Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a safe and effective medical treatment, yet provision varies internationally. We provide an up-to-date review of ECT practice in Nordic and western European countries.

European experts contributed data from peer-reviewed literature, governmental publications, unpublished administrative datasets, and hitherto unpublished surveys. The primary outcome was the number of individuals treated with ECT in each country per year. Primary analysis compared the annual treated person rate per million population in the most recent year since 2015 for which data were available. Secondary analysis compared trends in rates over 25 years, in countries for which a reliable outcome was available at two or more time points.

Across 15 countries, 12 had data meeting primary analysis criteria. Of these, all Nordic countries had annual treated patient rates per million population over 200, Italy 2.7, and other western European countries between 30 and 100. German-, Dutch-, and French-speaking countries saw increases in ECT use over 25 years, while English-speaking countries exhibited declines. Unilateral placement varied from 16% of treatments in the United Kingdom to 79% in Norway. Everywhere, most ECT was given for depressive episodes.

Although the optimal rate of use is unknown, widely differing rates across European nations suggest ECT is underused in some high-income countries, depriving patients of vital medical care. The European ECT community must support the development of reliable data collection on usage across the continent and service improvement where provision is underdeveloped, to ensure appropriate treatment is offered to all patients for whom it is indicated.

Standard treatments for eating disorders (EDs) typically include nutritional rehabilitation, psychotherapy, and pharmacotherapy, often resulting in modest effectiveness. Neuromodulation has been proposed as a potential add-on strategy. This review aims to critically evaluate its effects on EDs.

The PICO framework was used to conduct a search according to the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews (PROSPERO Registration no. CRD42024559700). Descriptive and clinical data for each study, including comorbidity and safety, were tabulated by disorder. Quality assessment was performed using the RoB2 and ROBINS-I tools.

Fifty-eight studies examining rTMS, tDCS, DBS, ECT, iTBS, and dTMS in AN, BN, and BED met inclusion criteria. In AN, the effects of rTMS and tDCS on weight and BMI were modest, with notable benefits for adolescents. Conversely, in refractory AN, DBS produced significant and lasting increases in BMI and reductions in comorbid psychopathology. For BN, single-session rTMS reduced cravings acutely, while multisession results were mixed; tDCS enhanced self-control. In BED, right-DLPFC tDCS decreased cravings, food intake, and binge frequency, showing a dose-dependent effect, whereas early data on NAcc DBS were promising but limited.

Noninvasive stimulation methods effectively reduced cravings and impulsivity, showing more consistent improvements in BN and BED than in weight restoration for AN. Overall, this pattern replicates recent review reports. However, variations in study designs, stimulation protocols, and outcome measures may undermine the reliability of these conclusions and complicate comparisons across studies. Future studies should be adequately powered, multisession, with durability endpoints, and target and dose refinement.

Previous studies have shown that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can treat suicidal symptoms; however, the effects of rTMS on suicidal ideation (SI) in late-life depression (LLD) have not been well-characterized, particularly with theta burst stimulation (TBS).

Data were analyzed from 84 older adults with depression from the FOUR-D trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02998580), who received either bilateral standard rTMS or bilateral TBS targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The primary outcome was change in the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (SSI). The secondary outcome was remission of SI. Demographic, cognitive, and clinical characteristics that may moderate the effects of rTMS or TBS on SI were explored.

There was a statistically significant change in the total SSI score over time [χ2(7) = 136.018, p < 0.001], with no difference between the two treatment groups. Remission of SI was 55.8% in the standard rTMS group and 53.7% in the TBS group. In the standard rTMS group, there was no difference in remission of SI between males and females, whereas remission was higher in females in the TBS group (χ2(1) =6.87, p = 0.009). There was a significant correlation between time to remission of SI and RCI z-score for D-KEFS inhibition/switching [rs = −0.389, p = 0.012].

Both bilateral rTMS and bilateral TBS were effective in reducing SI in LLD. There may be sex differences in response to TBS, with females having more favorable response in reducing SI. There may be an association between improvement in cognitive flexibility and inhibition and reduction of SI.

Difficult-to-treat depression (DTD) is a common clinical challenge for major depressive disorder and bipolar disorders. Electro convulsive therapy (ECT) has proven to be one of the most effective treatments for this condition. Although several studies have investigated individually the clinical factors associated with the DTD response, the role of their interplay in the clinical response to ECT remains unknown. In the present study, we aimed to characterize the network of symptoms in DTD, evaluate the effects of ECT on the interrelationship of depressive symptoms, and identify the network characteristics that could predict the clinical response.

A network analysis of clinical and demographic data from 154 patients with DTD was performed to compare longitudinally the patterns of relationships among depressive symptoms after ECT treatment. Furthermore, we estimated the network structure at baseline associated with a greater clinical improvement (≥80% reduction at Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score).

ECT modulated the network of depressive symptoms, with increased strength of the global network (p = 0.03, Cohen’s d = −0.98, 95% confidence interval = [−1.07, −0.88]). The strength of the edges between somatic symptoms (appetite and sleep) and cognitive-emotional symptoms (tension, lassitude, and pessimistic thoughts) was also increased. A stronger negative relationship between insomnia and pessimistic thoughts was associated with a greater improvement after ECT. Concentration difficulties and apparent sadness showed the greatest centrality.

In conclusion, ECT treatment may affect not only the severity of the symptoms but also their relationship; this may contribute to the response in DTD.

Schizophrenia is a multifactorial disorder with a range of risk factors. Dysregulation in the systems involved in the stress response is a key component of its pathophysiology. Individuals at risk of developing schizophrenia exhibit hyperreactivity to stress and altered cognitive performance, both known as vulnerability markers. This study aims to determine whether stimulation of the prefrontal cortex can reduce reactivity to stress in unaffected siblings of patients with schizophrenia.

In a randomized, sham-controlled trial, 27 participants were assigned to receive either active (n = 14) or sham (n = 13) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the prefrontal cortex for 30 min during exposure to an acute stressor. The stress response was measured biologically, via salivary cortisol levels, and cognitively, through a reality monitoring task, which serves as an intermediate cognitive vulnerability marker.

In contrast to the sham condition, active stimulation significantly reduced cortisol release in response to stress (F(9,216) = 1.972; p = 0.04) and prevented stress-induced impairment in reality monitoring (F(1,23) = 9.954; p = 0.004).

These findings suggest that tDCS should be a promising tool for reducing stress-induced biological and cognitive reactivity in a population at risk of schizophrenia.

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a devastating condition with frequent suicidality, contributing to overdose deaths. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is used to treat major depressive disorder (MDD) and is effective in treating suicidal ideation. We piloted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial of bilateral rTMS for patients with OUD and MDD experiencing suicidality.

Sequential bilateral TBS was delivered guided by structural neuroimaging: continuous TBS to the right then intermittent TBS to the left DLPFC, daily (20 treatments). The primary objective was to determine the feasibility of this population. The primary clinical outcome was the scale for suicidal ideation (SSI), secondary outcomes included depressive symptoms and opioid cue-induced craving. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04785456.

Eighty-seven individuals were pre-screened. The most common reasons for ineligibility included being unreachable by the study team, difficulty with scheduling/travel requirements, and medical/psychiatric instability. Six participants (5:1 M:F) were enrolled (3/arm), four had a fentanyl use history; two completed per protocol (1/arm). Of the participants with follow-up data, SSI scores decreased in 2/3 in the sham arm and 2/2 in the active arm; depression and opioid craving scores decreased in all participants.

We present the first data piloting a structural neuroimaging-guided, multi-session rTMS treatment course in outpatients with suicidality and OUD in the current North American context. Recruitment and retention were the main challenges given the highly unstable medical and psychosocial context of this patient population. Future trials should consider a suitable environment to improve the feasibility of delivering this treatment.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). This study evaluated its antidepressant and cognitive effects as a safe, effective, home-based therapy for MDD.

This double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized trial divided participants into low-intensity (1 mA, n = 47), high-intensity (2 mA, n = 49), and sham (n = 45) groups, receiving 42 daily tDCS sessions, including weekends and holidays, targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for 30 minutes. Assessments were conducted at baseline and weeks 2, 4, and 6. The primary outcome was cognitive improvement assessed by changes in total accuracy on the 2-back test from baseline to week 6. Secondary outcomes included changes in depressive symptoms (HAM-D), anxiety (HAM-A), and quality of life (QLES). Adverse events were monitored. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04709952).

In the tDCS study, of 141 participants (102 [72.3%] women; mean age 35.7 years, standard deviation 12.7), 95 completed the trial. Mean changes in the total accuracy scores from baseline to week 6 were compared across the three groups using an F-test. Linear mixed-effects models examined the interaction of group and time. Results showed no significant differences among groups in cognitive or depressive outcomes at week 6. Active groups experienced more mild adverse events compared to sham but had similar rates of severe adverse events and dropout.

Home-based tDCS for MDD demonstrated no evidence of effectiveness but was safe and well-tolerated. Further research is needed to address the technical limitations, evaluate broader cognitive functions, and extend durations to evaluate its therapeutic potential.

This study investigates the effects of accelerated high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (aHF-rTMS), applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), on locus coeruleus (LC) functional connectivity in the treatment of refractory medication-resistant major depression (MRD).

We studied 12 antidepressant-free refractory MRD patients, focusing on how aHF-rTMS affects the LC, a central component of the brain’s noradrenergic system and key to mood regulation and stress response.

A stronger decrease in LC functional connectivity following aHF-rTMS treatment resulted in better clinical improvement. We observed such LC functional connectivity decreases with several brain regions, including the superior frontal gyrus, precentral gyrus, middle occipital gyrus, and cerebellum. Moreover, our exploratory analyses hint at a possible role for E-field modeling in forecasting clinical outcomes. Additional analyses suggest potential genetic and dopaminergic factors influencing changes in LC functional connectivity in relation to clinical response.

The findings of this study underscore the pivotal role of the LC in orchestrating higher cognitive functions through its extensive connections with the prefrontal cortices, facilitating decision-making, influencing attention, and addressing depressive rumination. Additionally, the observed enhancement in LC-(posterior) cerebellar connectivity not only highlights the cerebellum’s role in moderating clinical outcomes through noradrenergic system modulation but also suggests its potential as a predictive marker for aHF-rTMS efficacy. These results reveal new insights into the neural mechanisms of refractory depression and suggest therapeutic targets for enhancing noradrenergic activity, thereby addressing both cognitive and psychomotor symptoms associated with the disorder.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an established treatment for depression, but more data on effectiveness and safety in clinical practice is needed. The aim of this register-based study was to investigate short-term effectiveness and cognitive safety after ECT, evaluated by clinicians and patients. Secondary, we investigated predictors for remission and cognitive decline.

The study included 392 patients from the Regional Register for Neurostimulation Treatment in Western Norway. Depressive symptoms and cognitive function were assessed with Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and Mini-Mental State Examination (clinician-rated) and Beck Depression Inventory and Everyday Memory Questionnaire (patient-rated). Assessments were done prior to ECT-series and a mean of 1.7 days after (range 6 days before and 12 days after) end of ECT-series. Paired samples t-tests were extended by detailed, clinically relevant subgroups. Predictors were examined using logistic regression.

Clinician- and patient-rated remission rates were 49.5 and 41.0%, respectively. There was a large reduction in depressive symptoms and a small improvement in cognition after ECT, but we also identified subgroups with non-response of ECT in combination with cognitive decline (4.6% clinician-rated, 15.7% patient-rated). Positive predictors for patient- and clinician-rated remission were increasing age, shorter duration of depressive episode, and psychotic features. Antipsychotic medication at the commencement of treatment and previous ECT-treatment gave higher odds of clinician-rated remission, whereas higher pretreatment subjective depression level was associated with lower odds for patient-rated remission. Clinician-rated cognitive decline was predicted by higher pretreatment MMSE scores, whereas psychotic features, increasing age, and greater pretreatment subjective memory concerns were associated with lower odds for patient-rated cognitive decline.

Our study supports ECT as an effective and safe treatment, although subgroups have a less favorable outcome. ECT should be considered at an early stage for older patients suffering from depression with psychotic features. Providing comprehensive and balanced information from clinicians and patients perspectives on effects and side effects, may assist in a joint consent process.