1 - Introduction
Whose Social Problems?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2020
Summary
At first glance, the 1961 collection Contemporary Social Problems is indistinguishable from dozens of similarly named textbooks. The volume, edited by Robert Merton and Robert Nisbet, was the latest installment in a long-running genre of works aiming to orient American sociology undergraduates to a range of “social problems.” Like its predecessors, the Merton and Nisbet collection featured a chapter-by-chapter march through a succession of named problems such as crime, drug addiction, and family disorganization.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Society on the EdgeSocial Science and Public Policy in the Postwar United States, pp. 1 - 67Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Abbott, Andrew. Department and Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew, and Sparrow, James T.. “Hot War, Cold War: The Structure of Sociological Action, 1940–1955.” In Sociology in America: A History, edited by Calhoun, Craig, 281–313. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, Binyamin. The Economists’ Hour: False Prophets, Free Markets, and the Fracture of Society. New York: Little, Brown, 2019.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E. “The Transformation of US Economics, 1920–1960, Viewed through a Survey of Journal Articles.” In From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, edited by Morgan, Mary S. and Rutherford, Malcolm, 85–107. Durham: Duke University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E., and Fontaine, Philippe, eds. The History of the Social Sciences since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E., and Fontaine, Philippe, “Economics and Other Social Sciences: A Historical Perspective.” Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi 52, no. 2 (2018): 7–44.Google Scholar
Balisciano, Márcia L. “Hope for America: American Notions of Economic Planning between Pluralism and Neoclassicism, 1930–1950.” In From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, edited by Morgan, Mary S. and Rutherford, Malcolm, 153–78. Durham: Duke University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Banfield, Edward C. “Review of An Economic Theory of Democracy, by Anthony Downs.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 2, no. 3 (1958): 324–25.Google Scholar
Bannister, Robert C. Sociology and Scientism: The American Quest for Objectivity, 1880–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Barber, William J. From New Era to New Deal: Herbert Hoover, the Economists, and American Economic Policy, 1921–1933. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Beach, Walter G. An Introduction to Sociology and Social Problems. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1925.Google Scholar
Beard, Charles A. The Nature of the Social Sciences in Relation to Objectives of Instruction. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1934.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard S. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard S. “Introduction.” In Social Problems: A Modern Approach, edited by Becker, Howard S., 1–31. New York: John Wiley 1966.Google Scholar
Bend, Emil, and Vogelfanger, Martin. “A New Look at Mills’ Critique.” In Mass Society in Crisis, edited by Rosenberg, Bernard, 271–81. New York: Macmillan, 1964.Google Scholar
Bergson, Abram. “Review of An Economic Theory of Democracy, by Anthony Downs.” American Economic Review 48, no. 3 (1958): 437–40.Google Scholar
Berman, Elizabeth Popp. Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Berman, Elizabeth Popp. “Not Just Neoliberalism: Economization in US Science and Technology Policy.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 39, no. 3 (2013): 397–431.Google Scholar
Berman, Elizabeth Popp. Thinking Like an Economist: How Economics Became the Language of US Public Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bernard, Luther L. “Contribution to ‘Questions for Sociology: An Informal Round Table Symposium’.” Social Forces 13, no. 2 (1934): 165–70.Google Scholar
“Questions for Sociology: An Informal Round Table Symposium.” Social Forces 13, no. 2 (1934): 165–223.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Michael A. A Perilous Progress: Economists and Public Purpose in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Best, Joel. “Whatever Happened to Social Pathology? Conceptual Fashions and the Sociology of Deviance.” Sociological Spectrum 26, no. 6 (2006): 533–46.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. “Social Problems as Collective Behavior.” Social Problems 18, no. 3 (1971): 298–306.Google Scholar
Bowden, A. O. “Our 396 Major Social Problems and Issues and the Schools.” Journal of Educational Sociology 2, no. 7 (1929): 397–411.Google Scholar
Burgin, Angus. The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Depression. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Burnham, John, ed. After Freud Left: A Century or Psychoanalysis in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. “Sociology, Other Disciplines, and the Project of a General Understanding of Social Life.” In Sociology and its Publics: The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization, edited by Halliday, Terence C. and Janowitz, Morris, 137–95. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. “Sociology in America: An Introduction.” In Sociology in America: A History, edited by Calhoun, Craig, 1–38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig, and VanAntwepren, Jonathan. “Orthodoxy, Heterodoxy, and Hierarchy: ‘Mainstream’ Sociology and Its Challengers.” In Sociology in America: A History, edited by Calhoun, Craig, 367–410. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel. “The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics.” In The Laws of the Markets, edited by Callon, Michel, 1–57. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Camic, Charles. “On Edge: Sociology during the Great Depression and the New Deal.” In Sociology in America: A History, edited by Calhoun, Craig, 225–80. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Capshew, James H. Psychologists on the March: Science, Practice, and Professional Identity in America, 1929–1969. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Case, Clarence M. “What Is a Social Problem?” Journal of Applied Sociology 8 (1924): 268–73.Google Scholar
Chall, Leo P. “Notes Toward a History of the Literature of Social Problems.” In Handbook on the Study of Social Problems, edited by Smigel, Erwin O., 399–407. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1971.Google Scholar
Cole, Arthur H. “Economic History in the United States: Formative Years of a Discipline.” Journal of Economic History 28, no. 4 (1968): 556–89.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Committee on Recent Economic Changes of the President’s Conference on Unemployment, ed. Recent Economic Changes in the United States. New York: NBER, 1929.Google Scholar
Connell, R. W. “Why is Classical Theory Classical?” American Journal of Sociology 102, no. 6 (1997): 1511–57.Google Scholar
Converse, Jean M. Survey Research in the United States: Roots and Emergence, 1890–1960. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Cravens, Hamilton. “Have the Social Sciences Mattered in Washington?” In The Social Sciences Go to Washington: The Politics of Knowledge in the Postmodern Age, edited by Cravens, Hamilton, 129–33. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Crowther-Heyck, Hunter. Herbert A. Simon: The Bounds of Reason in Modern America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Crowther-Heyck, Hunter. “Patrons of the Revolution: Ideals and Institutions in Postwar Behavioral Science.” Isis 97, no. 3 (2006): 420–46.Google Scholar
Cushman, Philip. Constructing the Self, Constructing America: A Cultural History of Psychotherapy. New York: Da Capo Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. “The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest.” American Political Science Review 55, no. 4 (1961): 763–72.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Deegan, Mary Jo. Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School: 1892–1918. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
DeLeon, Peter. Advice and Consent: The Development of the Policy Sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1989.Google Scholar
De Vos, Jan. “From Milgram to Zimbardo: The Double Birth of Postwar Psychology/Psychologization.” History of the Human Sciences 23, no. 5 (2010): 156–75.Google Scholar
De Vos, Jan. Psychologization and the Subject of Late Modernity. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2013.Google Scholar
Diamond, Martin. “Review of An Economic Theory of Democracy, by Anthony Downs.” Journal of Political Economy 67, no. 2 (1959): 208–11.Google Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. B. The Souls of Black Folk: Essays and Sketches. Chicago: A. C. McClurg & Co., 1903.Google Scholar
Easton, David. The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1953.Google Scholar
Easton, David. “The New Revolution in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 63, no. 4 (1969): 1051–61.Google Scholar
Ellwood, Charles A. Sociology and Modern Social Problems. New York: American Book Company, 1910.Google Scholar
Ellwood, Charles A. Sociology and Modern Social Problems. Revised and enlarged ed. New York: American Book Company, 1919.Google Scholar
Ellwood, Charles A. Methods in Sociology: A Critical Study. Durham: Duke University Press, 1933.Google Scholar
Erikson, Kai T. “Notes on the Sociology of Deviance.” Social Problems 9, no. 4 (1962): 307–14.Google Scholar
Farr, James. “Political Science.” In The Cambridge History of Science (The Modern Social Sciences), edited by Porter, Theodore M. and Ross, Dorothy, vol. 7, 306–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Fleishman, Joel L. “A New Framework for Integration: Policy Analysis and Public Management.” American Behavioral Scientist 33, no. 6 (1990): 733–54.Google Scholar
Fleury, Jean-Baptiste. “Wandering through the Borderlands of the Social Sciences: Gary Becker's Economics of Discrimination.” History of Political Economy 44, no. 1 (2012): 1–40.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Philippe. “Introduction: The Social Science in a Cross-Disciplinary Age.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 51, no. 1 (2015): 1–9.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Philippe. “Other Histories of Recent Economics: A Survey.” History of Political Economy 48, no. 3 (2016): 373–421.Google Scholar
Frank, Lawrence K. “Social Problems.” American Journal of Sociology 30, no. 4 (1925): 462–73.Google Scholar
Fuller, Richard C. “Sociological Theory and Social Problems.” Social Forces 15, no. 4 (1937): 496–502.Google Scholar
Fuller, Richard C. “The Problem of Teaching Social Problems.” American Journal of Sociology 44, no. 3 (1938): 415–35.Google Scholar
Fuller, Richard C. “Social Problems.” In An Outline of the Principles of Sociology, edited by Park, Robert E., 3–59. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1939.Google Scholar
Fuller, Richard C., and Myers, Richard R.. “The Natural History of a Social Problem.” American Sociological Review 6, no. 3 (1941): 320–29.Google Scholar
Fuller, Richard C., and Myers, Richard R.. “Some Aspects of a Theory of Social Problems.” American Sociological Review 6, no. 1 (1941): 24–32.Google Scholar
Furner, Mary O. Advocacy and Objectivity: A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Political Science, 1865–1905. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1975.Google Scholar
Gay, Edwin. “Introduction.” In Recent Economic Changes in the United States, vol. 1, edited by Committee on Recent Economic Changes of the President’s Conference on Unemployment, 1–12. New York: NBER, 1929.Google Scholar
Geiger, Roger L. Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities since World War II. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Gordon, Michael. “The Social Survey Movement and Sociology in the United States.” Social Problems 21, no. 2 (1973): 284–98.Google Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. “Anti-Minotaur: The Myth of a Value-Free Sociology.” Social Problems 9, no. 3 (1962): 199–213.Google Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. “The Sociologist as Partisan: Sociology and the Welfare State.” American Sociologist 3, no. 2 (1968): 103–16.Google Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books, 1970.Google Scholar
Greenwood, John. The Disappearance of the Social in American Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Grogan, Jessica. Encountering America: Humanistic Psychology, Sixties Culture, and the Shaping of the Modern Self. New York: Harper Perennial, 2013.Google Scholar
Guglielmo, Mark. “The Contribution of Economists to Military Intelligence During World War II.” Journal of Economic History 68, no. 1 (2008): 109–50.Google Scholar
Gusfield, Joseph R. The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Gusfield, Joseph R. “Constructing the Ownership of Social Problems: Fun and Profit in the Welfare State.” Social Problems 36, no. 5 (1989): 431–41.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. “Statistical Language, Statistical Truth, and Statistical Reason: The Self-Authentication of a Style of Scientific Reasoning.” In The Social Dimensions of Science, edited by McMullin, Ernan, 130–57. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Haney, David P. The Americanization of Social Science: Intellectuals and Public Responsibility in the Postwar United States. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Hart, Hornell. “What is a Social Problem?” American Journal of Sociology 29, no. 3 (1923): 345–52.Google Scholar
Haskell, Thomas L. The Emergence of Professional Social Science: The American Social Science Association and the Nineteenth-Century Crisis of Authority. Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Haveman, Robert H. “Policy Analysis and Evaluation Research after Twenty Years.” Policy Studies Journal 16, no. 2 (1987): 191–218.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. “The Intellectuals and Socialism.” University of Chicago Law Review 16, no. 3 (1949): 417–33.Google Scholar
Herman, Abbott P. “The Disproportionate Emphasis on Description in Social Problem Texts.” Social Problems 1, no. 3 (1954): 105–9.Google Scholar
Herman, Ellen. The Romance of American Psychology: Political Culture in the Age of Experts, 1940–1970. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Herring, Pendleton. “Political Science in the Next Decade.” American Political Science Review 39, no. 4 (1945): 757–66.Google Scholar
Hinkle, Roscoe C. Developments in American Sociological Theory, 1915–1950. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Daniel, and Berman, Elizabeth Popp. “Do Economists Make Policies? On the Political Effects of Economics.” Socio-Economic Review 12, no. 4 (2014): 779–811.Google Scholar
Horton, Paul B., and Leslie, Gerald R.. The Sociology of Social Problems. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1955.Google Scholar
House, James S. “Social Psychology, Social Science, and Economics: Twentieth Century Progress and Problems, Twenty-first Century Prospects.” Social Psychology Quarterly 71, no. 3 (2008): 232–56.Google Scholar
Kitsuse, John I., and Spector, Malcolm. “Toward a Sociology of Social Problems: Social Conditions, Value-Judgments, and Social Problems.” Social Problems 20, no. 4 (1973): 407–19.Google Scholar
Leach, William R. Land of Desire: Merchants, Power, and the Rise of a New American Culture. New York: Vintage, 1993.Google Scholar
Lears, Jackson. No Place of Grace: Antimodernism and the Transformation of American Culture, 1880–1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Lears, Jackson. “From Salvation to Self-Realization: Advertising and the Therapeutic Roots of the Consumer Culture, 1880–1930.” In The Culture of Consumption: Critical Essays in American History, 1880–1980, edited by Fox, Richard Wightman and Lears, Jackson, 1–38. New York: Pantheon Books, 1983.Google Scholar
Lee, Alfred McClung. “Sociologists in an Integrating Society: Significance and Satisfaction in Sociological Work.” Social Problems 2, no. 2 (1954): 57–66.Google Scholar
Lemert, Edwin M. Social Pathology: A Systematic Approach to the Theory of Sociopathic Behavior. New York: McGraw Hill, 1951.Google Scholar
Lengermann, Patricia. “The Founding of the American Sociological Review: The Anatomy of a Rebellion.” American Sociological Review 44, no. 2 (1979): 185–98.Google Scholar
Lengermann, Patricia, and Niebrugge, Gillian. “Thrice Told: Narratives of Sociology's Relation to Social Work.” In Sociology in America: A History, edited by Calhoun, Craig, 63–114. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Lengermann, Patricia, and Niebrugge-Brantley, Jill. “Back to the Future: Settlement Sociology, 1885–1930.” American Sociologist 33, no. 3 (2002): 5–20.Google Scholar
Liazos, Alexander. “The Poverty of the Sociology of Deviance: Nuts, Sluts, and Perverts.” Social Problems 20, no. 1 (1972): 103–20.Google Scholar
Light, Jennifer S. From Warfare to Welfare: Defense Intellectuals and Urban Problems in Cold War America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. “In Praise of Political Science.” World Politics 9, no. 2 (1957): 240–53.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M., and Smelser, Neil. “Change and Controversy in Recent American Sociology.” British Journal of Sociology 12, no. 1 (1961): 41–51.Google Scholar
LoConto. “Charles A. Ellwood and the End of Sociology.” American Sociologist 42, no. 1 (2011): 112–28.Google Scholar
Lundberg, George A. “The Social Sciences in the Postwar Era.” Sociometry 8, no. 2 (1945): 137–49.Google Scholar
Marquis, Donald G. “Scientific Methodology in Human Relations.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 92, no. 6 (1948): 411–16.Google Scholar
Martindale, Don. “Social Disorganization: The Conflict of Normative and Empirical Approaches.” In Social Problems: A Modern Approach, edited by Becker, Howard S., 340–67. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1966.Google Scholar
Maslow, Abraham H. Toward a Psychology of Being, 2nd ed. New York: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1968.Google Scholar
Merriam, Charles E. “Annual Report of the Social Science Research Council.” American Political Science Review 20, no. 1 (1926): 185–89.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. “Concluding Comments and an Example of Research.” In New Perspectives for Research on Juvenile Delinquency, edited by Witmer, Ellen and Kotinsky, Ruth, 75–92. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1956.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. “Social Problems and Sociological Theory.” In Contemporary Social Problems: An Introduction to the Sociology of Deviant Behavior and Social Disorganization, edited by Merton, Robert K. and Nisbet, Robert A., 697–737. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1961.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K., and Nisbet, Robert A., eds. Contemporary Social Problems: An Introduction to the Sociology of Deviant Behavior and Social Disorganization. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1961.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K., and Nisbet, Robert A., eds. Contemporary Social Problems: An Introduction to the Sociology of Deviant Behavior and Social Disorganization. 3rd ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1971.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. “The Professional Ideology of Social Pathologists.” American Journal of Sociology 49, no. 2 (1943): 165–80.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Muniesa, Fabian, Millo, Yuval, and Callon, Michel. “An Introduction to Market Devices.” Sociological Review 55, no. 2S (2007): 1–12.Google Scholar
Neumeyer, Martin H. Social Problems and the Changing Society. New York: Van Nostrand, 1953.Google Scholar
Nisbet, Robert A. The Quest for Community: A Study in the Ethics of Order and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Alice. Poverty Knowledge: Social Science, Social Policy, and the Poor in Twentieth-Century US History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Odum, Howard W. Man's Quest for Social Guidance: The Study of Social Problems. New York: H. Holt and Company, 1927.Google Scholar
Ogburn, William F. Social Change with Respect to Culture and Original Nature. New York: B. W. Huebsch, 1922.Google Scholar
Ogburn, William F., and Goldenweiser, Alexander, eds. The Social Sciences and Their Interrelations. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1927.Google Scholar
Ogg, Frederic A. “News and Notes: Political Scientists in the War.” American Political Science Review 36, no. 4 (1942): 728–33.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur, Jr. “Economics, Sociology, and the Best of All Possible Worlds.” Public Interest 12 (1968): 96–118.Google Scholar
Ott, Julia, Konczal, Mike, Connolly, N. D. B., Shenk, Timothy, and Rodgers, Daniel. “Debating the Uses and Abuses of ‘Neoliberalism’: Forum.” Dissent, January 22, 2018, www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/debating-uses-abuses-neoliberalism-forumGoogle Scholar
Park, Robert E. “Sociology and the Social Sciences.” American Journal of Sociology 26, no. 4 (1921): 401–24.Google Scholar
Park, Robert E. “Sociology and the Social Sciences: The Social Organism and the Collective Mind.” American Journal of Sociology 27, no. 1 (1921): 1–21.Google Scholar
Park, Robert E. “Sociology and the Social Sciences: The Group Concept and Social Research.” American Journal of Sociology 27, no. 2 (1921): 169–83.Google Scholar
Parsons, Philip A. An Introduction to Modern Social Problems. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1924.Google Scholar
Platt, Jennifer. A History of Sociological Research Methods in America: 1920–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Pooley, Jefferson. “The Consuming Self: From Flappers to Facebook.” In Blowing Up the Brand, edited by Aronczyk, Melissa and Powers, Devon, 71–89. New York: Peter Lang, 2010.Google Scholar
Pooley, Jefferson. “A ‘Not Particularly Felicitous’ Phrase: A History of the ‘Behavioral Sciences’ Label.” Serendipities 1, no. 1 (2016): 38–81.Google Scholar
Pooley, Jefferson, and Solovey, Mark. “Marginal to the Revolution: The Curious Relationship between Economics and the Behavioral Sciences Movement in Mid-Twentieth-Century America.” In The Unsocial Social Science? Economics and Neighboring Disciplines since 1945, edited by Backhouse, Roger E. and Fontaine, Philippe, 199–233. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore M., and Ross, Dorothy. “Introduction: Writing the History of Social Science.” In The Cambridge History of Science (The Modern Social Sciences), edited by Porter, Theodore M. and Ross, Dorothy, vol. 7, 1–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
President's Research Committee on Social Trends. Recent Social Trends in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1933.Google Scholar
Queen, Stuart A., and Mann, Delbert M.. Social Pathology. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Co., 1925.Google Scholar
Raab, Earl, and Selznick, Gertrude J.. Major Social Problems. Evanston: Row, Peterson, 1959.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, J. M. “Trends in the Teaching of ‘Social Problems’ in Colleges and Universities in the United States.” Social Forces 7, no. 3 (1929): 379–84.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel T. Age of Fracture. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel T. “The Uses and Abuses of ‘Neoliberalism’.” Dissent, 65, no. 1 (2018): 78–87.Google Scholar
Rose, Arnold M. “History and Sociology of the Study of Social Problems.” In Handbook on the Study of Social Problems, edited by Smigel, Erwin O., 3–18. Chicago: Rand McNally and Co., 1971.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas S. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Alexandra. Beyond the Box: B.F. Skinner's Technology of Behavior From Laboratory to Life, 1950s–1970s. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Scaff, Lawrence A. “Max Weber and the Social Sciences in America.” European Journal of Political Theory 3, no. 2 (2004): 121–32.Google Scholar
Senn, Mary S., and Senn, Peter R.. “What is a Social Problem? A History of its Definition.” In Jahrbuch für Soziologiegeschichte 1993, edited by Klingemann, Carsten, Neumann, Michael, Rehberg, Karl-Siegbert, Srubar, Ilja, and Stölting, Erhard, 211–46. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 1995.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. “Some Reflections on the Golden Age of Interdisciplinary Social Psychology.” Annual Review of Sociology 15, no 1. (1989): 1–17.Google Scholar
Skura, Barry. “Constraints on a Reform Movement: Relationships between SSSP and ASA, 1951–1970.” Social Problems 24, no. 1 (1976): 15–36.Google Scholar
Smigel, Erwin O. “Preface.” In Handbook on the Study of Social Problems, edited by Smigel, Erwin O., vii–viii. Chicago: Rand McNally and Co., 1971.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark A. The Right Talk: How Conservatives Transformed the Great Society into the Economic Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark C. Social Science in the Crucible: The American Debate over Objectivity and Purpose, 1918–1941. Durham: Duke University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Solovey, Mark. “Riding Natural Scientists’ Coattails onto the Endless Frontier: The SSRC and the Quest for Scientific Legitimacy.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 40, no. 4 (2004): 393–422.Google Scholar
Solovey, Mark. “Cold War Social Science: Specter, Reality, or Useful Concept?” In Cold War Social Science: Knowledge Production, Liberal Democracy, and Human Nature, edited by Solovey, Mark and Cravens, Hamilton, 1–22. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar
Solovey, Mark. Shaky Foundations: The Politics–Patronage–Social Science Nexus in Cold War America. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Solovey, Mark. “To Measure, Monitor, and Manage the Nation's Social Progress.” Working Paper, University of Toronto, 2019.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, and Tanenhaus, Joseph. The Development of Political Science: From Burgess to Behavioralism. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1967.Google Scholar
Spector, Malcolm, and Kitsuse, John I.. “Social Problems: A Re-Formulation.” Social Problems 21, no. 2 (1973): 145–59.Google Scholar
Spector, Malcolm, and Kitsuse, John I.. Constructing Social Problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1987.Google Scholar
Stedman Jones, Daniel. Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George. “American Sociology before and after World War II: The (Temporary) Settling of a Disciplinary Field.” In Sociology in America: A History, edited by Calhoun, Craig, 314–66. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Susman, Warren L. “‘Personality’ and the Making of Twentieth-Century Culture.” In New Directions in American Intellectual History, edited by Higham, John and Conkin, Paul K., 212–26. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Edwin H. “Social Pathology.” American Journal of Sociology 50, no. 6 (1945): 429–35.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard. Economics and Sociology – Redefining Their Boundaries: Conversations with Economists and Sociologists. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard. “‘The Battle of the Methods’: Toward a Paradigm Shift?” In Socio-economics: Toward a New Synthesis, edited by Etzioni, Amitai and Laurence, Paul R., 13–33. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 1991.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard, and Granovetter, Mark. “Introduction.” In The Sociology of Economic Life, edited by Granovetter, Mark and Swedberg, Richard, 1–26. Boulder: Westview Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. I., and Znaniecki, Florian. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Boston: Gorham Press, 1918.Google Scholar
Torgerson, Douglas. “Policy Analysis and Public Life: The Restoration of Phronesis.” In Political Science in History: Research Programs and Political Traditions, edited by Farr, James, Dryzek, John S., and Leonard, Stephen T., 225–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Turner, Jonathan H. “The More American Sociology Seeks to Become a Politically-Relevant Discipline, the More Irrelevant it Becomes to Solving Societal Problems.” American Sociologist 50, no. 4 (2019): 456–87.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen P. “The Origins of ‘Mainstream Sociology’ and Other Issues in the History of American Sociology.” Social Epistemology 8, no. 1 (1994): 41–67.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen P. “A Life in the First Half-Century of Sociology: Charles Ellwood and the Division of Sociology.” In Sociology in America: A History, edited by Calhoun, Craig, 115–54. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen P. American Sociology: From Pre-Disciplinary to Post-Normal. New York: Palgrave Pilot, 2013.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen P., and Turner, Jonathan H.. The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1990.Google Scholar
Walker, Harvey. “Political Scientists and the War.” American Political Science Review 39, no. 3 (1945): 555–74.Google Scholar
Waller, Willard. “Social Problems and the Mores.” American Sociological Review 1, no. 6 (1936): 922–33.Google Scholar
Worcester, Kenton W. Social Science Research Council, 1923–1998. New York: SSRC, 2001.Google Scholar
Young, Cristobal. “The Emergence of Sociology from Political Economy in the United States: 1890 to 1940.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 45, no. 2 (2009): 91–116.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.