Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T03:52:21.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epicureans on kingship*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2012

Sean McConnell
Sean McConnell
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Diogenes Laertius lists in his catalogue of Epicurus' works (10.28) a treatise On Kingship, which is unfortunately no longer extant. Owing to the Epicureans' antipathy to politics, such a work might be viewed with surprise and presumed to be virulently negative in outlook. Indeed, Plutarch reports that the Epicureans wrote on kingship only to ward people away from living in the company of kings (Adv. Col. 1127a) and that they maintained that to be king oneself was a terrible mistake (Adv. Col. 1125c-d). However, the scattered evidence that remains suggests the Epicurean views on kingship were both nuanced and sophisticated. In this paper I seek to reconstruct a viable account of the Epicurean position on kingship.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 56 , 2010, pp. 178 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2010

References

WORKS CITED

Alberti, A. (1995) ‘The Epicurean theory of law and justice’, in Laks, A. and Schofield, M. (eds.) Justice and generosity: studies in Hellenistic social and political philosophy, Cambridge, 161–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, J. M. (1997) ‘Epicurean justice’, Phronesis 42, 324–34.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (1973) Epicuro: opere (2nd edn.), Turin.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1991) ‘Philodemus' poetic theory and On the Good King according to Homer’, ClassAnt 10, 1–45.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (2004) ‘Epicurean economies’, in Fitzgerald, J. T., Obbink, D., and Holland, G. S. (eds.) Philodemus and the New Testament world, Leiden, 133–76.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (1926) Epicurus: the extant remains, Oxford.Google Scholar
Balch, D. L. (2004) ‘Philodemus, “On Wealth” and “On Household Management”: naturally wealthy Epicureans against poor Cynics’, in Fitzgerald, J. T., Obbink, D., and Holland, G. S. (eds.) Philodemus and the New Testament world, Leiden, 177–96.Google Scholar
Benferhat, Y. (2005) Ciues Epicurei: les Épicuriens et l'idée de monarchie à Rome et en Italie de Sylla à Octave, Brussels.Google Scholar
Bignone, E. (1920) Epicuro: opere, frammenti, testimonianze sulla sua vita, Bari.Google Scholar
Bollack, J. (1975) La pensée du plaisir. Épicure: textes moraux, commentaires, Paris.Google Scholar
Bourne, F. C. (1977) ‘Caesar the Epicurean’, CW 70, 417–32.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1986) ‘The cradle argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism’, in Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds.) The norms of nature: studies in Hellenistic ethics, Cambridge, 113–44.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. (2003) Lucretius on creation and evolution: a commentary on De Rerum Natura 5.772–1104, Oxford.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1998) ‘The cults of Epicurus’, in (id.) (ed.) Paradosis and survival: three chapters in the history of Epicurean philosophy, Ann Arbor, 75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. (1998) ‘Pleasure and desire in Epicurus’, in (id.) (ed.) Reason and emotion: essays on ancient moral psychology and ethical theory, Princeton, 449–84.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1982) Filodemo: il buon re secondo Omero, Naples.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (1991) ‘Hellenistic monarchy and Roman political invective’, CQ 41, 106–20.Google Scholar
Fish, J. (1999) ‘Philodemus on the education of the good prince: PHerc. 1507, col. 23’, in Abbamonte, G., Angelo, A. Rescigno, and Rossi, R. (eds.) Satura: collectanea philologica Italo Gallo ab amicis discipulisque dicata, Naples, 71–7.Google Scholar
Fish, J. (2002) ‘Philodemus' On the Good King according to Homer: columns 21–31’, Cronache Ercolanesi 32, 187–232.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1989) ‘Lucretius and politics’, in Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.) Philosophia togata vol. 1, Oxford, 120–50.Google Scholar
Frischer, B. (1982) The sculpted word: Epicureanism and philosophical recruitment in ancient Greece, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1966) ‘Lucretius and the Stoics’, BICS 13, 13–33.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1976) Diogene Laerzio, Vite dei filosofi (2nd edn.), Rome.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1992) Cinismo e Epicureismo, Naples.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. and Dorandi, T. (1980) ‘Anassarco e Epicuro “Sul regno”’, in Romano, F. (ed.) Democrito e 1'atomismo antico, Catania, 479–97.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, V. (1982) ‘La théorie épicurienne du droit’, in Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M., and Schofield, M. (eds.) Science and speculation: studies in Hellenistic theory and practice, Cambridge, 304–26.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (1989) ‘Philosophy, politics, and politicians at Rome’, in Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.) Philosophia togata vol. 1, Oxford, 1–37.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (2001) ‘Piso, Cicero and their audience’, in Auvray-Assayas, C. and Delattre, D. (eds.) Cicéron et Philodème: la polémique en philosophie, Paris, 85–99.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1986) ‘Les éléments philosophiques dans l'idée de monarchie à Rome à la fin de la République’, in Flashar, H. and Gigon, O. (eds.) Aspects de la philosophie hellénistique, Geneva, 233–73.Google Scholar
Hicks, R. D. (1931) Diogenes Laertius: Lives of eminent philosophers vol. 2 (rev. edn.), Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Jensen, C. (1906) Philodemi PERI OIKONOMIAS qui dicitur libellus, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Konstan, D., Clay, D.Glad, C. E.Thom, J. C., and Ware, J. (1998) Philodemus: On frank criticism, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Laurenti, R. (1973) Filodemo e il pensiero economico degli Epicurei, Milan.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1986) ‘Pleasure and social utility—the virtues of being Epicurean’, in Flashar, H. and Gigon, O. (eds.) Aspects de la philosophie hellénistique, Geneva, 283–316.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic philosophers vol. 1, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Long, H. S. (1964) Diogenis Laertii vitae philosophorum, Oxford.Google Scholar
Marcovich, M. (1999) Diogenis Laertii vitae philosophorum vol. 1, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1935) ‘Su alcuni dati della vita di Epicuro’, RFIC 13, 302–16.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1941) ‘Review of B. Farrington (1939) Science and politics in the ancient world’, JRS 31, 149–57.Google Scholar
Murray, O. (1965) ‘Philodemus on the good king according to Homer’, JRS 55, 161–82.Google Scholar
Murray, O. (1984) ‘Rileggendo il buon re secondo Omero’, Cronache Ercolanesi 14, 157–60.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1994) The therapy of desire: theory and practice in Hellenistic ethics, Princeton.Google Scholar
O'Keefe, T. (2001) ‘Would a community of wise Epicureans be just?’, AncPhil 21, 133–46.Google Scholar
O'Keefe, T. (2010) Epicureanism, Durham.Google Scholar
Race, W. H. (1981) ‘The word kairos in Greek drama’, TAPA III, 197–213.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1975) ‘Caesar's heritage: Hellenistic kings and their Roman equals’, JRS 65, 148–59.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2007) Live unnoticed (Λάθε βιώσας): on the vicissitudes of an Epicurean doctrine, Leiden.Google Scholar
Salem, J. (1989) Tel un dieu parmi les hommes: l'éthique d'Épicure, Paris.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999) ‘Social and political thought’, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M. (eds.) The Cambridge history of Hellenistic philosophy, Cambridge, 739–70.Google Scholar
Scholz, P. (1998) Der Philosoph und die Politik: Die Ausbildung der philosophischen Lebensform und die Entwicklung des Verhältnisses von Philosophie und Politik im 4. und 3. Jh. V. Chr., Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1997) ‘The ethics of Brutus and Cassius’, JRS 87, 41–53.Google Scholar
Smith, M. F. (1993) Diogenes of Oinoanda: the Epicurean inscription, Naples.Google Scholar
Tepedino, Guerra A. (1978) ‘Il primo libro “sulla ricchezza” di Filodemo’, Cronache Ercolanesi 8, 52–95.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2007) The ethics of Philodemus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tsouna, McKirahan V. (1996) ‘Epicurean attitudes to management and finance’, in Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M. (eds.) Epicureismo greco e romano vol. 2, Naples, 701–14.Google Scholar
Usener, H. (1887) Epicurea, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Van der Waerdt, P. A. (1987) ‘The justice of the Epicurean wise man’, CQ 37, 402–22.Google Scholar
Van der Waerdt, P. A. (1988) ‘Hermarchus and the Epicurean genealogy of morals’, TAPA 118, 87–106.Google Scholar
Von der Muehll, P. (1922) Epicurus: epistulae tres et ratae sententiae, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. and Hense, O. (1884) Ioannis Stobaei anthologium vol. 2, Berlin.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2001) ‘Epicurus and the pleasures of the future’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 21, 135–80.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2002) Epicurus and Democritean ethics: an archaeology of ataraxia, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. R. (1980) ‘KAIROS as “due measure”’, Glotta 83, 177–204.Google Scholar
Woolf, R. (2004) ‘What kind of hedonist was Epicurus?’, Phronesis 49, 303–22.Google Scholar