Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T14:25:42.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Augmented dimension groups and ordered cohomology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2009

MARCY BARGE  and
MEGAN SMITH
MARCY BARGE
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA (email: umsfmbar@math.montana.edu)
MEGAN SMITH
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA (email: umsfmbar@math.montana.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We show that the ordered Matsumoto K0-group of a substitutive system is derivable from the ordered Čech cohomology of a simple ‘augmentation’ of the tiling space associated with the substitution. Besides supplying a topological interpretation of the Matsumoto K0-group, this leads to finer invariants of the flow equivalence class of a substitutive system.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 1 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

References

[1]Anderson, J. and Putnam, I.. Topological invariants for substitution tilings and their associated C *-algebras. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 18(3) (1998), 509–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Barge, M. and Diamond, B.. A complete invariant for the topology of one-dimensional substitutive tiling spaces. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 21(5) (2001), 1333–1358.Google Scholar
[3]Barge, M., Diamond, B. and Holton, C.. Asymptotic orbits of primitive substitutions. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 301 (2003), 439–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Barge, M., Jacklitch, J. and Vago, G.. Homeomorphisms of one-dimensional inverse limits with applications to substitution tilings, unstable manifolds, and tent maps. Contemp. Math. 246 (1999), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Barge, M. and Swanson, R.. New techniques for classifying Williams solenoids. Tokyo J. Math. 30 (2007), 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Carlsen, T. and Eilers, S.. Augmenting dimension group invariants for substitution dynamics. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 24(4) (2004), 1015–1039.Google Scholar
[7]Carlsen, T. and Eilers, S.. Matsumoto K-groups associated to certain shift spaces. Doc. Math. 9 (2004), 639–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Carlsen, T. and Eilers, S.. A graph approach to computing nondeterminacy in substitutional dynamical systems. RAIRO—Theoret. Inform. Appl. 41 (2007), 285–306.Google Scholar
[9]Carlsen, T. and Eilers, S.. Ordered K-groups associated to substitutional dynamics. J. Funct. Anal. 38 (2006), 99–117.Google Scholar
[10]Giordano, T., Putnam, I. and Skau, C.. Topological orbit equivalence and C *-crossed products. J. Reine Angew. Math. 469 (1995), 51–111.Google Scholar
[11]Matsumoto, K.. Bowen–Franks groups as an invariant for flow equivalence of subshifts. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 21(6) (2001), 1831–1842.Google Scholar
[12]Williams, R. F.. One-dimensional non-wandering sets. Topology 6 (1967), 473–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Williams, R. F.. Classification of one-dimensional attractors. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 14 (1970), 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar