Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T19:58:18.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Birkhoff normalization and superintegrability of Hamiltonian systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2009

HIDEKAZU ITO
HIDEKAZU ITO*
Affiliation:
Division of Mathematics and Physics, Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma, Kanazawa, 920-1192, Japan (email: hideito@kenroku.kanazawa-u.ac.jp)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We study Birkhoff normalization in connection with superintegrability of an n-degree-of-freedom Hamiltonian system XH with holomorphic Hamiltonian H. Without assuming any Poisson commuting relation among integrals, we prove that, if the system XH has n+q holomorphic integrals near an equilibrium point of resonance degree q≥0, there exists a holomorphic Birkhoff transformation φ such that H∘φ becomes a holomorphic function of n−q variables and that XH∘φ can be solved explicitly. Furthermore, the Birkhoff normal form H∘φ is determined uniquely, independently of the choice of φ, as convergent power series. We also show that the system XH is superintegrable in the sense of Mischenko–Fomenko as well as Liouville-integrable near the equilibrium point.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 29 , Issue 6 , December 2009 , pp. 1853 - 1880
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

References

[1]Adler, M.. Some finite dimensional integrable systems and their scattering behavior. Comm. Math. Phys. 55 (1977), 195–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Arnol’d, V. I., Kozlov, V. V. and Neishtadt, A. I.. Mathematical Aspects of Classical and Celestial Mechanics, 3rd edn. (Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, 3). Springer, Berlin, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bambusi, D. and Grébert, B.. Birkhoff normal form for partial differential equations with tame modulus. Duke. Math. J. 135 (2006), 507–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Bogoyavlenski, O. I.. Extended integrability and bi-Hamiltonian systems. Comm. Math. Phys. 196 (1998), 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Eliasson, H.. Normal forms for Hamiltonian systems with Poisson commuting integrals—elliptic case. Comment. Math. Helv. 65 (1990), 4–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Fassò, F.. Superintegrable Hamiltonian systems: geometry and perturbations. Acta Appl. Math. 87 (2005), 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Ito, H.. Convergence of Birkhoff normal forms for integrable systems. Comment. Math. Helv. 64 (1989), 412–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Ito, H.. Action-angle coordinates at singularities for analytic integrable systems. Math. Z. 206 (1991), 363–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Ito, H.. Integrability of Hamiltonian systems and Birkhoff normal forms in the simple resonance case. Math. Ann. 292 (1992), 411–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Kapeller, T., Kodama, Y. and Némethi, A.. On the Birkhoff normal form of a completely integrable Hamiltonian system near a fixed point with resonance. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa C1. Sci. (4) 26 (1998), 623–661.Google Scholar
[11]Kapeller, T. and Pöschel, J.. KdV & KAM. Springer, Berlin, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Karasev, M. V. and Maslov, B. P.. Nonlinear Poisson Brackets. Geometry and Quantization (Translations of Mathematical Monographs, 119). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1993.Google Scholar
[13]Miranda, E. and Zung, N. T.. Equivariant normal form for nondegenerate singular orbits of integrable Hamiltonian systems. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 37 (2004), 819–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Mischenko, A. S. and Fomenko, A. T.. Generalized Liouville method of integration of Hamiltonian systems. Funct. Anal. Appl. 12 (1978), 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Nekhoroshev, N. N.. Action-angle variables and their generalizations. Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 26 (1972), 180–198.Google Scholar
[16]Pérez-Marco, R.. Convergence or generic divergence of the Birkhoff normal form. Ann. of Math. (2) 157 (2003), 557–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Rüssmann, H.. Über das Verhalten analytischer Hamiltonscher Differentialgleichungern in der Nähe einer Gleichgewichtslösung. Math. Ann. 154 (1964), 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Siegel, C. L.. Über die Existenz einer Normalform analytischer Hamiltonscher Differentialgleichungern in der Nähe einer Gleichgewichtslösung. Math. Ann. 128 (1954), 144–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Stolovitch, L.. Singular complete integrability. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 91 (2000), 133–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Stolovitch, L.. Normalisation holomorphe d’algèbres de type Cartan de champs de vecteurs holomorphes singuliers. Ann. of Math. (2) 161 (2005), 589–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Vey, J.. Sur certain systèmes dynamiques séparables. Amer. J. Math. 100 (1978), 591–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Zelditch, S.. The inverse spectral problem. Surv. Differ. Geom. IX (2004), 401–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Ziglin, S. L.. Branching of solutions and nonexistence of first integrals in Hamiltonian mechanics I. Funct. Anal. Appl. 16 (1983), 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Zung, N. T.. Convergence versus integrability in Birkhoff normal form. Ann. of Math. (2) 161 (2005), 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Zung, N. T.. Convergence versus integrability in Poincaré–Dulac normal form. Math. Res. Lett. 9 (2002), 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Zung, N. T.. Torus actions and integrable systems. Preprint, 2004, math/0407455v1.Google Scholar