Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T02:52:20.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coherence for monoidal endofunctors†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2010

KOSTA DOŠEN  and
ZORAN PETRIĆ
KOSTA DOŠEN
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, SANU, Knez Mihailova 36, P.O. Box 367, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia Email: kosta@mi.sanu.ac.rs; zpetric@mi.sanu.ac.rs
ZORAN PETRIĆ
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, SANU, Knez Mihailova 36, P.O. Box 367, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia Email: kosta@mi.sanu.ac.rs; zpetric@mi.sanu.ac.rs
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The goal of this paper is to prove coherence results with respect to relational graphs for monoidal endofunctors, that is, endofunctors of a monoidal category that preserve the monoidal structure up to a natural transformation that need not be an isomorphism. These results are proved first in the absence of symmetry in the monoidal structure, and then with this symmetry. In the later parts of the paper, the coherence results are extended to monoidal endofunctors in monoidal categories that have diagonal or codiagonal natural transformations, or where the monoidal structure is given by finite products or coproducts. Monoidal endofunctors are interesting because they stand behind monoidal monads and comonads, for which coherence will be proved in a sequel to this paper.

Information

Type
Paper
Information
Mathematical Structures in Computer Science , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , August 2010 , pp. 523 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

References

Bruguières, A. and Virelizier, A. (2007) Hopf monads. Adv. Math. 215 679–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Došen, K. and Petrić, Z. (1996) Modal functional completeness. In: Wansing, H. (ed.) Proof Theory of Modal Logic, Kluwer 167–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Došen, K. and Petrić, Z. (2004) Proof-Theoretical Coherence, KCL Publications (College Publications), London (revised 2007 version available at http://www.mi.sanu.ac.rs/kosta/coh.pdf).Google Scholar
Došen, K. and Petrić, Z. (2010) Coherence for monoidal monads and comonads. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science this volume (preprint available at: arXiv).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eilenberg, S. and Kelly, G. M. (1966) Closed categories. In: Eilenberg, S. et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Conference on Categorical Algebra, La Jolla 1965, Springer-Verlag 421–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, D. B. A. (1966) Functors between tensored categories. Invent. Math. 1 221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, P. T. (2002) Sketches of an Elephant: A Topos Theory Compendium, 2 volumes, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. M. and Mac Lane, S. (1971) Coherence in closed categories. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 1 97–140, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kock, A. (1970) Monads on symmetric monoidal closed categories. Arch. Math. 21 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kock, A. (1972) Strong functors and monoidal monads. Arch. Math. 23 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leinster, T. (2003) Higher Operads, Higher Categories, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. (1972) Coherence for a closed functor. In: Mac Lane, S. (ed.) Coherence in Categories. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science 281 148–195.Google Scholar
Mac Lane, S. (1998) Categories for the Working Mathematician, Expanded second edition, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Moerdijk, I. (2002) Monads on tensor categories. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 168 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moggi, E. (1991) Notions of computation and monads. Inform. and Comput. 93 55–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastro, C. and Street, R. (2009) Closed categories, star-autonomy, and monoidal comonads. J. Algebra 321 3494–3520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrić, Z. (2002) Coherence in substructural categories. Studia Logica 70 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar