Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T22:19:24.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relative formal topology: the binary positivity predicate comes first

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2011

SILVIO VALENTINI
SILVIO VALENTINI*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, Università di Padova, via Trieste n. 63, I–35121 Padova, Italy Email: silvio@math.unipd.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In this paper we introduce relative formal topology so that we can deal constructively with the closed subsets of a topological space as well as with the open ones. In fact, within standard formal topology, the cover relation allows the definition of the formal opens, which are supposed to act as the formal counterparts of the open subsets, and within balanced formal topology, the binary positivity predicate allows the definition of the formal closed subsets, which are supposed to act as the formal counterparts of the closed subsets. However, these approaches are only fully satisfactory (according to the criterion introduced by the author in Valentini (2005)) if we can provide an adequate formalisation of the cover relation and the positivity predicate. But current formalisations fail in this respect since some intuitionistically valid relations between the open and closed subsets of a concrete topological space cannot be expressed. Our central result is that we can solve this problem through a generalisation of the standard cover relation together with a binary positivity predicate satisfying the positivity axiom.

Information

Type
Paper
Information
Mathematical Structures in Computer Science , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 69 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

References

Coquand, T., Sambin, G., Smith, J. and Valentini, S. (2003) Inductively generated formal topologies. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 124 (1-3)71–106.Google Scholar
Curi, G. (2004) Geometry of observations, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Siena.Google Scholar
Curi, G. (2010) On some peculiar aspects of the constructive theory of point-free spaces. Math. Log. Quart. 56 (4)375–387.Google Scholar
Gebellato, S. and Sambin, G. (2002) Pointfree continuity and convergence. Preprint, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Padova.Google Scholar
Johnstone, P. T. (1982) Stone spaces, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin-Löf, P. (1984) Intuitionistic Type Theory, notes by G. Sambin of a series of lectures given in Padua, June 1980, Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Merryfield, K. and Stein, J. D. (1999) Common fixed points of two isotone maps on a complete lattice. Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal 49 (4)849–866.Google Scholar
Maietti, M. E. and Valentini, S. (2004) A structural investigation on formal topology: coreflection of formal covers and exponentiability. Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (4)967–1005.Google Scholar
Maietti, M. E. and Valentini, S. (2006) Relative Formal Topology. Preprint, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Padova.Google Scholar
Sambin, G. (1987) Intuitionistic formal spaces – a first communication. In: Skordev, D. (ed.) Mathematical logic and its applications, Plenum 187–204.Google Scholar
Sambin, G. (2003) Some points in formal topology. Theoretical Computer Science 305 (1-3)347–408.Google Scholar
Sambin, G., Gebellato, S., Martin-Löf, P. and Capretta, V. (2003) The basic Picture. Preprint, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Padova.Google Scholar
Sambin, G. and Trentinaglia, G. (2005) On the Meaning of Positivity Relations for Regular Formal Spaces. j-jucs 11 (12)2056–2062.Google Scholar
Sambin, G. and Valentini, S. (1997) Building up a tool-box for Martin-Löf's Type Theory. In: Sambin, G. and Smith, J. (eds.) Twenty five years of Constructive Type Theory, Oxford Science Publications 221–244.Google Scholar
Stefanova, M. and Valentini, S. (2011) Spatiality and classical logic. Math. Log. Quart. DOI: 10.1002/malq.201010020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarski, A. (1955) A lattice-theoretical fixpoint theorem and its applications. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 5 (2)285–309.Google Scholar
Valentini, S. (2005) The problem of the formalization of constructive topology. Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (1)115–129.Google Scholar
Valentini, S. (2006) Every inductively generated formal topology is spatial, classically. Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (2)491–500.Google Scholar
Vickers, S. (2007) Sublocales in formal topology. Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (2)463–482.Google Scholar