Engineering
- 12Aircraft Impact Engineering
- 13Quantitative Risk Assessment and Management
- 14Life-Cycle Corrosion Assessment and Management
- 15Lifetime Healthcare and Safe Decommissioning
- Book part
- Index
- References
Summary
Site-specific wave-induced hull girder loads must be calculated to enable the ultimate limit state (ULS) engineering of ship-shaped offshore installations (described in Chapters 7 and 15). Unlike trading ships which are associated with sea states of the twnenty-five-year unrestricted service condition in the North Atlantic Ocean, wave-induced hull girder loads of ship-shaped offshore installations are defined in association with survival conditions of most probable extreme waves for a one-hundred-year return period as far as they always remain on site. However, ship-shaped offshore installations with single-point or turret mooring systems can be disconnected if extreme environmental loads are imminent, sailed to sheltered areas and then returned to restart operation when the weather calms (described in Section 9.4). Also, environmental conditions in some regions may be fully benign accommodating spread mooring systems. In this case, their wave-induced hull girder loads may be defined in association with benign conditions which represent similar environments to those of trading ships but reflecting site-specific metocean data.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ship-Shaped Offshore InstallationsDesign, Construction, Operation, Healthcare and Decommissioning, pp. 111 - 161Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
ABS (2021). Rules for Building and Classing Floating Production Installation. American Bureau of Shipping, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
Alsobrooks, L., Camilli, W., Garrity, R., Krafft, S., McElligott, D. and Ray, W. (2007). Design of a Floating Liquefied Natural Gas Production Vessel for Timor Sea. OCEN 407 Design of Ocean Engineering Facilities, Ocean Engineering Program, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
Choi, J. H., Jang, B. S., Park, J. H., Kim, H. J. and Park, S. C. (2019). ‘Improved environmental contour methods based on an optimization of hybrid models’. Applied Ocean Research, 91, doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2019.101901.Google Scholar
DNV (2019). Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads. Recommended Practice DNV-RP-C205, Det Norske Veritas, Oslo.Google Scholar
DNV (2020). Offshore Standards: Structural Design of Offshore Ship-shaped Units. Det Norske Veritas, Oslo.Google Scholar
DNV (2021). Offshore Standards: Structural Design of Offshore Ship-Shaped and Cylindrical Units. Det Norske Veritas, Oslo.Google Scholar
Fonseca, N., Pascoal, R., Guedes Soares, C., Clauss, G. and Schmittner, C. (2010). ‘Numerical and experimental analysis of extreme wave induced vertical bending moments on a FPSO’. Applied Ocean Research, 32: 374–390.Google Scholar
Guedes Soares, C., Fonseca, N., Pascoal, R., Clauss, G. F., Schmittner, C. E. and Hennig, J. (2006). ‘Analysis of wave induced loads on a FPSO due to abnormal waves’. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 128: 241–247.Google Scholar
Hamdan, F. (2003). Margins of Safety in FPSO Hull Strength. Research Report 083, Health and Safety Executive, London.Google Scholar
Haselsteiner, A. F., Ohkendorf, J., Wosniok, W. and Thoben, K. (2017). ‘Deriving environmental contours from highest density regions’. Coastal Engineering, 123: 42–51.Google Scholar
IACS (2020). Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers. International Association of Classification Societies, London.Google Scholar
Loukakis, T. A. and Chryssostomidis, C. (1975). ‘Seakeeping standard series for cruiser-stern ships’. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 83: 67–127.Google Scholar
LR (2021). Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Offshore Units. Lloyd and Regula, Southampton.Google Scholar
Maerli, A., Das, P. and Smith, S. (2000). ‘A rationalization of failure surface equation for the reliability analysis of FPSO structures’. International Shipbuilding Progress, 47: 215–225.Google Scholar
Orimolade, A. P. and Gudmestad, O. T. (2017). ‘On weather limitations for safe marine operations in the Barents Sea’. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 276: doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/276/1/012018.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. (2020). Advanced Structural Safety Studies with Extreme Conditions and Accidents. Springer, Singapore.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Lee, D. H., Kim, S. J., Thomas, G. and Ma, M. (2019). ‘A new method for determining the design values of wave-induced hull girder loads acting on ships’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 14(S1): S63–S90.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Thayamballi, A. K. and Yang, S. H. (1998). ‘Residual strength assessment of ships after collision and grounding’. Marine Technology, 35(1): 38–54.Google Scholar
Sogstad, B. E. (1995). ‘A sensitivity study of hull girder wave loads for ship shaped oil production and storage vessels’. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 7769, Houston, TX, 1–4 May.Google Scholar
Vazirizade, S. M., Haldar, A. and Gaxiola-Camacho, J. R. (2019). ‘Uncertainty quantification of sea waves: An improved approach’. Oceanography & Fisheries, 9(5), doi: 10.19080/OFOAJ.2019.09.555775.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.