No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Equilibrium stability for non-uniformly hyperbolic systems
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 January 2018
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
We prove that for a wide family of non-uniformly hyperbolic maps and hyperbolic potentials we have equilibrium stability, i.e. the equilibrium states depend continuously on the dynamics and the potential. For this we deduce that the topological pressure is continuous as a function of the dynamics and the potential. We also prove the existence of finitely many ergodic equilibrium states for non-uniformly hyperbolic skew products and hyperbolic Hölder continuous potentials. Finally, we show that these equilibrium states vary continuously in the 
$\text{weak}^{\ast }$ topology within such systems.
Information
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © Cambridge University Press, 2018
References
Alves, J. F.. SRB measures for non-hyperbolic systems with multidimensional expansion. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4)
33 (2000), 1–32.Google Scholar
Alves, J. F., Bonatti, C. and Viana, M.. SRB measures for partially hyperbolic systems whose central direction is mostly expanding. Invent. Math.
140 (2000), 351–398.Google Scholar
Alves, J. F. and Viana, M.. Statistical stability for robust classes of maps with non-uniform expansion. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys.
22 (2002), 1–32.Google Scholar
Andronov, A. and Pontryagin, L.. Systèmes grossiers. Dokl. Akad. Nauk USSR
14 (1937), 247–251.Google Scholar
Araújo, V.. Semicontinuity of entropy, existence of equilibrium states and continuity of physical measures. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.
17(2) (2007), 371–386.Google Scholar
Arbieto, A., Matheus, C. and Oliveira, K.. Equilibrium states for random non-uniformly expanding maps. Nonlinearity
17 (2004), 581–593.Google Scholar
Bomfim, T., Castro, A. and Varandas, P.. Differentiability of thermodynamical quantities in non-uniformly expanding dynamics. Adv. Math.
292 (2016), 478–528.Google Scholar
Bowen, R.. Entropy for group endomorphisms and homogeneous spaces. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.
153 (1971), 401–414.Google Scholar
Buzzi, J., Fisher, T., Sambarino, M. and Vásquez, C.. Maximal entropy measures for certain partially hyperbolic, derived from Anosov systems. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys.
32 (2011), 63–79.Google Scholar
Buzzi, J., Paccaut, F. and Schmitt, B.. Conformal measures for multidimensional piecewise invertible maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys.
21 (2001), 1035–1049.Google Scholar
Buzzi, J. and Sarig, O.. Uniqueness of equilibrium measures for countable Markov shifts. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys.
23 (2003), 1383–1400.Google Scholar
Castro, A. and Nascimento, T.. Statistical properties of the maximal entropy measure for partially hyperbolic attractors. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys.
37 (2017), 1060–1101.Google Scholar
Castro, A. and Varandas, P.. Equilibrium states for non-uniformly expanding maps: decay of correlations and strong stability. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire
30(2) (2013), 225–249.Google Scholar
Climenhaga, V., Fisher, T. and Thompson, D. J.. Unique equilibrium states for Bonatti–Viana diffeomorphisms. Preprint, 2016.Google Scholar
Climenhaga, V., Fisher, T. and Thompson, D. J.. Equilibrium states for Mañé diffeomorphisms. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys., accepted.Google Scholar
Díaz, L. J., Horita, V., Rios, I. and Sambarino, M.. Destroying horseshoes via heterodimensional cycles: generating bifurcations inside homoclinic classes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys.
29 (2009), 433–474.Google Scholar
Ledrappier, F. and Walters, P.. A relativised variational principle for continuous transformations. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2)
16 (1977), 568–576.Google Scholar
Leplaideur, R., Oliveira, K. and Rios, I.. Equilibrium states for partially hyperbolic horseshoes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys.
31 (2011), 179–195.Google Scholar
Oliveira, K. and Viana, M.. Thermodynamical formalism for robust classes of potentials and non-uniformly hyperbolic maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys.
28 (2008), 501–533.Google Scholar
Pesin, Y.. Dimension Theory in Dynamical Systems: Contemporary Views and Applications
(Chicago Lectures in Mathematics)
. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1997.Google Scholar
Ramos, V. and Siqueira, J.. On equilibrium states for partially hyperbolic horseshoes: uniqueness and statistical properties. Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. (N.S.)
48 (2017), 347–375.Google Scholar
Ramos, V. and Viana, M.. Equilibrium states for hyperbolic potentials. Nonlinearity
30 (2017), 825–847.Google Scholar
Rios, I. and Siqueira, J.. On equilibrium states for partially hyperbolic horseshoes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys.
21 (2016), 1–35.Google Scholar
Ruelle, D.. Statistical mechanics of a one-dimensional lattice gas. Commun. Math. Phys.
9(4) (1968), 267–278.Google Scholar
Ruelle, D.. Thermodynamic Formalism
(Encyclopedia Mathematics and its Applications, 5)
. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1978.Google Scholar
Sarig, O.. Thermodynamic formalism for countable Markov shifts. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys.
19 (1999), 1565–1593.Google Scholar
Sarig, O.. Existence of Gibbs measures for countable Markov shifts. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.
131 (2003), 1751–1758.Google Scholar
Varandas, P. and Viana, M.. Existence, uniqueness and stability of equilibrium states for non-hyperbolic expanding maps. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire
27 (2010), 555–593.Google Scholar
Viana, M. and Oliveira, K. Foundations of Ergodic Theory
(Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 151)
. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016.Google Scholar
Walters, P.. A variational principle for the pressure of continuous transformations. Amer. J. Math.
97 (1975), 937–997.Google Scholar
You have
Access
- 6
- Cited by