What are the latest psychotherapeutic and pharmacotherapeutic treatment recommendations for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)? OCD is a relatively common disorder with a lifetime prevalence of ~2% in the general population. It often has an early onset, usually in childhood or adolescence, and frequently becomes chronic and disabling if left untreated. High associated healthcare utilization and costs, and reduced productivity resulting in loss of earning, pose a huge economic burden to OCD patients and their families, employers, and society. OCD is characterized by the presence of obsessions and compulsions that are time-consuming, cause marked distress, or significantly interfere with a person's functioning. Most patients with OCD experience symptoms throughout their lives and benefit from long-term treatment. Both psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy are recommended, either alone or in combination, for the treatment of OCD. Cognitive-behavioral therapy is the psychotherapy of choice. Pharmacologic treatment options include the tricyclic antidepressant clomipramine and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline. These have all shown benefit in acute treatment trials; clomipramine, fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, and sertraline have also demonstrated benefit in long-term treatment trials (at least 24 weeks), and clomipramine, sertraline, and fluvoxamine have United States Food and Drug Administration approvals for use in children and adolescents. Available treatment guidelines recommend first-line use of an SSR1 (ie, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, or citalopram) in preference to clomipramine, due to the latter's less favorable adverse-event profile. Further, pharmacotherapy for a minimum of 1–2 years is recommended before very gradual withdrawal may be considered.

Anxiety is common in the elderly and can present as a primary anxiety disorder or as a symptom of another disorder. Generalized anxiety disorder, in particular, is a common syndrome in late life. Anxiety symptoms are also common features of late-life depression and dementia. Treatment of anxiety in elderly persons has typically involved the use of benzodiazepines, which are often effective but problematic because they are associated with increased risk of cognitive impairment, falls, and fractures. Based on their safety and efficacy, antidepressants, particularly serotonergic medications, are considered first-line treatment for most anxiety disorders as well as anxiety symptoms of major depressive disorder. Psychotherapy, particularly cognitive-behavioral therapy, may be effective in these disorders as well; research is underway to adapt this therapy to the needs of elderly persons. Anxiety symptoms in dementia are poorly understood but may respond to atypical antipsychotics, serotonergic antidepressants, or mood stabilizers. Overall, the research in late-life anxiety has not caught up to the literature in late-life depression and, for the most part, treatment recommendations must be extrapolated from studies in young adults.

Recent data indicate that bipolar illness is underdiagnosed and therefore undertreated in the community (Slide 1). A recent survey of >85,000 households in the United States found a 3.7% positive screen for prominent bipolar symptomatology. Using the Mood Disorder Questionnaire, which has good specificity and sensitivity in outpatient clinics, the study also found that the prevalence was higher, 9.3%, among patients 18–24 years of age. However, most disappointing was that only 20% of the positive screens were diagnosed as bipolar, and among those, most were not treated with mood stabilizers. In addition, 31% of patients had been diagnosed with unipolar depression. Several studies have shown that approximately 20% to 40% of presumptively unipolar patients actually have bipolar II or bipolar disorder not otherwise specified. Combined, the data show that bipolar disorder, bipolar depression in particular, is highly prevalent and often misdiagnosed or unrecognized.

Two recent studies found virtually the same data showing that depression is the predominant problem in naturalistically treated bipolar outpatients. Judd and colleagues found that depression was three times more prevalent than mania in bipolar patients. This is exactly what was found in the Stanley Foundation bipolar outpatient follow-up study, which rated the study's first 258 patients every day for 1 year (Slide 2). The study found that patients were ill almost 50% of the time; they were depressed 33% of the days in the year, and hypomanic or manic 10.8% of the days. This occurred despite aggressive treatment with a variety of agents, such as mood stabilizers, antidepressants, and benzodiazepines in 50% of the patients, and typical or atypical neuroleptics in almost 50% of the patients. Thus, even bipolar patients who are intensively treated in academic settings have a very substantial degree of morbidity, particularly depression.

With the introduction of conventional antipsychotics in the 1950s, clinicians began to expect effective treatment of positive symptoms of schizophrenia. However, these drugs do not resolve negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia and are also associated with serious side effects, including extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) and tardive dyskinesia. In 1989, clozapine was introduced and labeled the first new antipsychotic owing to its improved efficacy and side-effect profile. Clozapine proved effective in alleviating many of the positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia, without causing inevitable EPS or tardive dyskinesia. Over the past decade, a number of different new antipsychotics have been developed. These drugs have an affinity for multiple dopamine-receptor subtypes as well as serotonin, norepinephrine, and glutamate receptors, allowing for better treatment outcomes. The antagonism of the 5-HT2A receptor may be responsible for improvement in negative symptoms and decrease in EPS. In addition to providing enhanced efficacy, the affinity of the new drugs for multiple receptors introduces new side effects not seen with the conventional agents, including weight gain. Each new antipsychotic has a unique receptor-binding profile that corresponds to its pharmacologic and side-effect profile. Understanding the differences in mechanisms of action of new antipsychotics will allow physicians to better choose treatment that meets the needs of each individual patient.

In treating and managing acute psychosis in patients with schizophrenia, early intervention may be valuable. The need to quickly control severe symptoms, however, must be balanced with a treatment algorithm that is both safe and effective. The present management of acute psychotic agitation varies among clinicians. Key treatment goals have been to calm the agitated, assaultive, violent, or disruptive patient, minimize the danger to self and others, and achieve a smooth transition from intramuscular to oral maintenance. For many years, intramuscular treatment with benzodiazepines and/or conventional antipsychotics, such as haloperidol, has been the mainstay of treatment for acute psychosis. Unfortunately, the poor tolerability of conventional antipsychotics compromises their usefulness for both short- and long-term treatment. Although new antipsychotics have a more favorable side-effect profile, the transition from an intramuscular formulation has been problematic. Fortunately, the development of intramuscular formulations of olanzapine and ziprasidone offer new treatment options for patients experiencing acute psychotic episodes. This article will review the use of intramuscular agents, standard antipsychotics, and new antipsychotics in the emergency room setting. The strengths and limitations of each will be discussed.

While an episode of depression can first present in late life, it is more likely to be a recurrence of a disorder that began earlier in life or a continuation of a chronic form of depression. Depression in the elderly often occurs in the context of ongoing medical conditions. The treatment for these medical conditions may pose problems in treatment of depression due to increased likelihood of drug interactions. This article discusses pharmacotherapeutic and psychotherapeutic approaches to the treatment of depression in the elderly population.