Social Network and the Brain

doi:10.1017/9781108974325.015

Chapter 10 - Social Network and the Brain

from Part III - An Individual’s Cognitive Aging with Others: Key Findings, Issues, and Implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2023

Yoosik Youm and

Junsol Kim

Edited by

Jeanyung Chey

Show author details

Jeanyung Chey: Affiliation:
Seoul National University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The social brain hypothesis originally developed by evolutionary psychologists has focused on the neural foundation of one of the most unique human characteristics: complex social interactions involving social networks. Although there is evidence to suggest that the capacity of the social brain contributes significantly to the size and position of one’s social network, it is also possible that social networking influences the structure and function of the individual’s brain. By using the unique features of the Korean Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (KSHAP), a dataset equipped with both neuroimaging data and comprehensive tracking of the social networks of the residents of two villages, this chapter explores the possible mechanisms through which brain and social networks interact with each other to form and change the social brain. It examines this relationship with studies utilizing mostly volumetry and resting-state activation of the brain. The studies show how social brain volume and connectivity are related to not only social network size but also to a variety of social network indices. By employing these indices, studies have been able to link the complex social world to human beings’ social brain in recent years. Furthermore, the chapter discusses causality issues in the relationship between the social brain and social networks.

Keywords

social brain hypothesis social network analysis brain structure brain function mentalizing network amygdala network social network size social network embeddedness brokerage position

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Society within the Brain
How Social Networks Interact with Our Brain, Behavior and Health as We Age
, pp. 217 - 230
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108974325.015 [Opens in a new window]
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adolphs, R. (2010). What does the amygdala contribute to social cognition? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191(1), 42.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Barton, R. (2001). The evolutionary ecology of the primate brain. In Lee, P. (ed.), Comparative Primate Socioecology, Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology, pp. 167–203. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bickart, K. C., Brickhouse, M., Negreira, A., Sapolsky, D., Barrett, L. F., & Dickerson, B. C. (2014). Atrophy in distinct corticolimbic networks in frontotemporal dementia relates to social impairments measured using the Social Impairment Rating Scale. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 85(4), 438–448.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bickart, K. C., Dickerson, B. C., & Barrett, L. F. (2014). The amygdala as a hub in brain networks that support social life. Neuropsychologia, 63, 235–248.Google Scholar

Bickart, K. C., Hollenbeck, M. C., Barrett, L. F., & Dickerson, B. C. (2012). Intrinsic amygdala–cortical functional connectivity predicts social network size in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(42), 14729–14741.Google Scholar

Bickart, K. C., Wright, C. I., Dautoff, R. J., Dickerson, B. C., & Barrett, L. F. (2011). Amygdala volume and social network size in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 14(2), 163–164.Google Scholar

Bunner, K. D., & Rebec, G. V. (2016). Corticostriatal dysfunction in Huntington’s disease: The basics. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 317.Google Scholar

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Christelis, D., & Dobrescu, L. (2019). The causal effect of social activities on cognition: Evidence from 20 European countries. Social Science & Medicine, 247, 112783.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cornwell, B. (2009). Good health and the bridging of structural holes. Social Networks, 31(1), 92–103.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Craig, M. C., Catani, M., Deeley, Q., Latham, R., Daly, E., Kanaan, R., Picchioni, M., McGuire, P. K., Fahy, T., & Murphy, D. G. (2009). Altered connections on the road to psychopathy. Molecular Psychiatry 14(10), 946–953.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dunbar, R. I. M. (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 6(5), 178–190.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I. M. (2014). The social brain: Psychological underpinnings and implications for the structure of organizations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 109–114.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I. M., & Shultz, S. (2007). Evolution in the social brain. Science, 317(5843), 1344–1347.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I. M., & Shultz, S. (2017). Why are there so many explanations for primate brain evolution? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1727), 20160244.Google Scholar

Dziura, S. L., & Thompson, J. C. (2014). Social-network complexity in humans is associated with the neural response to social information. Psychological Science, 25(11), 2095–2101.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Evans, I. E. M., Martyr, A., Collins, R., Brayne, C., & Clare, L. (2019). Social isolation and cognitive function in later life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 70(s1), S119–S144.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing. Harper.Google Scholar

Gould, R. V., & Fernandez, R. M. (1989). Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology, 19, 89–126.Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hultsch, D. F., Hertzog, C., Small, B. J., & Dixon, R. A. (1999). Use it or lose it: Engaged lifestyle as a buffer of cognitive decline in aging? Psychology and Aging, 14(2), 245.Google Scholar

Joo, W.-t., Kwak, S., Youm, Y., & Chey, J. (2017). Brain functional connectivity difference in the complete network of an entire village: The role of social network size and embeddedness. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–12.Google Scholar

Kanai, R., Bahrami, B., Roylance, R., & Rees, G. (2012). Online social network size is reflected in human brain structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1732), 1327–1334.Google Scholar

Klein, J. T., Shepherd, S. V., Platt, M. L. (2009). Social attention and the brain. Current Biology, 19(20), R958–R962.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Krackhardt, D. (1998). Super strong and sticky. In Kramer, R. M. & Neale, M. A. (eds.), Power and Influence in Organizations. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Kwak, S., Joo, W.-t., Youm, Y., & Chey, J. (2018). Social brain volume is associated with in-degree social network size among older adults. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1871), 20172708.Google Scholar

Lewis, P. A., Rezaie, R., Brown, R., Roberts, N., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). Ventromedial prefrontal volume predicts understanding of others and social network size. Neuroimage, 57(4), 1624–1629.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lin, C., Keles, U., Tyszka, J. M., Gallo, M., Paul, L., & Adolphs, R. (2020). No strong evidence that social network index is associated with gray matter volume from a data-driven investigation. Cortex, 125, 307–317.Google Scholar

Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today, 2(1). 60–67.Google Scholar

Parkinson, C., Kleinbaum, A., & Wheatley, T. (2017). Spontaneous neural encoding of social network position. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(5), 1–7.Google Scholar

Sallet, J., Mars, R. B., Noonan, M. P., Andersson, J. L., O’Reilly, J. X., Jbabdi, S., Croxson, P. L., Jenkinson, M., Miller, K. L., & Rushworth, M. F. (2011). Social network size affects neural circuits in macaques. Science, 334(6056), 697–700.Google Scholar

Shankar, A., Hamer, M., McMunn, A., & Steptoe, A. (2013). Social isolation and loneliness: Relationships with cognitive function during 4 years of follow-up in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Psychosomatic Medicine, 75(2). 161–170.Google Scholar

Strombach, T., Weber, B., Hangebrauk, Z., Kenning, P., Karipidis, I. I., Tobler, P. N., Kalenscher, T. (2015). Social discounting involves modulation of neural value signals by temporoparietal junction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(5), 1619–1624. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414715112 Google Scholar

Van Overwalle, F. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: A meta‐analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 30(3), 829–858.Google Scholar

Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R. A., Nichols, T. E., Van Essen, D. C., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nature Methods, 8(8), 665–670.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Youm, Y., Kim, J., Kwak, S., & Chey, J. (2021). Neural and social correlates of attitudinal brokerage: Using the complete social networks of two entire villages. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 288(1944), 20202866.Google Scholar

Zerubavel, N., Bearman, P. S., Weber, J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2015). Neural mechanisms tracking popularity in real-world social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(49), 15072–15077.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.