Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T21:14:05.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The analytic utility of distinguishing fighting from dying—ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2019

Ian Grant Hansen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Erratum
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019, e34
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

In the originally-released pdf, the word “and” within quotation marks was accidentally and erroneously inserted, contrary to the instructions of the author, before the final word of the abstract in the commentary by Hansen (2018) on the target article by Whitehouse (Reference Whitehouse2018).

The abstract should read as follows.

Abstract

Fighting and dying, or what Whitehouse calls “out-group hostility” and “extreme self-sacrifice,” are not conceptually overlapping, but in fact are highly distinguishable, both theoretically and empirically. I present empirical evidence from a reanalysis of Ginges et al. (2009, Study 4), demonstrating the potentially inverse relationship between “parochial hostility” – fighting and “sacrificial altruism” – dying.

We regret the error and we have corrected the abstract online.

In addition, there is an error in the note to Table 1 in the commentary. The note should read as follows:

†p < .10 *p < .05 **p < .01 ***p < .001

The table with the corrected note follows:

Table 1.

(Hansen) Odds of blaming people of other religions for the world's problems (parochial hostility) as predicted by sacrificial altruism and other religiosity measures

†p < .10. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.

References

Hansen, I. The analytic utility of distinguishing fighting from dying. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41:e204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18001772Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H. (2018) Four things we need to know about extreme self-sacrifice [response article]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41:e222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1800208X.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1.(Hansen) Odds of blaming people of other religions for the world's problems (parochial hostility) as predicted by sacrificial altruism and other religiosity measures