ABSTRACT IMPACT: This work is intended to improve community engagement salons both virtually and generally in order to maximize the benefit of this vital research tool. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The Meharry-Vanderbilt Community Engaged Research Core (CERC) provides a protocol to maintain high standards in community engagement studios, even in a virtual setting amidst a pandemic. A virtual community engagement salon was selected as a case study to evaluate outcomes. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A virtual salon regarding sun safety in the Latinx community was observed live via Zoom and as a recording afterward. Following dissemination and completion of the post-meeting surveys, authors compiled and reviewed the results. An assessment was developed to determine the salon’s alignment with the Meharry-Vanderbilt CERC guidelines in a virtual setting; this was designated as the primary outcome. Data from the session were compared to the available literature on the topic, which produced three subheadings to the secondary outcome essential to the success of virtual community engagement salons: researcher preparedness, participant selection, and survey importance. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The CERC guidelines of the community engagement salon were met and were effectively translated into a virtual setting. The presentation given by the researcher followed all technical instructions, yet it was clear that the researcher’s demeanor and conversational soft-skills were lacking. Instead of the recommended bi-directional flow of conversation, the conversation flow shifted to a unidirectional state controlled by the participants. Following the session, only three participants completed the survey along with the researcher. This completion rate of under 50% provides limited feedback on participants’ perspectives on the session’s quality and points to improve future sessions. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: Pre-meeting researcher preparation is necessary to engage community stakeholders effectively. The lack of completed surveys from participants suggests potential fatigue from leading a majority of the conversation. Results demonstrate that solely meeting the requirements of the CERC does not suffice.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Community-engaged research can provide important input to researchers to understand the impact of health services on diverse communities. In emergency (911) dispatch research, most studies have focused on specific health conditions, especially on identifying and managing those conditions remotely and identifying the most appropriate resources to send. Community-engaged research can add a needed component to these studies, identifying not only what happens when someone calls 911, but who calls and who doesn’t, what barriers community members encounter when they call, and what they expect from their 911 service. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A recent study published in the Journal of Clinical and Translational Science outlined a method for identifying and evaluating the needed competencies and readiness of individual researchers to do effective community-engaged research. The investigators involved in an ongoing study on community attitudes toward 911 propose to use the methods outlined in that study to receive feedback from their Community Advisory Board on their own competencies and readiness. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: It is anticipated that 13 people will be involved in providing feedback to the investigators, including all official member of the Community Advisory Boards and all supportive academic staff and faculty. The feedback will be gathered using a survey instrument developed from the recently-published study and will include questions about the purpose of the research, openness to feedback, communication, cultural sensitivity, community presence, power sharing, recognizing partner contributions, and developing community capacity. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Identifying the most appropriate resources to send to any given emergency is the primary role of the emergency dispatcher. However, they are also public servants, providing care and comfort in a time of stress to members of many diverse communities. As such, it is critical that they understand the needs and expectations of those communities, as well as the barriers they face in calling 911. The proposed study adds value to an ongoing community-engaged research project by providing feedback about readiness and competency to the investigators.

Objectives/Goals: Texas Southern University (TSU), a low-resourced HBCU and one of the largest in the USA, without an affiliated hospital, clinic network, or patient population, established a community-focused clinical research site to educate, recruit, and expand research participation, especially among those with unmet health needs. Methods/Study Population: The implementation process involved strategic planning in five key areas as below: * Collaboration: Partnered with mentor site to align site capabilities with industry standards * Capacity Building: EstablishCTMS, eReg, eSource, and REDCap workflow * Workforce Training: Hired and strengthened research personnel expertise through training, certification, and mentorship * Community Engagement: Enhanced trusted relationships with community members, key stakeholders, and advisory board members * Infrastructure Development: Defined site capabilities: regulatory processes, data management, IRB optimization, budgeting, contract management, and prospective study feasibility assessments. Developed standard operating procedures and clinical research registry for site readiness Results/Anticipated Results: A first of its kind Community-Focused Clinical Research Site in a low-resourced HBCU without an affiliated hospital, clinic network, or patient population was successfully established at TSU with mentorship by the University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston, PhRMA Foundation EQBMED, and RCMI Coordinating Center. A registry for potential research participants was successfully implemented in May 2025. Since its inception, 160 community members have indicated interest in clinical research registry participation. 56 community members are fully enrolled in the registry. Key challenges included bridging feasibility gaps at TSU, navigating the development of new clinical research infrastructure, and managing regulatory and contracting approval timeline. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Establishing a clinical research site in a low-resourced HBCU without an affiliated hospital requires cross-disciplinary collaboration and intentional community engagement. TSU’s approach offers a replicable model for integrating clinical research to expand access to community member especially among those with unmet health needs.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Low-dose aspirin is an established treatment to prevent preeclampsia, a leading cause of maternal and perinatal complications. Nevertheless, aspirin failure is not uncommon. We are investigating whether a gain-of-function genetic polymorphism in a platelet thrombin receptor is associated with aspirin failure in the prevention of preeclampsia. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Women who had preeclampsia in an initial pregnancy who then received low-dose aspirin in a subsequent pregnancy will be evaluated. We will compare between women who developed preeclampsia despite aspirin (aspirin non-responders) to women who did not develop preeclampsia with aspirin treatment (aspirin responders). Specifically, we will evaluate the allelic frequency of a single nucleotide variant (rs773902) in PAR4 thrombin receptor on platelets. This variant is associated with increased platelet function and potentially aspirin resistance. In addition, we will analyze the platelet response to PAR4 activation before and 1 hour after administering a single 81 mg enteric-coated aspirin tablet. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We hypothesize that the prevalence of the PAR4 variant will be significantly higher among women who had recurrence of preeclampsia despite aspirin therapy. We also postulate that women who developed preeclampsia despite aspirin prophylaxis and have the polymorphism will have increased platelet aggregation in response to activation of PAR4, either by thrombin or peptides that activate the receptor, both at baseline and 1 hour after aspirin administration. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: If our hypothesis that aspirin failure in preeclampsia prevention is associated with the gain-of-function polymorphism in the platelet PAR4 thrombin receptor, there may be justification for additional experimental studies to assess whether better pregnancy outcomes can be obtained by targeting thrombin itself using low molecular weight heparin.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Healthcare costs for falls are expected to reach nearly 55 billion dollars annually in the US by 2020. Leveraging 911 calls as trigger events to activate fall prevention solutions could transform our ability to identify high-risk individuals and significantly improve fall prevention strategies globally. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: An innovative pilot program entitled Community-centered Fall Intervention Team (Community FIT). Community FIT that leverages 911 calls, implementation science approaches, community partnerships, and collaboration among multiple healthcare disciplines including physical therapists, community paramedics, physicians, and social service coordinators was used to design and implement a community paramedicine fall intervention program. 911 call reports from February 2016 – August 2019 were analyzed using time series analyses to measure community level outcomes in fall-related calls and transports. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 224 grab bars were installed free of charge to local residents (averaging approximately $125 per home for modifications).Over an 18-month period, time series analysis indicated an approximate demonstrated a consistent drop in the average fall-related 911 calls per month from 11.6 to 4.5 calls (a change of 61.21%) and a decrease of 58% in the transport rates to the hospital for fall-related 911 calls. 911 referrals to the community paramedicine program have also increased by 83%, demonstrating increased activation of fall prevention strategies with Community FIT. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Collectively, these pilot study results provide preliminary support for individual and system level improvements in fall prevention by leveraging 911 calls to activate a community medicine fall prevention program. Future studies are needed to determine reach, long-term effectiveness, and sustainability of the program. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DESCRIPTION: Johnson & Johnson Hip Fracture Advisory Board (not related to project submission)

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: In March 2019, Duke updated recruitment guidelines and adopted an “Engagement” policy that requires patients to ‘opt-out’ of communications regarding potential research participation. This created an opportunity to evaluate recruitment for ongoing clinical studies pre and post implementation. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Implementation of the new policy required new training for study teams, modification to recruitment plans, and expansion of ongoing efforts to improve direct-to-patient messaging through EPIC/MyChart tools. The impact of this new policy on overall recruitment was monitored and characterized both prior to and after implementation of the policy. Customized MyChart messages have been generated for over 22 studies, with a total of 41,386 messages sent to potential participants. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Only a small number of study teams have modified their recruitment plans with transition to the new policy. This may be related to lack of understanding about policy implementation, potential recruitment opportunities, required training, resource limitations, etc. However, our case study, TMIST, had an 48% improvement in average enrollment within the first 2 months of implementation, and an almost 40% improvement in recruitment efficiency. Since becoming an “opt-out” institution, 11 study teams have implemented direct-to-patient recruitment via the MyChart patient portal. One unintended consequence we’ve noted is several different study invitations to potential participants within some patient populations. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The new policy allows study teams to engage in direct-to-patient outreach, leading to an increase in enrollment for some studies. Incorporation of direct-to-patient messaging strategies can be a cost and resource saving measure to improve recruitment. The need to recruit similar populations demonstrated that strategic, thoughtful approaches are needed.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: This study examines psychological resilience in adults living with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) in the U.S. aiming to explore how psychological resilience is defined by this community. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Participants were recruited between 2014 – 2018, from across the U.S. as part of an ongoing cross-sectional study: Insights into Microbiome and Environmental Contributions to Sickle Cell Disease and Leg Ulcers Study (INSIGHTS). Inclusion criteria included age of 18 or older, with a clinical history of SCD, and were interviewed if they completed the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) as part of INSIGHTS. 150 study participants were separated by their BRS scores into “High” and “Low” scoring quartiles. 30 participants were randomly selected, 15 from the lowest quartile and 15 from the highest. All participants completed the Connor Davidson Resilience (CD) measure at the end of their qualitative interview. All identified as Black with an average age of 42.5 (13 F, 17 M). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Three main concepts emerged within both groups in response to the question “How do you define resilience?” (a) not giving up (b) how one deals with challenges and (c) moving forward. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our analysis shows that the BRS may not be a precise or accurate indicator of the resilience of adults living with SCD. Therefore, it remains to be seen if these measures are descriptive of these individuals true psychological or physiological state as they have not been used in this community until now.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Smoking is a well-established risk factor for lung cancer, but never smokers account for up to 25% of lung cancer cases. There is mounting evidence that lung cancer in never smokers is biologically distinct. We aim to characterize the genomic and immunologic features of lung adenocarcinoma in never smokers versus smokers. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We examined clinical, genomic, and bulk-RNA sequencing data from 499 patients in the TCGA lung adenocarcinoma cohort. Tumor mutation burden was analyzed using maftools (R package). Tumor immune characterization was completed using CIBERSORTx, a digital cytometry tool that uses single cell reference profiles to determine immune cell type frequencies from bulk-RNA sequencing data. Single cell reference profiles for 19 different immune cell types were constructed from sequencing of freshly resected lung tumor tissue from UCSF patients. Partitioning Around Medoids (PAM; R package) was used to identify distinct immune phenotypes based on immune cell composition. Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate for associations between immune phenotypes and smoking status. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Of the 499 TCGA lung adenocarcinoma patients, 75 were never smokers, 269 were female, and 246 were over the age of 65. Never smokers had lower tumor mutation burden and lower predicted neoantigen burden compared to smokers (p < 0.001). There was no difference in total tumor immune cell infiltration between never smokers and smokers. PAM yielded 2 distinct clusters/immune phenotypes. The first was enriched in M1 Macrophages, cytotoxic T Cells, helper T Cells, regulatory T Cells, and Plasma Cells. The second was enriched in plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells, M2 Macrophages, and exhausted cytotoxic T Cells. Never smoking status was associated with an increased odds of having the first immune phenotype (OR 1.95, 95% CI: 1.15 - 3.35) and this association was statistically significant (p = 0.0086). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that never smokers have an immune phenotype that is distinct from that observed in smokers. The distinct immune characteristics we observed could explain clinical trial data suggesting immune checkpoint inhibitors are less effective in never smokers and hold implications for tailoring therapy.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The goal of this study is to characterize traumatic events and post-traumatic stress symptom severity experienced by caregivers of children with hydrocephalus. Results will eventually be evaluated and compared with demographic and medical characteristics. This study is part of a larger research project that aims to (1) determine the prevalence and risk factors for post-traumatic stress symptoms in pediatric hydrocephalus patients and their caregivers; (2) develop a targeted intervention to mitigate its effects and pilot test the intervention. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Caregivers of children with hydrocephalus that have received surgical treatment (CSF shunt or ETV/CPC) were enrolled during routine follow up visit in a pediatric neurosurgery clinic. Caregivers completed the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), a 20-item self-report measure that assesses the presence and severity of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Participant responses (n=56) revealed that 57.14% of caregivers indicated that their most traumatic event was directly related to their child’s medical condition. In total, 23.21% of caregivers did not specify their most traumatic event and 1.79% of caregivers indicated that they had never experienced a traumatic event. Median Total Symptom Severity Score was 11 (mean: 15.32±14.92), and scores ranged from 0 to 67; 32.14% of caregivers scored 19 or greater, and 16.07% of caregivers scored 33 or greater, a value suggestive of a provisional diagnosis of PTSD. Severity scores by DSM-V clusters were as follows: cluster B—intrusion symptoms (mean: 4.91±4.77, median: 4, range: 0–20), cluster C—avoidance symptoms (mean: 1.27±1.87, median: 0.5, range: 0–8), cluster D—negative alterations in cognition and mood (mean: 4.86±6.07, median: 2, range: 0–22), and cluster E—alterations in arousal and reactivity (mean: 4.29±4.07, median: 3, range: 0–17). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Preliminary results from this study indicate that post-traumatic stress symptoms are prevalent among caregivers of children with hydrocephalus. These results suggest that psychosocial issues such as PTSS may be a significant problem in need of treatment, that is not traditionally addressed as part of routine care for families of children with hydrocephalus. Characterizing post-traumatic stress symptoms in this population sets the foundation for the development of screening and treatment protocols for post-traumatic stress symptoms in caregivers of children with hydrocephalus. This study is the first step towards fundamentally improving routine clinical care and quality of life for patients with hydrocephalus and their caregivers by understanding and addressing the effects of traumatic stress.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The peer-reviewed journal Progress in Community Health Partnerships (PCHP) promotes health research partnerships to improve community health. PCHP’s Writing, Dissemination and Reviewer Learning Community Pilot aims to increase stakeholders writing and reviewing for greater relevance and diversity. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Led by PCHP’s Editorial Team, Morehouse SOM, Community-Campus Partnerships for Health (CCPH) and a community-academic Workgroup, the LC will guide stakeholders on scholarly writing and publish collaborative research. It builds on the 2017 Writing/Dissemination Learning Institute held by Morehouse, CCPH, and Community Based Organization Partners with the APHA Public Health Caucus. The LC begins with a Workshop [https://sites.google.com/view/pchp2023/pchpcommunity2023] alongside the 2023 APHA Annual Meeting. Wrap arounds include a PCHP Special Issue (participants work), Webinars, PCHP Reflections/Community Perspectives Article Guidelines [https://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/progress-community-health-partnerships-research-education-and-action], “Beyond the Manuscript [https://open.spotify.com/show/2LiBanXAyHyOqNSeGnBPHs]” Podcast, Toolkit/Resources; and coaching. The evaluation will inform PCHP practices. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Key outcomes include successful implementation of all LI activities. The cohort (approximately 40 stakeholders representing partnerships) will increase exposure to scholarly writing and peer review, ideally publish 12+ manuscripts (e.g., PCHP special issue), increase diversity in scholarly writing, and strengthen recognition/significance of stakeholder authorship in the research community. The year 1 pilot evaluation (e.g., tracking participant authorship, documenting outcomes/lessons learned) will provide evidence to encourage sustainability, model responsiveness among other peer reviewed journals, inform PCHP, and increase diversity in scholarly writing on health disparities research. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The pilot will build a sustainable model and how PCHPaddresses health disparities to increase diversity, equity, and inclusion. The LC aims to diversify framing community health research, supporting/publishing stakeholders work, and increasing diversity among reviewers, all impacting the field.

ABSTRACT IMPACT: This work will inform and improve the way we assess and treat distress in women with endometrial cancer. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Distress from cancer is associated with worse processes of care. Differences in outcomes by race/ethnicity in endometrial cancer (EC) are well documented, but differences in distress have not been previously explored. Here we characterize the association between race/ethnicity, distress scores, and stressors reported by patients with EC. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Patients presenting to a single academic outpatient gynecologic oncology practice for initial evaluation of known EC from January 2013-May 2020 were included. The electronic health record was used to abstract demographics, National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer and Problem List (NCCN DT) scores and stressor categories (physical, emotional, spiritual, practical, and family) from the initial encounter. Referral to support services occurs at NCCN DT score ≥4. We excluded women who received prior cancer-directed therapy and those without an initial NCCN DT score. Summary statistics were tabulated for demographics. Mann-Whitney U tests were used for inter-group difference on continuous variables and 2-sample tests for equality of proportions were used for binary variables. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 412 non-Hispanic White (NHW, mean age 63) and 149 non-Hispanic Black (NHB, mean age 65) women were included in our analysis. More NHB women presented with high-grade EC (53.7%) vs NHW women (21.9%) and fewer NHB women were privately insured (32% vs 52%). Median distress scores were higher in NHW women compared to their NHB counterparts (4 vs. 2, p<0.001) and NHB women were more likely to report a distress score of 0 compared to their NHW counterparts (32% vs 19%, p=0.001). 50.5% NHW women had a score ≥4 and thus qualified for referral to services compared to 20.7% of NHB women (p=0.02). Of those referred, NHB and NHW women declined referral to support services at similar rates (35.1% vs 34.5%; NS). There was a significant difference in the median number of stressors reported by NHW and NHB women, (4 vs 3 stressors; p=0.02). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: The NCCN DT, a widely used tool in cancer clinics, may fail to adequately measure distress in NHB women presenting with a diagnosis of EC, despite >30% more high-risk histology cancers in this cohort. This difference leads to disparities in referral to additional support services, which may affect quality of care and quality of life.

Objectives/Goals: The purpose of this study was to explore pharmacists’ and patients’ attitudes, contextual barriers, organizational readiness, and preferences regarding implementation of a mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) program for chronic pain management in the community pharmacy setting in rural Alabama. Methods/Study Population: Pharmacists in independently owned community pharmacies and patients ≥18 treated for chronic pain in the past year in rural Alabama were recruited via purposive and snowball sampling. One-hour virtual semi-structured interviews were conducted by Marketry, a qualitative market research company. Interview questions were guided by the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) and focused on 1) knowledge/awareness; 2) attitudes; 3) barriers/facilitators (e.g., demand, reimbursement); 4) pharmacies’ organizational readiness (e.g., technology, personnel, and culture); and 5) program preferences (content, format) regarding a potential pharmacy-based MBSR program for chronic pain management. Interview transcripts were analyzed using deductive content analysis to identify themes. Results/Anticipated Results: A total of 60 interviews were conducted (n = 30 pharmacists, n = 30 patients). Qualitative data analysis is ongoing and is expected to be completed by December 2024. Interviewee’s responses describing knowledge, attitudes, barriers, facilitators, pharmacies’ organizational readiness, and recommended program elements will be categorized according to the CFIR domains of “inner setting,” “outer setting,” “intervention characteristics,” and “characteristics of individuals.” Domains will be summarized with over-arching themes. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Findings are expected to inform development of a community pharmacy-based MBSR program for chronic pain management. This serves as the first step in building and implementing a sustainable, accessible community pharmacy-based program offering a nonopioid alternative for pain management in the underserved rural Deep South.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS:

• Conduct an environmental scan of Marion County (Indianapolis) neighborhoods using electronic medical record data, state health data, and social and economic data

• Develop strong network of community collaborators

• Conduct a thorough assessment for each targeted neighborhood by listening and understanding the pressing health issues in the community and working together to design and deliver solutions

METHODS/STUDY POPULATION:

• Identify measures in the 3 domains of vulnerability, health and assets for the targeted neighborhoods and conduct bivariate descriptive statistics and multivariable regression analyses to investigate association between measures of vulnerability and health outcomes.

• Initiate relationships with leaders and residents in targeted neighborhoods

• Locate organizations working in targeted neighborhoods through online mapping software and word-of-mouth at neighborhood events, and created a spreadsheet with contact information.

• Conduct multidisciplinary assessment (i.e. key informant interviews, focus groups, town hall meetings) of the targeted neighborhood.

• Iteratively synthesize assessments to develop areas of interest and relevance to the community.

• Develop a road map for solutions identified by the community.

RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The results from the environmental scan conducted will be displayed in a report and visual “map” of health outcomes and health determinants, including assets and barriers for the targeted neighborhoods. The research team will use results from the environmental scan coupled with listening activities including attendance at community events, key informant interviews and focus groups to develop relationships and strong collaborations with the targeted neighborhood stakeholders. The relationship building between the research team and community will provide increased trust and engagement that will further enhance the effectiveness of the assessments completed with the targeted neighborhood. The assessments will help to empower communities to develop sustainable solutions and drive future work that will lead to future grant applications and larger-scale implementation in other community impact hub neighborhoods. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Through the community impact hub work, we will develop collaborative efforts with targeted neighborhoods with the greatest health inequities in the Marion County area. In partnership with these neighborhoods, we will build a foundation – a network of community collaborators and a focused plan – upon which we will improve the health outcomes of residents while learning best practices on how to do so.

Objectives/Goals: To describe the early implementation of the FDA-approved Shield blood-based colorectal cancer screening test using a mobile health unit serving rural Louisiana, assessing population reach and acceptability of the test. Methods/Study Population: This is a secondary analysis of implementation data collected by the Partners in Wellness (PIW) Mobile Health Unit between February and August 2025. The mobile unit includes a designated blood-draw space where specimens were collected by a trained phlebotomist or a registered nurse following standardized procedures. Adults aged ≥45 years were eligible. De-identified demographic information and Shield test results were analyzed descriptively. All individuals with positive results were referred for colonoscopy, and those with inconclusive results were offered Cologuard stool-based testing. One participant declined the stool-based testing. Results/Anticipated Results: A total of 77 individuals completed Shield testing the mean age was 59.5 years (range 30.6–89.9). Most were female (98.7%), representing 31 rural cities and one urban city. Racial/ethnic distribution included African American (33), White (26), Hispanic/Latino (16), Pacific Islander (5), and Asian (1) participants. Test outcomes were negative (87%), positive (10%), and inconclusive (3%). All positive participants were referred for colonoscopy. Among inconclusive cases, two were offered stool-based testing and one declined. Implementation was well accepted and demonstrated operational feasibility within mobile health services. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Integrating an FDA-approved blood-based colorectal cancer screening test into a mobile health program demonstrates a scalable and innovative strategy to reach medically underserved populations. This model can transform rural screening delivery and advance cancer health equity.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: While hospital-hospital transfers of pediatric patients is often necessary, some pediatric transfers are potentially avoidable. Pediatric potentially avoidable transfers (PAT) represent a process with high costs and safety risks but few, if any, benefits. To better understand this issue, we described pediatric inter-facility transfers with early discharges. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We conducted a descriptive study using electronic medical record data at a single-center over a 12-month period to examine characteristics of pediatric patients with a transfer admission source and early discharge. Among patients with early discharges, we performed descriptive statistics for PAT defined as patient transfers with a discharge home within 24 hours without receiving any specialized tests, interventions, consultations, or diagnoses. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Of the 2414 pediatric transfers 31.2% were discharged home within 24 hours. Among transferred patients with early discharges, 348 patients (14.4% of total patient transfers) received no specialized tests, interventions, consultations, or diagnoses. Direct admissions were categorized as PAT 2.2-fold more frequently than transfers arriving to the emergency department. Among transferred direct admissions, PAT proportions to the neonatal intensive care unit (ICU), pediatric ICU, and non-ICU were 5.8%, 17.4%, and 27.3%, respectively. Respiratory infections, asthma, and fractures were the most common PAT diagnoses. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Early discharges and PAT are relatively common among transferred pediatric patients. Further studies are needed to identify the etiologies and clinical impacts of PAT, with a focus on direct admissions given the high frequency of PAT among direct admissions to both the pediatric ICU and non-ICU.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Background: The importance of engaging community in research and fostering community-academic research partnerships is increasingly acknowledged by Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) institutes. However, forming and maintaining such collaborations is often hampered by numerous challenges. It is critical to investigate the barriers to effective community-academic partnerships and to develop novel approaches to overcome these barriers. Objective: To explore community and academic perspectives of the challenges faced by community-academic research partnerships and potential solutions to these identified challenges. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Methods: In an effort to explore creative approaches to address these issues, the Community Engagement Program at the Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research (MICHR), the CTSA site that serves Michigan, hosted a retreat to elicit the input of community members and academics from across the state. There was a mix of participants ranging from those with established community-academic partnerships to others who were new to community-engaged research and in early stages of forming partnerships. At the retreat, attendees were randomly divided into groups and asked to answer the specific question, “What are your barriers to partnering in research?” After each group identified a set of barriers and reported their findings to the entire room, attendees were asked to work again in their small groups to discuss potential solutions to these barriers. Ideas for solutions were also shared with the entire room. As part of the process of brainstorming about these questions, attendees were asked to document their ideas --- for both barriers and solutions --- on post-it notes which were then grouped by category. Artifacts from the retreat were saved digitally and transcripts made from these records. The findings were then analyzed to identify common themes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Results: Eighty-six participants attended the retreat from across the state of Michigan. Forty-three represented community organizations that focus on addressing a wide array of social determinants of health issues. The remaining forty-three participants represented various academic institutions. The most frequently mentioned challenges to community-academic partnerships were related to communication and relationship building. To overcome barriers in these areas, participants noted that it is critical to collaboratively and explicitly identify shared goals, values and norms in the early stages of partnership development. This was closely linked to the need for additional funding to help foster and strengthen relationships by allowing partners to spend time together to both work and socialize informally, preferably in face-to-face settings. These were deemed crucial for building trust and common ground. In addition, more equitable funding and role distribution --- including shared leadership and governance of research projects between community and academia--- that recognizes and supports the true costs of involvement in research for community members was viewed as important. Other frequently noted issues on the part of community members were the need for greater respect for community partners and for more training opportunities to build capacity within communities to participate in research. Participants from academic institutions emphasized that the current requirements and timeline for promotion in academia make it harder for them to participate in community-engaged research, especially as early career researchers. They maintained that wider recognition of the value of community-engaged research is necessary and that this requires the support of home departments. Finally, participants underscored the importance of building infrastructure to better connect potential partners from the community and academia by making it easier to identify common interests and reciprocal strengths. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Conclusion: The problems faced by community-academic partnerships may be alleviated by working with community and academic members to identify potential solutions. Further work is needed to systematically examine barriers and the efficacy of solutions to enhance community-academic partnerships. Acknowledgements: We thank all attendees of the MICHR Community Engagement retreat for their participation in this activity that explored barriers to effective community-academic partnerships. Their honest and frank feedback was essential to broaching sensitive topics related to partnership development, and to identify realistic and practical solutions. We also thank all members of the planning committee and our colleagues in the Community Engagement Program for their work on bringing together community and academic members for this retreat. This project was supported by grant number UL1TR002240 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS).

Justice-involved youth (JIY) have high rates of behavioral health disorders, but few can access, much less complete, treatment in the community. Behavioral health treatment completion among JIY is poorly understood, even within treatment studies. Measurement, reporting, and rates of treatment completion vary across studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes the literature on rates of treatment completion among JIY enrolled in research studies and identifies potential moderators. After systematically searching 6 electronic databases, data from 13 studies of 20 individual treatment groups were abstracted and coded. A meta-analysis examined individual prevalence estimates of treatment completion in research studies as well as moderator analyses. Prevalence effect sizes revealed high rates of treatment completion (pr = 82.6). However, analysis suggests a high likelihood that publication bias affected the results. Treatment groups that utilized family- or group-based treatment (pr = 87.8) were associated with higher rates of treatment completion compared to treatment groups utilizing individual treatment (pr = 61.1). Findings suggest that it is possible to achieve high rates of treatment completion for JIY, particularly within the context of family- and group-based interventions. However, these findings are limited by concerns about reporting of treatment completion and publication bias.