Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity. New York: The Free Press. [10, 34]
Abdellaoui, M. (2000). Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Science, 46, 1497–1512. [32]
Abelson, R. P., & Levi, A. (1985). Decision making and decision theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 231–309). New York: Random House. [7, 19]
Ackerman, F., & Heinzerling, L. (2004). Priceless: On knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing. New York: The New Press. [36]
Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 463–496. [20]
Ainslie, G. (1992). Picoeconomics: The strategic interaction of successive motivational states within the person. New York: Cambridge University Press. [20]
Ainslie, G., & Haslam, N. (1992). Self-control. In Loewenstein, G. & Elster, J. (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 177–209). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [20]
Ajzen, I., & Peterson, G. L. (1988). Contingent value measurement: The price of everything and the value of nothing? In Peterson, G. L., Driver, B. L., & Gregory, R. (Eds.), Amenity resource valuation: Integrating economics with other disciplines (pp. 65–76). State College, PA: Venture. [33]
Alba, J. W., & Chattopadhyay, A. (1985). Effects of context and part-category cues on recall of competing brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 340–349. [34]
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411–454. [15, 17]
Alba, J. W., Hutchinson, J. W., & Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1991). Memory and decision making. In Robertson, T. S. & Kassarjian, H. H. (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behavior (pp. 1–49). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [10]
Alba, J. W., Lynch, J. G., Weitz, B., Janiszweki, C., Lutz, R. J., Sawyer, A. G., et al. (1997). Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. Journal of Marketing, 61, 38–53. [17]
Alba, J. W., & Marmorstein, H. (1987). The effects of frequency knowledge on consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 14–26. [17]
Alhakami, A. S., & Slovic, P. (1994). A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Analysis, 14, 1085–1096. [23, 24]
Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulate et axioms de l'école americaine [The behavior of rational man in risk situations: A critique of the axioms and postulates of the American school]. Econometrica, 21, 503–546. [1, 2, 9, 19, 27]
Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little Brown. [22]
American Medical Association. (1993). Strategies for cadaveric organ procurement: Mandated choice and presumed consent. Chicago: American Medical Association. [37]
Ames, D. R., Flynn, F. J., & Weber, E. U. (2004). It's the thought that counts: On perceiving how helpers decide to lend a hand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 461–474. [21]
Amiel, Y., Cowell, F. A., Davidovitz, L., & Plovin, A. (2003). Preference reversals and the analysis of income distributions (No. DARP 66). Retrieved April 20, 2005, from London School of Economics, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines Web site: http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/publications/darp.asp. [1]
Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (in press). Decisions by rules: The case of unwillingness to pay for beneficial delays. Journal of Marketing Research. [28, 29]
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [21]
Anderson, J. R., & Reder, L. M. (1999). The fan effect: New results and new theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 186–197. [21]
Anderson, M. C., & Neely, J. H. (1996). Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. In Bjork, E. L. & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.), Memory (2nd ed., pp. 237–313). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [21]
Anderson, M. C., & Spellman, B. A. (1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review, 102, 68–100. [21]
Anderson, N. (1996). A functional theory of cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [31]
Anderson, N. D., & Craik, F. I. M. (2000). Memory in the aging brain. In Tulving, E. & Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 411–425). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [21]
Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Methuen. [28]
Ariely, D. (1998). Combining experiences over time: The effects of duration, intensity changes and on-line measurements on retrospective pain evaluations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 19–45. [9, 13, 29]
Ariely, D., & Carmon, Z. (2003). Summary assessment of experiences: The whole is different from the sum of its parts. In Loewenstein, G., Read, D., & Baumeister, R. F. (Eds.), Time and decision: Economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice (pp. 323–349). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [14]
Ariely, D., & Levav, J. (2000). Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 279–290. [29]
Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2000). The importance of duration in ratings of and choices between sequences of outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 508–523. [13]
Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2002). Determinants of anchoring effects (Working paper). [13]
Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2003). Coherent arbitrariness: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 73–105. [1, 13, 14, 21, 35]
Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2006). Tom Sawyer and the myth of fundamental value. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60, 1–10. [1, 14]
Ariely, D., & Wallsten, T. (1995). Seeking subjective dominance in multidimensional space: An explanation of the asymmetric dominance effect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 223–232. [18]
Ariely, D., & Zauberman, G. (2000). On the making of an experience: The effects of breaking and combining experiences on their overall evaluation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 219–232. [13]
Arkes, H. R. (2001). The attribution of cues, implicit memory, and human judgment. Columbus, OH: Department of Psychology, Ohio State University. [21]
Arkes, H. R., & Ayton, P. (1999). The sunk cost and Concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals?Psychological Bulletin, 125, 591–600. [29]
Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124–140. [29]
Arrow, K. J. (1982). Risk perception in psychology and economics. Economic Inquiry, 20, 1–9. [6, 27, 31, 34, 36]
Arrow, K. J., Solow, R., Portney, P. R., Leamer, E. E., Radner, R., & Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation.Washington, DC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. [31, 33, 34]
Axelrod, P. (1976). Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University. [18]
Ayres, I., & Gertner, R. (1989). Filling gaps in incomplete contracts: An economic theory of default rules. Yale Law Journal, 99, 87–130. [38]
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [20]
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman. [35]
Barber, B., Heath, C., & Odean, T. (2002). Good rationales sell: Reason-based choice among group and individual investors in the stock market. (Working paper). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. [29]
Bar-Gad, I., & Bergman, H. (2001). Stepping out of the box: Information processing in the neural networks of the basal ganglia. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 689–695. [11]
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244. [21]
Baron, J. (1988). Thinking and deciding. New York: Cambridge University Press. [9, 34]
Baron, J. (1997a). Biases in the quantitative measurement of values for public decisions. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 72–88. [34]
Baron, J. (1997b). Confusion of relative and absolute risk in valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 301–309. [9, 23]
Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. [12]
Baron, J., & Greene, J. (1996). Determinants of insensitivity to quantity in valuation of public goods: Contribution, warm glow, budget constraints, availability, and prominence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 107–125. [31, 32, 34]
Baron, J., & Ritov, I. (1994). Reference points and omission bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 475–498. [37]
Baron, J., & Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 1–16. [34]
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social-psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. [15]
Barsalou, L. W. (1992). Cognitive psychology: An overview for cognitive scientists. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [31]
Bartels, L. M. (1998, September). Democracy with attitudes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Political Science Association, Boston. [31]
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [1]
Bateman, I. A., Carson, R., Day, R., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., et al. (2002). Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: A manual.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. [1]
Bateman, I. A., Dent, S., Peters, E., Starmer, C., & Slovic, P. (2006). The affect heuristic and the attractiveness of simple gambles. (Report No. 06-06). Eugene, OR: Decision Research. [1, 23]
Bateman, I. A., & Willis, K. G. (1999). Valuing environmental preferences.New York: Oxford University Press. [38]
Bazerman, M. H., Loewenstein, G., & White, S. B. (1992). Reversals of preference in allocation decisions: Judging an alternative versus choosing among alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 220–240. [9, 10, 28]
Bazerman, M. H., Moore, D. A., Tenbrunsel, A. E., Wade-Benzoni, K. A., & Blount, S. (1999). Explaining how preferences change across joint versus separate evaluation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 39, 41–58. [29]
Bazerman, M. H., & Neale, M. A. (1992). Negotiating rationally.New York: The Free Press. [34]
Bazerman, M. H., Schroth, H. A., Shah, P. P., Diekmann, K. A., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (1994). The inconsistent role of comparison others and procedural justice in reactions to hypothetical job descriptions: Implications for job acceptance procedures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 326–352. [9]
Bazerman, M. H., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (1998). Negotiating with yourself and losing: Understanding and managing competing internal preferences. Academy of Management Review, 23, 225–241. [9]
Bazerman, M. H., White, S. B., & Loewenstein, G. (1995). Perceptions of fairness in interpersonal and individual choice situations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 39–43. [1]
Beach, L. R. (1990). Image theory: Decision making in personal and organizational contexts.Chichester, UK: Wiley. [17, 18, 19]
Beach, L. R., & Lipshitz, R. (1993). Why classical decision theory is an appropriate standard for evaluating and aiding most human decision making. In Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 21–35). Norwood, NJ: Ables. [18]
Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1978). A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Academy of Management Review, 3, 439–449. [19]
Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1987). Image theory: Principles, goals, and plans in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 66, 201–308. [21]
Beattie, J., & Baron, J. (1991). Investigating the effect of stimulus range on attribute weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 571–585. [9]
Beattie, J., Baron, J., Hershey, J. C., & Spranca, M. D. (1994). Psychological determinants of decision attitude. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 129–144. [16]
Beattie, J., Covey, J., Dolan, P., Hopkins, L., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., et al. (1998). On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 17, 5–25. [35]
Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7–15. [24]
Becker, G. M., DeGroot, D. H., & Marschak, J. (1963). An experimental study of some stochastic models for wagers. Behavioral Science, 8, 41–55. [13]
Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9, 226–232. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8]
Becker, G. S. (1962). Irrational behavior and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 1–13. [13]
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217. [5]
Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 813–846. [5]
Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of marriage: Part II. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 511–526. [5]
Beckmann, J., & Kuhl, J. (1984). Altering information to gain action control: Functional aspects of human information processing in decision making. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 224–237. [18]
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168. [17]
Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 669–679. [21]
Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961–981. [36]
Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W., Swindler, A., & Tipton, S. (1985). Habits of the heart.Los Angeles: University of California Press. [16]
Bellman, S., Johnson, E. J., & Lohse, G. L. (2001). To opt-in or opt-out? It depends on the question. Communications of the ACM, 44(2), 25–27. [37]
Bellman, S., Lohse, G. L., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Predictors of online buying behavior. Communications of the ACM, 42(12), 32–38. [15]
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 2–62). New York: Academic Press. [22]
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 73–92. [20]
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1999). Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments. Management Science, 45, 364–381. [38]
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2002). How much is investor autonomy worth?Journal of Finance, 57, 1593–1616. [38]
Benson, L. (1993). Studies in human decision making: On the effects of experimental instructions, framing, and time constraints. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. [19]
Benson, L., & Svenson, O. (1992). Post-decision consolidation following the debriefing of subjects about experimental manipulations affecting their prior decisions. Lund University, Psychological Research Bulletin, 32 (3). [19]
Bentham, J. (1996). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation (J. H. Burns & H. L. A. Hart, Eds.). New York: Oxford University Press (Original work published in 1823). [27]
Benthin, A., Slovic, P., Moran, P., Severson, H., Mertz, C. K., & Gerrard, M. (1995). Adolescent health-threatening and health-enhancing behaviors: A study of word association and imagery. Journal of Adolescent Health, 17, 143–152. [23]
Benthorn, L. (1994). On post-decision processes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. [19]
Berg, J. E., Dickhaut, J. W., & O'Brien, J. R. (1985). Preference reversal and arbitrage. In Smith, V. L. (Ed.), Research in experimental economics (pp. 31–72). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. [8]
Berg, J. E., Dickhaut, J. W., & Rietz, T. A. (2003). Preference reversals and induced risk preferences: Evidence for noisy maximization. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27, 139–170. [1]
Berman, L. (1982). Planning a tragedy.New York: Norton. [22]
Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk (L. Sommer, Trans.). Econometrica, 22, 23–36 (Reprinted from Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, 1738, 5, 175–192). [2]
Bettman, J. R. (1979). An information processing theory of consumer choice.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [1, 17]
Bettman, J. R., Johnson, E. J., & Payne, J. W. (1991). Consumer decision making. In Robertson, T. S. & Kassarjian, H. H. (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behavior (pp. 50–84). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [19]
Bettman, J. R., & Kakkar, P. (1977). Effects of information presentation format on consumer information acquisition strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 233–240. [7]
Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187–217. [1, 17, 29, 34]
Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 234–248. [17]
Bettman, J. R., Payne, J. W., & Staelin, R. (1986). Cognitive considerations in designing effective labels for presenting risk information. Journal of Marketing and Public Policy, 5, 1–28. [34]
Bettman, J. R., & Sujan, M. (1987). Effects of framing on evaluation of comparable and noncomparable alternatives by expert and novice consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 141–154. [15, 17]
Bettman, J. R., & Zins, M. A. (1979). Information format and choice task effects in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 141–153. [7]
Betts, R., & Gelb, L. (1979). The irony of Vietnam: The system worked.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. [22]
Bewley, T. F. (1998). Why not cut pay?European Economic Review, 62, 459–490. [13]
Beyth-Marom, R., & Fischhoff, B. (1997). Adolescent decisions about risk. In Schulenberg, J., Maggs, J., & Hurnelmans, K. (Eds.), Health risks and developmental transactions during adolescence (pp. 110–135). New York: Cambridge University Press. [35]
Biehal, G., & Chakravarti, D. (1983). Information accessibility as a moderator of consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 1–14. [10]
Biehal, G., & Chakravarti, D. (1986). Consumers' use of memory and external information on choice: Macro and micro perspectives. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 382–405. [15]
Biel, A., & Montgomery, H. (1986). Scenarios in energy planning. In Brehmer, B., Jungermann, H., Lourens, P., & Sevon, G. (Eds.), New directions in research on decision making (pp. 205–218). Amsterdam: North-Holland. [18]
Bigelow, J. (Ed.). (1887). The complete works of Benjamin Franklin (Vol. 4). New York: Putnam. [22]
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology.New York: Cambridge University Press. [22]
Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions. London: Sage. [18]
Billings, R. S., & Scherer, L. L. (1988). The effect of response mode and importance on decision-making strategies: Judgment versus choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 1–19. [10]
Birnbaum, M. H. (1982). Controversies in psychological measurement. In Wegener, B. (Ed.), Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement (pp. 401–485). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [1]
Birnbaum, M. H. (1992). Issues in utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 319–330. [9]
Birnbaum, M. H., & Mellers, B. A. (1979). Stimulus recognition may mediate exposure effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1090–1096. [25]
Birnbaum, M. H., & Stegner, S. E. (1979). Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge's point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 48–74. [21]
Birnbaum, M. H., & Sutton, S. E. (1992). Scale convergence and utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 183–215. [1, 11]
Bishop, R. C. (1986). Resource valuation under uncertainty: Theoretical principles for empirical research. In Smith, V. K. (Ed.), Advances in applied micro-economics (Vol. 4, pp. 133–152). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. [33]
Bishop, R. C., & Heberlein, T. A. (1979). Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased?American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 926–930. [33]
Bizer, G. Y., & Krosnick, J. A. (2001). Exploring the structure of strength-related attitude features: The relation between attitude importance and attitude accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 566–586. [15]
Blattberg, R. C., & Neslin, S. A. (1990). Sales promotion: Concepts, methods, and strategies.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [22]
Bleichrodt, H., & Pinto, J. (2000). A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Science, 46, 1485–1497. [32]
Blom Kemdal, A., & Montgomery, H. (1997). Perspectives and emotions in personal decision making. In Ranyard, R., Crozier, W. R., & Svenson, O. (Eds.), Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations (pp. 72–89). London: Routledge. [18]
Blount, S., & Bazerman, M. H. (1996). The inconsistent evaluation of absolute versus comparative payoffs in labor supply and bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 30, 227–240. [9]
Bockenholt, U., Albert, D., Aschenbrenner, M., & Schmalhofer, F. (1991). The effects of attractiveness, dominance, and attribute differences on information acquisition in multiattribute binary choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, 258–281. [18]
Bohm, P. (1994). Behavior under uncertainty without preference reversals: A field experiment. Empirical Economics, 19, 185–200. [1]
Bohm, P., & Lind, H. (1993). Preference reversal, real-world lotteries, and lottery-interested subjects. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 22, 327–348. [1]
Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289. [23]
Bostic, R., Herrnstein, R. J., & Luce, R. D. (1990). The effect on the preference-reversal phenomenon of using choice indifferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 13, 193–212. [1, 8]
Bovie, P. (Ed.). (1992). Terence: The comedies.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. [16]
Bower, G. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148. [24]
Boyle, K., Desvousges, W., Johnson, F., Dunford, R., & Hudson, S. (1994). An investigation of part-whole biases in contingent valuation studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 64–83. [32]
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59. [24]
Braga, J., & Starmer, C. (2004). Does market experience eliminate preference reversal? Unpublished manuscript. [1]
Brandstätter, E., Kühberger, A., & Schneider, F. (2002). A cognitive-emotional account of the shape of the probability weighting function. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 79–100. [32]
Brehm, J. W. (1956). Post-decision changes in desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384–389. [19, 26]
Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance.New York: Academic Press. [16]
Brehmer, B. (1990). Strategies in real-time dynamic decision making. In Hogarth, R. (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp. 262–279). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [18]
Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. J. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917–927. [27, 28, 30]
Bromley, D. (Ed.). (1986). National resource economics: Policy problems and contemporary analysis.Boston: Kluwer/Nijhoff Publishing. [33]
Brookshire, D. S., & Coursey, D. (1987). Measuring the value of a public good: An empirical comparison of elicitation procedures. American Economic Review, 77(4), 554–566. [33]
Brookshire, D. S., Thayer, M. A., Schulze, W. D., & D'Arge, R. C. (1982). Valuing public goods: A comparison of survey and hedonic approaches. American Economic Review, 72(1), 165–177. [33]
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company. (1999). Kool Natural Lights [Advertisement]. [23]
Brown, C., & Feinberg, F. (2002). How does choice affect evaluations?Advances in Consumer Research, 29, 331–332. [28]
Brown, T. C. (1984). The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Economics, 60, 231–246. [33]
Brown, T. C., & Slovic, P. (1988). Effects of context on economic measures of value. In Peterson, G. L., Driver, B. L., & Gregory, R. (Eds.), Integrating economic and psychological knowledge in valuations of public amenity resources (pp. 23–30). State College, PA: Venture. [33]
Brownstein, A. (2003). Biased pre-decision processing. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 545–568. [12, 19]
Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 1–16. [15]
Brucks, M. (1988). Search monitor: An approach for computer-controlled experiments involving consumer information search. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 117–121. [15]
Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152. [15]
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking.New York: Wiley. [2]
Busemeyer, J. R., & Diederich, A. (2002). Survey of decision field theory. Mathematical Social Sciences, 43, 345–370. [11]
Busemeyer, J. R., & Goldstein, D. G. (1992). Linking together different measures of preference: A dynamic model of matching derived from decision field theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 370–396. [11]
Busemeyer, J. R., Hastie, R., & Medin, D. L. (1995). Decision making from a cognitive perspective.San Diego, CA: Academic. [23]
Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1992). Fundamental derivations for decision field theory. Mathematical Social Sciences, 23, 255–282. [11]
Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic cognition approach to decision making. Psychological Review, 100, 432–459. [11, 12, 19]
Busemeyer, J. R., Townsend, J. T., & Stout, J. C. (2002). Motivational underpinnings of utility in decision making: Decision Field Theory analysis of deprivation and satiation. In Moore, S. C. & Oaksford, M. (Eds.), Advances in consciousness research: Vol. 44. Emotional cognition: From brain to behaviour (pp. 197–219). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [11]
Cabanac, M. (1992). Pleasure: The common currency. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 155, 173–200. [24]
Calabresi, G., & Melamed, A. D. (1972). Property rules, liability rules, and inalienability: One view of the cathedral. Harvard Law Review, 85, 1089–1128. [38]
Caldwell, C. (2004, March 1). Select all: Can we have too many choices?The New Yorker, pp. 91–93. [1]
Calle, E. E., Thun, M. J., Petrelli, J. M., Rodriguez, C., & Heath, C. W., Jr. (1999). Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. adults. New England Journal of Medicine, 341, 1097–1105. [38]
Camerer, C. F. (2000). Prospect theory in the wild: Evidence from the field. In Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 288–300). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [38]
Camerer, C. F., Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., & Thaler, R. H. (1997). Labor supply of New York City cab drivers: One day at a time. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 407–441. [20]
Camerer, C. F., & Ho, T. (1994). Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probabilities. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8, 167–196. [32]
Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 1–3, 7–42. [38]
Camerer, C. F., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O'Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Regulation for conservatives: Behavioral economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism.”University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151, 2111–2154. [37]
Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., & Weber, M. (1989). The curse of knowledge in economic settings: An experimental analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 117, 1232–1254. [13]
Caplan, A. L. (1994). Current ethical issues in organ procurement and transplantation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 1708–1709. [37]
Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human computer interaction.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [7]
Carlson, K. A., & Klein Pearo, L. (2004). Limiting predecisional distortion by prior valuation of attribute components. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94, 48–59. [19]
Carlson, K. A., & Russo, J. E. (2001). Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 91–103. [21]
Carroll, J. D. (1972). Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In Shepard, R. N., Romney, A. K., & Neriove, S. (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences: Vol. 1. Theory (pp. 105–155). New York: Seminar Press. [6]
Carson, R. T., Hanemann, M., Kopp, R., Krosnick, J., Mitchell, R., Presser, S., et al. (1994). Prospective interim lost use value due to DDT and PCB contamination in the Southern California Bight.La Jolla, CA: Natural Resource Damage Assessment. [31]
Carson, R. T., & Mitchell, R. C. (1993). The issue of scope in contingent valuation studies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75, 1263–1267. [31, 32]
Carson, R. T., & Mitchell, R. C. (1995). Sequencing and nesting in contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 155–173. [31]
Casey, J. T. (1991). Reversal of the preference reversal phenomenon. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 224–251. [1]
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2003). 1991–2001 prevalence of obesity among U.S. adults, by characteristics. Retrieved May 6, 2004, from http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/trend/prev_char.htm. [38]
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology.New York: Guilford Press. [1, 32]
Chapman, G. B., & Bornstein, B. (1996). The more you ask the more you get: Anchoring in personal injury verdicts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 519–540. [31]
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1994). The limits of anchoring. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 223–242. [21]
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 115–153. [13, 14, 15, 21]
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (2002). Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Intuitive judgment: Heuristics and biases (pp. 120–138). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [21]
Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224. [24]
Cherry, T. L., Crocker, T. D., & Shogren, J. F. (2003). Rationality spillovers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 63–84. [1]
Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Form vs. function: Emotional and behavioral consequences of trading off hedonic vs. utilitarian attributes (Working paper).University of Texas, Austin. [29]
Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C., & Metrick, A. (2002). Defined contribution pensions: Plan rules, participant decisions, and the path of least resistance. In Poterba, J. M. (Ed.), Tax policy and the economy (Vol. 16, pp. 67–113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [38]
Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C., & Metrick, A. (2004). For better or for worse: Default effects and 401(k) savings behavior. In Wise, D. (Ed.), Perspectives in the economics of aging (pp. 81–121). University of Chicago. [37]
Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. J. (1978). Problem-solving strategies: A selection mechanism, some implications, and some data. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 307–323. [16]
Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. J. (1980). A further examination of the selection of problem-solving strategies: The effects of deadlines and analytic aptitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 107–122. [16]
Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. J. (1984). Discount functions and the measurement of patients' values: Women's values during childbirth. Medical Decision Making, 4, 47–58. [27]
Chu, Y. P., & Chu, R. L. (1990). The subsidence of preference reversals in simplified and marketlike experimental settings: A note. American Economic Review, 80(4), 902–911. [1]
Cicchetti, C., & Dubin, J. (1994). A microeconomic analysis of risk aversion and the decision to self-insure. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 169–186. [20]
Clay, M., & Block, W. (2002). A free market for human organs. Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies, 27, 227–236. [37]
Clemen, R. T. (1996). Making hard decisions: An introduction to decision analysis.Belmont, CA: Duxbury. [34]
Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44. [37]
Cohen, M. S. (1993). The naturalistic basis of decision biases. In Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 51–99). Norwood, NJ: Ables. [18]
Cohen, M. S., Freeman, J. P., & Wolf, S. (1996). Metarecognition in time-stressed decision making: Recognizing, critiquing, and correcting. Human Factors, 38, 206–219. [18]
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428. [15, 21]
Collins, B. E., & Hoyt, M. G. (1972). Personal responsibility for consequences: An integration and extension of the “forced compliance” literature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 558–593. [16]
Connolly, T., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Regret in decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 212–215. [24]
Constans, J. I., & Mathews, A. M. (1993). Mood and the subjective risk of future events. Cognition & Emotion, 7, 545–560. [24]
Coombs, C. H. (1958). On the use of inconsistency of preference in psychological measurement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 1–7. [19]
Coombs, C. H., Bezembinder, T. G., & Goode, F. M. (1967). Testing expectation theories of decision making without measuring utility or subjective probability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 4, 72–103. [2, 3, 6]
Coombs, C. H., & Pruitt, D. G. (1960). Components of risk in decision making: Probability and variance preferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 265–277. [1, 2]
Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 229–266). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. [16]
Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–730. [16]
Cortese, A. E., & Stepanek, M. (1998, May 4). Goodbye to fixed pricing? How electronic commerce could create the most efficient market of them all. Business Week, pp. 70–71. [15]
Coupey, E. (1994). Restructuring: Constructive processing of information displays in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 83–99. [17, 19]
Coupey, E., Irwin, J. R., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Product category familiarity and preference construction. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 459–467. [9, 15]
Coursey, D. L., Hovis, J. J., & Schulze, W. D. (1987). The disparity between willingness to accept and willingness to pay measures of value. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, 679–690. [9]
Cox, J. C., & Epstein, S. (1989). Preference reversals without the independence axiom. American Economic Review, 79(3), 408–426. [1, 8]
Cox, J. C., & Grether, D. M. (1996). The preference reversal phenomenon: Response mode, markets, and incentives. Economic Theory, 7, 381–405. [1, 13]
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. M. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302. [33]
Cropper, M. L., Aydede, S. K., & Portney, P. R. (1994). Preferences for life-saving programs: How the public discounts time and age. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8, 243–265. [38]
Cubitt, R. P., Munro, A., & Starmer, C. (2004). Testing explanations of preference reversal. The Economic Journal, 114, 709–726. [1]
Cummings, R. G., Brookshire, D. S., & Schulze, W. D. (1986). Valuing environmental goods: Assessment of the contingent valuation method.Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld. [1, 33]
Cummings, R. G., Harrison, G. W., & Rutstrom, E. E. (1995). Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys: Is the dichotomous choice approach incentive-compatible?American Economic Review, 85(1), 260–266. [31]
Dahlstrand, U., & Montgomery, H. (1984). Information search and evaluative processes in decision making: A computer-based process tracing study. Acta Psychologica, 56, 113–123. [18]
Dale, H. C. A. (1959). A priori probabilities in gambling. Nature, 183, 842–843. [2]
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain.New York: Avon. [1, 23, 24]
Damasio, A. R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1990). Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond autonomically to social stimuli. Behavioural Brain Research, 41, 81–94. [23]
Darley, J. M., & Berscheid, E. (1967). Increased liking caused by the anticipation of interpersonal contact. Human Relations, 10, 29–40. [30]
Davidson, A. R., Yantis, S., Norwood, M., & Montano, D. E. (1985). Amount of information about the attitude object and attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1184–1198. [26]
Davidson, D., & Marschak, J. (1959). Experimental tests of a stochastic decision theory. In Churchman, C. W. & Ratoosh, P. (Eds.), Measurement: Definitions and theories (pp. 233–269). New York: Wiley. [2]
Dawes, R. M. (1977). Predictive models as a guide to preference. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-7, 355–358. [33]
Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34, 571–582. [17]
Dawes, R. M. (1998). Behavioral decision making, judgment, and inference. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 589–597). Boston: McGraw-Hill. [19]
Bondt, W. F. M., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Do security analysts overreact?American Economic Review, 80(2), 52–57. [38]
Charms, R. (1968). Personal causation.New York: Academic Press. [16]
Tocqueville, A. (1969). Democracy in America.New York: Harper & Row (Original work published 1830). [16]
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation.New York: Plenum Press. [16]
Deci, E. L. (1981). The psychology of self-determination.Lexington, MA: Heath. [16]
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.New York: Plenum Press. [16]
DeKay, M., & McClelland, G. (1996). Probability and utility components of endangered species preservation programs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 60–83. [31, 34]
Delucchi, K. L. (1983). The use and misuse of chi-square: Lewis and Burke revisited. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 166–176. [16]
DeMaio, T. J., & Rothgeb, J. M. (1996). Cognitive interviewing techniques: In the lab and in the field. In Schwarz, N. & Sudman, S. (Eds.), Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communication processes in survey research (pp. 177–195). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [34]
Dember, W. N., Galinsky, T. L., & Warm, J. S. (1992). The role of choice in vigilance performance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 201–204. [16]
Dembo, T. (1931). Der Ärger als dynamisches Problem [Anger as a dynamic problem]. Psychologische Forschung, 15, 1–144. [19]
Denes-Raj, V., & Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 819–829. [23]
Desvousges, W. H., Johnson, F. R., Dunford, R. W., Boyle, K. J., Hudson, S. P., & Wilson, K. N. (1992). Measuring nonuse damages using contingent valuation: An experimental evaluation of accuracy (Research Triangle Institute Monograph 92–1).Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute. [1, 9, 31]
Desvousges, W. H., Johnson, F. R., Dunford, R. W., Boyle, K. J., Hudson, S. P., & Wilson, K. N. (1993). Measuring natural resource damages with contingent valuation: Tests of validity and reliability. In Hausman, J. A. (Ed.), Contingent valuation: A critical assessment (pp. 91–164). Amsterdam: North-Holland. [32]
Desvousges, W. H., Smith, V. K., & Fisher, A. (1987). Option price estimates for water quality improvements: A contingent valuation study for the Monongahela River. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 14, 248–267. [33]
Devine, P. C. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. [15]
Dhar, R. (1997). Consumer preference for a no-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 215–231. [10, 16]
Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. M. (1999). The effect of time pressure on consumer choice deferral. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 369–384. [16]
Dhar, R., Nowlis, S. M., & Sherman, S. J. (1999). Comparison effects on preference construction. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 293–306. [28]
Dhar, R., Nowlis, S. M., & Sherman, S. J. (2000). Trying hard or hardly trying: An analysis of context effects in choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9, 189–200. [11]
Dhar, R., & Simonson, I. (2003). The effect of forced choice on choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 146–160. [11]
Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 60–71. [32]
Diamond, P. A. (1996). Testing the internal consistency of contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, 337–347. [31]
Diamond, P. A., & Hausman, J. A. (1994). Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number?The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 45–64. [31]
Diamond, P. A., Hausman, J. A., Leonard, G., & Denning, M. (1993). Does contingent valuation measure preferences? Experimental evidence. In Hausman, J. A. (Ed.), Contingent valuation: A critical assessment (pp. 41–85). Amsterdam: North-Holland. [31]
Dickens, W. T., & Katz, L. F. (1987). Inter-industry wage differences and industry characteristics. In Lang, K. & Leonard, J. S. (Eds.), Unemployment and the structure of labor markets (pp. 48–89). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. [13]
Dickie, M., Fisher, A., & Gerking, S. (1987). Market transactions and hypothetical demand data: A comparative study. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 69–75. [33]
Diederich, A. (1997). Dynamic stochastic models for decision making under time constraints. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 260–274. [11]
Diederich, A., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2003). Simple matrix methods for analyzing diffusion models of choice probability, choice response time, and simple response time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 304–322. [11]
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43. [28]
Diener, E., Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. In Costa, P. T. & Siegler, I. C. (Eds.), Advances in cell aging and gerontology: Vol. 15. Relevant advances in psychology and aging (pp. 187–219). Amsterdam: Elsevier. [28]
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302. [28]
Dougherty, M. R. P., Gettys, C. F., & Ogden, E. E. (1999). MINERVA-DM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood. Psychological Review, 106, 180–209. [21]
Dougherty, M. R. P., Gronlund, S. D., & Gettys, C. F. (2003). Memory as a fundamental heuristic for decision making. In Schneider, S. L. & Shanteau, J. (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision making (pp. 125–164). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [21]
Downs, J. S., Murray, P. J., Bruine de Bruin, W., White, J. P., Palmgren, C., & Fischhoff, B. (2004). An interactive video program to reduce adolescent females' STD risk: A randomized controlled trial. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 1561–1572. [35]
Doyle, J. R., O'Connor, D. J., Reynolds, G. M., & Bottomley, P. A. (1999). The robustness of the asymmetrically dominated effect: Buying frames, phantom alternatives, and in-store purchases. Psychology & Marketing, 16, 225–243. [1]
Drolet, A. (1997). Generic preferences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. [17]
Drolet, A., Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (2000). Indifference curves that travel with the choice set. Marketing Letters, 11, 199–209. [13]
Dunn, E. W., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Location, location, location: The misprediction of satisfaction in housing lotteries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1421–1432. [28]
Dunning, D., Griffin, D. W., Milojkovoc, J., & Ross, L. (1990). The overconfidence effect in social predication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 568–581. [30]
Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 510–517. [30]
Dworkin, G. (1988). The theory and practice of autonomy.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [38]
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes.Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College. [31]
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 269–322). Boston: McGraw-Hill. [31]
Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? In David, P. A. & Reder, M. W. (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press. [28]
Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111, 465–484. [28]
Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Building a better theory of well-being (IZA discussion paper).Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor. [28]
Edwards, A. L. (1957). Techniques of attitude scale construction.New York: Appleton-Century-Croft. [23]
Edwards, W. (1953). Probability-preferences in gambling. American Journal of Psychology, 66, 349–364. [1, 2]
Edwards, W. (1954a). Probability-preferences among bets with differing expected values. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 56–67. [1, 2]
Edwards, W. (1954b). The reliability of probability-preferences. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 68–95. [1, 2]
Edwards, W. (1954c). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380–417. [1, 18, 19, 33]
Edwards, W. (1954d). Variance preferences in gambling. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 441–452. [2]
Edwards, W. (1955). The prediction of decisions among bets. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 201–214. [2, 3]
Edwards, W. (1961). Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 12, 473–498. [1, 33]
Edwards, W. (1962). Subjective probabilities inferred from decisions. Psychological Review, 69, 109–135. [2]
Edwards, W., & Fasolo, B. (2001). Decision technology. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 581–606. [12]
Edwards, W., & Newman, J. R. (1982). Multiattribute evaluation.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. [12]
Edwards, W., & Winterfeldt, D. (1987). Public values in risk debates. Risk Analysis, 7, 141–158. [33]
Einhorn, H. J. (1972). Expert measurement and mechanical combination. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 7, 86–106. [34]
Einhorn, H. J. (1980). Learning from experience and suboptimal rules in decision making. In Wallsten, T. S. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior (pp. 1–20). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [17]
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 53–88. [19, 33]
Eisele, P. (2000). Post-decision consolidation: Group members in different social settings compared to individual decision makers. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 275–282. [19]
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 543–576. [34]
Ellickson, R. C. (1989). Bringing culture and human frailty to rational actors: A critique of classical law and economics. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 65, 23–55. [27]
Elliott, R., & Dolan, R. J. (1998). Neural response during preference and memory judgments for subliminally presented stimuli: A functional neuro-imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 4697–4704. [1, 25]
Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk ambiguity and the Savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669. [27]
Elster, J., & Loewenstein, G. (1992). Utility from memory and anticipation. In Elster, J. & Loewenstein, G. (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 213–224). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [27, 32]
Emanuel, E. E., & Emanuel, L. L. (1992). Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, 2221–2226. [36]
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological Science, 12, 391–396. [13, 21]
Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724. [1, 23, 32]
Erber, M. W., Hodges, S. D., & Wilson, T. D. (1995). Attitude strength and attitude stability. In Petty, R. E. & Krosnick, J. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 433–454). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [26]
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251. [10, 18]
Eriksen, C. W. (1980). Discrimination and learning without awareness: A methodological survey and evaluation. Psychological Review, 67, 279–300. [25]
Erwin, P. G., & Calev, A. (1984). The influence of Christian name stereotypes on the marking of children's essays. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 223–227. [23]
Estes, W. K. (1994). Classification and cognition.New York: Oxford University Press. [19]
An ethically defensible market in organs [Editorial]. (2002). British Medical Journal, 325, 114–115. [37]
Fair, R. C. (1978). A theory of extramarital affairs. Journal of Political Economy, 86, 45–61. [5]
Falmagne, J.-C. (1985). Elements of psychophysical theory.New York: Oxford University Press. [6]
Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In Petty, R. E. & Krosnick, J. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247–282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [23]
Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238. [31]
Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. Jr. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 421–435. [17, 32, 34]
Feldman-Stewart, D., Brundage, M. D., Manen, L., & Svenson, O. (2004). Patient-focused decision making in early-stage prostate cancer: Insights from a cognitively based decision aid. Health Expectations, 7, 126–141. [19]
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [18, 19, 30]
Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [12, 19]
Fetherstonhaugh, D., Slovic, P., Johnson, S. M., & Friedrich, J. (1997). Insensitivity to the value of human life: A study of psychophysical numbing. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 283–300. [9, 23, 32]
Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17. [23, 32]
Fischer, G. W. (1995). Range sensitivity to attribute weights in multiattribute value models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 252–266. [10]
Fischer, G. W., Carmon, Z., Ariely, D., & Zauberman, G. (1999). Goal-based construction of preferences: Task goals and the prominence effect. Management Science, 45, 1057–1075. [1, 21, 28, 29]
Fischer, G. W., Damodaran, N., Laskey, K. B., & Lincoln, D. (1987). Preferences for proxy attributes. Management Science, 33, 198–214. [6, 9]
Fischer, G. W., & Hawkins, S. (1993). Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 580–597. [1, 9, 10, 18, 29]
Fischer, G. W., Jia, J., & Luce, M. F. (2000). Attribute conflict and preference uncertainty: The Rand MAU model. Management Science, 46, 669–684. [11]
Fischer, P. M. (1991). Brand logo recognition by children ages 3 to 6 years: Mickey Mouse and Old Joe the Camel. Journal of the American Medical Association, 266, 3145. [23]
Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight ≢ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299. [19]
Fischhoff, B. (1980). Clinical decision analysis. Operations Research, 28, 28–43. [35]
Fischhoff, B. (1983). Predicting frames. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 113–116. [1, 21, 35]
Fischhoff, B. (1991). Value elicitation: Is there anything in there?American Psychologist, 46, 835–847. [15, 19, 21, 31, 34, 35]
Fischhoff, B. (1993). Transaction analysis: A framework and an application to insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7, 53–69. [35]
Fischhoff, B. (1996). The real world: What good is it?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 232–248. [19, 35]
Fischhoff, B. (1997). What do psychologists want? Contingent valuation as a special case of asking questions. In Kopp, R. J., Pommerehne, W. W., & Schwartz, N. (Eds.), Determining the value of non-marketed goods: Economic, psychological, and policy relevant aspects of contingent valuation methods (pp. 189–217). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing. [34]
Fischhoff, B. (2005). Cognitive issues in stated preference methods. In Mäler, K.-G. & Vincent, J. R. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental economics: Vol. 2. Valuing environmental changes (pp. 937–968). Amsterdam: Elsevier. [35]
Fischhoff, B., & Furby, L. (1988). Measuring values: A conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with special reference to contingent valuation of visibility. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 147–184. [33, 34, 35]
Fischhoff, B., Quadrel, M. J., Kamlet, M., Loewenstein, G., Dawes, R. M., Fischbeck, P., et al. (1993). Embedding effects: Stimulus representation and response mode. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6, 211–234. [33, 34]
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1978). Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 330–344. [33]
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1980). Knowing what you want: Measuring labile values. In Wallstein, T. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior (pp. 117–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [6, 19, 34, 35]
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes toward technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9, 127–152. [23, 35]
Fischhoff, B., Watson, S., & Hope, C. (1984). Defining risk. Policy Sciences, 17, 123–139. [35]
Fischhoff, B., Welch, N., & Frederick, S. (1999). Construal processes in preference assessment. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 139–176. [34]
Fishburn, P. C. (1984). SSB utility theory: An economic perspective. Mathematical Social Sciences, 8, 63–94. [6, 8]
Fishburn, P. C. (1985). Nontransitive preference theory and the preference reversal phenomenon. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali, 32, 39–50. [1, 6, 8]
Fisher, I. (1906). The nature of capital and income.New York: Macmillan. [2]
Fisher, I. (1968). Is ‘utility’ the most suitable term for the concept it is used to denote? In Page, A. N. (Ed.), Utility theory: A book of readings (pp. 49–51). New York: Wiley (Reprinted from American Economic Review, 8, 335–337, 1918). [27]
Fisher, R. (1969). Basic negotiating strategy: International conflict for beginners.London: Allen Lane. [20]
Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889–906. [7]
Fiske, S. T., & Pavelchak, M. A. (1986). Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect. In Sorrentino, R. M. & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 167–203). New York: Guilford Press. [19]
Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210. [6]
Fitzsimons, G. J., & Morwitz, V. G. (1996). The effect of measuring intent on brand-level purchasing behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 1–11. [21]
Florig, H. K., Morgan, M. G., Morgan, K. M., Jenni, K. E., Fischhoff, B., & Fischbeck, P. S., et al. (2001). A test bed for studies of risk taking. Risk Analysis, 21, 913–922. [35]
Ford, J. K., Schmitt, N., Schechtman, S. L., Hults, B. M., & Doherty, M. L. (1986). Process tracing methods: Contribution, problems, and neglected research questions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 75–117. [19]
Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39–66. [21, 30]
Foster, V., Bateman, I. J., & Harley, D. (1997). Real and hypothetical willingness to pay for environmental preservation: A non-experimental comparison. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 48, 123–138. [31]
Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. (1995). Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 585–603. [9, 13, 14]
Franciosi, R., Kujal, P., Michelitsch, R., & Smith, V. (1993). Experimental tests of the endowment effect (Working paper).Tucson: University of Arizona, Department of Economics. [27]
Frank, R. H. (1992). The role of moral sentiments in the theory of intertemporal choice. In Elster, J. & Loewenstein, G. (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 265–286). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [27]
Frank, R. H. (1997). The frame of reference as public good. Economic Journal, 107, 1832–1847. [28]
Franklin, B. (1950). The autobiography of Benjamin Franklin.New York: Pocket Books. [26]
Frederick, S. (2002). Automated choice heuristics. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 548–558). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [29, 32]
Frederick, S. (2003). Measuring intergenerational time preference: Are future lives valued less?Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26, 39–53. [35, 38]
Frederick, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1998). Scope (in)sensitivity in elicited valuations. Risk Decision and Policy, 3, 109–123. [9, 13, 14, 31, 32]
Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 302–329). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [28]
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O'Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351–401.[38]
Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 45–55. [27]
Freeman, A. M. III. (1993a). The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods.Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. [34]
Freeman, A. M., III. (1993b). Nonuse values in natural resource damage assessments. In Kopp, R. & Smith, V. K. (Eds.), Valuing natural assets: The economics of natural resource damage assessment (pp. 264–303). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. [33]
Freeman, A. M. III. (2003). The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods (2nd ed.).Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. [36]
Freud, A. (1937). The ego and the mechanisms of defense.London: Hogarth Press. [30]
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy, and institutions. Economic Journal, 110, 918–938. [28]
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002a). Happiness and economics.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [28]
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002b). What can economists learn from happiness research?Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 402–435. [28]
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2003). Economic consequences of mispredicting utility. Unpublished manuscript. [28]
Frey, D. (1981). Postdecisional preference for decision-relevant information as a function of its source and the degree of familiarity with its information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 51–67. [19]
Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 41–80. [19]
Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. (1980). Free to choose: A personal statement.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. [38]
Friedrich, J., Barnes, P., Chapin, K., Dawson, I., Garst, V., & Kerr, D. (1999). Psycho-physical numbing: When lives are valued less as the lives at risk increase. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8, 277–299. [23]
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions: Studies in emotion and social interaction.New York: Cambridge University Press. [24]
Frisch, D., & Clemen, R. T. (1994). Beyond expected utility: Rethinking behavioral decision research. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 46–54. [17, 34]
Frisch, D., & Jones, S. K. (1993). Assessing the accuracy of decisions. Theory and Psychology, 3, 115–135. [9]
Gäbel, H. (2002). Donor and non-donor registries in Europe.Stockholm, Sweden: On behalf of the committee of experts on the Organizational Aspects of Co-operation in Organ Transplantation of the Council of Europe. [37]
Gaeth, G. J., & Shanteau, J. (1984). Reducing the influence of irrelevant information on experienced decision makers. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 263–282. [33]
Gallhofer, L., & Saris, W. (1989). Decision trees and decision rules: The empirical decision analysis procedure. In Montgomery, H. & Svenson, O. (Eds.), Process and structure in human decision making (pp. 293–311). Chichester, UK: Wiley. [18]
The Gallup Organization, Inc. (1993). The American public's attitude toward organ donation and transplantation.Boston: Author. [37]
Ganzach, Y. (1995). Attribute scatter and decision outcome: Judgment versus choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 113–122. [10]
Ganzach, Y. (1996). Preference reversals in equal-probability gambles: A case for anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 95–109. [11]
Gardiner, P. C., & Edwards, W. (1975). Public values: Multiattribute-utility measurement for social decision making. In Kaplan, M. F. & Schwartz, S. (Eds.), Human judgment and decision processes (pp. 1–37). New York: Academic Press. [33]
Garvil, J., Gärling, T., Lindberg, E., & Montgomery, H. (1991, August). In search of evidence for dominance structuring in decision making. Paper presented at the 13th European Research Conference of Subjective Probability, Utility, and Decision Making, Fribourg, Switzerland. [18]
Gertner, J. (2003, September 7). The futile pursuit of happiness. The New York Times, Sec. 6, p. 44. [1]
Gettys, C. F., Pliske, R. M., Manning, C., & Casey, J. T. (1987). An evaluation of human act generation performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 23–51. [9]
Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2001). Rethinking rationality. In Gigerenzer, G. & Selten, R. (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 1–12). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. [1]
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & The ABC Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart.New York: Oxford University Press. [21]
Gilbert, D. T., Driver-Linn, E., & Wilson, T. D. (2002). The trouble with Vronsky: Impact bias in the forecasting of future affective states. In Barrett, L. F. & Salovey, P. (Eds.), The wisdom in feeling: Psychological processes in emotional intelligence (pp. 114–143). New York: Guilford Press. [28]
Gilbert, D. T., & Ebert, J. E. J. (2002). Decisions and revisions: The affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 503–514. [30]
Gilbert, D. T., Gill, M. J., & Wilson, T. D. (2002). The future is now: Temporal correction in affective forecasting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 430–444. [28, 29, 30, 32]
Gilbert, D. T., Lieberman, M. D., Morewedge, C. K., & Wilson, T. D. (2004). The peculiar longevity of things not so bad. Psychological Science, 15, 14–19. [30]
Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617–638. [28, 30]
Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (2002). Durability bias in affective forecasting. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 292–312). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [28]
Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2000). Miswanting: Some problems in the forecasting of future affective states. In Forgas, J. P. (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 178–197). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [1, 28, 30]
Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, D. (1995). Case-based decision theory. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 605–639. [13]
Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1995). The experience of regret: What, when, and why. Psychological Review, 102, 379–395. [16]
Gimbel, R. W., Strosberg, M. A., Lehrman, S. E., Gefenas, E., & Taft, F. (2003). Presumed consent and other predictors of cadaveric organ donation in Europe. Progress in Transplantation, 13, 5–15. [37]
Glass, D. C., & Singer, J. E. (1972a). Stress and adaptation: Experimental studies of behavioral effects of exposure to aversive events.New York: Academic Press. [16]
Glass, D. C., & Singer, J. E. (1972b). Urban stress.New York: Academic Press. [16]
Glimcher, P. W., & Rustichini, A. (2004). Neuroeconomics: The consilience of brain and decision. Science, 306, 447–452. [1]
Gneezy, U., & Potters, J. (1997). An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 631–645. [20]
Gold, J. I. (2003). Linking reward expectation to behavior in the basal ganglia. Trends in Neurosciences, 26, 12–14. [11]
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2001). Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 10–16. [11]
Goldstein, W. M. (1984). The relationship between judgment and choice. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45(07B), 2341. [7]
Goldstein, W. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1987). Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psychological Review, 94, 236–254. [1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In Higgins, E. T. & Sorrentiono, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 53–92). New York: Guilford Press. [18]
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Bayer, U. (1999). Deliberative versus implementational mindsets in the control of action. In Chaiken, S. & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 403–422). New York: Guilford Press. [12]
Gollwitzer, P. M., Heckhausen, H., & Ratajczak, H. (1990). From weighting to willing: Approaching a change decision through pre- or postdecisional mentation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 41–65. [18]
Gollwitzer, P. M., Heckhausen, H., & Steller, B. (1990). Deliberative and implementational mind mind-sets: Cognitive turning toward congruous thoughts and information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1119–1127. [19]
Gonzalez, R., & Wu, G. (1999). On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 129–166. [32]
González-Vallejo, C., Erev, I., & Wallsten, T. S. (1994). Do decision quality and preference order depend on whether probabilities are verbal or numerical?American Journal of Psychology, 107, 157–172. [29]
González-Vallejo, C., & Moran, E. (2001). The evaluability hypothesis revisited: Joint and separate preference reversal as a function of attribute importance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 216–233. [28]
Gorovitz, S. (1982). Doctors' dilemmas: Moral conflict and medical care.New York: Macmillan. [36]
Gourville, J. T. (1998). Pennies-a-day: The effect of temporal re-framing on transaction evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 395–408. [20]
Green, D., Jacowitz, K., Kahneman, D., & McFadden, D. (1998). Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods. Resource and Energy Economics, 20, 85–116. [13, 31]
Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1990). Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing, 45, 33–41. [34]
Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603–618. [19]
Greenwald, A. G., Carnot, C. G., Beach, R., & Young, B. (1987). Increasing voting behavior by asking people if they expect to vote. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 315–318. [21]
Gregory, R., Flynn, J., Johnson, S. M., Satterfield, T. A., Slovic, P., & Wagner, R. (1997). Decision pathway surveys: A tool for resource managers. Land Economics, 73, 240–254. [34]
Gregory, R., Keeney, R., & Winterfeldt, D. (1992). Adapting the environmental impact statement process to inform decision makers. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1, 58–75. [33]
Gregory, R., Lichtenstein, S., Brown, T. C., Peterson, G. L., & Slovic, P. (1995). How precise are monetary representations of environmental improvements?Land Economics, 71, 462–473. [1]
Gregory, R., Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1993). Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7, 177–197. [1, 17, 33, 34]
Gregory, R., MacGregor, D. G., & Lichtenstein, S. (1992). Assessing the quality of expressed preference measures of value. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 17, 277–292. [33]
Gregory, R., & McDaniels, T. (1987). Valuing environmental losses: What promise does the right measure hold?Policy Sciences, 20, 11–26. [33]
Grether, D. M. (1980). Bayes rules as a descriptive model: The representativeness heuristic. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95, 537–557. [38]
Grether, D. M., & Plott, C. R. (1979). Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economic Review, 69(4), 623–638. [1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 33, 34]
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Davidson, D. & Harman, G. (Eds.), The logic of grammar (pp. 64–75). Encino, CA: Dickenson. [35]
Griffin, D. W., Dunning, D., & Ross, L. (1990). The role of construal processes in overconfident predictions about the self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1128–1139. [30]
Griffin, D. W., & Ross, L. (1991). Subjective construal, social interference, and human misunderstanding. In Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 319–356). New York: Academic Press. [30]
Griffin, D. W., & Tversky, A. (1992). The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 411–435. [31]
Grossberg, S. (1982). Associative and competitive principles of learning and development: The temporal unfolding and stability of STM and LTM patterns. In Amari, S. I. & Arbib, M. (Eds.), Competition and cooperation in neural networks (pp. 448–485). New York: Springer-Verlag. [11]
Grossberg, S. (1988). Neural networks and natural intelligence.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [11]
Grossberg, S., & Gutowski, W. E. (1987). Neural dynamics of decision making under risk: Affective balance and cognitive-emotional interactions. Psychological Review, 94, 300–318. [11]
Guadagni, P. M., & Little, J. D. C. (1983). A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Science, 2, 203–238. [10]
Guala, F. (2000). Artefacts in experimental economics: Preference reversals and the Becker-deGroot-Marschak mechanism. Economics and Philosophy, 16, 47–75. [1]
Guo, F. Y., & Holyoak, K. J. (2002, August). Understanding similarity in choice behavior: A connectionist model. Poster presented at the Cognitive Science Society Meeting, Fairfax, VA. [11]
Hamm, R. M. (1984). The conditions of occurrence of the preference reversal phenomenon (ICS Publication #90–11).Boulder: University of Colorado, Center for Research on Judgment and Policy. [8]
Hammarberg, A., & Svenson, O. (2000). Individual postdecisional processes in group settings. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 145–158. [19]
Hammermesh, D., & Soss, D. (1978). An economic theory of suicide. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 83–98. [5]
Hammond, J. S., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1999). Smart choices: A practical guide to making better decisions.Boston: Harvard Business School Press. [1]
Hammond, K. R. (1990). Functionalism and illusionism: Can integration be usefully achieved? In Hogarth, R. M. (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp. 227–261). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [21]
Hammond, K. R. (1996a). How convergence of research paradigms can improve research on diagnostic judgment. Medical Decision Making, 16, 216–233. [28]
Hammond, K. R. (1996b). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice.New York: Oxford University Press. [34]
Hammond, K. R., Hursch, C., & Todd, F. J. (1964). Analyzing the components of clinical inference. Psychological Review, 72, 215–224. [1, 2]
Hammond, K. R., McClelland, G. H., & Mumpower, J. (1980). Human judgment and decision making: Theories, methods, and procedures.New York: Praeger. [33]
Hammond, K. R., Stewart, T. R., Brehmer, B., & Steinmann, D. O. (1975). Social judgment theory. In Kaplan, M. F. & Schwartz, S. (Eds.), Human judgment and decision processes.New York: Academic Press. [34]
Hammond, P. (1985). Consequential behavior in decision trees and expected utility (Working Paper No. 112).Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences. [27]
Hanemann, W. M. (1994). Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 19–43. [31]
Hansen, F. (1972). Consumer choice behavior: A cognitive theory.New York: The Free Press. [17]
Hanson, J. D., & Kysar, D. A. (1999a). Taking behavioralism seriously: Some evidence of market manipulation. Harvard Law Review, 112(7), 1420–1572. [1, 23]
Hanson, J. D., & Kysar, D. A. (1999b). Taking behavioralism seriously: The problem of market manipulation. New York University Law Review, 74(3), 630–749. [1, 23]
Hanson, J. D., & Kysar, D. A. (2001). The joint failure of economic theory and legal regulation. In Slovic, P. (Ed.), Smoking: Risk, perception, & policy (pp. 229–276). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [23]
Harari, H., & McDavid, J. W. (1973). Name stereotypes and teachers' expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 222–225. [23]
Hardie, B. G. S., Johnson, E. J., & Fader, P. S. (1993). Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Science, 12, 378–394. [27]
Hare, R. D. (1965). Psychopathy, fear arousal, and anticipated pain. Psychological Reports, 16, 499–502. [23]
Harris, C. C., Tinsley, H. E. A., & Donnelly, D. M. (1988). Research methods for public amenity resource valuation: Issues and recommendations. In Peterson, G. L., Driver, B. L., & Gregory, R. (Eds.), Amenity resource valuation: Integrating economics with other disciplines (pp. 201–218). State College, PA: Venture. [34]
Harris, C. E., & Alcorn, S. P. (2001). To solve a deadly shortage: Economic incentives for human organ donation. Issues in Law and Medicine, 3, 213–233. [37]
Harris, J. (2003). Organ procurement: Dead interests, living needs. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29, 130–134. [37]
Harte, J. M., Westenberg, R. M., & Someren, M. (1994). Process models in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 87, 95–120. [19]
Hastie, R., & Dawes, R. M. (2002). Rational choice in an uncertain world (2nd ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [35]
Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258–268. [15]
Hastie, R., Schkade, D., & Payne, J. (1999). Juror judgments in civil cases: Effects of plaintiff's request and plaintiff's identity on punitive damage awards. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 445–470. [31]
Hauser, J. R., Simester, D. I., & Wernerfelt, B. (1994). Customer satisfaction incentives. Marketing Science, 13, 327–350. [10]
Hauser, J. R., & Wernerfelt, B. (1990). An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 393–408. [16]
Hausman, D. M. (1991). On dogmatism in economics: The case of preference reversals. Journal of Socio-Economics, 20, 205–225. [1]
Hays, W. L. (1963). Statistics for psychologists.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [2]
Heath, C., & Soll, J. (1996). Mental budgeting and consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 40–52. [20]
Heeler, R. M., Okechuku, C., & Reid, S. (1979). Attribute importance: Contrasting measurements. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 60–63. [10]
Heider, F. (1980). The psychology of interpersonal relations.New York: Wiley. [22]
Helson, H. (1933). The fundamental functions of gestalt psychology. Psychological Review, 40, 13–22. [19]
Hendrick, C., Mills, M., & Kiesler, C. A. (1968). Decision time as a function of number and complexity of equally attractive alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 313–318. [16]
Hendrickx, L., Vlek, C., & Oppewal, H. (1989). Relative importance of scenario information and frequency information in the judgment of risk. Acta Psychologica, 72, 41–63. [23]
Herman, L. M., & Bahrick, H. P. (1966). Information encoding and decision time as variables in human choice behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 718–724. [2]
Herr, P. M. (1986). Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 323–340. [15]
Herr, P. M. (1989). Priming price: Prior knowledge and context effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 67–75. [15]
Herr, P. M., Sherman, S. J., & Fazio, R. H. (1983). On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 323–340. [15]
Herrnstein, R. J. (1982). Stimuli and the texture of experience. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 6, 105–117. [20]
Herrnstein, R. J., Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D., & Vaughan, W. (1993). Utility maximization and melioration: Internalities in individual choices. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 149–185. [20]
Herrnstein, R. J., & Prelec, D. (1992a). Melioration. In Loewenstein, G. & Elster, J. (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 235–263). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [20]
Herrnstein, R. J., & Prelec, D. (1992b). A theory of addiction. In Loewenstein, G. & Elster, J. (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 331–360). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [20]
Hershey, J., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1985). Probability vs. certainty equivalence methods in utility measurement: Are they equivalent?Management Science, 31, 1213–1231. [1, 6]
Heyman, G. M. (1996). Resolving the contradictions of addiction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 561–610. [20]
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford Press. [15]
Higgins, E. T., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles.New York: Guilford Press. [21]
Hirt, E. R., & Markman, K. D. (1995). Multiple explanations: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1069–1086. [28]
Hirt, E. R., & Sherman, S. J. (1985). The role of prior knowledge in explaining hypothetical events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 519–543. [21]
HM Treasury, . (2004). Managing risks to the public: Appraisal guidance. London: Author. [35]
Hoch, S. J. (1984). Availability and interference in predictive judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 649–662. [21]
Hoch, S. J. (1985). Counterfactual reasoning and accuracy in predicting personal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 719–731. [21]
Hoch, S. J., & Loewenstein, G. (1991). Time-inconsistent preferences and consumer self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 492–507. [17]
Hoeffler, S., & Ariely, D. (1999). Constructing stable preferences: A look into dimensions of experience and their impact of preference stability. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11, 113–139. [13]
Hoehn, J. P., & Randall, A. (1989). Too many proposals pass the benefit cost test. American Economic Review, 79(3), 544–551. [31]
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60, 50–68. [15]
Hoffman, P. J. (1960). The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 116–131. [1, 2]
Hogarth, R. M. (Ed.). (1982). New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: No. 11. Question framing and response consistency.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [33]
Hogarth, R. M. (1987). Judgment and choice. New York: Wiley. [34]
Hollerman, J. R., & Shultz, W. (1998). Dopamine neurons report an error in the temporal prediction of reward during learning. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 304–309. [11]
Holt, C. A. (1986). Preference reversals and the independence axiom. American Economic Review, 76(3), 508–515. [1, 8]
Holyoak, K. J., & Simon, D. (1999). Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 3–31. [11, 12, 19]
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13, 295–355. [12]
Holzberg, J. D. (1957). The clinical and scientific method: Synthesis or antithesis?Journal of Projective Techniques, 21, 227–242. [2]
Hong, S.-T., & Wyer, R. S. (1990). Determinants of product evaluation: Effects of the time interval between knowledge of products' country of origin and information about its specific attributes. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 277–288. [10]
Horsky, D., & Nelson, P. (1992). New brand positioning and pricing in an oligopolistic market. Marketing Science, 11, 133–153. [10]
Houston, D. A., & Sherman, S. J. (1995). Cancellation and focus: The role of shared and unique features in the choice process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 357–378. [28]
Hovenkamp, H. (1991). Legal policy and the endowment effect. Journal of Legal Studies, 20, 225–247. [27]
Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. N. (1969). The theory of buyer behavior.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [17]
Hsee, C. K. (1993). When trend of monetary outcomes matters: Separate versus joint evaluation and judgment of feelings versus choice. Unpublished manuscript, The University of Chicago. [9]
Hsee, C. K. (1995). Elastic justification: How tempting but task-irrelevant factors influence decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 330–337. [9, 29]
Hsee, C. K. (1996a). The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 247–257. [1, 9, 10, 20, 23, 28, 29, 31, 32]
Hsee, C. K. (1996b). Elastic justification: How unjustifiable factors influence judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 122–129. [9, 23]
Hsee, C. K. (1998). Less is better: When low-value options are valued more highly than high-value options. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 107–121. [1, 9, 23, 28]
Hsee, C. K. (1999). Value-seeking and prediction-decision inconsistency: Why don't people take what they predict they'll like the most?Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 555–561. [29]
Hsee, C. K. (2000). Attribute evaluability and its implications for joint-separate evaluation reversals and beyond. In Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (Eds.), Choices, values and frames (pp. 543–563). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [28]
Hsee, C. K., & Abelson, R. P. (1991). Velocity relation: Satisfaction as a function of the first derivative of outcome over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 341–347. [9, 29]
Hsee, C. K., Abelson, R. P., & Salovey, P. (1991). The relative weighting of position and velocity in satisfaction. Psychological Science, 2, 263–266. [1]
Hsee, C. K., & Kunreuther, H. (2000). The affection effect in insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 20, 141–159. [23, 29]
Hsee, C. K., & Leclerc, F. (1998). Will products look more attractive when evaluated jointly or when evaluated separately?Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 175–186. [9, 28]
Hsee, C. K., Loewenstein, G., Blount, S., & Bazerman, M. H. (1999). Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 576–590. [1, 9, 10, 13, 14, 20, 28, 29, 32, 34]
Hsee, C. K., & Menon, S. (1999). Affection effect in consumer choices. Unpublished study, University of Chicago. [23]
Hsee, C. K., & Rottenstreich, Y. (2004). Music, pandas, and muggers: On the affective psychology of value. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 23–30. [1, 28, 29, 32]
Hsee, C. K., Salovey, P., & Abelson, R. P. (1994). The quasi-acceleration relation: Satisfaction as a function of the change in velocity of outcome over time. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 96–111. [9]
Hsee, C. K., & Weber, E. U. (1997). A fundamental prediction error: Self-other discrepancies in risk preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 45–53. [28]
Hsee, C. K., Yu, F., Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2003). Medium maximization. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 1–14. [28, 29]
Hsee, C. K., & Zhang, J. (2003). Inconsistency between choice and consumption experience. Unpublished manuscript. [28]
Hsee, C. K., & Zhang, J. (2004). Distinction bias: Misprediction and mischoice due to joint evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 680–695. [1, 28, 32]
Hsee, C. K., Zhang, J., & Chen, J. (2004). Internal and substantive inconsistencies in decision-making. In Koehler, D. J. & Harvey, N. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 360–378). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. [1, 28]
Hsee, C. K., Zhang, J., Yu, F., & Xi, Y. (2003). Lay rationalism and inconsistency between predicted experience and decision. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 257–272. [1, 28, 29]
Huber, J. (1997). What we have learned from 20 years of conjoint research: When to use self-explicated, graded pairs, full profiles, or choice experiments. In 1997 Sawtooth Conference Proceedings.Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software. [34]
Huber, J., Lynch, J. G., Corfman, K. P., Feldman, J., Holbrook, M. C., Lehman, D. R., et al. (1997). Thinking about values in prospect and retrospect: Maximizing experienced utility. Marketing Letters, 8, 323–334. [34]
Huber, J., Payne, J. W., & Puto, C. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 90–98. [1, 10, 11, 17, 18, 22]
Huber, J., Wittink, D. R., Fiedler, J. A., & Miller, R. (1993). The effectiveness of alternative preference elicitation procedures in predicting choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 105–114. [10, 17, 34]
Huber, O. (1980). The influence of some task variables on cognitive operations in an information-processing decision model. Acta Psychologica, 45, 187–196. [10, 33]
Huber, O. (1989). Information-processing operators in decision making. In Montgomery, H. & Svenson, O. (Eds.), Process and structure in human decision making (pp. 3–21). Chichester, UK: Wiley. [19]
Irwin, J. R. (1994). Buying/selling price preference reversals: Preference for environmental changes in buying versus selling modes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 431–457. [9, 28]
Irwin, J. R., Schenk, D., McClelland, G. H., Schulze, W. D., Stewart, T., & Thayer, M. (1990). Urban visibility: Some experiments on the contingent valuation method. In Mathei, C. V. (Ed.), Visibility and fine particles (pp. 647–658). Pittsburgh, PA: Air and Waste Management Association. [33, 34]
Irwin, J. R., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., & McClelland, G. H. (1993). Preference reversals and the measurement of environmental values. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6, 5–18. [1, 9, 33]
Isen, A. M. (1993). Positive affect and decision making. In Lewis, M. & Haviland, J. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 261–277). New York: Guilford Press. [23]
Isen, A. M. (2000). Some perspectives on positive affect and self-regulation. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 184–187. [24]
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006. [1, 16]
Jacowitz, K., & Kahneman, D. (1995). Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1161–1166. [13, 31]
Jako, R. A., & Murphy, K. R. (1990). Distributional ratings, judgment decomposition, and their impact on interrater agreement and rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 500–505. [34]
James, W. (1981). The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Original work published 1890). [22]
Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: The Free Press. [9, 12, 19, 26, 28, 34]
Jenni, K., & Loewenstein, G. (1997). Explaining the “identifiable victim effect.”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 235–257. [9, 23]
John, D. R., & Whitney, J. C. (1986). The development of consumer knowledge in children: A cognitive structure approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 406–417. [17]
Johnson, E. J. (2001). Digitizing consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 331–336. [15]
Johnson, E. J., Bellman, S., & Lohse, G. L. (2002). Defaults, framing and privacy: Why opting in-opting out. Marketing Letters, 13, 5–15. [37]
Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. G. (2003). Do defaults save lives?Science, 302, 1338–1139. [1, 37]
Johnson, E. J., Hershey, J., Meszaros, J., & Kunreuther, H. (1993). Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7, 35–51. [37, 38]
Johnson, E. J., Meyer, R. M., & Ghose, S. (1989). When choice models fail: Compensatory representations in negatively correlated environments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 255–270. [33]
Johnson, E. J., Payne, J. W., & Bettman, J. R. (1988). Information displays and preference reversals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 1–21. [7]
Johnson, E. J., Payne, J. W., & Bettman, J. R. (1993). Adapting to time constraints. In Svenson, O. & Maule, A. J. (Eds.), Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making (pp. 103–116). New York: Plenum. [15]
Johnson, E. J., Payne, J. W., Schkade, D. A., & Bettman, J. R. (1988). Monitoring information acquisitions and decisions: Mouse decision laboratory software [Mouselab users manual]. Durham, NC: Duke University, Fuqua School of Business. [7]
Johnson, E. J., & Russo, J. E. (1984). Product familiarity and learning new information. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 542–550. [15]
Johnson, E. J., & Schkade, D. A. (1989). Bias in utility assessments: Further evidence and explanations. Management Science, 35, 406–424. [7, 13, 14]
Johnson, E. J., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 20–31. [21, 23, 24]
Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E. U. (2000, November). Preferences as memory. Paper presented at the meetings of the Judgment and Decision Making Society, New Orleans, LA. [21]
Johnson, J. G., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2005). A dynamic, stochastic, computational model of preference reversal phenomena. Psychological Review, 112, 841–861. [1, 11]
Johnson, M. D. (1984). Consumer choice strategies for comparing noncomparable alternatives. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 741–753. [10, 17]
Jolls, C., Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. H. (1998). A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanford Law Review, 50, 1471–1550. [38]
Jones-Lee, M., Hammerton, M., & Phillips, R. (1985). The value of safety: Results from a national survey. Economic Journal, 95, 49–72. [33]
Jones-Lee, M., & Loomes, G. (2001). Private values and public policy. In Weber, E. U., Baron, J., & Loomes, G. (Eds.), Conflict and tradeoffs in decision making (pp. 205–230). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [38]
Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., & Philips, P. (1995). Valuing the prevention of non-fatal road injuries: Contingent valuation vs. standard gambles. Oxford Economic Papers, 47, 676–695. [31]
Joseph, R. A., Larrick, R. F., Steele, C. M., & Nisbett, R. E. (1992). Protecting the self from negative consequences of risky decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 26–37. [19]
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441–480. [7]
Kagel, J. H., & Battalio, R. C. (1975). Experimental studies of consumer demand behavior using laboratory animals. Economic Inquiry, 13, 22–38. [5]
Kagel, J. H., & Battalio, R. C. (1976). Demand curves for animal consumers [Mimeo]. St. Louis, MO: Washington University. [5]
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [17, 20]
Kahneman, D. (1986). Valuing environmental goods: An assessment of the contingent valuation method. In Cummings, R., Brookshire, D., & Schulze, W. (Eds.), Valuing environmental goods: An assessment of the contingent valuation method (pp. 185–194). Totowa, NJ. [31]
Kahneman, D. (1994). New challenges to the rationality assumption. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150, 18–36. [1, 17, 23, 27, 28, 29, 34, 36]
Kahneman, D. (1995). Varieties of counterfactual thinking. In Roese, N. J. & Olson, J. M. (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 375–396). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [28]
Kahneman, D. (2000). Experienced utility and objective happiness: A moment-based approach. In Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (Eds.), Choices, values and frames (pp. 673–692). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [28]
Kahneman, D. (2003a). Experiences of collaborative research. American Psychologist, 58, 723–730. [1]
Kahneman, D. (2003b). Maps of bounded reality. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475. [35]
Kahneman, D. (2003c). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720. [24, 31]
Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [28]
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Heuristics of intuitive judgment: Extensions and applications (pp. 49–81). New York: Cambridge University Press. [32, 38]
Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A., & Redelmeier, D. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4, 401–405. [9, 27, 29, 31]
Kahneman, D., & Knetsch, J. L. (1992). Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22, 57–70. [1, 13, 20, 31, 32, 33]
Kahneman, D., & Knetsch, J. L. (1993). Anchoring or shallow inferences: The effect of format. University of California, Berkeley. [13]
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business, 59, 285–300. [28]
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325–1348. [1, 9, 19, 27, 33]
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206. [27, 31, 38]
Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Science, 39, 17–31. [20]
Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality with its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153. [9, 13, 31]
Kahneman, D., & Ritov, I. (1994). Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public goods: A study in the headline method. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9, 5–38. [9, 13, 20, 23, 31]
Kahneman, D., Ritov, I., & Schkade, D. (1999). Economic preferences or attitude expressions? An analysis of dollar responses to public issues. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 203–235. [1, 9, 13, 14, 28, 31, 32, 34, 35]
Kahneman, D., Schkade, D., Ritov, I., & Sunstein, C. R. (1999). Reversals of judgement: The effect of cross-category comparisons on intendedly absolute scales. Unpublished manuscript. [31]
Kahneman, D., Schkade, D., & Sunstein, C. R. (1998). Shared outrage and erratic awards: The psychology of punitive damages. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 16, 49–86. [13, 23, 24, 29, 31, 34]
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press. [1, 23, 33]
Kahneman, D., & Snell, J. (1990). Predicting utility. In Hogarth, R. M. (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp. 295–311). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1, 9, 21, 27, 28, 29]
Kahneman, D., & Snell, J. (1992). Predicting a change in taste. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5, 187–200. [9, 19, 23, 27, 28, 29, 30]
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454. [31]
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237–251. [31]
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291. [1, 8, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 27, 28, 32, 35, 36]
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 509–520). New York: Cambridge University Press. [28]
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350. [1, 6, 17]
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [36, 37]
Kahneman, D., & Varey, C. A. (1991). Notes on the psychology of utility. In Roemer, J. & Elster, J. (Eds.), Interpersonal comparisons of well-being (pp. 127–163). New York: Cambridge University Press. [27]
Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 375–405. [13, 20, 28, 31]
Kant, I. (1785/1959). Foundations of the metaphysics of morals. New York: Bobbs-Merrill. [18]
Karni, E., & Safra, Z. (1987). “Preference reversal” and the observability of preferences by experimental methods. Econometrica, 55, 675–685. [1, 8]
Keeney, R. L. (1980). Siting energy facilities. New York: Academic. [33]
Keeney, R. L. (1982). Decision analysis: An overview. Operations Research, 30, 803–838. [33]
Keeney, R. L. (1984). Ethics, decision analysis, and public risk. Risk Analysis, 4, 117–129. [36]
Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decisionmaking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. [19, 34, 35]
Keeney, R. L. (1996). Valuing billions of dollars. In Zeckhauser, R. J., Keeney, R. L., & Sebenius, J. K. (Eds.), Wise choices: Decisions, games, and negotiations (pp. 63–80). Boston: Harvard Business School Press. [34]
Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley. [12, 33]
Keller, K. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57, 1–22. [10]
Keller, L. R., & Ho, J. L. (1988). Decision problem structuring: Generating options. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18, 715–728. [19]
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In Levine, D. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192–240). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. [16]
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128. [16]
Kemp, M., & Maxwell, C. (1993). Exploring a budget context for contingent valuation. In Hausman, J. A. (Ed.), Contingent valuation: A critical assessment (pp. 217–265). Amsterdam: North-Holland. [31]
Keren, G. (1991a). Additional tests of utility theory under unique and repeated conditions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4, 297–304. [19]
Keren, G. (1991b). Calibration and probability judgments: Conceptualization and methodological issues. Acta Psychologica, 77, 217–273. [20]
Keren, G. (1999). The explanatory power of choice bracketing: A commentary on Read et al., “Choice bracketing.”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 199–200. [1]
Keren, G., & Raaijmakers, J. B. (1988). On between-subjects versus within-subjects comparisons in testing utility theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 4, 233–247. [13, 14]
Keren, G., & Wagenaar, W. A. (1987). Violation of utility theory in unique and repeated gambles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 387–391. [19, 20]
Keselman, H. J., Lix, L. M., & Kowalchuk, R. K. (1998). Multiple comparison procedures for trimmed means. Psychological Methods, 3, 123–141. [15]
Kiesler, C. A. (1966). Conflict and number of choice alternatives. Psychological Reports, 18, 603–610. [16]
Kiesler, C. A. (1971). The psychology of commitment: Experiments linking behavior to belief. New York: Academic Press. [12]
Kilka, M., & Weber, M. (2001). What determines the shape of the probability weighting function?Management Science, 47, 1712–1726. [32]
Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E., Tamir, M., Scollon, C., & Diener, M. (2005). Integrating the diverse definitions of happiness: A timesequential framework of subjective wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 261–300. [28]
Kirby, K. N. (1997). Bidding on the future: Evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 54–70. [20]
Klassen, A. C., & Klassen, D. K. (1996). Who are the donors in organ donation? The family's perspective in mandated choice. Annals of Internal Medicine, 125, 70–73. [37]
Klayman, J., & Brown, K. (1993). Debias the environment instead of the judge: An alternative approach to improving diagnostic (and other) judgment. Cognition, 49, 97–122. [29]
Klein, G. A. (1989). Recognition-primed decisions. In Rouse, W. B. (Ed.), Advances in man-machine system research (Vol. 5, pp. 47–92). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. [19]
Klein, G. A. (1993a). A recognition primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 138–147). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. [18]
Klein, G. A. (1993b). Twenty questions: Suggestions for research in naturalistic decision making. In Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 389–403). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. [18]
Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.). (1993). Decision making in action: Models and methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. [18, 21]
Kleindorfer, P. R., Kunreuther, H. C., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Decision sciences: An integrative perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press. [19]
Kleinmuntz, B. (1963). Profile analysis revisited: A heuristic approach. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 70, 315–324. [19]
Kleinmuntz, D. N. (1990). Decomposition and the control of error in decision-analytic models. In Hogarth, R. M. (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp. 107–126). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [34]
Kleinmuntz, D. N., & Schkade, D. A. (1993). Information displays and decision processes. Psychological Science, 4, 221–227. [28, 34]
Knetsch, J. L., & Sinden, J. A. (1984). Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: Experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99, 507–521. [9, 33]
Knez, M., & Smith, V. L. (1991). Hypothetical valuations and preference reversals in the context of asset trading. In Smith, V. L. (Ed.), Papers in experimental economics (pp. 315–338). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [8]
Koehler, J. (1996). The base-rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 1–53. [31]
Kopp, R., Portney, P., & Smith, V. K. (1990). Natural resource damages: The economics have shifted after Ohio v. United States Department of the Interior. Environmental Law Reporter, 4, 10127–10131. [33]
Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107–118. [21, 26]
Korobkin, R. (1998). The status quo bias and contract default rules. Cornell Law Review, 83, 608–687. [38]
Krantz, D. H. (1991). From indices to mappings: The representational approach to measurement. In Brown, D. R. & Smith, J. E. K. (Eds.), Frontiers of mathematical psychology (pp. 1–52). New York: Springer-Verlag. [1]
Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press. [6]
Kray, L. (2000). Contingent weighting in self-other decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 82–106. [29]
Kray, L., & Gonzales, R. (1999). Differential weighting in decision versus advice: I'll do this, you do that. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 207–217. [29]
Kreuger, J., & Rothbart, M. (1990). Contrast and accentuation effects in category learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 651–663. [19]
Krosnick, J. A., & Schuman, H. (1988). Attitude intensity, importance, and certainty and susceptibility to response effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 940–952. [34]
Krueger, A. B., & Summers, L. H. (1988). Efficiency wages and inter-industry wage structure. Econometrica, 56, 259–293. [13]
Kudajie-Gyambi, E., & Rachlin, H. (1996). Temporal patterning choice among delayed outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 61–67. [20]
Kuhl, J. (1992). A theory of self-regulation: Action versus state orientation, self-discrimination, and some applications. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41, 97–129. [18]
Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J. (1994). Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber. [19]
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498. [17, 19, 29]
Kunreuther, H. (1996). Mitigating disaster losses through insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 12, 171–187. [38]
Kunreuther, H., & Hogarth, R. (1993, August). Decision making under ignorance: Arguing with yourself (Center for Decision Research Report). University of Chicago, Graduate School of Business. [19]
France, M., & Hecht, M. A. (1995). Why smiles generate leniency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 207–214. [23]
Laibson, D. (1994). Hyperbolic discounting and consumption. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. [20]
Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 443–477. [20]
Laibson, D. (1999). Commentary on “Choice bracketing” by Read, Loewenstein and Rabin. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 201–202. [1]
Lancaster, K. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74, 132–157. [33]
Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328. [16]
Langer, E. J. (1978). Rethinking the role of thought in social interaction. In Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W. J., & Kidd, R. F. (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2, pp. 35–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [26]
Langer, E. J. (1989). Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness-mindfulness. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 137–173). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [26]
Langer, E. J., & Rodin, J. (1976). The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: A field experiment in an institutional setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 191–198. [16]
Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 46, 352–367. [25]
LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon & Schuster. [1, 25]
Lefcourt, H. M. (1973). The function of the illusions of control and freedom. American Psychologist, 28, 417–425. [16]
Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). Focusing in reasoning and decision making. Cognition, 49, 37–66. [9, 17, 34]
Lehman, D. R., Davis, C. G., Delongis, A., Wortman, C. B., Bluck, S., Mandel, D. R., et al. (1993). Positive and negative life changes following bereavement and their relations to adjustment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12, 90–112. [30]
Lepper, M. R. (1983). Social control processes and the internalization of social values: An attributional perspective. In Higgins, E. T., Ruble, D. N., & Hartup, W. W. (Eds.), Social cognition and social development (pp. 294–330). New York: Cambridge University Press. [16]
Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14, 144–150. [24]
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 473–493. [24]
Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings: Carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science, 15, 337–341. [21, 24]
Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255–275. [29]
Levav, J. (1996). Questioning contingent valuation: Maximality and violations of monotonicity in willingness-to-pay for public goods. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. [31]
Levin, I. P. (1999, November). Why do you and I make different decisions? Tracking individual differences in decision making. Presidential address to the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, Los Angeles, CA. [1]
Levin, I. P., & Gaeth, G. J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 374–378. [17, 21]
Levin, I. P., & Hart, S. S. (2003). Risk preferences in young children: Early evidence of individual differences in reaction to potential gains and losses. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 397–413. [1]
Levin, I. P., & Jasper, J. D. (1993, November). Identifying compensatory and non-compensatory processes in phased decision making. Paper presented at the meeting of the Judgment and Decision Making Society, Washington, DC. [19]
Levin, S. J., & Levine, D. S. (1996). Multiattribute decision making in context: A dynamic neural network methodology. Cognitive Science, 20, 271–299. [11]
Lewicka, M. (1997). Rational or uncommitted? Depression and indecisiveness in interpersonal decision making. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38, 227–236. [18]
Lewin, K. (1952). Group decision and social change. In Swanson, G. E., Newcomb, T. M., & Hartley, E. L. (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 459–473). New York: Henry Holt. [16]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L. A., & Sears, P. S. (1944). Levels of aspiration. In Hunt, J. M. (Ed.), Personality and behavior disorders (Vol. 1, pp. 333–378). New York: Ronald. [19]
Lichtenstein, S. (1965). Bases for preferences among three-outcome bets. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 162–169. [2, 3]
Lichtenstein, S., & Newman, J. R. (1967). Empirical scaling of common verbal phrases associated with numerical probabilities. Psychonomic Science, 9, 563–564. [35]
Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 46–55. [1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18, 21, 29, 33]
Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1973). Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in Las Vegas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 16–20. [1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11]
Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., & Combs, B. (1978). Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 551–578. [23]
Lifton, R. J. (1990). The Nazi doctors: Medical killings and the psychology of genocide. New York: Basic Books. [20]
Lindberg, E., Gärling, T., & Montgomery, H. (1988). People's beliefs and values as determinants of housing preferences and simulated choices. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 5, 181–197. [18]
Lindberg, E., Gärling, T., & Montgomery, H. (1989a, August). Decision with incompletely described alternatives. Paper presented at the 12th European Research Conference on Subjective Probability, Utility, and Decision Making, Moscow. [18]
Lindberg, E., Gärling, T., & Montgomery, H. (1989b). Differential predictability of preferences and choices. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2, 205–219. [10, 18]
Lindberg, E., Gärling, T., & Montgomery, H. (1989c). Belief-value structures as determinants of consumer behavior: A study of housing preferences and choices. Journal of Consumer Policy, 12, 119–137. [18]
Lindberg, E., Gärling, T., & Montgomery, H. (1990). Intra-urban residential mobility: Subjective belief-value structures as determinants of residential preferences and choices (Umea Psychological Reports, No. 197). Umea, Sweden: Department of Psychology, University of Umea. [18]
Lindecrantz, M. (2001). Individuella skillnader vid beslutsfattande: Beslutsprocesser hos staterespektive actionorienterade individer [Individual differences in decision making: Decision processes in state- versus action-oriented individuals]. Unpublished masters thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm. [19]
Linder, D. E., Cooper, J., & Jones, E. E. (1967). Decision freedom as a determinant of the role of incentive magnitude in attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 245–254. [16]
Lindman, H. R. (1965). The measurement of utilities and subjective probabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. [1, 2]
Lindman, H. R. (1971). Inconsistent preferences among gambles. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 390–397. [1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 11]
Linville, P., & Fischer, G. W. (1991). Preferences for separating or combining events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 5–23. [20]
Lipshitz, R. (1993). Converging themes in the study of decision making in realistic settings. In Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 103–137). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. [18]
Littig, L. W. (1962). Effects of skill and chance orientations on probability preferences. Psychological Reports, 10, 67–70. [2]
Lodge, M. (1981). Magnitude scaling: Quantitative measurement of opinions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. [31]
Loewenstein, G. (1987). Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption. Economic Journal, 97, 666–684. [23]
Loewenstein, G. (1988). Frames of mind in intertemporal choice. Management Science, 34, 200–214. [21]
Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272–292. [9, 28, 29]
Loewenstein, G. (2000). How people make decisions: Costs and benefits of health- and retirement-related choice. In Burke, S., Kingson, E., & Reinhardt, U. (Eds.), Social Security and Medicare: Individual versus collective risk and responsibility (pp. 87–113). Washington, DC: National Academy of Social Insurance. [38]
Loewenstein, G., & Adler, D. (1995). A bias in the prediction of tastes. Economic Journal, 105, 929–937. [27]
Loewenstein, G., Blount, S., & Bazerman, M. H. (1993). Reversals of preference between independent and simultaneous evaluation of alternatives. Unpublished manuscript, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. [9]
Loewenstein, G., & Frederick, S. (1997). Predicting reactions to environmental change. In Bazerman, M., Messick, D., Tenbrunsel, A., & Wade-Benzoni, K. (Eds.), Environment, ethics, and behavior (pp. 52–72). San Francisco: New Lexington Press. [9, 29]
Loewenstein, G., O'Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Projection bias in predicting future utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1209–1248. [35]
Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 573–597. [20]
Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1993). Preferences for sequences of outcomes. Psychological Review, 100, 91–108. [9, 20, 29]
Loewenstein, G., & Schkade, D. (1999). Wouldn't it be nice? Predicting future feelings. In Diener, E., Schwartz, N., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 85–105). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [23, 28, 29, 30, 34]
Loewenstein, G., & Sicherman, N. (1991). Do workers prefer increasing wage profiles?Journal of Labor Economics, 9, 67–84. [9, 27]
Loewenstein, G., & Thaler, R. H. (1989). Anomalies: Intertemporal choice. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(4), 181–193. [13]
Loewenstein, G., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, E. S. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267–286. [21, 23, 24, 29]
Loftus, E. F., & Pickrell, J. E. (1995). The formation of false memories. Psychiatric Annals, 25, 720–725. [21]
Loomes, G., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1989). Preference reversal: Information-processing effect or rational nontransitive choice. Economic Journal, 99, 140–151. [8]
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal, 92, 805–824. [6, 8, 19, 36]
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1983). A rationale for preference reversal. American Economic Review, 73(3), 428–432. [1, 6, 7, 8]
Loomis, J. B., Gonzalez-Caban, A., & Gregory, R. (1994). Do reminders of substitutes and budget constraints influence contingent valuation estimates?Land Economics, 70, 499–506. [31]
Loomis, J. B., Hanemann, W. M., Kanninen, B., & Wegge, T. (1991). Willingness to pay to protect wetlands and reduce wildlife contamination from agricultural damage. In Dinar, A. & Zilberman, D. (Eds.), The economics and management of water and drainage in agriculture (pp. 411–429). Boston: Kluwer Academic. [33]
Loomis, J. B., Lockwood, M., & DeLacy, T. (1993). Some empirical evidence on embedding effects in contingent valuation of forest protection. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25, 45–55. [33]
Lopes, L. L. (1981). Decision making in the short run. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 377–385. [19, 20]
Lopes, L. L. (1982, December). Toward a procedural theory of judgment (Technical Report No. WHIPP 17). Madison: Wisconsin Human Information Processing Program. [7]
Lopes, L. L. (1996). When time is of the essence: Averaging, aspiration, and the short run. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 179–189. [20]
Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., & Mackie, D. (1984). Attitude prototypes as determinants of attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1254–1266. [30]
Lowenthal, D. (1993). Preference reversals in candidate evaluation (Working paper). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University. [9]
Lucas, R. E. (1986). Adaptive behavior and economic theory. Journal of Business, 59, S401–S426. [17, 34]
Luce, M. F. (1998). Choosing to avoid: Coping with negatively emotion-laden consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 409–423. [34]
Luce, M. F., Payne, J. W., & Bettman, J. R. (1999). Emotional trade-off difficulty and choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 143–159. [17, 29, 34]
Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press. [15]
Lundberg, C. G., & Svenson, O. (2000). Postdecision consolidation in a trend prediction task. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 159–168. [19]
Lusk, C. M., & Judd, C. M. (1988). Political expertise and the structural mediators of candidate evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 105–126. [26]
Lustig, C., & Hasher, L. (2001). Implicit memory is not immune to interference. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 618–628. [21]
Lynch, J. G., Chakravarti, D., & Mitra, A. (1991). Contrast effects in consumer judgments: Changes in mental representations or in the anchoring of rating scales?Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 284–297. [17]
Lynch, J. G., Marmorstein, H., & Weigold, M. F. (1988). Choices from sets including remembered brands: Use of recalled attributes and prior overall evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 169–184. [10]
MacGregor, D. G., & Slovic, P. (1986). Perceived acceptability of risk analysis as a decision-making approach. Risk Analysis, 6, 245–256. [33]
MacGregor, D. G., Slovic, P., Dreman, D., & Berry, M. (2000). Imagery, affect, and financial judgment. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 1, 104–110. [23]
Machina, M. J. (1987). Choice under uncertainty: Problems solved and unsolved. Economic Perspectives, 1, 121–154. [8]
MacLean, D. (1994). Cost-benefit analysis and procedural values. Analyse & Kritik, 2, 166–180. [36]
Madrian, B. C., & Shea, D. F. (2001). The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1149–1187. [37, 38]
Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In Snow, R. E. & Farr, M. J. (Eds.), Aptitude, learning and instruction: Vol. 3. Conative and affective process analysis (pp. 223–253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [16]
Mandel, N., & Johnson, E. J. (2002). When Web pages influence choice: Effects of visual primes on experts and novices. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 235–245. [1, 15, 21]
Mann, L., Janis, I. L., & Chaplin, R. (1969). The effects of anticipation of forthcoming information on predecisional processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 10–16. [18]
March, J. (1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the rationality of choice. Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 587–608. [1, 6, 9, 17, 27, 29, 34]
March, J. (1994). A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York: The Free Press. [28, 29]
Marder, E. (1997). The laws of choice. New York: The Free Press. [34]
Markman, A. B., & Medin, D. L. (1995). Similarity and alignment in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 117–130. [10]
Markman, A. B., Zhang, S., & Moreau, C. P. (2000). Representation and the construction of preferences. In Dietrich, E. & Markman, A. (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual and representational change in humans and machines (pp. 343–365). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [12]
Markman, K. D., & Hirt, E. R. (2002). Social prediction and the allegiance bias. Social Cognition, 20, 58–86. [28]
Markowitz, H. (1952). The utility of wealth. Journal of Political Economy, 60, 151–158. [20]
Marsh, H. W. (1984). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 707–754. [9]
Martin, L. L., & Tesser, A. (Eds.). (1992). The construction of social judgments. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [1]
Martin, L. M. (1986). Set/reset: Use and disuse of concepts in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 493–504. [15]
May, K. O. (1954). Intransitivity, utility, and the aggregation of preference patterns. Econometrica, 22, 1–3. [1, 9, 19]
McClure, S. M., Li, J., Tomlin, D., Cypert, K. S., Montague, L. M., & Montague, R. P. (2004). Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks. Neuron, 44, 379–387. [1]
McFadden, D. (1994). Contingent valuation and social choice. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 689–703. [31]
McFadden, D. (1999). Rationality for economists. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 73–106. [17, 34]
McFadden, D., & Leonard, G. (1993). Issues in The contingent valuation of environmental goods: Methodologies for data collection and analysis. In Hausman, J. A. (Ed.), Contingent valuation: A critical assessment (pp. 165–208). Amsterdam: North-Holland. [31]
McGuire, W. J. (1969). Suspiciousness of experimenter's intent. In Rosenthal, R. & Rosnow, R. L. (Eds.), Artifact in behavioral research (pp. 13–57). New York: Academic Press. [35]
McKenzie, C. R. M., & Nelson, J. D. (2003). What a speaker's choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame selection, and framing effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 596–602. [21]
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1995). Conceptual combinations and relational contexts in free association and in priming in lexical decision and naming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 527–533. [15]
McLanahan, S. S., & Sorensen, A. B. (1984). Life events and psychological well-being: A reexamination of theoretical and methodological issues. Social Science Research, 13, 111–128. [28]
McNamara, T. P. (1992). Priming and constraints it places on theories of memory and retrieval. Psychological Review, 99, 650–662. [15]
McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C. Jr., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 306, 1259–1262. [1]
Mellers, B. A., Chang, S., Birnbaum, M. H., & Ordóñez, L. D. (1992). Preferences, prices, and ratings in risky decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 347–361. [9, 10, 28]
Mellers, B. A., & Cooke, A. D. J. (1994). Trade-offs depend on attribute range. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1055–1067. [9]
Mellers, B. A., & Cooke, A. D. J. (1996). The role of task and context in preference measurement. Psychological Science, 7, 76–82. [10]
Mellers, B. A., Ordóñez, L., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1992). A change-of-process theory for contextual effects and preference reversals in risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 331–369. [1, 9]
Mellers, B. A., Richards, V., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1992). Distributional theories of impression formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 313–343. [23]
Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., & Cooke, A. D. J. (1998). Judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 447–477. [17]
Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., Ho, K., & Ritov, I. (1997). Elation and disappointment: Emotional reactions to risky options. Psychological Science, 8, 423–429. [24, 29]
Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., & Ritov, I. (1999). Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 332–345. [29]
Merkhofer, M. W., & Keeney, R. L. (1987). A multiattribute utility analysis of alternative sites for the disposal of nuclear waste. Risk Analysis, 7, 173–194. [33]
Middleton, F. A., & Strick, P. L. (2000). A revised neuroanatomy of frontal-subcortical circuits. In Lichter, D. G. & Cummings, J. L. (Eds.), Frontal-subcortical circuits in psychiatric and neurological disorders (pp. 44–58). New York: Guilford Press. [11]
Mill, J. S. (1974). On liberty. London: Penguin. [38]
Millar, M. G., & Tesser, A. (1986). Effects of affective and cognitive focus on the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 270–276. [26]
Millar, M. G., & Tesser, A. (1989). The effects of affective-cognitive consistency and thought on the attitude-behavior relation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 189–202. [26]
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. [19, 20]
Miller, J. G. (1961). Sensory overloading. In Flaherty, B. E. (Ed.), Psychophysiological aspects of space flight (pp. 215–237). New York: Columbia University Press. [2]
Miller, L., & Meyer, D. E. (1966). Decision effectiveness as a function of the structure and number of alternatives at a choice point. Proceedings of the 74th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1, 25–26. [2]
Milliken, B., Joordens, S., Merikle, P. M., & Seiffert, A. E. (1998). Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review, 105, 203–229. [21]
Mills, J., Meltzer, R., & Clark, M. (1977). Effect of number of options on recall of information supporting different decision strategies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 213–218. [16]
Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Thoret, A. (1976). The structure of unstructured decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 246–275. [19]
Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. [31, 33, 34]
Monahan, J. L., Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11, 462–466. [25]
Montague, R. P. (2002, October). Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation [Lecture notes]. Paper presented at the University of California Conference on Recent Research in Behavioral Finance, Monterey, CA. [1]
Montague, R. P., & Berns, G. S. (2002). Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation. Neuron, 36, 265–284. [1, 24]
Montgomery, H. (1983). Decision rules and the search for a dominance structure: Towards a process model of decision making. In Humphreys, P. C., Svenson, O., & Vari, A. (Eds.), Analysing and aiding decision processes (pp. 343–369). Amsterdam/Budapest: North-Holland and Hungarian Academic Press. [1, 6, 12, 18, 19, 22, 23]
Montgomery, H. (1989). From cognition to action: The search for dominance in decision making. In Montgomery, H. & Svenson, O. (Eds.), Process and structure in human decision making (pp. 23–49). Chichester, England: Wiley. [18]
Montgomery, H. (1993). The choice of a home seen from the inside: Psychological contributions to the study of decision making in housing markets. In Gärling, T. & Golledge, R. G. (Eds.), Behavior and environment (pp. 317–341). Amsterdam: Elsevier. [18]
Montgomery, H. (1994). Towards a perspective theory of decision making and judgment. Acta Psychologica, 87, 155–187. [18, 19]
Montgomery, H. (1997). Surrender at Perevolochna: A case study of perspective and action control in decision making under stress. In Flin, R., Salas, E., Strub, M., & Martin, L. (Eds.), Decision making under stress: Emerging themes and applications (pp. 193–204). Aldershot, England: Ashgate. [18]
Montgomery, H. (1998). Decision making and action: The search for a dominance structure. In Kofta, M., Weary, G., & Sedek, G. (Eds.), Personal control in action: Cognitive and motivational mechanisms (pp. 279–298). New York: Plenum. [1, 18]
Montgomery, H., Gärling, T., Lindberg, E., & Selart, M. (1990). Preference judgments and choice: Is the prominence effect due to information integration or to information evaluation? In Borcherding, K., Larichev, O. I., & Messick, D. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in decision making (pp. 149–157). Amsterdam: North-Holland. [18]
Montgomery, H., & Hemlin, S. (1991). Judging scientific quality: A cross-disciplinary investigation of professorial evaluation documents (Göteborg Psychological Reports, Vol. 21, No. 4). Göteborg, Sweden: University of Göteborg, Department of Psychology. [18]
Montgomery, H., Selart, M., Gärling, T., & Lindberg, E. (1994). The judgment-choice discrepancy: Noncompatibility or restructuring?Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 145–155. [10, 18]
Montgomery, H., & Svenson, O. (1989). A think aloud study of dominance structuring in decision processes. In Montgomery, H. & Svenson, O. (Eds.), Process and structure in human decision making (pp. 135–150). Chichester, UK: Wiley. [18, 19]
Moore, D. (1999). Order effects in preference judgments: Evidence for context dependence in the generation of preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 146–165. [28]
Morewedge, C. K., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2005). The least likely of times: How remembering the past biases forecasts of the future. Psychological Science, 16, 626–630. [1]
Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., & Atman, C. J. (2002). Risk communication: A mental models approach. New York: Cambridge University Press. [35]
Morrison, E. R. (1998). Judicial review of discount rates used in regulatory cost-benefit analysis. The University of Chicago Law Review, 65, 1333–1359. [38]
Morrow, J., & Nolan-Hoeksema, S. (1990). Effects of responses to depression on the remediation of depressive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 519–527. [26]
Morwitz, V. G. (1997). Why consumers don't always accurately predict their own future behavior. Marketing Letters, 8, 57–60. [21]
Morwitz, V. G., Johnson, E. J., & Schmittlein, D. (1993). Does measuring intent change behavior?Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 46–61. [21]
Morwitz, V. G., & Pluzinski, C. (1996). Do polls reflect opinions or do opinions reflect polls? The impact of political polling on voters' expectations, preferences, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 53–67. [21]
Mowen, J. C., & Gentry, J. W. (1980). Investigation of the preference-reversal phenomenon in a new product introduction task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 715–722. [1, 8]
Mowrer, O. H. (1960a). Learning theory and behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons. [23]
Mowrer, O. H. (1960b). Learning theory and the symbolic processes. New York: John Wiley & Sons. [23]
Murphy, S. T., Monahan, J. L., & Zajonc, R. B. (1995). Additivity of nonconscious affect: Combined effects of priming and exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 589–602. [25]
Murray, K. B., & Häubl, G. (2005). Processes of preference construction in agent-assisted online shopping. In Haugtvedt, C., Machleit, K., & Yalch, R. (Eds.), Online consumer psychology: Understanding and influencing consumer behavior in the virtual world (pp. 265–286). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [1]
Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2001a). Considering the impossible: Explaining the effects of implausible anchors. Social Cognition, 19, 145–160. [13]
Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2001b). The semantics of anchoring. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 234–255. [21]
Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., & Pfeiffer, T. (2000). Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: Considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1142–1150. [21]
Myers, D. G. (1993). The pursuit of happiness: Who is happy and why?New York: Avon Books. [28]
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. (2001). Understanding adult obesity. Retrieved May 4, 2005, from http://win.niddk.nih.gov/publications/understanding.htm. [38]
Neill, H. (1995). The context for substitutes in CVM studies: Some empirical observations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, 393–397. [31]
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. [1]
Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78, 331–329. [10]
Nickerson, C. (1995). Does willingness-to-pay reflect the purchase of moral satisfaction? A reconsideration of Kahneman and Knetsch. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 126–133. [31]
Nicosia, F. M. (1966). Consumer decision processes: Marketing and advertising implications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [17]
Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [1]
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. [22, 26]
Nogee, P., & Lieberman, B. (1960). The auction value of certain risky situations. Journal of Psychology, 49, 167–179. [2]
Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books. [34]
North, A. C., Hargreaves, D. J., & McKendrick, J. (1999). The influence of in-store music on wine selections. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 271–276. [21]
Norwick, R. J., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2005). Surrogation: An antidote for errors in affective forecasting. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. [1]
Novemsky, N., & Kronzon, S. (1999). How are base-rates used, when they are used: A comparison of additive and Bayesian models of base-rate use. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 55–69. [31]
Novemsky, N., & Ratner, R. K. (2003). The time course and impact of consumers' erroneous beliefs about hedonic contrast effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 507–516. [28]
Nowlis, S. M., & Simonson, I. (1994). The context-dependency of attributes as a determinant of preference reversals between choices and judgments of purchase likelihood (Working paper). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. [9, 10]
Nowlis, S. M., & Simonson, I. (1997). Attribute-task compatability as a determinant of consumer preference reversals. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 205–218. [1, 9, 10, 20, 28, 29]
Nutt, P. C. (1998). How decision makers evaluate alternatives and the influence of complexity. Management Science, 44, 1148–1166. [34]
O'Curry, S. (1995). Income source effects (Working paper). Chicago: DePaul University, Department of Marketing. [20]
O'Donoghue, E., & Rabin, M. (1997). Incentives for procrastinators (Working paper). University of California, Berkeley, Department of Economics. [20]
O'Donoghue, E., & Rabin, M. (1999). Doing it now or later. American Economic Review, 89(1), 103–124. [20]
Okin, S. M. (1989). Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic. [38]
Orasanu, J., & Connoly, T. (1993). The reinvention of decision making. In Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 3–20). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. [18]
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois. [23, 31]
Osnos, E. (1997, September 27). Too many choices? Firms cut back on new products. Philadelphia Inquirer, D1, D7. [16]
Oz, M. C., Kherani, A. R., Rowe, A., Roels, L., Crandall, C., Tournatis, L., et al. (2003). How to improve organ donation: Results of the ISHLT/FACT poll. Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 22, 389–396. [37]
Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In Kantowitz, B. H. (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 41–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [15]
Papandreou, A. G. (1953). An experimental test of an axiom in the theory of choice. Econometrica, 21, 477. [19]
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [27]
Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2005). Decision-making competence: External validation through an individual-differences approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 1–27. [1, 35]
Patrick, C. J. (1994). Emotion and psychopathy: Startling new insights. Psychophysiology, 31, 319–330. [23]
Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 366–387. [7, 17, 19, 34]
Payne, J. W. (1982). Contingent decision behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 382–401. [6, 10, 16, 17, 19]
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 534–552. [1, 16, 34]
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). The adaptive decision maker: Effort and accuracy in choice. In Hogarth, R. M. (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp. 129–153). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [21]
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87–131. [1, 9, 10, 12, 17, 19, 21, 22, 31, 33, 34, 37]
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York: Cambridge University Press. [11, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, 23, 34]
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Schkade, D. A. (1999). Measuring constructed preferences: Towards a building code. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 243–270. [1, 17, 24, 31, 34, 35, 38]
Payne, J. W., & Braunstein, M. L. (1978). Risky choice: An examination of information acquisition behavior. Memory & Cognition, 5, 554–561. [7]
Payne, J. W., Braunstein, M. L., & Carroll, J. S. (1978). Exploring predecisional behavior: An alternative approach to decision research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 17–44. [7]
Payne, J. W., Schkade, D. A., Desvousges, W. H., & Aultman, C. (2000). Valuation of multiple environmental programs. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 21, 95–115. [31]
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 521–533. [22]
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189–206. [22]
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993a). Reasoning in explanation-based decision making. Cognition, 49, 123–163. [18]
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993b). A theory of explanation-based decision making. In Klein, G., Orasano, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 188–204). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. [23]
Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (1996). The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1427–1453. [23, 24]
Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (2000). The springs of action: Affective and analytical information processing in choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1465–1475. [1, 23, 24]
Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (2006). Affective asynchrony and development of the HUE affect scale. (Report No. 06-04). Eugene, OR: Decision Research. [24]
Peters, E., Slovic, P., & Gregory, R. (2003). The role of affect in the WTA/WTP disparity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 309–330. [24]
Peters, E., Slovic, P., & Hibbard, J. (2004). Evaluability manipulations influence the construction of choices among health plans. (Report No. 04-02). Eugene, OR: Decision Research. [24]
Peters, E., Slovic, P., Hibbard, J., & Tusler, M. (2006). Why worry? Worry, risk perceptions, and willingness to act to reduce errors. Health Psychology, 25, 144–152. [24]
Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., & Starmer, C. (2006). Feeling your way to the right price. (Report No. 06-05). Eugene, OR: Decision Research. [24]
Pham, M. T. (1998). Representativeness, relevance, and the use of feelings in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 144–159. [23]
Phillips, C., & Zeckhauser, R. (1989). Contingent valuation of damage to natural resources: How accurate? How appropriate?Toxics Law Reporter, 4, 520–529. [33]
Phillips, F. (2002). The distortion of criteria after decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 769–784. [12, 19]
Phillips, L. D. (1984). A theory of requisite decision models. Acta Psychologica, 56, 29–48. [1]
Phillips, L. D., & Edwards, W. (1966). Conservatism in a simple probability inference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 346–354. [1]
Pidgeon, N., & Gregory, R. (2004). Judgment, decision making, and public policy. In Koehler, D. J. & Harvey, N. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 604–623). Oxford: Blackwell. [1]
Plott, C. R. (1996). Rational individual behavior in markets and social choice processes: The discovered preference hypothesis. In Arrow, K. J., Colombatto, C., Perleman, M., & Schmidt, C. (Eds.), The rational foundations of economic behavior (pp. 225–250). New York: St. Martin's. [1, 17, 34]
Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill. [35]
Pommerehne, W. W., Schneider, F., & Zweifel, P. (1982). Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon: A reexamination. American Economic Review, 72(3), 569–574. [8]
Posovac, S. S., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1997). Considering the best choice: Effects of the salience and accessibility of alternatives on attitude-decision consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 253–261. [34]
Postman, L., & Underwood, B. J. (1973). Critical issues in interference theory. Memory & Cognition, 1, 19–40. [21]
Poulton, E. C. (1989). Bias in quantifying judgment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [35]
Pratkanis, A. (1989). The cognitive representation of attitudes. In Pratkanis, A., Breckler, S. J., & Greenwald, A. G. (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 71–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [23]
Pratto, F. (1994). Consciousness and automatic evaluation. In Niedenthal, P. M. & Kitayama, S. (Eds.), The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 115–143). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [31]
Prelec, D., & Herrnstein, R. (1991). Preferences or principles: Alternative guidelines for choice. In Zeckhauser, R. J. (Ed.), Strategy and choice (pp. 319–340). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [22, 28, 29]
Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1991). Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Science, 37, 770–786. [21]
Premack, D., & Premack, A. J. (1983). The mind of an ape. New York: Norton. [26]
Preston, M. G., & Baratta, P. (1948). An experimental study of the auction-value of an uncertain outcome. American Journal of Psychology, 61, 183–193. [2]
Puto, C. P. (1987). The framing of buying decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 301–315. [17]
Qualified Transportation Fringe Benefits, 26 CFR Parts 1 and 602. (2001). [38]
Quattrone, G., & Tversky, A. (1984). Causal versus diagnostic contingencies: On self-deception and the voter's illusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 237–248. [31]
Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 11–46. [34]
Rachlin, H. (1995). Self-control: Beyond commitment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 109–159. [20]
Rae, J. (1834/1905). The sociological theory of capital. London: Macmillan. [13]
Raiffa, H. (1968). Decision analysis: Introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [1, 3, 26]
Rajecki, D. W. (1974). Effects of prenatal exposure to auditory or visual stimulation on postnatal distress vocalizations in chicks. Behavioral Biology, 11, 525–536. [25]
Randall, A. (1986). Valuation in a policy context. In Bromley, D. (Ed.), Natural resource economics: Policy problems and contemporary analysis (pp. 163–200). Boston: Kluwer/Nijhoff Publishing. [33]
Randall, A., & Hoehn, J. (1996). Embedding in market demand systems. Journal of Environmental and Economic Management, 30, 369–380. [31]
Randall, A., Hoehn, J., & Brookshire, D. (1983). Contingent valuation surveys for evaluating environmental assets. Natural Resources Journal, 23, 635–648. [33]
Ranyard, R. (1989). Structuring and evaluating simple monetary risks. In Montgomery, H. & Svenson, O. (Eds.), Process and structure in human decision making. Chichester, UK: Wiley. [19]
Rasmussen, J. (1993). Deciding and doing: Decision making in natural contexts. In Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 158–171). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. [18]
Ratcliff, R., Cherian, A., & Segraves, M. (2003). A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of two-choice decisions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 1392–1407. [11]
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1997). A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word identification. Psychological Review, 104, 319–343. [21]
Ratner, R. K., Kahn, B., & Kahneman, D. (1999). Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 1–15. [28]
Ratneshwar, S., Warlop, L., Mick, D. G., & Seeger, G. (1997). Benefit salience and consumers' selective attention to product features. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14, 245–259. [15]
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [36]
Read, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1995). Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separate choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 34–49. [17, 20, 30, 34]
Read, D., Loewenstein, G., & Kalyanaraman, S. (1999). Mixing virtue with vice: The combined effects of hyperbolic discounting and diversification. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 257–273. [20]
Read, D., Loewenstein, G., & Rabin, M. (1999). Choice bracketing. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 171–197. [1, 20]
Read, D., Ouden, L., Trienekens, H., & Antonides, G. (1999). Diversification bias in choice for consecutive consumption (Working paper). Leeds, UK: Leeds University Business School. [20]
Read, D., & Leeuwen, B. (1998). Predicting hunger: The effects of appetite and delay on choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 189–205. [20, 28]
Read, S. J., & Marcus-Newhall, J. (1993). Explanatory coherence in social explanations: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 429–447. [12]
Read, S. J., Snow, C. J., & Simon, D. (2003, August). Constraint satisfaction processes in social reasoning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston. [12]
Read, S. J., Vanman, E. J., & Miller, L. C. (1997). Connectionism, parallel constraint satisfaction processes, and gestalt principles: (Re)introducing cognitive dynamics in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 26–53. [12]
Redelmeier, D., & Kahneman, D. (1996). Patients' memories of painful medical treatment: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain, 116, 3–8. [1, 27]
Redelmeier, D., Rozin, P., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Understanding patients' decisions: Cognitive and emotional perspectives. Journal of the American Medical Association, 270, 72–76. [38]
Redelmeier, D., & Shafir, E. (1993). Medical decisions over multiple alternatives (Working paper). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto. [22]
Redelmeier, D., & Tversky, A. (1992). On the framing of multiple prospects. Psychological Science, 3, 191–193. [20]
Reder, L. M., & Anderson, J. R. (1980). A partial resolution of the paradox of interference: The role of integrating knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 447–472. [21]
Reilly, R. J. (1982). Preference reversal: Further evidence and some suggested modifications in experimental design. American Economic Review, 72(3), 576–584. [8]
Revesz, R. L. (1999). Environmental regulation, cost-benefit analysis, and the discounting of human lives. Columbia Law Review, 99, 941–1017. [38]
Reyna, V. F., & Lloyd, F. (1997). Theories of false memory in children and adults. Learning and Individual Differences, 9, 95–123. [21]
Reyna, V. F., Lloyd, F. J., & Brainerd, C. J. (2003). Memory, development, and rationality: An integrative theory of judgment and decision making. In Schneider, S. L. & Shanteau, J. (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research (pp. 203–245). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [21]
Ristau, C. A., & Robbins, D. (1982). Language in the great apes: A critical review. In Rosenblatt, J. S., Hinde, R. A., Beer, C., & Busnel, M. (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 141–255). New York: Academic Press. [26]
Ritov, I. (1996). Anchoring in a simulated competitive market negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 16–25. [31]
Ritov, I., Baron, J., & Hershey, J. (1993). Framing effects in the evaluation of multiple risk reduction. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6, 145–159. [31]
Robinson, G. H. (1964). Continuous estimation of a time-varying probability. Ergonomics, 7, 7–21. [2]
Robinson, R. J., Keltner, D., Ward, A., & Ross, L. (1995). Actual versus assumed differences in construal: “Naive realism” in intergroup perception and conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 404–417. [30]
Roe, R. M., Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Multi-alternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision-making. Psychological Review, 108, 370–392. [11]
Roedder, D. L. (1981). Age differences in children's responses to television advertising: An information-processing approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 144–153. [17]
Roedder, D. L., Sternthal, B., & Calder, B. J. (1983). Attitude-behavior consistency in children's responses to television advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 337–349. [17]
Roedinger, H. L., & Guynn, M. J. (1996). Retrieval processes. In Bjork, E. L. & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.), Memory (pp. 197–236). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [21]
Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133–148. [28]
Rohrmann, B., & Borcherding, K. (1988, August). The cognitive structure of residential decisions: A longitudinal field study. Paper presented at the XXIV International Congress of Psychology, Sydney, Australia. [18]
Rolston, H. (1981). Values in nature. Environmental Ethics, 3, 115–128. [33]
Rosch, E., & Lloyd, B. (1978). Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [31]
Rosen, L. D., & Rosenkoetter, P. (1976). An eye fixation analysis of choice and judge ment with multiattribute stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 4, 747–752. [7]
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1969). Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press. [35]
Ross, H. L. (1973). Law, science, and accidents: The British Road Safety Act of 1967. Journal of Legal Studies, 2, 1–78. [13]
Rottenstreich, Y., & Hsee, C. K. (2001). Money, kisses, and electric shocks: On the affective psychology of risk. Psychological Science, 12, 185–190. [23, 24, 29, 32]
Rottenstreich, Y., & Tversky, A. (1997). Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: Advances in support theory. Psychological Review, 104, 406–415. [31]
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external locus of con trol of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28. [16]
Royden, H. L., Suppes, P., & Walsh, K. (1959). A model for the experimental measure ment of the utility of gambling. Behavioral Science, 4, 11–18. [2]
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [11, 12]
Russell, J. A. (2002). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172. [21]
Russell, M. (1990). The making of cruel choices. In Hammond, P. B. & Coppock, R. (Eds.), Valuing health risks, costs, and benefits for environmental decision making: Report of a conference (pp. 15–22). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. [34]
Russo, J. E. (1977). The value of unit price information. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 193–201. [17, 34]
Russo, J. E., & Dosher, B. A. (1983). Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 676–696. [7, 9, 10, 17]
Russo, J. E., & Leclerc, F. (1991). Characteristics of successful product information programs. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 73–92. [13]
Russo, J. E., & Leclerc, F. (1994). An eye-fixation analysis of choice processes for con sumer nondurables. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 274–290. [1, 17]
Russo, J. E., Medvec, V. H., & Meloy, M. G. (1996). The distortion of information during decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 102–110. [12, 17, 19]
Russo, J. E., Meloy, M. G., & Medvec, V. H. (1998). Predecisional distortion of product information. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 438–452. [12, 19, 21]
Russo, J. E., Meloy, M. G., & Wilks, T. J. (2000). Predecisional distortion of information by auditors and salespersons. Management Science, 46, 13–27. [19, 21]
Russo, J. E., & Rosen, L. D. (1975). An eye fixation analysis of multialternative choice. Memory & Cognition, 3, 267–276. [7]
Russo, J. E., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1989). Decision traps. New York: Fireside. [34]
Rutherford, M., Knetsch, J. L., & Brown, T. (1998). Assessing environmental losses: Judgments of importance and damage schedules. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 22, 51–101. [31]
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. [28]
Sabini, J., & Silver, M. (1982). Moralities of everyday life. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [20]
Salancik, G. R. (1974). Inference of one's attitude from behavior recalled under linguistically manipulated cognitive sets. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 415–427. [26]
Salo, I. (2000). A psychological process approach to decision making: Postdecision restructuring of value conflicts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. [19]
Salo, I., & Svenson, O. (2001). Constructive psychological responses before and after a real-life choice. In Alwood, C. M. & Selart, M. (Eds.), Decision making: Social and creative dimensions (pp. 137–151). Dordrecht, Germany: Kluwer. [19]
Salthouse, T. A. (1992). Why do adult age differences increase with task complexity?Developmental Psychology, 28, 905–918. [24]
Samuelson, P. (1963). Risk and uncertainty: A fallacy of large numbers. Scientia, 98, 108–113. [20]
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision-making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–59. [19, 37, 38]
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1990). The role of attitudes in memory-based decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 614–622. [10]
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Kardes, F. R., & Gibson, B. D. (1991). The role of attribute knowledge and overall evaluations in comparative judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 131–146. [10]
Sanfey, A., & Hastie, R. (1998). Does evidence presentation format affect judgment? An experimental evaluation of displays of data for judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 99–103. [23]
Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley. [1, 22]
Scheffler, S. (1985). The role of consent in the legitimation of risky activities. In Gibson, M. (Ed.), To breathe freely (pp. 75–88). Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield. [36]
Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton. [14]
Schelling, T. C. (1984a). Choice and consequence: Perspectives of an errant economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [27]
Schelling, T. C. (1984b). Self-command in practice, in policy, and in a theory of rational choice. American Economic Review, 74(2), 1–11. [29]
Schick, F. (1991). Understanding action: An essay on reasons. New York: Cambridge University Press. [22]
Schkade, D. A., & Johnson, E. J. (1989). Cognitive processes in preference reversals. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 44, 203–231. [1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]
Schkade, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1998). Does living in California make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgments of life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 9, 340–346. [21, 28, 29, 30]
Schkade, D. A., & Payne, J. W. (1994). How people respond to contingent valu ation questions: A verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 88. [20, 34]
Schmidt, U., & Hey, J. D. (2004). Are preference reversals errors?Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 29, 207–218. [1]
Schneider, C. E. (1998). The practice of autonomy: Patients, doctors, and medical decisions. New York: Oxford University Press. [38]
Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1982). The expected utility model: Its variants, purposes, evidence, and limitations. Journal of Economic Literature, 20, 529–563. [7]
Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1991). When and how to use scenario planning: A heuristic approach with illustration. Journal of Forecasting, 10, 549–564. [34]
Schooler, J. W., & Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36–71. [26]
Schooler, J. W., Ohlsson, S., & Brooks, K. (1993). Thoughts beyond words: When ver balization overshadows insight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 166–183. [26]
Schreiber, C. A., & Kahneman, D. (2000). Determinants of the remembered utility of aversive sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 27–42. [31]
Schultz, W., Romo, R., Ljungberg, T., Mirenowicz, J., Hollerman, J. R., & Dickinson, A. (1995). Reward-related signals carried by dopamine neurons. In Houk, J. C., Davis, J. L., & Beiser, D. G. (Eds.), Models of information processing in the basal ganglia (pp. 233–248). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [11]
Schulz, R. (1976). Effects of control and predictability on the physical and psychological well-being of the institutionalized aged. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 563–573. [16]
Schulz, R., & Hanusa, B. H. (1978). Long-term effects of control and predictability-enhancing interventions: Findings and ethical issues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1194–1201. [16]
Schulze, W., McClelland, G. H., Waldman, D., & Lazo, J. (1996). Sources of bias in contingent valuation. In Bjornstad, D. J. & Kahn, J. R. (Eds.), The contingent valua tion of environmental resources: Methodological issues and research needs (pp. 97–116). Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar. [33]
Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. New York: Academic Press. [34]
Schwartz, B. (1994). The costs of living: How market freedom erodes the best things in life. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. [16]
Schwartz, B. (2000). Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist, 55, 79–88. [16]
Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: HarperCollins. [1]
Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In Sorrentino, E. T. H. R. (Ed.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527–561). New York: Guilford Press. [30]
Schwarz, N. (1996). Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [34]
Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93–105. [35]
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Information and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523. [21, 24, 30]
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1988). How do I feel about it? Informative functions of affective states. In Fiedler, K. & Forgas, J. (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 44–62). Toronto: Hogrefe International. [23]
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 294–301. [24]
Schweitzer, M. (1994). Disentangling status quo and omission effects: An experimental analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 457–476. [19]
Scitovsky, T. (1976). The joyless economy. New York: Oxford University Press. [27, 28]
Sedeck, G., Kofta, M., & Tyszka, T. (1993). Effects of uncontrollability on subsequent decision making: Testing the cognitive exhaustion hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1270–1281. [18]
Segal, U. (1988). Does the preference reversal phenomenon necessarily contradict the independence axiom?American Economic Review, 78(1), 233–236. [1, 8]
Seidl, C. (2002). Preference reversal. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16, 621–655. [1]
Seip, K., & Strand, J. (1992). Willingness to pay for environmental goods in Norway: A contingent valuation study with real payment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2, 91–106. [31]
Selart, M. (1996). Structure compatibility and restructuring in judgment and choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 106–116. [18]
Selart, M., Montgomery, H., Romanus, J., & Gärling, T. (1994). Violations of procedural invariance in preference measurement: Cognitive explanations. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 417–436. [18]
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Effects of salience of extrinsic rewards on liking and loving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 453–460. [26]
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize the potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: The Free Press. [28]
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. [28]
Sen, A. (1982). Choice, welfare, and measurement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [13]
Sen, A. (1987). On ethics and economics. Blackwell, UK: Oxford. [27]
Sen, A. (1990). Rational behavior. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., & Newman, P. (Eds.), The new Palgrave: Utility and probability (pp. 198–216). New York: W. W. Norton. [27]
Sen, A. (1993). Internal consistency of choice. Econometrica, 61, 495–521. [27, 28]
Sen, A. (1997). Maximization and the act of choice. Econometrica, 65, 745–779. [34]
Shafer, G., & Tversky, A. (1985). Language and designs for probability judgment. Cognitive Science, 9, 309–339. [6]
Shafir, E. (1993). Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others. Memory & Cognition, 21, 546–556. [1, 9, 19, 22]
Shafir, E. (2002). Cognition, intuition, and policy guidelines. In Gowda, R. & Fox, J. (Eds.), Judgments, choices, and public policy (pp. 71–88). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [9, 28]
Shafir, E., & LeBoeuf, R. A. (2002). Rationality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 491–517. [19]
Shafir, E., Osherson, D. N., & Smith, E. E. (1989). An advantage model of choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2, 1–23. [17, 23]
Shafir, E., Osherson, D. N., & Smith, E. E. (1993). The advantage model: A compara tive theory of evaluation and choice under risk. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 325–378. [17, 23]
Shafir, E., Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49, 11–36. [1, 12, 16, 18, 21, 22, 23, 29]
Shafir, E., & Tversky, A. (1992). Thinking through uncertainty: Nonconsequential rea soning and choice. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 449–474. [16, 19, 22]
Shamoun, S. (2004). Post-decisional processes: Consolidation and value conflicts in decision making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University, Stockholm. [19]
Shamoun, S., & Svenson, O. (2002). Value conflict and post-decisional consolidation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 325–333. [19]
Shepard, R. N. (1964). On subjectively optimum selection among multiattribute alter natives. In Shelley, M. W. II, & Bryan, G. L. (Eds.), Human judgments and optimality (pp. 257–281). New York: Wiley. [2, 19, 34]
Sherman, D. A., Kim, H., & Zajonc, R. B. (1998, August). Affective perseverance: Cogni tions change but preferences stay the same. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, San Francisco. [23]
Sherman, L. W. (1990). Police crackdowns: Initial and residual deterrence. In Tonry, M. & Morris, N. (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 12, pp. 1–48). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [13]
Sherman, S. J. (1980). On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 211–221. [28]
Sherman, S. J., McMullen, M. N., & Gavanski, I. (1992). Natural sample spaces and the inversion of conditional judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 401–421. [21]
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human informa tion processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190. [19]
Shiller, R. J. (1998). Human behavior and the efficiency of the financial system. In Taylor, J. B. & Woodford, M. (Eds.), Handbook of macroeconomics (Vol. 1, pp. 1305–1340). Amsterdam: Elsevier. [13, 14]
Shiller, R. J. (2000). Irrational exuberance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [1, 38]
Shiv, B., Edell, J. A., & Payne, J. W. (1997). Factors affecting the impact of nega tively and positively framed ad messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 285–294. [17]
Shuford, E. H. (1961). Percentage estimation of proportion as a function of element type, exposure time, and task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 430–436. [2]
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill. [16]
Siegel, S., Krank, M. D., & Hinson, R. E. (1987). Anticipation of pharmacological and nonpharmacological events: Classical conditioning and addictive behavior. Journal of Drug Issues, 17, 83–110. [21]
Simmons, C. J., Bickart, B. A., & Lynch, J. G. Jr. (1993). Capturing and creating public opinion in survey research. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 316–329. [17, 34]
Simon, D., & Holyoak, K. J. (2002). Structural dynamics of cognition: From consistency theories to constraint satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 283–294. [1, 12, 19]
Simon, D., Krawczyk, D. C., & Holyoak, K. J. (2004). Construction of preferences by constraint satisfaction. Psychological Science, 15, 331–336. [1, 12,19]
Simon, D., Pham, L. B., Le, Q. A., & Holyoak, K. J. (2001). The emergence of coherence over the course of decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1250–1260. [12, 19]
Simon, D., Snow, C. J., & Read, S. J. (2004). The redux of cognitive consistency theories: Evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 814–837. [12]
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 59, 99–118. [1, 16, 17, 19, 27, 34]
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138. [1, 16, 23]
Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. New York: Wiley. [2, 20]
Simon, H. A. (1978). Rationality as process and as product of a thought. American Economic Review, 68(2), 1–16. [33]
Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1–19. [17, 19]
Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 158–174. [1, 11, 22, 29]
Simonson, I. (1990). The effect of purchase quantity and timing on variety seeking behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 150–162. [17, 20, 27, 28, 29, 30]
Simonson, I. (1992). The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 105–118. [17]
Simonson, I., Carmon, Z., & O'Curry, S. (1994). Experimental evidence on the negative effect of product features and sales promotions on brand choice. Marketing Science, 13, 23–40. [22]
Simonson, I., Huber, J., & Payne, J. W. (1988). The relationship between prior brand knowledge and information acquisition order. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 566–578. [10]
Simonson, I., & Nowlis, S. M. (2000). The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: Unconventional choices based on reasons. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 150–162. [28, 29]
Simonson, I., Nowlis, S. M., & Lemon, K. (1993). The effect of local consideration sets on global choice between lower price and higher quality. Marketing Science, 12, 357–377. [10]
Simonson, I., Nowlis, S. M., & Simonson, Y. (1993). The effect of irrelevant preference arguments on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2, 287–306. [22]
Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extreme ness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 281–295. [10, 17, 22]
Simonson, I., & Winer, R. S. (1992). The influence of purchase quantity and display format on consumer preference for variety. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 133–138. [20]
Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22. [1, 23, 32]
Slovic, P. (1972). From Shakespeare to Simon: Speculation – and some evidence – about man's ability to process information. Oregon Research Institute Research Monograph, 12(2). [34]
Slovic, P. (1975). Choice between equally valued alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 280–287. [5, 6, 18, 19, 22]
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285. [23, 35]
Slovic, P. (1990). Choice. In Osherson, D. N. & Smith, E. E. (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 3, pp. 89–116). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [22]
Slovic, P. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50, 364–371. [12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 24, 31, 34, 37]
Slovic, P. (2000a). Rational actors and rational fools: The influence of affect on judgment and decision-making. Roger Williams University Law Review, 6, 163–212. [23]
Slovic, P. (Ed.). (2000b). The perception of risk. London: Earthscan. [35]
Slovic, P. (2001). Cigarette smokers: Rational actors or rational fools? In Slovic, P. (Ed.), Smoking: Risk, perception, & policy (pp. 97–124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [23]
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397–420). New York: Cambridge University Press. [1, 23, 24, 29, 32, 35, 36]
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 1–39. [19]
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1982). Response mode, framing, and information-processing effects in risk assessment. In Hogarth, R. M. (Ed.), New direc tions for methodology of social and behavioral science: No. 11. Question framing and response consistency (pp. 21–36). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [33]
Slovic, P., Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1990). Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. In Hogarth, R. M. (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp. 5–27). Chicago: University of Chicago. [1, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 19, 23, 33, 36]
Slovic, P., Kunreuther, H., & White, G. F. (1974). Decision processes, rationality and adjustment to natural hazards. In White, G. F. (Ed.), Natural hazards: Local, national, global (pp. 187–205). New York: Oxford University Press. [38]
Slovic, P., Layman, M., Kraus, N., Flynn, J., Chalmers, J., & Gesell, G. (1991). Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. Risk Analysis, 11, 683–696. [23]
Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1968). Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk-taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 78(3, Pt. 2), 1–18. [1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 29]
Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1971). Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 649–744. [1, 6, 33]
Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1983). Preference reversals: A broader perspective. American Economic Review, 73(4), 596–605. [1, 6, 7, 8, 18]
Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., & Edwards, W. (1965). Boredom-induced changes in pref erences among bets. American Journal of Psychology, 78, 208–217. [1, 2]
Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1979). Images of disaster: Perception and acceptance of risks from nuclear power. In Goodman, G. & Rowe, W. (Eds.), Energy risk assessment (pp. 223–245). London: Academic Press. [33]
Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1984). Modeling the societal impact of fatal accidents. Management Science, 30, 464–474. [35]
Slovic, P., & MacPhillamy, D. J. (1974). Dimensional commensurability and cue utilization in comparative judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 172–194. [1, 10, 33]
Slovic, P., Monahan, J., & MacGregor, D. G. (2000). Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instructions, and employing probability vs. frequency formats. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 271–296. [23]
Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1974). Who accepts Savage's axiom?Behavioral Science, 19, 368–373. [27]
Smith, E. R. (1992). The role of exemplars in social judgment. In Martin, L. L. & Tesser, A. (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 107–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [19]
Smith, G. (1997). The political impact of name sounds. Unpublished manuscript, Eastern Washington University, Ellensburg, WA. [23]
Smith, V. K. (1992). Arbitrary values, good causes, and premature verdicts. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22, 71–89. [31]
Smith, V. K., & Desvousges, W. (1987). An empirical analysis of the economic value of risk changes. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 89–114. [34]
Smith, V. K., Desvousges, W., & Fisher, A. (1986). A comparison of direct and indi rect methods for estimating environmental benefits. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68, 280–290. [33]
Soelberg, P. (1967). Unprogrammed decision making. Management Review, 3, 19–29. [18]
Soman, D., & Cheema, A. (2001). The effects of windfall gains on the sunk-cost effect. Marketing Letters, 12, 51–62. [29]
Spangenberg, E. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1999). Social influence by requesting self-prophecy. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8, 61–89. [28]
Spellman, B. A., & Holyoak, K. J. (1992). If Saddam is Hitler then who is George Bush? Analogical mapping between systems of social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 913–933. [12]
Spellman, B. A., Ullman, J. B., & Holyoak, K. J. (1993). A coherence model of cognitive consistency: Dynamics of attitude change during the Persian Gulf War. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 147–165. [12]
Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [1]
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 161–188. [17]
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–726. [1]
Starr, C. (1969). Social benefit versus technological risk. Science, 165, 1232–1238. [35]
Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of self. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261–302). New York: Academic Press. [30]
Stevens, S. S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement, and psychophysics. In Stevens, S. S. (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1–49). New York: Wiley. [33]
Stevens, S. S. (1975). Psychophysics. New York: Wiley. [13, 31, 32]
Stevens, S. S., & Galanter, E. H. (1957). Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 377–411. [2]
Stevens, T. H., Echeverria, J., Glass, R. J., Hager, T., & More, T. A. (1991). Measuring the existence value of wildlife: What do CVM estimates really show?Land Economics, 67, 390–400. [1, 33]
Strack, F., Argyle, M., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1991). Subjective well-being: An interdisci plinary perspective. New York: Pergamon Press. [28]
Strack, F., & Mussweiler, T. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mecha nisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 437–446. [13, 21, 31]
Sudman, S., Bradburn, N. M., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [34]
Suh, E., Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1996). Events and subjective well-being: Only recent events matter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1091–1102. [30]
Sujan, M. (1985). Consumer knowledge: Effects of evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 16–31. [10]
Summers, L. H. (1986). Does the stock market rationally reflect fundamental values?Journal of Finance, 41, 591–602. [13, 14]
Sunstein, C. R. (1990). Preferences and politics. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 20, 3–34. [34]
Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Human behavior and the law of work. Virginia Law Review, 87, 205–276. [38]
Sunstein, C. R. (2002a). Risk and reason: Safety, law, and the environment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [38]
Sunstein, C. R. (2002b). Switching the default rule. New York University Law Review, 77, 106–134. [38]
Sunstein, C. R. (2004). Lives, life-years, and willingness to pay. Columbia Law Review, 104, 205–252. [38]
Sunstein, C. R., Kahneman, D., & Schkade, D. (1998). Assessing punitive damages. Yale Law Journal, 107, 2071–2153. [31, 32]
Sunstein, C. R., Kahneman, D., Schkade, D., & Ritov, I. (2002). Predictably incoherent judgments. Stanford Law Review, 54, 1153–1215. [13, 14, 28, 38]
Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. H. (2003). Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. The University of Chicago Law Review, 70, 1159–1202. [1, 37, 38]
Svenson, O. (1973). Analysis of strategies in subjective probability inferences as evidenced in continuous verbal reports and numerical responses. (Reports from the Psychological Laboratories, No. 396.) Sweden: University of Stockholm. [19]
Svenson, O. (1974). A note on think aloud protocols obtained during the choice of a home. (Reports from the Psychological Laboratories, No. 421.) Sweden: University of Stockholm. [19]
Svenson, O. (1979). Process descriptions of decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 23, 86–112. [1, 18, 19]
Svenson, O. (1983). Cognitive processes in judging cumulative risk over different periods of time. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 22–41. [19]
Svenson, O. (1985). Cognitive strategies in a complex judgment task: Analysis of con current verbal reports and judgments of cumulated risk over different exposure times. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 1–15. [19]
Svenson, O. (1990). Some propositions for the classification of decision situations. In Borcherding, K., Larichev, O. I., & Messick, D. M. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in decision making (pp. 17–31). Amsterdam: Elsevier. [19]
Svenson, O. (1992). Differentiation and Consolidation Theory of human decision making: A frame of reference for the study of pre- and post-decision processes. Acta Psychologica, 80, 143–168. [12, 18, 19]
Svenson, O. (1996). Decision making and the search for fundamental psychological realities: What can be learned from a process perspective?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 252–267. [1, 18, 31]
Svenson, O. (2003). Values, affect, and processes in human decision making: A Differentiation and Consolidation Theory perspective. In Schneider, S. L. & Shanteau, J. (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision making (pp. 287–326). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [19]
Svenson, O., & Benthorn, L. (1992). Consolidation processes in decision making: Post-decision changes in attractiveness of alternatives. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, 1–13. [19]
Svenson, O., & Edland, A. (1987). Change of preferences under time pressure: Choices and judgments. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 29, 322–330. [1]
Svenson, O., & Fischhoff, B. (1985). Levels of environmental decisions: A case study of radiation in Swedish homes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5, 55–67. [19]
Svenson, O., & Hill, T. (1997). Turning prior disadvantages into advantages: Decision making through the glass of differentiation and consolidation theory. In Ranyard, R., Crozier, W. R., & Svenson, O. (Eds.), Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations (pp. 218–232). London: Routledge. [18, 19]
Svenson, O., & Malmsten, N. (1991). Post-decision consolidation processes in human decision making. Journal of Scientific Contributions to Human Decision Making (Italy), 6, 109–120. [19]
Svenson, O., & Malmsten, N. (1996). Post-decision consolidation overtime as a function gain or loss of an alternative. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 37, 302–311. [19]
Svenson, O., Ortega Rayo, A., Sandberg, A., Svahlin, I., & Andersen, M. (1994). Post-decision consolidation as a function of the instructions to the decision maker and of the decision problem. Acta Psychologica, 87, 181–197. [19]
Svenson, O., & Shamoun, S. (1997). Predecision conflict and different patterns of post decision attractiveness restructuring: Empirical illustrations from an important real-life decision. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38, 243–251. [19]
Swagler, R. M., & Wheeler, P. (1989). Rental-purchase agreements: A preliminary inves tigation of consumer attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 23, 145–160. [20]
Swann, W. B., & Pittman, T. S. (1977). Initiating play activity of children: The moderat ing influence of verbal cues on intrinsic motivation. Child Development, 48, 1128–1132. [16]
Taurek, J. (1977). Should the numbers count?Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 293–316. [36]
Taylor, K. F., & Sluckin, W. (1964). Flocking in domestic chicks. Nature, 201, 108–109. [25]
Taylor, S. E. (1983). Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. American Psychologist, 38, 1161–1173. [30]
Taylor, S. E. (1989). Positive illusions: Creating self-deception and the healthy mind. New York: Basic Books. [16]
Taylor, S. E., & Armor, D. A. (1996). Positive illusions and coping with adversity. Journal of Personality, 64, 873–898. [30]
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social-psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210. [16, 30]
Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1981). Getting inside the head: Methodologies for process analysis. In Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W. J., & Kidd, R. F. (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 3, pp. 459–524). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [7]
Taylor, S. E., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1996). Effects of mindset on positive illusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 213–226. [18]
Telhami, S. (1990). Power and leadership in international bargaining: The path to the Camp David Accords. New York: Columbia University Press. [22]
Tesser, A. (1978). Self-generated attitude change. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 289–338). New York: Academic Press. [1]
Tesser, A., Leone, C., & Clary, G. (1978). Affect control: Process constraints versus catharsis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2, 265–274. [26]
Tesser, A., & Martin, L. (1996). The psychology of evaluation. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 400–432). New York: Guilford Press. [31]
Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 331–376). New York: Academic Press. [22]
Tetlock, P. E., & Boettger, R. (1989). Accountability: A social magnifier of the dilution effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 388–398. [29]
Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 435–502. [12]
Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1, 39–60. [27]
Thaler, R. H. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4, 199–214. [20, 29]
Thaler, R. H. (1991). Quasi-rational economics. New York: Russell Sage. [38]
Thaler, R. H. (1992). The winner's curse: Paradoxes and anomalies of economic life. New York: The Free Press. [31]
Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. In Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (Eds.), Choices, values and frames (pp. 241–268). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [20, 21, 29]
Thaler, R. H., & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save More Tomorrow™: Using behavioral eco nomics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112, S164–S187. [38]
Thaler, R. H., & Shefrin, H. M. (1981). An economic theory of self-control. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 392–406. [20, 29]
Thaler, R. H., Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., & Schwartz, A. (1997). The effect of myopia and loss aversion on risk taking: An experimental test. The Quarterly Journal of Eco nomics, 112, 647–661. [20]
Thorngate, W. (1980). Efficient decision heuristics. Behavioral Science, 25, 219–225. [1]
Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology, 33, 529–554. [23]
Timmermans, D. (1993). The impact of task complexity on information use in multi-attribute decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 95–111. [16]
Toda, M. (1962). The design of a fungus-eater: A model of human behavior in an unsophisticated environment. Behavioral Science, 7, 164–183. [2]
Toulmin, S. (1950). An examination of the place of reason in ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press. [22]
Townsend, J. T., & Busemeyer, J. R. (1995). Dynamic representation of decision-making. In Port, R. F. & Gelder, T. (Eds.), Mind as motion (pp. 101–120). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [11]
Trafimow, D., & Sheeran, P. (2004). A theory about the translation of cognition into affect and behavior. In Maio, G. R. & Haddock, G. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in the psychology of attitudes: The cardoff symposium (pp. 57–75).London: Psychology Press. [24]
Trollope, A. (1883/1980). An autobiography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [20]
Tune, G. S. (1964). Response preferences: A review of some relevant literature. Psychological Bulletin, 61, 286–302. [35]
Turner, C. F., & Krauss, E. (1978). Fallible indicators of the subjective state of the union. American Psychologist, 33, 456–470. [35]
Tversky, A. (1967a). Additivity, utility and subjective probability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 4, 175–201. [2]
Tversky, A. (1967b). Utility theory, additivity analysis, and decision making under risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 27–36. [2, 3]
Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31–48. [1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 17, 28]
Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79, 281–299. [1, 5, 11, 17, 19, 23]
Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352. [6, 17]
Tversky, A. (1996). Contrasting rational and psychological principles of choice. In Zeckhauser, R. J., Keeney, R. L., & Sebenius, J. K. (Eds.), Wise choices: Decisions, games, and negotiations (pp. 5–21). Boston: Harvard Business School Press. [17, 34]
Tversky, A., & Bar-Hillel, M. (1983). Risk: The long and the short. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 713–717. [20]
Tversky, A., & Gati, I. (1978). Studies of similarity. In Rosch, E. & Lloyd, B. (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 79–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [6]
Tversky, A., & Griffin, D. (1991). Endowment and contrast in judgments of well-being. In Strack, F., Argyle, M., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (Vol. 12, pp. 101–118). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press. [9, 29]
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 105–110. [31]
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232. [38]
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. [1, 6, 7, 13, 21, 23, 35, 38]
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458. [1, 17, 19, 20, 33]
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Evidential impact of base rates. In Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 153–160). New York: Cambridge University Press. [31]
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293–315. [31]
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59, S251–S278. [1, 6, 8, 12, 17, 22, 27, 31]
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061. [17, 21, 27, 31, 37]
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323. [19, 27, 32]
Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371–384. [1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 17, 18, 21, 22, 28, 29, 33, 34]
Tversky, A., & Shafir, E. (1992a). Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decision. Psychological Science, 3, 358–361. [22]
Tversky, A., & Shafir, E. (1992b). The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty. Psychological Science, 3, 305–309. [22]
Tversky, A., & Simonson, I. (1993). Context-dependent preferences. Management Science, 39, 1179–1189. [11, 17, 22]
Tversky, A., Slovic, P., & Kahneman, D. (1990). The causes of preference reversal. American Economic Review, 80(1), 204–217. [1, 6, 7, 8, 27, 33, 36]
Tversky, A., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Anomalies: Preference reversals. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(2), 201–211. [Frontispiece, 1, 31, 38]
Tyszka, T. (1983). Contextual multiattribute decision rules. In Sjöberg, L., Tyszka, T., & Wise, J. A. (Eds.), Human decision making (pp. 243–256). Bodafors, Sweden: Bokförlaget Doxa. [18]
Tyszka, T. (1985). Variability of predecisional information seeking behavior. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 16, 275–282. [19]
Tyszka, T., & Wielochovski, M. (1991). Must boxing verdicts be partial?Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4, 283–295. [18, 19]
Urban, G. L., & Hauser, J. R. (1993). Design and marketing of new products (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [10]
Urban, G. L., Hauser, J. R., Qualls, W. J., Weinberg, B. D., Bohlmann, J. D., & Chicos, R. A. (1997). Information acceleration: Validation and lessons from the field. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 143–153. [34]
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1993). Comparative risk. Washington, DC: Author. [35]
Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamic models of multi-alternative choice. Psychological Review, 111, 757–769. [11]
Vaillant, G. (1993). The wisdom of the ego. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [30]
Meer, H. C. (1963). Decision-making: The influence of probability preference, variance preference, and expected value on strategy in gambling. Acta Psychologica, 21, 231–259. [2]
Gelder, L. (1996, January 7). Remembering the road not taken. The New York Times, p. F7. [30]
van Praag, B. M. S. (2003). The connection between old and new approaches to financial satisfaction. Unpublished manuscript. [28]
van Raaij, W. F. (1977). Consumer information processing for different informa tion structures and formats. In Perrault, W. D. (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 176–184). Chicago: Association for Consumer Research. [19]
Vanderplas, J. M. (1960). Some tests of significance of multivariate data. Journal of General Psychology, 62, 257–268. [2]
VanDeVeer, D. (1986). Paternalistic intervention: The moral bounds of benevolence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [38]
Varey, C. A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Experiences extended across time: Evaluation of moments and episodes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5, 169–185. [27, 31]
Varian, H. R. (1984). Microeconomic analysis. New York: Norton. [6, 31]
Varian, H. R. (1999). Intermediate microeconomics: A modern approach (5th ed.). New York: Norton. [21]
Verplanken, B., Hofstee, G., & Janssen, H. J. W. (1998). Accessibility of affective versus cognitive components of attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 23–36. [24]
Verplanken, B., & Svenson, O. (1997). Personal involvement in human decision making: On conceptualization and effects on decision process. In Ranyard, R., Crozier, W. R., & Svenson, O. (Eds.), Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations (pp. 41–57). London: Routledge. [19]
Viscusi, W. K. (1992). Smoking: Making the risky decision. New York: Oxford University Press. [23]
Viscusi, W. K., & Magat, W. A. (1987). Learning about risk: Consumer and worker responses to hazard warnings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [33]
Viscusi, W. K., Magat, W. A., & Huber, J. (1986). Informational regulation of consumer health risks: An empirical evaluation of hazard warnings. Rand Journal of Economics, 17, 351–365. [33]
Viscusi, W. K., Magat, W. A., & Huber, J. (1991). Pricing environmental health risks: Survey assessments of risk-risk and risk-dollar trade-offs for chronic bronchitis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 21, 32–51. [33]
Viswanathan, M., & Narayanan, S. (1994). Comparative judgments of numerical and verbal attribute labels. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3, 79–102. [10, 29]
von Clausewitz, C. (1992). On war.Harmandsworth, UK: Penguin Books (Original work published 1832). [20]
Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [21, 22, 35]
von Winterfeldt, D. (1999). On the relevance of behavioral decision research for deci sion analysis. In Shanteau, J., Mellers, B., & Schum, D. (Eds.), Decision science and technology: Reflections on the contributions of Ward Edwards (pp. 133–154). Boston: Kluwer. [1]
Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioral research. New York: Cambridge University Press. [33, 34, 35]
Wald, A. (1950). Sequential analysis. New York: Wiley. [19]
Walden, M. L. (1990). The economics of rent-to-own contracts. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 24, 326–337. [20]
Walsh, R. G., Bjonback, R. D., Aiken, R. A., & Rosenthal, D. H. (1990). Estimating the public benefits of protecting forest quality. Journal of Environmental Management, 30, 175–189. [33]
Watkins, M. J., & Tulving, E. (1978). When retrieval cueing fails. British Journal of Psychology, 69, 443–450. [21]
Watkins, O. C., & Watkins, M. J. (1975). Buildup of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 442–452. [21]
Watterson, B. (1996). It's a magical world. Kansas City, MO: Andrews and McNeel. [16]
Weber, E. U., Ames, D. R., & Blais, A.-R. (2005). “How do I choose thee? Let me count the ways”: A textual analysis of similarities and differences in modes of decision-making in China and the United States. Management and Organization Review, 1, 87–118. [21]
Weber, E. U., Goldstein, W. M., & Barlas, S. (1995). And let us not forget memory: The role of memory processes and techniques in the study of judgment and choice. In Busemeyer, J. R., Hastie, R., & Medin, D. L. (Eds.), Decision making from the perspective of cognitive psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 33–82). San Diego: Academic Press. [17, 21]
Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. K. (2000). Culture and individual judgment and decision making. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 32–61. [21]
Wedell, D. H. (1991). Distinguishing among models of contextually induced prefer ences reversals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 767–778. [22]
Wedell, D. H., & Bockenholt, U. (1990). Moderation of preference reversals in the long run. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 429–438. [1, 20]
Wedell, D. H., & Bockenholt, U. (1994). Contemplating single versus multiple encoun ters of a risky prospect. American Journal of Psychology, 107, 499–518. [20]
Wertenbroch, K. (1998). Segmentation and pricing under consumption self-control via purchase quantity rationing. Marketing Science, 17, 317–337. [17]
West, P. M., Brown, C. L., & Hoch, S. J. (1996). Consumption vocabulary and preference formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 120–135. [17]
Westen, D. (1994). Toward an integrative model of affect regulation: Applications to social psychological research. Journal of Personality, 62, 641–667. [30]
Wickens, C. D. (1984). Engineering psychology and human performance. Columbus, OH: Merrill. [6]
Wickens, J. R., & Oorschot, D. E. (2000). Neuronal dynamics and surround inhibition in the neostriatum: A possible connection. In Miller, R. & Wickens, J. R. (Eds.), Brain dynamics and the striatal complex (pp. 141–150). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic. [11]
Wicklund, R. A., & Brehm, J. W. (1976). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [12, 22]
Wilde, O. (1893). Lady Windermere's fan: A play about a good woman. London: Mathews and Lane. [30]
Willemsen, M. C., & Keren, G. (2002). Negative-based prominence: The role of neg ative features on matching and choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 643–666. [28]
Willemsen, M. C., & Keren, G. (2004). The role of negative features in joint and separate evaluation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 313–329. [28]
Willén, H. (1994). How do couples decide about having their first child? An explorative study (Göteborg Psychological Reports, Vol. 24, No. 1). Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborg University, Department of Psychology. [18]
Wilson, T. D. (1990). Self-persuasion via self-reflection. In Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Self-inference processes: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 6, pp. 43–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [26]
Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 19, 117–142. [30]
Wilson, T. D., & Dunn, D. S. (1986). Effects of introspection on attitude-behavior consistency: Analyzing reasons versus focusing on feelings. Journal of Experimen tal Social Psychology, 22, 249–263. [26]
Wilson, T. D., Dunn, D. S., Kraft, D., & Lisle, D. J. (1989). Introspection, attitude change, and attitude-behavior consistency: The disruptive effects of explaining why we feel the way we do. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 287–343. [26, 29]
Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. In Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 345–411). New York: Elsevier. [28]
Wilson, T. D., & Hodges, S. D. (1992). Attitudes as temporary constructions. In Tesser, A. & Martin, L. (Eds.), The construction of social judgment (pp. 37–65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [1, 26]
Wilson, T. D., Hodges, S. D., & LaFleur, S. J. (1995). Effects of introspecting about reasons: Inferring attitudes from accessible thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 16–28. [29]
Wilson, T. D., Houston, C. E., Etling, K. M., & Brekke, N. (1996). A new look at anchor ing effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 387–402. [31]
Wilson, T. D., & Kraft, D. (1993). Why do I love thee? Effects of repeated introspections about a dating relationship on attitudes toward the relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 409–418. [26]
Wilson, T. D., Kraft, D., & Dunn, D. S. (1989). The disruptive effects of explaining attitudes: The moderating effect of knowledge about the attitude object. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 379–400. [26, 28]
Wilson, T. D., & LaFleur, S. J. (1993). [Effects of analyzing reasons on the accuracy of self-predictions]. Unpublished data, University of Virginia. [26]
Wilson, T. D., LaFleur, S. J., & Lindsey, J. S. (1995). Expertise and introspection: Analyzing the reasons for one's attitudes. Unpublished manuscript. [1]
Wilson, T. D., Lisle, D. J., Schooler, J. W., Hodges, S. D., Klaaren, K. J., & LaFleur, S. J. (1993). Introspecting about reasons can reduce post-choice satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 331–339. [1, 26, 30]
Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181–192. [1, 22, 26, 28, 29, 34]
Wilson, T. D., Wheatley, T., Meyers, J. M., Gilbert, D. T., & Axsom, D. (2000). Focalism: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 821–836. [28, 30]
Wilson, W. R. (1979). Feeling more than we can know: Exposure effects without learn ing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 811–821. [25]
Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill. [7]
Winkielman, P., Zajonc, R. B., & Schwarz, N. (1997). Subliminal affective priming resists attributional interventions. Cognition & Emotion, 11, 433–465. [23]
Wolf, J. S., Servino, E. M., & Nathan, H. N. (1997). National strategy to develop public acceptance of organ and tissue donation. Transplantation Proceedings, 29, 1477–1478. [37]
Wood, W. (1982). Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 798–810. [26]
Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1954). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt. [35]
Wortman, C. B., & Silver, R. C. (1989). The myths of coping with loss. Journal of Con sulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 349–357. [30]
Wright, A. A., & Lynch, J. G. (1995). Communication effects of advertising versus direct experience when both search and experience attributes are present. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 708–718. [29, 32]
Wright, P. L. (1975). Consumer choice strategies: Simplifying vs. optimizing. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 60–67. [16, 17, 23]
Wright, P. L., & Kriewall, M. A. (1980). State-of-mind effects on the accuracy with which utility functions predict marketplace choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 277–293. [17, 34]
Wright, P. L., & Rip, P. D. (1980). Product class advertising effects on first time buyers' decision strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 176–188. [15]
Wright, P. L., & Weitz, B. (1977). Time horizon effects on product evaluation strategies. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 429–443. [34]
Wright, W., & Bower, G. H. (1992). Mood effects on subjective probability assessment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 276–291. [24]
Wu, G. (1999). Anxiety and decision making with delayed resolution of uncertainty. Theory and Decision, 46, 159–198. [32]
Wu, G., & Gonzalez, R. (1996). Curvature of the probability weighting function. Management Science, 42, 1676–1690. [32]
Wu, G., & Gonzalez, R. (1998). Common consequence effects in decision making under risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 16, 113–135. [32]
Yaari, M., & Bar-Hillel, M. (1984). On dividing justly. Social Choice and Welfare, 1, 1–24. [20]
Yalch, R. F., & Yalch, R. E. (1984). The effect of numbers on the route to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 522–527. [29]
Yamagishi, K. (1997). When a 12.86% mortality is more dangerous than 24.14%: Impli cations for risk communication. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 495–506. [23]
Yankelovich, D. (1991). Coming to public judgment: Making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. [34]
Yates, J. F. (1990). Judgment and decision making. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [19]
Yi, Y. (1990). The effects of contextual priming in print advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 215–222. [15]
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph, 9(2, Pt. 2), 1–27. [23, 25]
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175. [1, 19, 22, 23, 25, 27, 32]
Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect. In Forgas, J. P. (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 31–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [25]
Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224–228. [1, 25]
Zakay, D., & Tsal, Y. (1993). The impact of using forced decision making strategies on post-decision confidence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 53–68. [19]
Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [31]
Zinbarg, R. E., & Mohlman, J. (1998). Individual differences in the acquisition of affectively-valenced associations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1024–1040. [24]
Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., Alvarez-Royo, P., & Clower, R. P. (1991). Independence of memory functions and emotional behavior. Hippocampus, 1, 207–220. [25]
Zuckerman, M., Porac, J., Lathin, D., Smith, R., & Deci, E. L. (1978). On the impor tance of self-determination for intrinsically motivated behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 443–446. [16]
