Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T10:21:15.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gaussian beam evolution in nonlinear inhomogeneous plasma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2014

P. Berczynski,
Yu. A. Kravtsov and
V. Tikhonchuk
P. Berczynski*
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin 70-310, Poland
Yu. A. Kravtsov
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Maritime University of Szczecin, Szczecin 70-500, PolandSpace Research Institute, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow 117 997, Russia
V. Tikhonchuk
Affiliation:
University Bordeaux – CNRS – CEA, Centre Lasers Intenses et Applications, UMR 5107, 33405 Talence, France
*
†Email address for correspondence: Pawel.Berczynski@zut.edu.pl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The method of nonlinear complex geometrical optics (NCGO) is proposed in this paper for description of the evolution of a spatially narrow Gaussian beam (GB) in an inhomogeneous nonlinear plasma. NCGO method deals with first-order ordinary differential equations for the complex curvature of the wave front and for GB amplitude and for second-order ordinary differential equation for GB width. Thus, NCGO simplifies the description of GB diffraction and self-focusing effects as compared to the known methods of plasma physics and this way it can be assumed to be attractive and comprehensive approach in problems of plasma heating by electromagnetic waves. Moreover, we demonstrate in this paper some regularity for nonlinear inhomogeneous plasma in the framework of which central ray of a GB is not subjected to nonlinear refraction within NCGO method boundary applicability. On the contrary, the beam width, wave front curvature, and GB amplitude are modified by diffraction and self-focusing processes. General properties of the beam propagation are illustrated with results of numerical modeling for two particular cases: GB diffraction and self-focusing along curvilinear trajectory with torsion in axially symmetric plasma column and GB reflection from nonlinear inhomogeneous plasma layer. We prove in this paper that NCGO is new effective method of plasma physics, which can be applied for improvement of ray tracing techniques and plasma diagnostics.

Information

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 80 , Issue 2 , April 2014, pp. 197 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

References

REFERENCES

Akhmanov, S. A., Sukhorukov, A. P. and Khokhlov, R. V. 1968 Self-focusing and light diffraction in nonlinear medium. Soviet Phys. Uspekhi 10, 609–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. 1978 Stationary self-trapped laser beams in Plasma. Phys. Scripta 18, 35–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakin, A. A., Balakina, M. A., Permitin, G. V. and Smirnov, A. I. 2007a Quasi-optical description of wave beams in smoothly inhomogeneous anisotropic media. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40, 4285.Google Scholar
Balakin, A. A., Balakina, M. A., Permitin, G. V. and Smirnov, A. I. 2007b Scalar equation for wave beams in a magnetized plasma. Plasma Phys. Rep. 33, 302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berczynski, P. 2011 Complex geometrical optics of nonlinear inhomogeneous fibres. J. Opt. 13 (3), 035707.Google Scholar
Berczynski, P. 2012 Gaussian beam diffraction in inhomogeneous and logarithmically saturable nonlinear media. Cent. Eur. J. Phys. 10, 898–905.Google Scholar
Berczynski, P. 2013a Complex geometrical optics of inhomogeneous and nonlinear saturable media. Opt. Commun. 295, 208–218.Google Scholar
Berczynski, P. 2013 b Gaussian beam evolution in longitudinally and transversely inhomogeneous nonlinear fibres with absorption. Opto-Electron. Rev. 21 (3), 303–319.Google Scholar
Berczynski, P., Bliokh, K. Yu., Kravtsov, Yu. A. and Stateczny, A. 2006 Diffraction of Gaussian beam in 3D smoothly inhomogeneous media: eikonal-based complex geometrical optics approach. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23 (6), 1442–1451.Google Scholar
Berczynski, P. and Kravtsov, Yu. A. 2004 Theory for Gaussian beam diffraction in 2D inhomogeneous medium, based on the eikonal form of complex geometrical optics. Phys. Lett. A 331 (3–4), 265–268.Google Scholar
Berczynski, P., Kravtsov, Yu. A. and Sukhorukov, A. P. 2010 Complex geometrical optics of Kerr type nonlinear media. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 239 (5), 241–247.Google Scholar
Bertelli, N., Balakin, A. A., Westerhof, E. and Buyanova, M. N. 2010 ECCD calculations in ITER by means of the quasi-optical code. Nucl. Fusion 50, 115008.Google Scholar
Farina, D. 2007 A quasi-optical beam-tracing code for electron cyclotron absorption and current drive: GRAY. Fusion Sci. Technol. 52, 154.Google Scholar
Gill, T. S., Mahajanand, R. and Kaur, R. 2010 Relativistic and ponderomotive effects on evolution of laser beam in a non-uniform plasma channel. Laser Part. Beams 28, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goncharenko, A. M., Logvin, Yu. A., Samson, A. M. and Shapovalov, P. S. 1991 Rotating Gaussian beams in nonlinear medium of Kerr type. Opt. Comm. 81, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, D. D. 2011 Geometric Mechanics: Part 1: Dynamics and Symmetry, 2nd edn.London: Imperial College Press.Google Scholar
Kravtsov, Yu. A. and Berczynski, P. 2007 Gaussian beams in inhomogeneous media: a review. Stud. Geophys. Geod. 51 (1), 1–36.Google Scholar
Kravtsov, Yu. A., Berczynski, P. and Bieg, B. 2009 Gaussian beam diffraction in weakly anisotropic inhomogeneous media. Phys. Lett. A 373, 2979–2983.Google Scholar
Kravtsov, Yu A. and Zhu, N. Y. 2009 Theory of Diffraction: Heuristic Approaches. Oxford: Alpha Science International.Google Scholar
Lam, J. F. and Lipman, B. 1977 Self-trapped laser beams in plasma. Phys. Fluids 20 (7), 1176–1179.Google Scholar
Marburger, J. H. 1975 Self-focusing: theory. Prog. Quant. Electr. 4, 35–110.Google Scholar
Max, C. E. 1976 Strong self-focusing due to the ponderomotive force in plasma. Phys. Fluids 19 (1), 74–77.Google Scholar
Nowak, S. and Orefice, A. 1993 Quasioptical treatment of electromagnetic Gaussian beams in inhomogeneous and anisotropic plasmas. Phys. Fluids B 5, 1945.Google Scholar
Permitin, G. V. and Smirnov, A. I. 1996 Quasioptics of smoothly inhomogeneous isotropic media. JETP 82 (3), 395–402.Google Scholar
Poli, E., Pereverzev, G. V. and Peeters, A. G. 1999 Paraxial Gaussian wave beam propagation in an anisotropic inhomogeneous plasma. Phys. Plasmas 6, 5.Google Scholar
Tewari, D. P. and Sharma, R. R. 1979 Nonlinear propagation of laser radiation in an inhomogeneous plasma. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 12, 1019–1025.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, W. J., Gordon, J. P., Smith, P. W. and Kaplan, A. E. 1982 Reflection of a Gaussian beam at a nonlinear interface. Appl. Opt. 21, 2041–2051.Google Scholar
Weber, S., Riazuelo, G., Michel, P., Loubère, R., Walraet, F., Tikhonchuk, V. T., Malka, V., Ovadia, J. and Bonnaud, G. 2004 Modeling of laser-plasma interaction on hydrodynamic scales: physics development and comparison with experiments. Laser Part. Beams 22, 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yariv, A. and Yeh, P. 2006 Photonics: Optical Electronics in Modern Communications. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar