Book contents
- Worldwide Perspectives on English Usage
- Worldwide Perspectives on English Usage
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Section 1 Usage Variation and Codification
- 1 ‘All-Governing Custom’
- 2 On National Dictionaries
- 3 ‘No “Afringlish”, Please, We’re British’
- 4 Being Representative?
- Section 2 Usage Variation amid Social Diversity and Political Change
- Section 3 Corpus-Based Research on Variable Usage in Place and Medium
- Index
- References
4 - Being Representative?
Standardisation of the Spoken Word in Australian and British Hansard
from Section 1 - Usage Variation and Codification
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 June 2026
Book contents
- Worldwide Perspectives on English Usage
- Worldwide Perspectives on English Usage
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Section 1 Usage Variation and Codification
- 1 ‘All-Governing Custom’
- 2 On National Dictionaries
- 3 ‘No “Afringlish”, Please, We’re British’
- 4 Being Representative?
- Section 2 Usage Variation amid Social Diversity and Political Change
- Section 3 Corpus-Based Research on Variable Usage in Place and Medium
- Index
- References
Summary
Parliamentary Hansard records are texts that stand at an intersection between the representation of spoken discourse and the application of standardised written norms.While they are categorised as ‘verbatim’ accounts of what is said during parliamentary proceedings, they are also edited, official government publications, and are therefore likely to represent a normative, formalised version of the language that was used. Add to this the factors of changing standards over time, different varieties of English and evolving reporting methods, and they become a valuable historical record for charting shifting attitudes towards language prescription. This chapter analyses data from Australian and British Hansard, from 1901 to the present, to assess the degree to which prescriptive practices have been applied to the originally spoken text. It looks at language features that have been identified as being indicative of spoken or written style. These include use of contractions, split infinitives and singular agreement with plural nouns. The data show generally more acceptance of the informal option in Australia in recent times, but also in the early part of the twentieth century.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Worldwide Perspectives on English UsageInto the Third Millennium, pp. 96 - 124Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2026
References
Alexander, M. (2023). Speech in the British Hansard. In Korhonen, M., Kotze, H. & Tyrkkö, J (Eds.), Exploring Language and Society with Big Data (pp. 17–53). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Government Style Manual for Authors, Editors and Printers (AGSM) (1966). 1st ed. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Australian Government Style Manual for Authors, Editors and Printers (AGSM) (2002). 6th ed. Brisbane: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Blair, D. & Collins, P. (1989). English in Australia. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia Hansard Style Guide (June, 2005).Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia Hansard Style Guide (December, 2023).Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia Hansard Usage and Editing Guide (February, 2008).Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia Hansard Usage and Editing Guide (September, 2022).Google Scholar
Collins, P., Korhonen, M., Kotze, H., Smith, A. & Yao, X. (2021). Diachronic register change: A corpus-based study of Australian English, with comparisons across British and American English. Register Studies, 3(1), 33–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, M. (1998). New Zealand English Grammar: Fact or Fiction? Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, M. (2009). Concord with collective nouns in Australian and New Zealand English. In Peters, P., Collins, P. & Smith, A. (Eds.), Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond (pp. 207–224). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostadinova, V. (2020). Examining the split infinitive: Prescriptivism as a constraint in language variation and change. In Chapman, D. & Rawlins, J. (Eds.), Language Prescription: Values, Ideologies and Identity (pp. 95–120). Bristol & Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotze, H., Korhonen, M., Smith, A. & Van Rooy, B. (2023). Salient differences between Australian oral parliamentary discourse and its official written records: A comparison of ‘close’ and ‘distant’ analysis methods. In Korhonen, M, Kotze, H & Tyrkkö, J (Eds.), Exploring Language and Society with Big Data (pp. 54–88). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, H. & Smith, A. (2018). Colloquialization versus densification in Australian English: A multidimensional analysis of the Australian Diachronic Hansard Corpus (ADHC). Australian Journal of Linguistics, 38(3), 293–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labat, S., Kotze, H. & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2023). Processing and prescriptivism as constraints on language variation and change: Relative clauses in British and Australian English parliamentary debates. In Korhonen, M., Kotze, H. & Tyrkkö, J. (Eds.), Exploring Language and Society with Big Data (pp. 250–276). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macquarie Dictionary. (2023). 9th ed. Macquarie Dictionary Publishers, an imprint of Pan Macmillan Australia Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
Mollin, S. (2007). The Hansard hazard: Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora, 2(2), 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, P. (1995). The Cambridge Australian English Style Guide. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, P. (1998). The survival of the subjunctive in Australia and elsewhere. English World-Wide, 19(1), 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, P. (2009). Australian English as a regional epicenter. In Hoffmann, T & Siebers, L (Eds.), World Englishes: Problems, Properties and Prospects– Selected Papers from the 13th IAWE Conference (pp.107–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, P. (2012). Usage guides and Australian English: Prescription and description. In Schröder, A (Ed.), Codification, Canons and Curricula: Description and Prescription in Language and Literature (pp. 247–264). Bielefeld: Aisthesis Verlag.Google Scholar
Peters, P. (2017). The lexicography of English usage: Describing usage variation and change. In Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (Ed.), English Usage Guides: History, Advice, Attitudes (pp. 31–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Reid, G. S. & Forrest, M. (1989). Australia’s Commonwealth Parliament. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W. (2007). Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slembrouck, S. (1992). The parliamentary Hansard ‘verbatim’ report: The written construction of spoken discourse. Language and Literature, 1, 2102–2119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. & Korhonen, M. (2022). Parliamentary Hansard records and epicentral influence in Australia, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea. World Englishes, 41, 475–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vice, J. & Farrell, S. (2017). The History of Hansard. London: House of Lords Hansard and House of Lords Library.Google Scholar
Weatherston, J. (1975). Commonwealth Hansard: Its Establishment and Development. 3rd ed. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage (1989). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.Google Scholar
Willoughby, L. & Manns, H. (2020). Australian English Reimagined. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D., Wong, G. & Dita, S. N. (2018). Split infinitives across World Englishes: A corpus-based investigation. Asian Englishes, 20(3), 242–267.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this chapter
complies with version 2.2 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range
of users and attains the highest
(AAA)
level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive
accessibility guidelines.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.