OBJECTIVES/GOALS: This presentation reports activities of a NCATS-funded collaborative working group created to promote dissemination and implementation (D&I) research within the CTSA landscape. Our working group seeks to meet both the conceptual as well as practical challenges to advancing the utilization of D&I across the translational science spectrum. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A fundamental focus of D&I is supporting the movement of effective health interventions into real-world use so that they benefit population health. Yet, this process remains unpredictable, with some interventions receiving widespread uptake in practice and others (of similar potential benefit) failing to translate. The value of research efforts is wasted when directed toward the “wrong” interventions. Recent discussion and experience amongst investigators in our collaborative working group has resulted in new ways of addressing this problem. Specifically, tools borrowed from business and management have shown promise in predicting which health interventions have the highest potential for commercialization and dissemination. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We will conduct an environmental scan of CTSA hubs to understand their approaches to supporting commercialization and business development around research products, identifying the most promising and effective methods and processes. We will compile various tools for identifying and supporting interventions with the highest potential for commercialization, including how to form the multidisciplinary and stakeholder-engaged teams necessary to make these determinations. Finally, we will further explore the differences between patentable and non-patentable innovations and make recommendations for CTSAs in supporting the latter. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Commercialization of non-patentable interventions is an essential and underexplored element of the translational science spectrum. The perspectives and methods of D&I should not be relegated to late-stage translational steps, but rather inform the conduct of translational science writ large.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: “Loss to follow up” is a common phenomenon and challenge in clinical medicine. Missed appointments are a well-documented source of waste in the health care system, and can lead to strained patient-physician relationships and inferior quality of care. Meningiomas are relatively common, benign tumors that arise from the dural coverings of the brain. Although complete surgical resection is considered curative, surgically excised meningiomas have a well-documented propensity to recur, necessitating continued imaging surveillance of postresection patients. A recent retrospective study at our institute demonstrated that 20% of postresection patients fail to return for follow up within a year of their surgery. Although social determinants of health have been associated with failure to follow up in this population, there has been no research identifying patient-reported barriers that result in loss to follow up in this patient population. The purpose of this study is to identify specific barriers that prevent patients from returning for surveillance. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We used an IRB approved, prospective brain tumor clinical database to identify patients who underwent surgical resection of intracranial meningioma at our institution between 2001 and 2013. “Loss to follow up” was defined as failure to attend follow-up appointments with neurosurgery, radiation oncology, or neuro-oncology within a year of the most recent assigned follow-up interval, as recorded in the electronic medical record. Structured interviews were conducted with patients who met study criteria and specific barriers to follow-up were elicited, transcribed, and coded. In 2 cases, a primary caregiver participated in all or portions of the interview with the patient. A general assessment of patient knowledge about meningioma and a screening for basic health literacy were also conducted. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: There were 80 patients in the brain tumor clinical database met chart review criteria for inclusion in the study. A total of 9 structured interviews were conducted; 1 interview was excluded from analysis for failure to meet study criteria. In total, 24 unique obstacles to follow up were recorded. These were stratified and grouped into 4 broad categories: 2 of 8 (25%) patients identified environmental factors, including distance to appointment and challenges with insurance coverage as barriers to follow up; 2 patients (25%) identified psychosocial factors, including poor communication with and distrust of their neurosurgeon as barriers to follow up; 2 (25%) patients identified health factors, including poor health and old age, as barriers to follow up; 6 patients identified healthcare systems factors as barriers to follow up, with 6 patients (75%) reporting seeing a non-specialist for follow up after surgery and 4 patients (50%) reporting not being told by their neurosurgeon that they would need continued follow up. Of those patients seen by non-specialists, only 1 reported any recent brain imaging by those providers. All patients had limited to no prior knowledge of meningiomas before their diagnosis. Four (50%) patients reported satisfaction with the level education about meningiomas they received from their physician. Of these patients, 3 (75%) correctly reported that meningiomas may recur following surgery. Of the patients who did not report satisfaction with physician counseling, 3 (75%) did not realize that meningiomas can recur. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Healthcare system factors, including uncoordinated transition of postoperative care to non-neurosurgeons and uncertain postoperative surveillance schedules, represent that most common patient-identified barriers to follow up after meningioma resection. Improving transition of care from specialists to non-specialists, including designation of appropriate imaging surveillance schedules, as well as improving communication between specialists and patients about the need for continued follow up, represent clear points for intervention that could improve care for this patient population. In addition, consistent and clear counseling about meningioma and its disease course may reduce loss to follow up following meningioma resection. It is important to note, however, that the small sample size represents a significant limitation of the study.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Partnering with the Housing Authority of Los Angeles, we launched a place-based initiative in the Nickerson Gardens housing development in South Los Angeles, where we apply our community engagement approach of listening and learning, and trust and relationship building, to deliver public health interventions in a discrete community. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Nickerson Gardens is the largest housing development in Los Angeles, with 1,066 units and over 3,000 residents. 58% and 40% of the residents are Hispanic and Black/African American respectively with an average yearly income of less than $30,000. To build trust and establish relationships, our team began attending community events, holding weekly educational workshops, and participating in the summer program for youth. We also held listening sessions in English and Spanish that asked aboutthe overall health of the Nickerson Gardens community, environment and public space, access and barriers to care, needed healthcare services, and the lived experience within Nickerson Gardens. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: To date, we have held eight 90-minute listening sessions in English and Spanish with 59 participants. The sessions provided insight into theneeded health and educational resources and services, the organizational structure of the housing development and how that impacts access to information and services, as well as the nuanced and area-specific transportation issues and the connection to safety concerns. These findings will inform the next phase of this initiative which includes convening a Coordinating Council composed of service providers and Nickerson Gardens residents. This council will oversee the coordination and implementation of needed services, help maintain accountability of the providers, and offer residents the opportunity to take ownership of the process. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Academic-community partnerships are an effective strategy to deliver public health interventions and promote health equity in under-resourced communities. We tested and measured impact in a distinct community to reinforce a widely-applicable place-based model.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Diet-related diseases such as obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and irritable bowel syndrome comprise a large portion of primary care visits in the United States. However, primary care physicians seldom prescribe dietary interventions that effectively treat these conditions, and their rate of use has declined in recent years. There are many plausible reasons for this decline, including baseline nutrition education, perceived efficacy of the intervention, time limitations, and compensation. No study has been conducted to assess which of these factors physicians perceive as relevant to their decision to use dietary interventions in their practice. Our study aims to identify key factors that ubiquitously limit physicians’ use of dietary interventions. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We created a 30-item survey designed to evaluate physicians’ self-reported use of dietary interventions, relevant knowledge base, comfort employing these interventions, and attitudes regarding the importance of such interventions in their practices. This survey was was distributed to internal medicine, pediatrics, and family medicine residents and physicians at Michigan Medicine and St. Joseph hospitals in Ann Arbor, MI. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Socio-demographic data, knowledge base and attitudes will be summarized and analyzed using descriptive statistics and simple regression modeling following the administration of the survey. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: We hope that our study may elucidate identify specific avenues of increasing the use of dietary interventions, and thus of improving treatment efficacy for diet-related disorders in the United States.

Objectives/Goals: Electronic health record (EHR)-based recruitment can facilitate participation in clinical trials, but is not a panacea to trial accrual challenges. We conducted a root cause analysis to identify EHR-based accrual barriers and facilitators in a pragmatic randomized trial of metformin for those with prostate cancer and glucose intolerance. Methods/Study Population: We quantitatively analyzed enrollment drop-offs among eligible patients who either did not complete a consent (with analysis of EHR-embedded consent process) or who completed a consent but were not enrolled (with analysis of EHR implementation of a Best Practice Alert). We summarized data from the EHR by eligibility, provider encounters, and alerts, and generated CONSORT diagrams and tables to trace the enrollment pathway. We supplemented quantitative findings with a thematic analysis of semi-structured individual interviews with eligible patients (n = 10) and study providers (n = 4) to identify systematic barriers to recruitment and enrollment of eligible patients. Results/Anticipated Results: CONSORT diagram analysis found that 24% of potentially eligible patients (268 of 1130) had an eligible study encounter but were not enrolled. Additionally, BPAs were not triggering for some eligible patients. Interviews revealed that study providers wanted more detailed information about which study arm their patient would be assigned to, and about next steps after enrollment, especially relating to additional lab tests and follow-up care needed. Patient interviews suggested that patients often did not remember completing the consent process and felt overwhelmed with appointments and information; patients expected providers to actively bring up research opportunities during appointments. Discussion/Significance of Impact: While pragmatic EHR-embedded trials are often characterized as lower-burden, these trials still require active engagement by providers, as well as ongoing attention from both research and informatics teams to ensure that EHR-embedded processes are functioning as designed, and that they are effective in recruiting study participants.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To examine i) how longstanding (≥6 years) community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships nationwide implemented a validated questionnaire to measure success and its contributing factors and ii) how the CBPR partnerships utilized and applied a feedback mechanism, or reports of findings from the questionnaire and a facilitation guide METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This mixed methods study builds upon a larger NIH-funded project entitled ’Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS). MAPS developed and validated the 109-item MAPS questionnaire to measure success in longstanding (≥6 years) CBPR partnerships. In 2020, 55 CBPR partnerships nationwide completed the MAPS Questionnaire and, a year later, received the MAPS Feedback Mechanism, consisting of questionnaire findings and a facilitation guide on how to present the findings. In this follow-up study, we administered multi-method surveys to each partnership contact person in 2022 to examine their experience with and utility of the MAPS Questionnaire and the MAPS Feedback mechanism. We performed descriptive analysis of quantitative responses using SAS and thematic analysis of qualitative responses. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Survey responses have been presently collected from 14 partnerships. Preliminary findings suggest that the most frequently reported benefits of completing the MAPS Questionnaire included stimulating partnership reflections and ease of completion. Many partnerships shared results of the MAPS Questionnaire by e-mail or during partnership meetings. Nearly half of the partnerships rated components of the MAPS feedback mechanism as useful. Over one-third of the partnerships reported that the COVID pandemic limited their capacity to engage with the MAPS Feedback Mechanism. Key qualitative suggestions included making the MAPS Questionnaire shorter, providing it in a different format, and offering additional facilitation to support the implementation of the MAPS Feedback Mechanism. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This study examines how CBPR partnerships utilize an evaluation instrument and apply results on success. Current findings suggest potential utility of the MAPS Questionnaire and Feedback Mechanism for ongoing evaluation. Reducing the questionnaire length and providing facilitation resources may enhance implementation across diverse settings.

Objectives/Goals: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common during pregnancy and postpartum, leading to adverse birth outcomes. Despite effective interventions like narrative exposure therapy, PTSD often goes untreated due limited training opportunities and lack of community support. Expanding training for PTSD is crucial to improving access to care. Methods/Study Population: Six 3-day PNET trainings were delivered to 57 participants over a 23-month period. Workshop attendees represented a variety of professions (19% Social Workers, 19% Mental Health Graduate Trainees, 18% Psychologists, 18% Counselors, 12% Doulas, 11% Physicians, and 5% Home Visitor/Parent Educators) with varying levels of specialty experience from diverse locations (2 countries and 13 states). Key workshop outcomes included participant one-week post-workshop satisfaction, perceptions of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the intervention, and pre- to one-week post-workshop perceptions of connectedness to trauma treatment and perinatal healthcare communities. Data will be explored at 6 months post-workshop to evaluate longer-term effects on connectedness. Results/Anticipated Results: The majority of workshop attendees (84%, M =  4.76, range 1–5) reported being “extremely satisfied” with the training and 98% indicated they would “recommend it to others.” Most attendees found NET to be acceptable (M  =  4.64, range  =  1–5), appropriate (M  =  4.37, range  =  1–5), and feasible (M  =  4.49, range  =  1–5) to use within their practice. Paired t-tests revealed a significant increase in a sense of connectedness to both the trauma treatment and perinatal healthcare communities from pre- to post-workshop. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Findings indicate that the PNET workshop is feasible and effective in training interdisciplinary providers on perinatal PTSD evidence-based interventions. By training a range of professionals and fostering a sense of connectedness, the PNET workshop has the potential to make effective trauma treatments accessible to underserved populations.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The Title V Cooperative Project of the UPR-MSC and UCC has demonstrated that educational interventions in CTR are very effective in fulfilling the objective of promoting awareness, stimulate interest and increase the knowledge, skills and opportunities, to US, GS and F (participants) in CTR. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The training sessions (TS) offered through the Title V initiative have become an engine for the involvement in CTR for participants from higher education institutions island-wide. TS consisted of cycles –level 1 and 2–: Research Education Towards Opportunities (RETO,I,II) and Mentorship Offering Training Opportunities for Research (MOTOR,I,II), ending in the formation of the Clinical and Translational Mentoring Teams (CTMT)s, in which participants, paired by their research interests, were mentored by a well-established CT researchers in their research project, to be developed in the Intensive Development and Experiences in Advancement of Research and Increased Opportunities (IDEARIO). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Up to date, 4 TS-level 1 and 2 TS-level 2 were offered. Eighty (80) participants completed level 1, distributed: 42 (52.5%) US in RETO, 21 (26.25%) GS and 17 (21.25%) F in MOTOR and 17 participants completed level 2, distributed: 4 (23.52%) US in RETO, 6 (25.29%) GS and 7 (41.17%) F in MOTOR. From which, 15, with 8 CT researchers, formed 5 CTMTs in different research areas – cardio, neuro, liver, renal, Zika–. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: US, GS and F were integrated in the active process throughout educational levels for their development in CTR.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The Institute of Translational Health Science (ITHS) Remote Technologies for Research Reference Center (REMOTECH) aims to support researchers using remote technologies. Understanding barriers specifically for engagement of diverse populations is critical to improve equitable access and increase diverse participation in research. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We conducted semi-structured interviews with researchers (N=30) within the WWAMI (Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana and Idaho) region, identified through participation in a previous survey as well as those known to have previously implemented remote technologies at ITHS institutions. We solicited specific concerns regarding equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) related to remote research participant recruitment, retention, and implementation, as well as outcomes and potential solutions. Interview transcripts were coded, summarized, and emerging themes were identified. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The pandemic necessitated a shift to the use of remote research engagement strategies. Our interview findings show that researchers have a desire to: increase diversity through remote engagement options; decrease participant burden; and understand and include strategies that advance equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) efforts. While geographic diversity was positively impacted by the use of remote technologies, significant barriers and challenges currently exist in the use of remote technologies with respect to other types of diversity, for example access to technologies and limited financial resources. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Remote technologies in research could increase diversity, but interviewees shared barriers and challenges that prevent that from happening. Researchers would benefit from equity-oriented digital literacy resources to use with diverse populations. Such tools can also be used to guide study design/procedures, materials, and processes.

Objectives/Goals: The University of Illinois Chicago’s CTSA is developing dynamic dashboards to track K awardee outcomes. Integrating data on grants, publications, and milestones, the dashboard illustrates scholars’ research journeys while highlighting the role of the K program in advancing their careers. Methods/Study Population: Since 2007, CCTS has supported over 60 KL2 scholars and affiliates. To track scholar outcomes, the evaluation program has developed Power BI dashboards that visualize scholars’ career trajectories. These dashboards draw on several sources, including publicly available data, institutional records, and FlightTracker. They highlight key career outcomes such as grant awards and peer-reviewed publications since program entry, providing an overview of scholars’ careers while illustrating how they advanced after the program. The dashboards shown continue to evolve. Our current efforts are focused on incorporating impacts from the TSBM and streamlining data collection. Results/Anticipated Results: The dashboards provide a comprehensive and interactive view of KL2 scholars’ career trajectories, illustrating how the K program contributes to research productivity and career advancement. They reveal trends in grant funding, publications, and other key career milestones over time. The dashboards enable us to more easily identify patterns across cohorts, explore individual scholar achievements, and assess broader program impact. Continued refinement of processes in collecting and displaying data, including AI-supported data collection and incorporation of TSBM outcomes, is expected to ensure a more complete picture of the translational impact of K award support. Discussion/Significance of Impact: The dashboards enhance tracking of K awardees by providing a clear, data-driven view of scholar and affiliate outcomes. They can inform program improvements and highlight broad impacts on career development and translational science. This approach may be adopted by other CTSA hubs.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The goals of this evaluation were 1) to describe the pilot grant application cycle and processes at NC TraCS, 2) to illustrate the impact of pilot grants on extramural grant funding, and 3) to provide a framework for other institutions to utilize for the evaluation of pilot grant programs. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: From 2009-2019 the NC TraCS pilot program funded 925 projects, varying from $2,000 to $100,000. Pilot grants are available to any researcher affiliated with the university as well as partner institutions and community stakeholders. For this evaluation we analyzed data on pilot applicants (demographics, type of pilot, funding status, resubmissions, etc.) and outcomes (extramural funding, publications, etc.) yielded from funded pilots. In addition to summary statistics, we also calculated return on investment (ROI) for the program as a whole and by specific grant type. We will use bibliometric network analysis to assess productivity, citation impact, and scope of collaboration. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: There have been 2,777 submitted proposals with an acceptance rate of 33.3%. Unfunded proposals can resubmit, 61.8% of resubmitted applications are successfully funded, and 29.6% of funded applications are resubmissions. The $2,000 awards accounted for 43.4% of all grants awarded but only accounted for 6.4% of all pilot funds awarded. Success of proposals was proportional to the number of applications from each academic unit. 60.8% of funded applicants were affiliated with the School of Medicine and account for 65.3% of all funding awarded from 2009-2019. Additionally, we plan on analyzing return on investment rates to illustrate the impact of pilot awards on future research funding. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Pilot grants can lead to subsequent extramural grants, publications, and successful translation of research into practice. This evaluation will assist our institution in understanding the impact of pilot grants and will provide a road map for other institutions evaluating their own programs.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Our objective was to establish a new protocol to evaluate new biomarkers to detect Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD) in high-risk infants. As early intervention results in better outcomes, our goal was to implement the protocol to promote earlier NDD diagnosis and referral for treatment. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We implemented a new protocol using the General Movement Assessment (GMA), Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE), and Capute Scales to evaluate infants who were at high risk of NDD. To determine the success of our protocol with these biomarkers, we studied former premature infants who were evaluated in follow-up clinic from 10/1/2018-10/1/2019. We defined our primary and secondary outcomes as the ages of neurodevelopmental diagnoses and referral to early intervention services before and after implementation of the new protocol, respectively. Our hypotheses were that infants who were evaluated with these biomarkers would be diagnosed with NDD and be referred for treatment at younger ages than their counterparts. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Approximately 120 patients were evaluated during the time period that was defined. About half were evaluated prior to implementing the GMA and HINE, and the remainder were evaluated using GMA and other developmental measures. We anticipate that infants who underwent GMA will be diagnosed with NDD and referred for therapies at a younger age than their counterparts. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Through our translational research, we will transform the standard of care for high-risk infants by incorporating clinical biomarkers into day-to-day clinical care for these infants. Implementation of this novel protocol will promote the early diagnosis and referral to treatment for NDD.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Team science is a focus of the University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UF CTSI) Learning Health System Initiative. Citizen Scientists (CSs) are integral research partners who provide pragmatic feedback. The UF Health Cancer Center (UFHCC) aspired to adopt a similar approach to research, starting with onboarding CSs. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: To understand the content with which they would be engaging through the CTSI, CSs first became certified through a self-paced online curriculum focused on clinical research basics. UFHCC envisioned their onboarding as a companion piece to this first course, and CSs must complete both courses to work in cancer-focused research. The new CS Cancer Curriculum consists of a mix of didactic lessons with quizzes, case studies, a behind-the-scenes look at a research lab meeting, and interviews with CSs. As with the clinical research course, the cancer course was co-developed alongside the CSs and utilized the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) instructional design model. The course was implemented with UF CSs from July to September 2021 through Canvas. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: For the nine CSs completing this pilot test, scores for all didactic quizzes across the course were mostly high. Two CSs scored a perfect 100%, three missed only one question (98%), and two CSs missed two questions (96%). A course evaluation was completed by eight of the CSs and determined that most (86%) felt that they were capable of applying what they had learned. An additional 75% felt the course empowered them to advocate for the needs of all stakeholders involved in cancer research. Qualitative responses on the evaluation found that the course helped CSs better relate to the challenges faced by other stakeholders (patients, clinicians, caregivers) and helped them conceptualize how they could contribute to cancer research. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The partnerships within the UF CTSI have a direct impact on patient care through research studies in Florida and nationwide. CSs can be overlooked by researchers unfamiliar with concepts of a learning health system, including those in cancer research. By engaging these stakeholders, we may soon see similar impacts to cancer-related patient care.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Peer supporters are frequently engaged to help people with marginalized identities access a range of health services, including newly developed interventions. Understanding how that individuals in these lay roles approach their interactions with clients may help to inform their future selection and training in order to support T3-T4 translation. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We examined the strategies and perspectives of Peer Mentors in an HIV/STI prevention intervention (Passport to Wellness, PtW) designed to encourage regular screening for HIV and sexually transmitted infections and the use of HIV biomedical prevention (pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis). Fifteen men were trained to serve as Mentors for this novel PtW intervention for Black sexual minority men (SMM) that was being tested in Los Angeles County. Surveys were conducted at the start of their training and both surveys and semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted after the Mentors had provided peer services for several months. Thematic analysis was conducted on interview transcripts for the 10 men who actually served as program Mentors during the pilot study and small randomized trial of the intervention. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Peer Mentors described trust, rapport, accountability, encouragement, and flexibility as key characteristics of successful mentor-mentee relationships. The Mentors, their peers, and the mentor training and intervention design facilitated these dynamics. Mentors established trust, rapport, and accountability in the first 1-2 sessions with mentees through self-disclosure, reassurance, non-judgement, and discussion of roles and expectations. They also reviewed the goals and referrals developed at baseline with each mentee and used this plan as an accountability tool throughout their sessions. Participants had also viewed an introductory video and read a short mentor biography prior to their first mentor meeting -- a step mentors felt increased participants’ enthusiasm and willingness to engage. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Despite similar histories and demographics that made them peers, the mentors had progressed beyond those they served and often approached interactions with mentees in a manner similar to that of academic mentors. Mentors’ expertise and life progress elevates their roles; additional tools from academic mentoring may aid their training and support.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The present study sought to investigate kratom use motives among the U.S population with the goal of discovering previously unknown health-related reasons for kratom use by the general public. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: To guide decisions regarding kratom regulation, the FDA solicited comments from the public regarding the abuse potential of these substances, medical usefulness, and impact of scheduling changes from July 2021 until August 2021. Comment participation was open to the public. The first 6,353 consecutive comments posted on the Federal Register website were retrieved and analyzed. Duplicate comments and comments not pertaining to kratom were excluded from the analysis. The comment submissions were reviewed and categorized using an inductive approach via thematic content analysis. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Respondents reported over 108 independent health-related reasons for kratom self-medication. Most often fell under the categories of mental health (1911 counts), pain management (1873 counts), substance use disorder (1635 counts), rheumatic diseases (613 counts), and degenerative spine diseases (247 counts). Many comments (701 counts) reported use for miscellaneous purposes, which included to increase focus (212 counts), treat insomnia (127 counts), and decrease fatigue (99 counts). Neurological diseases (e.g., migraines, restless legs syndrome, and multiple sclerosis) and digestive disorders (e.g., irritable bowel syndrome and Crohns Disease) were also reported (147 and 96 counts, respectively). Respondents also reported on the abuse potential and adverse effects of Kratom (122 counts). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study to delineate and classify motives for kratom use among Americans. Individuals reported using kratom for a wide spectrum of health-related reasons. Though these results may be influenced by the placebo effect, they suggest that kratom alkaloids may possess therapeutic activity for previously unknown applications.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To access obesity risk perceptions, knowledge and behaviors of Hispanic taxi cab drivers and develop a better understanding of the factors that influence health outcomes in this population. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Focus groups were conducted at NYC H+H/Lincoln, where subjects were screened and recruited from taxi bases with the help of the local Federation of Taxi Drivers. This was done by utilizing flyers, messages through taxi-base radios, and referrals from livery cab drivers. Approval from the local Institutional Review Board was obtained. The research investigators, developed a structured focus group procedural protocol of open-ended interview questions related to cardiovascular disease. Participants for the focus groups were older than 18 years old and working as livery cab drivers in NYC for at least 6 months. Three focus groups were held with informed consent obtained from each participant in their primary language before the start of each session. After completion of the focus group, participants received a gift voucher for attending the approximately 1-hour session. Focus groups were moderated by trained research staff members at Lincoln. Three main categories of questions were organized based on perception, knowledge, and behavior. Participants were questioned on topics about obesity, CVD and diabetes knowledge; knowledge about etiology, risk perception, possible prevention and interventions. Responses were recorded using audiotapes and transcribed verbatim. If participants did not elaborate on the initial question, a probing question was asked to clarify. The transcript was translated from Spanish by trained bilingual staff and analyzed using standard qualitative techniques with open code method. Four research investigators read the transcript separately and formulated concepts, which were then categorized and formulated into dominant themes. These themes were then compared and analyzed with a group consensus to ensure representative data. Once recurring themes emerged and the saturation point was reached, the study concluded, after enrolling 25 participants. The Health Believe Model (HBM) was employed to understand and explain the perceptions and behaviors of taxi drivers. HBM is one of the most widely recognized models and is used to understand, predict and modify health behavior. HBM helps to identify perception of risks of unhealthy behavior, barriers for having healthy behavior, actions taken by patients to stay healthy, self-efficacy and commitment to goals [12]. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Of the 25 Hispanic livery cab drivers, 92% were male. The majority of taxi drivers that participated in the study were immigrants (96%), with a mean age of 53 years (ranged 21–69), and 92%, were spoke Spanish. In total, 52% participants identified themselves as Hispanic, 20% White, 4% Black, and 20% did not identify their race. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 31 (22.8–38.7) kg/m2. In all, 56% were obese and another 40% were overweight. From this sample, 50% had been diagnosed with hypertension and 27% were living with diabetes. In all, 64% had a high school education or higher. Answers provided by the taxi drivers to focus group questions were recorded, reviewed and divided into 8 dominant themes based on concepts that emerged from the focus groups discussions. (a) Focus group study findings: Themes recorded during the focus group discussions, include poor diet, sedentary lifestyle, comorbidities/risk factors, stress, health not being a priority, discipline, education, and intervention. Participants shared their opinions in regards to these themes with minimal differences, making an emphasis on the fact that the nature of their profession was the root cause. Of the themes, the top 3 dominant themes include poor diet, sedentary/lifestyle and comorbidities/risk factors. (1) Diet: The theme “Poor diet” evolved from 151 related concepts that were described by participants. All 25 participants perceived their diet as bad due to eating high-fat meals associated with the cultural food and restaurant chains with lower food prices and ease of car parking. Drivers also reported that they did not have enough time to eat healthy foods based on their long working hours. They say: “comemos muy tarde por que preferimos montar un pasajero” … stating that they preferred to pick up passengers and delay their meals. However, they consider poor diet as the most decisive factor in their increased risk for obesity, diabetes, and hypertension. (2) Life Style: The theme “Sedentary lifestyle” was derived from 147 similar concepts described by participants. They believe that physical inactivity is another leading risk factor for obesity, diabetes, and CVD. The demands of the profession force them to drive more than 10 hours per day. They understand the importance of daily exercise but they admit that at the end of the workday they are too tired to exercise or “stop working” to participate in exercise as this means less money. They also understand that family history of obesity in addition to poor diet increases their risk of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular risks. (3) Comorbidity: The theme “Comorbidities” developed from 143 concepts grouped together. Taxi-drivers perceived that obesity complications directly affects many vital organs, such as the kidneys, the heart, and vasculature. Participants perceive obesity as important risk factor for high blood sugar and cholesterol levels. Taxi drivers see an association between their health condition and their work as a taxi driver. However, taxi-drivers reported that they are more concerned about the economic well-being of their families than themselves. Taxi-drivers begin to intervene in their own health only when more serious health conditions related to obesity, diabetes, and hypertension developed. (4) Work Stress: The theme “Stress/other risk factors” was derived from 141 concepts. Taxi-drivers perceive their profession with lack of organization and high-stress levels as one of the leading risk factors contributing to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. They also attribute a combination of stressful lifestyle, poor diet, lack of exercise, consumption of alcohol and cigarettes as determining factors in developing negative health outcomes. “One participant says; Tenemos el paquete completo” … we have the entire package. (5) Health as a priority: The theme “Health is not a priority” was derived from 120 concepts based on the cab drivers’ responses. Taxi drivers prioritize their work while their health takes a back seat. They work long shifts as they feel the pressures of financial responsibilities of their family. They admitted lack of intentions to change their behavior and they consider themselves as “hard headed.” Drivers changed their behavior only when serious health conditions develop that require professional medical attention. Taxi drivers explain that the lack of time as being a big factor in pursuing preventative care. (6) Personal Discipline: The theme “Discipline” evolved from 80 concepts derived from the driver’s transcripts. Taxi drivers are aware of their lack of organizational skills in general, especially when it comes to the balance between work and a healthy lifestyle. Taxi drivers recognize that not being disciplined results in the development of their obesity and chronic health conditions. Drivers admit that they do not have a fixed schedule, with no direct supervision, and cannot find the time to go to the doctor or change their behavior. (7) Health Education: The theme “Education” was derived from79 concepts noted from the focus group discussion. Taxi drivers know that their lack of health education is affecting them. With little understanding about the severity of the disease process it is difficult to take proactive measures. They are interested in the development of programs that will educate them about obesity, diabetes and CVD prevention. They want to attend programs that can educate them about prevention of obesity, diabetes, and CVD prevention with strong focus on healthy eating. They understand that this would increase their ability to change their unhealthy behavior. (8) Health interventions: The last major theme “Intervention” was derived out of 71 concepts. When asked about possible interventions that might help them towards healthy behaviors, taxi drivers think that the use of technology as a means of education is very effective. They understand the most direct route to reach them is by cellphone, email, and social media such as Facebook. They also feel that it would be good to use this type of communication to not only to inform them about health issues, but to also educate them directly. (b) Application of Health Behavior Model: We employed the HBM, one of the most utilized and easy to understand health models (18, 20–22) to explain the knowledge, perception, and health behaviors of our study participants. The HBM consist of 6 posits: (1) risk susceptibility, (2) risk severity, (3) benefits of action, and (4) barriers to action, (5) self-efficacy, and (6) cues to action [23]. According to the HBM, people’s beliefs about their risk and their perception of the benefits of taking action to avoid it, influence their readiness to take action [15, 21–22, 24]. Using the HBM, health behavior can be modified positively if the 6 posits are perceived by the person [23]. According to the results of our study, taxi drivers that participated in our study, do not perceive the severity of their risk. Participants admitted that they go to the doctor and start paying attention to their health condition only when they get seriously sick. Another posit of the HBM, understanding benefit of actions, is also not perceived by taxi drivers. Participants understand that they should be involved in physical activity, but do not pursue physical activity. They stated that they are too busy and tired to exercise daily without realizing the benefits of having a healthy life style. Findings from the focus groups also demonstrate that taxi drivers do not possess self-efficacy, as they are not confident that they are able to change their own health behavior. They openly admitted to having poor discipline, lack of organizational skills, and lack of time management skills. But, they expressed their wish to get information about time management, healthy snacks, places where they can get affordable and healthy food, learn more about different physical activities, and places where they can exercise. The sixth posit of the HBM model is the cues for action which should trigger the action to change behavior. Cues such as physical pain or illness in them or family members of cab drivers, trigger a visit to the physician’s office. Cab drivers were open to receiving educational material provided by physicians or health information provided on TV/cellphone about disease prevention. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Obesity is steadily on the increase in the US population and has become a major public health concern [1–3]. Latinos are at the higher risk of heart diseases such as obesity, hypertension compared to other ethnical groups [3, 13]. There is a higher prevalence of obesity among particular occupational groups with cab drivers having one of the highest obesity prevalence among all professions [5, 7–9, 13]. Obesity risks therefore seem to affect NYC cab drivers who are of Latino background more than others. Surveys conducted in different countries in Asia, Europe, and Africa reported that taxi, truck, and bus show that drivers are at a higher risk of developing obesity, diabetes, and hypertension [5, 8–11]. This study is the first to evaluate the knowledge, perception, and behaviors of NYC Latino taxi cab drivers with respect to obesity. The study uncovers factors and barriers that contribute to their behavior, and identify possible ways that can modify their behavior and decrease their chances of developing obesity. The study results demonstrated that Latino immigrant taxi drivers perceive themselves at a high risk for obesity development. As the result of discussions with focus groups, the eight dominant themes were identified. Participants perceive their risk susceptibility and understand that working as a driver is a sedentary occupation with lack of physical activity significantly contributing to obesity development. Additionally, taxi drivers report that their unhealthy diet is a major factor that contributes to their weight gain. Taxi drivers perceive their poor diet as the result of the food they consume being high in fat content. Due to financial constraints and their cultural diet requirements, they feel limited to unhealthy food options. They acknowledge the risk that poor diet contributes to obesity, high cholesterol, obesity development. Participants also expressed that work stress is another important factor. Busy traffic, lack of organization, financial stress to support their families-push them to work prolonged hours. Participants also admitted that in their leisure time, they use alcohol, smoke cigarettes, and watch TV, instead of going to the gym, because they feel too tired to exercise. Taxi drivers perceive their barriers as a lack of education and knowledge about healthy food choices, places where they can buy healthy affordable snacks, information about physical activities, stress management skills, and organizational skills. Other perceived barriers that prevent them from leading healthy lifestyle include lack of discipline, lack of time for physical activity, economic uncertainty, financial responsibility and the perception that the wellbeing of their families is more important than themselves and their health. HBM is a widely used model that helps to identify perception of risks of unhealthy behavior, barriers to healthy behavior, actions taken by patients to stay healthy, self-efficacy, and commitment to goals. Based on the Glasgow theory, the core of health behavior models is the identification of the barriers and self-efficacy [25]. Our study is unique as it involves using the HBM to explain the basis of taxi cab drivers’ behavior. Results of our research study showed that our participants perceived barriers very well. However, lack of self-efficacy, lack of perceiving benefits of action, lack of cues to action, and lack of understanding the risk of disease severity explain why taxi drivers have greater risk for obesity among occupations, and are not ready to embrace health behavior modification. This qualitative study shows us where the window of opportunity for intervention lies, how we can intervene and modify the health behavior of the at-risk NYC Latino cab driver population. By Glasgow theory, self-efficacy is an important factor in behavior modification models [25]. If the barriers that are perceived by participants as too high, and self-efficacy is low, one can intervene by improving self-efficacy. Bandura has offered ways to increase patients’ self-efficacy by using three strategies: (a) setting small, incremental, and achievable goals; (b) using formalized behavioral contracting to establish goals and specify rewards; and (c) monitoring and reinforcement, including patient self-monitoring by keeping records [20]. We can also improve perception of the benefits of action by providing cues to action namely education during the office visits, by providing reading materials, and the use of modern technology (emails, interactive Web sites, apps, etc.). A study was conducted in South Asia, encouraging taxi drivers to exercise through the use of pedometers [7]. This study provides an example of ways to motivate taxi drivers, improve their self-efficacy, overcome barriers, and provide cues to action. As one of the theories that can explain and help in behavioral modification, the Health Belief model includes the impact of the environment and elements of social learning. Using this model, we were able to differentiate and identify the factors that influence their behavior that need to be addressed by health care workers and public health representatives to improve obesity related risks among inner city taxi cab drivers in NYC.

Objectives/Goals: Our hub’s annual survey evaluates the impacts of our institute’s support on investigators’ research productivity and real-world impacts. We have piloted new measures to establish valid and reliable approaches to measuring short- and long-term translational science impacts of interest to the CTSAs. Methods/Study Population: SC CTSI developed an annual survey to assess our institute’s impact on investigators’ research productivity, sustained engagement in behaviors of translational scientists, and real-world impacts. In 2023, we piloted two versions of the TSBM 30-elements across four domains. In 2025, we piloted a 20-item hallmarks of a Translational Scientist scale covering collaboration, mindset, capacity building, and planning for D&I and real-world impact. After online administration to over 700 CTSI-supported USC and CHLA-affiliated researchers, data are analyzed using descriptive statistics and exploratory factor analysis, to assess factor structure, item loadings, validity, and reliability. Results/Anticipated Results: Prior analyses showed that 27/30 TSBM items aligned well with intended domains, with clinical/medical and policy benefits demonstrating strong internal consistency. Current analyses will establish the psychometric properties of the new Hallmarks of a Translational Scientist scale and sub-domains. Refinement of items and best practices will be shared. Anticipated outcomes include standardized tools for CTSA evaluators to assess short- and long-term translational science impacts. The survey aims to enable consistent measurement of translational science benefits, support longitudinal tracking, and strengthen cross-hub comparisons of real-world impact beyond research productivity. Discussion/Significance of Impact: The validated impact measures shared in this session advance translational science evaluation. Standardized items assessing translational science short- and long-term impacts are of interest to the CTSA community and any organization engaged in translational science capacity building.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: In this pilot study, we are testing a new approach for detecting neuroinflammation in individuals who have sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI). We hypothesize that many long-term adverse consequences of TBI are driven by abnormal inflammatory processes in the brain that occur secondary to the original neural injury. This inflammation can spread well beyond the damaged tissue and cause profound fatigue, widespread pain, cognitive impairment, and depressed mood. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Using a technique based on magnetic resonance spectroscopy, we can obtain precise and accurate temperature measurements throughout the human brain, which may serve as a proxy for neuroinflammation. In this study, we examine 20 men who have sustained a moderate-to-severe TBI and 10 age-matched healthy men without history of TBI. Temperature is assessed on a voxel-by-voxel basis throughout the entire brain. Cognitive ability is measured with the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). Information on pain, fatigue, and mood is collected through questionnaire. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We anticipate that (1) average whole-brain temperature will be significantly higher in the TBI group than the healthy control group; (2) severity of (a) pain, (b) fatigue, and (c) mood symptoms will be correlated with brain temperature; and (3) severity of cognitive impairment will be correlated with brain temperature. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: If the hypotheses are confirmed, this tool will fill a need for objective tests of TBI pathology that can be used to improve diagnostic and treatment decisions and predict long-term functioning. This test would be the first completely noninvasive tool for detecting neuroinflammation, and will allow for safe and inexpensive longitudinal testing. Ultimately, we hope this noninvasive scanning technique will accurately track neuroinflammation in TBI, leading to more targeted and effective treatments.

Objectives/Goals: The University of Illinois Chicago’s Center for Clinical and Translational Science has implemented an innovative approach to program evaluation. We blend high-impact quantitative and in-depth qualitative approaches to identify local and national impacts and areas for improvement that are not captured solely by traditional quantitative methods. Methods/Study Population: CCTS manages service requests and investigator demographics through an in-house system that our evaluation program utilizes to report on service requests, investigator satisfaction, and investigator demographics to service groups, CTSA and campus leadership, and other stakeholders throughout the year. Through this system, we are able to regularly survey and interview investigators about their experiences and solicit feedback about the service process. During interviews, we focus on questions about receiving services, recommendations for CCTS and colleagues, and plans to work with CCTS in the future. This mixed-methods approach helps us lay the foundation to expand evaluation beyond reporting and establish a robust CQI program that focuses both on CCTS staff needs and improving investigator experiences. Results/Anticipated Results: Soliciting both quantitative and qualitative feedback from investigators has enabled our service groups to make significant changes to their internal processes to ensure that investigators are aware of services and supports available. Our quantitative data show us that investigators return time and again to CCTS for services and supports. Yet the feedback we receive through short, targeted interviews also helps identify challenges that investigators experience that could improve the services they come to us to receive. We have already used this system to recommend improved marketing of existing services within certain service groups that were highly requested by investigators, which increased utilization of that service. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Our mixed-method approach to evaluation allows us to easily and rapidly identify areas for improvement within our service groups, an instrumental part of implementing a CQI program that is focused on staff-identified areas of improvement. This approach can be easily replicated by other CTSA hubs with minimal impact to existing resources.