Book contents
- Worldwide Perspectives on English Usage
- Worldwide Perspectives on English Usage
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Section 1 Usage Variation and Codification
- Section 2 Usage Variation amid Social Diversity and Political Change
- 5 Effects of L1 and Social Attitudes on English Gender-Fair Pronouns
- 6 Lexical Influence of Migrant Languages on English in Australia
- 7 Metaphor Variations in Public Discourse in a Dynamic Multilingual Society
- 8 Light-Verb Constructions vs. Simplex Verbs in Sri Lankan English
- 9 Uniformity and Diversity at the Same Time?
- Section 3 Corpus-Based Research on Variable Usage in Place and Medium
- Index
- References
7 - Metaphor Variations in Public Discourse in a Dynamic Multilingual Society
from Section 2 - Usage Variation amid Social Diversity and Political Change
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 June 2026
Book contents
- Worldwide Perspectives on English Usage
- Worldwide Perspectives on English Usage
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Section 1 Usage Variation and Codification
- Section 2 Usage Variation amid Social Diversity and Political Change
- 5 Effects of L1 and Social Attitudes on English Gender-Fair Pronouns
- 6 Lexical Influence of Migrant Languages on English in Australia
- 7 Metaphor Variations in Public Discourse in a Dynamic Multilingual Society
- 8 Light-Verb Constructions vs. Simplex Verbs in Sri Lankan English
- 9 Uniformity and Diversity at the Same Time?
- Section 3 Corpus-Based Research on Variable Usage in Place and Medium
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter presents a synthesis of results on the patterns of metaphor use in corpora of public discourse in Hong Kong. The corpora cover three critical periods: before and after the transfer of Hong Kong’s sovereignty from Great Britain to China in 1997, and during the COVID-19 crisis. We summarise and compare the use of metaphors over time in terms of two types of changes: fundamental changes involving the transformation of source domains and incremental changes involving the transformation of source-to-target domain mapping principles. We find that patterns of diachronic metaphor variations in Hong Kong English (HKE) reflect changes in target domains based on different social dynamics, especially shifting priorities in societal issues, such as a FREE ECONOMY and ELECTIONS. We also demonstrate that the shifts in focused target domains extend to mapping principles in frequently used source domains, such as WAR, JOURNEY and BUILDING. By examining metaphors and their associated mappings across different varieties of HKE, this study contributes to a framework for understanding cultural differences within the lexical-conceptual dimension of HKE.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Worldwide Perspectives on English UsageInto the Third Millennium, pp. 185 - 205Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2026
References
Ahrens, K. (2009). Politics, Gender, and Conceptual Metaphors. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahrens, K. (2010). Mapping principles for conceptual metaphors. In Lynne, C., Deignan, A., Low, G. & Todd, Z. (Eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World (pp. 185–207). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahrens, K. (2020). Contesting territory via editorials in different varieties of English. World Englishes, 42(2), 186–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahrens, K., Jiang, M. & Zeng, W. H. (2021). BUILDING metaphors in Hong Kong policy addresses. In Degani, M. & Callies, M. (Eds.), Metaphor in Language and Culture across World Englishes (pp. 105–128). London: Bloomsbury. Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350157569.ch-006Google Scholar
Ahrens, K. & Zeng, W. H. (2021). Expressing concepts metaphorically in English editorials in Sinosphere. In Peters, P & Burridge, K (Eds.), Exploring the Ecologies of World Englishes in the Twenty-First Century: Language, Society and Culture (pp. 170–192). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474462877-012Google Scholar
Ahrens, K. & Zeng, W. H. (2022). Referential and evaluative strategies of conceptual metaphor use in government discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 188, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgers, C. (2016). Conceptualizing change in communication through metaphor. Journal of Communication, 66(2), 250–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgers, C. & Ahrens, K. (2020). Change in metaphorical framing: Metaphors of trade in 225 years of state of the union addresses (1790–2014). Applied Linguistics, 41(2), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A. & Steen, G. J. (2016). Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony. Communication Theory, 26(4), 410–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callies, M. & Onysko, A. (Eds.). (2017). Metaphor variation in Englishes around the world. [Special Issue]. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 4(1), 1–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004a). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004b). Why ‘an angel rides in the whirlwind and directs the storm’: A corpus-based comparative study of metaphor in British and American political discourse. Language and Computers, 49(1), 133–150.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2005/2011). Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Britain as a container: immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society, 17(5), 563–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2009). Metaphor and gender in British parliamentary debates. In Kathleen, A (Ed.), Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors (pp. 139–165). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2013). Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chung, S. F., Ahrens, K. & Huang, C. R. (2013). Ontologies and conceptual metaphors in English and Mandarin. 当代语言学 (Contemporary Linguistics), 15(2), 195–213.Google Scholar
Evans, S. (2010). Language in transitional Hong Kong: Perspectives from the public and private sectors. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 31(4), 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J. & Leong, S. (2007). Metaphors in the discursive construction of patriotism: The case of Hong Kong’s constitutional reform debate. Discourse & Society, 18(3), 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. R., Ahrens, K., Becker, T., Llamas, R., Tam, K. F. & Meisterernst, B. (2019). Chinese language art: The role of language and linguistic devices in literary and artistic expressions. In Huang, C. R., Jing-Schmidt, Z. & Meisterernst, B. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Applied Linguistics (pp. 237–255). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Z. (2016). Metaphor in Chinese: Cognition, culture, and society. In Chan, S. W (Ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of the Chinese Language (pp. 629–644). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Z. & Peng, X. (2017). Winds and tigers: Metaphor choice in China’s anti-corruption discourse. Lingua Sinica, 3, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer Circle. In Quirk, R & Widdowson, H. G (Eds.), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures (pp. 11–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1992). Teaching world Englishes. In Kachru, B. B (Ed.), The Other Tongue. English across Cultures. 2nd ed. (pp. 355–365). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony, A (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought. 2nd ed (pp. 202–250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1996/2002). Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don’t [2nd ed. published as Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980/2003). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lam, W. M., Lui, P. L. T. & Wong, W. (Eds.).(2012). Contemporary Hong Kong Government and Politics: Expanded Second Edition, Vol. 2. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. L. (2005). Media and metaphor: Exploring the rhetoric in China’s and Hong Kong’s public discourses on Hong Kong and China. In Xu, S, Kienpointner, M & Servaes, J (Eds.), Read the Cultural Other: Forms of Otherness in the Discourses of Hong Kong’s Decolonization (pp. 139–163). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lu, L. W. L. & Ahrens, K. (2008). Ideological influence on BUILDING metaphors in Taiwanese presidential speeches. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 383–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2016). Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2017). Truths, lies and figurative scenarios: Metaphors at the heart of Brexit. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(5), 641–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saich, T. (2015). Governance and Politics of China. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E. W. (2018). The interface between cultures and corpora: Tracing reflections and manifestations. ICAME Journal, 42(1), 97–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E., Demjén, Z. & Demmen, J. (2018). An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics, 39(5), 625–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802426753SeminoGoogle Scholar
Wang, V. X., Chen, X., Lim, L. & Huang, C. R. (2023). Framing COVID-19 reporting in the Macau Daily News using metaphors and gain/loss prospects: A war for collective gains. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–10, China.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., Ahrens, K. & Huang, C. R. (2022). The distance between illocution and perlocution: A tale of different pragmemes to call for social distancing in two cities. Intercultural Pragmatics, 19(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, W. H. & Ahrens, K. (2023). Corpus-based metaphorical framing analysis: WAR metaphors in Hong Kong public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 38(3), 254–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2022.2158088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, W. H., Ahrens, K. & Huang, C. R. (2023). Tracing social change through metaphor: A diachronic corpus-assisted analysis. Presented at Proceedings of the 37th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC 37). Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, 2–5 December 2023. https://aclanthology.org/2023.paclic-1.90.pdfGoogle Scholar
Zeng, W. H., Burgers, C. & Ahrens, K. (2021). Framing metaphor use over time: ‘Free Economy’ metaphors in Hong Kong political discourse (1997–2017). Lingua, 252, 102955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, W. H., Huang, C. R. & Ahrens, K. (2022a). Media framing of COVID-19 vaccination in Hong Kong: The role of metaphors and gain/loss frames. Presented at the 17th International Conference for Language and Social Psychology (ICLASP17), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, 22–25 June 2022.Google Scholar
Zeng, W. H., Huang, C. R. & Ahrens, K. (2022b). Fighting against the pandemic: A gain-framed or loss-framed WAR? Presented at the 30th Joint Workshop on Linguistics and Language Processing (JWLLP 2022), University of Macau, 26 March 2022.Google Scholar
Zeng, W. H., Huang, C. H. & Chen, J. (2023). Metaphor of Covid-19 in public discourse: A cross-linguistic and cross-cultural gain-loss framing perspective. Presented at the 16th conference of the Association for Researching and Applying Metaphor (RaAM 16), University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain, 28–30 June 2023.Google Scholar
Zeng, W. H., Tay, D. & Ahrens, K. (2020). A multifactorial analysis of metaphors in political discourse: Gendered influence in Hong Kong political speeches. Metaphor and the Social World, 10(1), 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.19016.zenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, W. H., Tay, D. & Ahrens, K. (2021). Metaphor development in public discourse using a Time Series Analysis approach. Presented at Proceedings of the 35th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC 35), Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China, 5–November 2021. https://aclanthology.org/2021.paclic-1.82.pdfGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this chapter
complies with version 2.2 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range
of users and attains the highest
(AAA)
level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive
accessibility guidelines.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.