In this article, we propose a new classification of $\Sigma ^0_2$ formulas under the realizability interpretation of many-one reducibility (i.e., Levin reducibility). For example, $\mathsf {Fin}$, the decision of being eventually zero for sequences, is many-one/Levin complete among $\Sigma ^0_2$ formulas of the form $\exists n\forall m\geq n.\varphi (m,x)$, where $\varphi $ is decidable. The decision of boundedness for sequences $\mathsf {BddSeq}$ and for width of posets $\mathsf {FinWidth}$ are many-one/Levin complete among $\Sigma ^0_2$ formulas of the form $\exists n\forall m\geq n\forall k.\varphi (m,k,x)$, where $\varphi $ is decidable. However, unlike the classical many-one reducibility, none of the above is $\Sigma ^0_2$-complete. The decision of non-density of linear orders $\mathsf {NonDense}$ is truly $\Sigma ^0_2$-complete.

This is a continuation of the paper [J. Symb. Log. 87 (2022), 1065–1092]. For an ideal $\mathcal {I}$ on $\omega $ we denote $\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}=\{f\in \omega ^{\omega }: f^{-1}[\{n\}]\in \mathcal {I} \text { for every } n\in \omega \}$ and write $f\leq _{\mathcal {I}} g$ if $\{n\in \omega :f(n)>g(n)\}\in \mathcal {I}$, where $f,g\in \omega ^{\omega }$.

We study the cardinal numbers $\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}))$ describing the smallest sizes of subsets of $\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}$ that are unbounded from below with respect to $\leq _{\mathcal {I}}$.

In particular, we examine the relationships of $\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}))$ with the dominating number $\mathfrak {d}$. We show that, consistently, $\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}))>\mathfrak {d}$ for some ideal $\mathcal {I}$, however $\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}))\leq \mathfrak {d}$ for all analytic ideals $\mathcal {I}$. Moreover, we give example of a Borel ideal with $\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}))=\operatorname {\mathrm {add}}(\mathcal {M})$.

In $\mathsf {ZF}$ (i.e., Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory minus the axiom of choice ($\mathsf {AC}$)), we investigate the open problem of the deductive strength of the principle

which was introduced by Herzberg, Kanovei, Katz, and Lyubetsky [(2018), Journal of Symbolic Logic, 83(1), 385–391]. Typical results are:

1. (1) “$\aleph _{1}\leq 2^{\aleph _{0}}$” is strictly weaker than $\mathsf {UF_{wob}}(\omega )$ in $\mathsf {ZF}$.

2. (2) “There exists a free ultrafilter on $\omega $” does not imply “$\aleph _{1}\leq 2^{\aleph _{0}}$” in $\mathsf {ZF}$, and thus (by (1)) neither does it imply $\mathsf {UF_{wob}}(\omega )$ in $\mathsf {ZF}$. This fills the gap in information in Howard and Rubin [Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, American Mathematical Society, 1998], as well as in Herzberg et al. (2018).

3. (3) Martin’s Axiom ($\mathsf {MA}$) implies “no free ultrafilter on $\omega $ has a well-orderable base of cardinality $<2^{\aleph _{0}}$”, and the latter principle is not implied by $\aleph _{0}$-Martin’s Axiom ($\mathsf {MA}(\aleph _{0})$) in $\mathsf {ZF}$.

4. (4) $\mathsf {MA} + \mathsf {UF_{wob}}(\omega )$ implies $\mathsf {AC}(\mathbb {R})$ (the axiom of choice for non-empty sets of reals), which in turn implies $\mathsf {UF_{wob}}(\omega )$. Furthermore, $\mathsf {MA}$ and $\mathsf {UF_{wob}}(\omega )$ are mutually independent in $\mathsf {ZF}$.

5. (5) For any infinite linearly orderable set X, each of “every filter base on X can be well ordered” and “every filter on X has a well-orderable base” is equivalent to “$\wp (X)$ can be well ordered”. This yields novel characterizations of the principle “every linearly ordered set can be well ordered” in $\mathsf {ZFA}$ (i.e., Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with atoms), and of $\mathsf {AC}$ in $\mathsf {ZF}$.

6. (6) “Every filter on $\mathbb {R}$ has a well-orderable base” implies “every filter on $\omega $ has a well-orderable base”, which in turn implies $\mathsf {UF_{wob}}(\omega )$, and none of these implications are reversible in $\mathsf {ZF}$.

7. (7) “Every filter on $\omega $ can be extended to an ultrafilter with a well-orderable base” is equivalent to $\mathsf {AC}(\mathbb {R}),$ and thus is strictly stronger than $\mathsf {UF_{wob}}(\omega )$ in $\mathsf {ZF}$.

8. (8) “Every filter on $\omega $ can be extended to an ultrafilter” implies “there exists a free ultrafilter on $\omega $ which has no well-orderable base of cardinality ${<2^{\aleph _{0}}}$”. The former principle does not imply “there exists a free ultrafilter on $\omega $ which has no well-orderable base” in $\mathsf {ZF}$, and the latter principle is true in the Basic Cohen Model.

Lyubetsky and Kanovei showed in [8] that there is a second-order arithmetic model of $\mathrm {Z}_2^{-p}$, (comprehension for all second-order formulas without parameters), in which $\Sigma ^1_2$-$\mathrm {CA}$ (comprehension for all $\Sigma ^1_2$-formulas with parameters) holds, but $\Sigma ^1_4$-$\mathrm {CA}$ fails. They asked whether there is a model of $\mathrm {Z}_2^{-p}+\Sigma ^1_2$-$\mathrm {CA}$ with the optimal failure of $\Sigma ^1_3$-$\mathrm {CA}$. We answer the question positively by constructing such a model in a forcing extension by a tree iteration of Jensen’s forcing. Let $\mathrm {Coll}^{-p}$ be the parameter-free collection scheme for second-order formulas and let $\mathrm {AC}^{-p}$ be the parameter-free choice scheme. We show that there is a model of $\mathrm {Z}_2^{-p}+\mathrm { AC}^{-p}+\Sigma ^1_2$-$\mathrm {CA}$ with a failure of $\Sigma ^1_4$-$\mathrm {CA}$. We also show that there is a model of $\mathrm {Z}_2^{-p}+\mathrm {Coll}^{-p}+\Sigma ^1_2$-$\mathrm {CA}$ with a failure of $\Sigma ^1_4$-$\mathrm {CA}$ and a failure of $\mathrm {AC}^{-p}$, so that, in particular, the schemes $\mathrm {Coll}^{-p}$ and $\mathrm {AC}^{-p}$ are not equivalent over $\mathrm {Z}_2^{-p}$.

A left-variable word over an alphabet A is a word over $A \cup \{\star \}$ whose first letter is the distinguished symbol $\star $ standing for a placeholder. The ordered variable word theorem ($\mathsf {OVW}$), also known as Carlson–Simpson’s theorem, is a tree partition theorem, stating that for every finite alphabet A and every finite coloring of the words over A, there exists a word $c_0$ and an infinite sequence of left-variable words $w_1, w_2, \dots $ such that $\{ c_0 \cdot w_1[a_1] \cdot \dots \cdot w_k[a_k] : k \in \mathbb {N}, a_1, \dots , a_k \in A \}$ is monochromatic.

In this article, we prove that $\mathsf {OVW}$ is $\Pi ^0_4$-conservative over $\mathsf {RCA}_0 + \mathsf {B}\Sigma ^0_2$. This implies in particular that $\mathsf {OVW}$ does not imply $\mathsf {ACA}_0$ over $\mathsf {RCA}_0$. This is the first principle for which the only known separation from $\mathsf {ACA}_0$ involves non-standard models.

This paper studies the conjecture of Hirschfeldt, Miller, and Podzorov in [13] on the complexity of order-computable sets, where a set A is order-computable if there is a computable copy of the structure $(\mathbb {N}, <,A)$ in the language of linear orders together with a unary predicate. The class of order-computable sets forms a subclass of $\Delta ^{0}_{2}$ sets. Firstly, we study the complexity of computably enumerable (c.e.) order-computable sets and prove that the index set of c.e. order-computable sets is $\Sigma ^{0}_{4}$-complete. Secondly, as a corollary of the main result on c.e. order-computable sets, we obtain that the index set of general order computable sets is $\Sigma ^{0}_{4}$-complete within the index set of $\Delta ^{0}_{2}$ sets. Finally, we continue to study the complexity of more general $\Delta ^{0}_{2}$ sets and prove that the index set of $\Delta ^{0}_{2}$ sets is $\Pi ^{0}_{3}$-complete.

We explore the interplay between $\omega $-categoricity and pseudofiniteness for groups, and we conjecture that $\omega $-categorical pseudofinite groups are finite-by-abelian-by-finite. We show that the conjecture reduces to nilpotent p-groups of class 2, and give a proof that several of the known examples of $\omega $-categorical p-groups satisfy the conjecture. In particular, we show by a direct counting argument that for any odd prime p the ($\omega $-categorical) model companion of the theory of nilpotent class 2 exponent p groups, constructed by Saracino and Wood, is not pseudofinite, and that an $\omega $-categorical group constructed by Baudisch with supersimple rank 1 theory is not pseudofinite. We also survey some scattered literature on $\omega $-categorical groups over 50 years.

We investigate the tower spectrum in the generalized Baire space, i.e., the set of lengths of towers in $\kappa ^\kappa $. We show that both small and large tower spectra at all regular cardinals simultaneously are consistent. Furthermore, based on previous work by Bağ, the first author and Friedman, we prove that globally, a small tower spectrum is consistent with an arbitrarily large spectrum of maximal almost disjoint families. Finally, we show that any non-trivial upper bound on the tower spectrum in $\kappa ^\kappa $ is consistent.

Condensed mathematics, developed by Clausen and Scholze over the last few years, proposes a generalization of topology with better categorical properties. It replaces the concept of a topological space by that of a condensed set, which can be defined as a sheaf for the coherent topology on a certain category of compact Hausdorff spaces. In this case, the sheaf condition has a fairly simple explicit description, which arises from studying the relationship between the coherent, regular, and extensive topologies. In this paper, we establish this relationship under minimal assumptions on the category, going beyond the case of compact Hausdorff spaces. Along the way, we also provide a characterization of sheaves and covering sieves for these categories. All results in this paper have been fully formalized in the Lean proof assistant.

We examine the consequences of having a total division operation $\frac {x}{y}$ on commutative rings. We consider two forms of binary division, one derived from a unary inverse, the other defined directly as a general operation; each are made total by setting $1/0$ equal to an error value $\bot $, which is added to the ring. Such totalised divisions we call common divisions. In a field the two forms are equivalent and we have a finite equational axiomatisation E that is complete for the equational theory of fields equipped with common division, which are called common meadows. These equational axioms E turn out to be true of commutative rings with common division but only when defined via inverses. We explore these axioms E and their role in seeking a completeness theorem for the conditional equational theory of common meadows. We prove they are complete for the conditional equational theory of commutative rings with inverse based common division. By adding a new proof rule, we can prove a completeness theorem for the conditional equational theory of common meadows. Although, the equational axioms E fail with common division defined directly, we observe that the direct division does satisfy the equations in E under a new congruence for partial terms called eager equality.

We study the question of $\mathcal {L}_{\mathrm {ring}}$-definability of non-trivial henselian valuation rings. Building on previous work of Jahnke and Koenigsmann, we provide a characterization of henselian fields that admit a non-trivial definable henselian valuation. In particular, we treat the cases where the canonical henselian valuation has positive residue characteristic, using techniques from the model theory and algebra of tame fields.

Inspired by Adler’s idea on VC minimal theories [1], we introduce VC-minimal complexity. We show that for any $N\in \mathbb {N}^{>0}$, there is $k_N>0$ such that for any finite bipartite graph $(X,Y;E)$ with VC-minimal complexity $< N$, there exist $X'\subseteq X$, $Y'\subseteq Y$ with $|X'|\geq k_N |X|$, $|Y'|\geq k_N |Y|$ such that $X'\times Y' \subseteq E$ or $X'\times Y'\cap E=\emptyset $.

Let ${\mathbb K}$ be an algebraically bounded structure, and let T be its theory. If T is model complete, then the theory of ${\mathbb K}$ endowed with a derivation, denoted by $T^{\delta }$, has a model completion. Additionally, we prove that if the theory T is stable/NIP then the model completion of $T^{\delta }$ is also stable/NIP. Similar results hold for the theory with several derivations, either commuting or non-commuting.

We generalize two of our previous results on abelian definable groups in p-adically closed fields [12, 13] to the non-abelian case. First, we show that if G is a definable group that is not definably compact, then G has a one-dimensional definable subgroup which is not definably compact. This is a p-adic analogue of the Peterzil–Steinhorn theorem for o-minimal theories [16]. Second, we show that if G is a group definable over the standard model $\mathbb {Q}_p$, then $G^0 = G^{00}$. As an application, definably amenable groups over $\mathbb {Q}_p$ are open subgroups of algebraic groups, up to finite factors. We also prove that $G^0 = G^{00}$ when G is a definable subgroup of a linear algebraic group, over any model.

By replacing the use of arbitrary bijections in the definition of “cardinal number” with that of suitably computable re-orderings, one arrives at the notion of an “effective cardinal.” We use this notion to give a characterization of $\Sigma ^0_4$-determinacy in the spirit of Reverse Mathematics.