Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T14:18:27.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REJOINDER

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

David I. Harvey ,
Stephen J. Leybourne  and
A.M. Robert Taylor
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Article Commentary
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , June 2009 , pp. 658 - 667
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

References

REFERENCES

Elliott, G. & Müller, U.K. (2006) Minimizing the impact of the initial condition on testing for unit roots. Journal of Econometrics 135, 285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D.A.S. (2004) Ancillaries and conditional inference (with commentaries). Statistical Science 19, 333–369.10.1214/088342304000000323Google Scholar
Ng, S. & Perron, P. (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69, 1519–1554.10.1111/1468-0262.00256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, P. & Qu, Z. (2007) A simple modification to improve the finite sample properties of Ng and Perron's unit root tests. Economics Letters 94, 12–19.10.1016/j.econlet.2006.06.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar