Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T22:35:31.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Veech’s dichotomy and the lattice property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2008

JOHN SMILLIE
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA (email: smillie@math.cornell.edu)
BARAK WEISS
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Ben Gurion University, Be’er Sheva, 84105, Israel (email: barakw@math.bgu.ac.il)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Veech showed that if a translation surface has a stabilizer which is a lattice in SL(2,ℝ), then any direction for the corresponding constant slope flow is either completely periodic or uniquely ergodic. We show that the converse does not hold: there are translation surfaces that satisfy Veech’s dichotomy but for which the corresponding stabilizer subgroup is not a lattice. The construction relies on work of Hubert and Schmidt.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press