Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T16:25:34.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pricing Two Heterogeneous Trees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

Nicole Branger,
Christian Schlag and
Lue Wu
Nicole Branger
Affiliation:
Finance Center Münster, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Universitätsstr. 14-16, 48143 Münster, Germany. nicole.branger@wiwi.uni-muenster.de
Christian Schlag
Affiliation:
Goethe University, House of Finance, Grüneburgplatz 1, 60323 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. schlag@finance.uni-frankfurt.de
Lue Wu
Affiliation:
Goethe University, House of Finance, Grüneburgplatz 1, 60323 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. wu_lue@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We consider a Lucas-type exchange economy with two heterogeneous stocks (trees) and a representative investor with constant relative risk aversion. The dividend process for one stock follows a geometric Brownian motion with constant and known parameters. The expected dividend growth rate for the other tree is stochastic and in general unobservable, although there may be a signal from which the investor can learn about its current value. We find that the equilibrium quantities in our model significantly depend on the information structure and on the level of risk aversion. While an observable stochastic drift mainly makes the economy more risky, a latent expected growth rate process with learning significantly changes the equilibrium price-dividend ratios, price reactions to dividend and drift innovations, expected returns, volatilities, correlations, and differences between the stocks. These effects are the more pronounced the more risk averse the representative investor.

Information

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 46 , Issue 5 , October 2011, pp. 1437 - 1462
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2011

References

Beber, A.; Breedon, F.; and Buraschi, A.. “Differences in Beliefs and Currency Risk Premia.” Journal of Financial Economics, 98 (2010), 415–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M. J., and Xia, Y.. “Stock Price Volatility and Equity Premium.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 47 (2001), 249–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buraschi, A.; Trojani, F.; and Vedolin, A.. “When Uncertainty Blows in the Orchard: Comovement and Equilibrium Volatility Risk Premia.” Working Paper, Imperial College (2009).Google Scholar
Cochrane, J. H.; Longstaff, F. A.; and Santa-Clara, P.. “Two Trees.” Review of Financial Studies, 21 (2008), 347–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detemple, J. B. “Asset Pricing in a Production Economy with Incomplete Information.” Journal of Finance, 41 (1986), 383–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dothan, M. U., and Feldman, D.. “Equilibrium Interest Rates and Multiperiod Bonds in a Partially Observable Economy.” Journal of Finance, 41 (1986), 369–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driessen, J.; Maenhout, P.; and Vilkov, G.. “The Price of Correlation Risk: Evidence from Equity Options.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 1377–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 427–465.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1993), 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 55–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gala, V. D. “Investment and Returns.” Working Paper, University of Chicago (2006).Google Scholar
Gennotte, G. “Optimal Portfolio Choice under Incomplete Information.” Journal of Finance, 41 (1986), 733–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, J.; Kogan, L.; and Zhang, L.. “Equilibrium Cross-Section of Returns.” Journal of Political Economy, 111 (2003), 693–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, T. S., and Omberg, E.. “Dynamic Nonmyopic Portfolio Behavior.” Review of Financial Studies, 9 (1996), 141–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liptser, R. S., and Shiryaev, A. N.. Statistics of Random Processes II. Applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag (2001).Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. Jr. “Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy.” Econometrica, 46 (1978), 1429–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, I. “The Lucas Orchard.” Working Paper, Stanford University (2011).Google Scholar
Parlour, C.; Stanton, R.; and Walden, J.. “The Term Structure in an Exchange Economy with Two Trees.” Working Paper, University of California Berkeley (2009).Google Scholar
Pastor, L., and Veronesi, P.. “Learning in Financial Markets.” Annual Review of Financial Economics, 1 (2009), 361–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlova, A., and Rigobon, R.. “Asset Prices and Exchange Rates.” Review of Financial Studies, 20 (2007), 1139–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar