Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T11:25:55.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sparse Recovery via ℓq -Minimization for Polynomial Chaos Expansions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2017

Ling Guo*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China
Yongle Liu*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China
Liang Yan*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China
*
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:lguo@shnu.edu.cn (L. Guo), 1000378341@smail.shnu.edu.cn (Y. Liu), yanliang@seu.edu.cn (L. Yan)
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:lguo@shnu.edu.cn (L. Guo), 1000378341@smail.shnu.edu.cn (Y. Liu), yanliang@seu.edu.cn (L. Yan)
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:lguo@shnu.edu.cn (L. Guo), 1000378341@smail.shnu.edu.cn (Y. Liu), yanliang@seu.edu.cn (L. Yan)

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In this paper we consider the algorithm for recovering sparse orthogonal polynomials using stochastic collocation via ℓq minimization. The main results include: 1) By using the norm inequality between ℓq and ℓ 2 and the square root lifting inequality, we present several theoretical estimates regarding the recoverability for both sparse and non-sparse signals via ℓq minimization; 2) We then combine this method with the stochastic collocation to identify the coefficients of sparse orthogonal polynomial expansions, stemming from the field of uncertainty quantification. We obtain recoverability results for both sparse polynomial functions and general non-sparse functions. We also present various numerical experiments to show the performance of the ℓq algorithm. We first present some benchmark tests to demonstrate the ability of ℓq minimization to recover exactly sparse signals, and then consider three classical analytical functions to show the advantage of this method over the standard ℓ 1 and reweighted ℓ 1 minimization. All the numerical results indicate that the ℓq method performs better than standard ℓ 1 and reweighted ℓ 1 minimization.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2017