Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T01:07:45.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

463 What’s your problem? Methods for refining translational science challenges to create meaningful solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2026

Elizabeth LaPensee
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Maureen Brudzinski
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Sarah Miles
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Elias Samuels
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Objectives/Goals: The Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research (MICHR) created an eight-phase adaptive Translational Science Framework to guide us in selecting and solving translational science problems. We operationalized the initial problem selection phases and assessed utility of various methods in shaping complex problems for solution design. Methods/Study Population: We identified three high-priority strategic domains where there was potential to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of research and related processes. Starting with broad problem statements, we engaged a wide array of stakeholders and end-users in a sequence of methods to reduce ambiguity, uncover root causes, and clarify actionable challenges. The methods we selected align with the four problem selection/problem analysis phases of our Translational Science Framework: contextualize, frame, map, and craft. Methods used included landscape and workforce assessments; purpose and scoping sessions; design research strategies; systems mapping; quantitative needs assessments; and translational science proposal pitches. Results/Anticipated Results: Across the three strategic domains, we successfully reframed and scaled ill-defined problem statements into translational science questions that are actionable, meaningful, feasible, and relevant. The outputs of each problem selection/problem analysis phase served as critical inputs for subsequent phases; for example, synthesis of landscape and workforce assessments in the contextualize phase provided critical substrate for structuring the design research and broad scale needs assessments in the frame phase. This funneling approach brought continuous focus and clarity to the problem statements. A variety of metrics embedded within the phases informed performance, progress, and decision-making, which enabled rapid adjustments in the face of evolving contexts and unforeseen challenges. Discussion/Significance of Impact: In the absence of translational science problem analysis, we risk not addressing actual needs, duplicating effort, and/or creating unwanted solutions. The methods and metrics within the analysis phases of our Translational Science Framework promote iterative refinement of intractable problems, with the goal of yielding impactful solutions.

Information

Type
Research management, operations, and administration
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. The Association for Clinical and Translational Science