Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T02:37:47.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Investigating ecological speciation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Daniel J. Funk
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University
Roger Butlin
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Jon Bridle
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Dolph Schluter
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Get access

Summary

Ecological speciation

Across the years, biological thought on the causal associations between ecological factors and species formation has evolved from an initially implicit to an increasingly explicit level of recognition. Darwin (1859) recognized that adaptation to divergent environments via natural selection promoted the formation of new ‘kinds’. Shortly thereafter, Benjamin Walsh (1864) offered prescient insights on the relationship between host-plant-associated divergence, interbreeding and species status in herbivorous insects (see also Bates (1862) for related inferences). Dobzhansky (1937) and Mayr (1942) later more explicitly invoked the reproductive isolation between populations as the defining characteristic of ‘biological species’, the concept adopted for this chapter. Simpson (1944, 1953) noted the association of ecological shifts with increased species diversity in ‘adaptive radiations’. However, the questions of why and how why access to novel resources should promote the reproductive isolation required for increased speciation were long treated as a black box. Other workers of the synthesis provided verbal models that – with varying degrees of explicitness – illuminated this box. These models described how divergent adaptation might be expected to incidentally yield reproductive isolation between populations from different environments as a byproduct (Mayr 1942, 1947; Muller 1942; Dobzhansky 1951). This might occur via the pleiotropic effects of selected loci, or the direct effects of loci in linkage disequilibrium with them, on reproductive barriers.

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×