Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T09:16:39.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distributed vortex receptivity of a swept-wing boundary layer. Part 1. Efficient excitation of CF modes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2020

V. I. Borodulin
Affiliation:
Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics SB RAS, Institutskaya str. 4/1, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
A. V. Ivanov
Affiliation:
Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics SB RAS, Institutskaya str. 4/1, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
Y. S. Kachanov*
Affiliation:
Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics SB RAS, Institutskaya str. 4/1, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
A. P. Roschektayev
Affiliation:
Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics SB RAS, Institutskaya str. 4/1, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
*
†Email address for correspondence: kachanov@itam.nsc.ru

Abstract

The paper is devoted to an experimental investigation of distributed receptivity of a laminar swept-wing boundary layer to unsteady freestream vortices with streamwise orientation of the vorticity vector. The experiments were performed on a model of a swept wing with sweep angle of $25^{\circ }$ at fully controlled disturbance conditions with freestream vortices generated by a special disturbance source. It is found that the unsteady streamwise vortices are able to provide very efficient excitation of non-stationary cross-flow instability modes without the necessity of the presence of any surface non-uniformities. The developed experimental approach provides the possibility for a detailed quantitative investigation of the mechanism of distributed excitation of unsteady boundary-layer disturbances due to scattering of freestream vortices on natural base-flow non-uniformity. This mechanism has been studied experimentally in detail. This paper (Part 1 of the present study) is devoted to description of: (a) the experimental approach and the base-flow structure; (b) the method of excitation of fully controlled streamwise-elongated freestream vortices; (c) the results of measurements of structure of these vortices; and (d) the experimental evidence of high efficiency of the distributed vortex receptivity mechanism under study. Part 2 of this study (see Borodulin et al., J. Fluid Mech., vol. 908, 2021, A15) is devoted to the theoretical background and experimental quantitative characteristics of the distributed vortex receptivity. Values of the corresponding receptivity coefficients are estimated there for their three different definitions as functions of the disturbance frequency, spanwise wavenumber and wave propagation angle.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Sketch of experimental model. Dimensions are in millimetres.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Sketch of the instrumentation used.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Sketch of the mechanical part of the vortex generator. 1: square metal frame; 2: shakers; 3: thin tungsten wire; 4: stepping motors; 5: tension mechanism.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Relative positioning of the swept-plate leading edge, vortex generator and region of receptivity measurements.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Microphotograph of wire non-uniformity (swelling).

Figure 5

Figure 6. Downstream distribution of the streamwise component of potential-flow velocity normalised by incident freestream speed $C_o$, measured outside the boundary layer ($y \approx 10\ \textrm {mm}$) at two freestream speeds.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Wall-normal profiles of the $x$ component of the mean-flow velocity measured at several chordwise and spanwise positions.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Boundary-layer displacement thickness $\delta _1$, momentum thickness $\delta _2$ and shape factor $H$ measured at various chordwise locations in comparison with those measured by Borodulin et al. (2013, 2016b) at lower speed.

Figure 8

Table 1. Values of $\delta _1$ and $\delta$ versus streamwise coordinate.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Wall-normal distributions of amplitudes ($a$) and phases ($b$) of streamwise component of flow-velocity fluctuations within vortex street obtained in centre of region of main measurements ($x' = 528.8\ \textrm {mm}$) at spanwise locations, which are far from wire swelling. Here $f = 24.59\ \textrm {Hz}$.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Typical spanwise distributions of streamwise velocity disturbance amplitude ($a$) and phase ($b$) measured inside the boundary layer (at $U/U_e = 0.6$, $y/\delta \approx 1.0$) in the centre of the region of the main measurements ($x' = 528.8\ \textrm {mm}$). Here $f = 24.59\ \textrm {Hz}$.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Typical spanwise distributions of streamwise velocity disturbance amplitude ($a$) and phase ($b$) measured outside boundary layer (at $y = 3.67\ \textrm {mm}$, $y/\delta _1 = 3.86$), that is, at the position of inner disturbance amplitude maximum in $y$ profiles (see figure 9$a$) in centre of the region of the main measurements ($x' = 528.8\ \textrm {mm}$). Here $f = 24.59\ \textrm {Hz}$.

Figure 12

Figure 12. Wall-normal distributions of amplitude ($a$) and phase ($b$) of the streamwise component of flow-velocity fluctuations obtained in the centre of the region of main measurements ($x' = 528.8\ \textrm {mm}$) at various spanwise locations in the region of boundary-layer disturbance non-uniformity. Positions $A$, $B$, $C$, $D$, $E$ and $F$ are indicated in figures 10$(a)$ and 11$(a)$. Here $f = 24.59\ \textrm {Hz}$.

Figure 13

Figure 13. Wall-normal distributions of amplitude ($a$) and phase ($b$) of the streamwise component of flow-velocity fluctuations obtained in the centre of the region of main measurements ($x' = 528.8\ \textrm {mm}$) at various spanwise locations in the region of freestream-vortex disturbance non-uniformity. Positions $A$, $G$, $H$, $I$, $E$ and $F$ are indicated in figures 10$(a)$ and 11$(a)$. Here $f = 24.59\ \textrm {Hz}$.

Figure 14

Figure 14. Rough extraction of essentially three-dimensional modes in boundary layer in section $B$ ($z'_c = -19.9\ \textrm {mm}$, $x' = 528.8\ \textrm {mm}$). Wall-normal distributions of extracted disturbance amplitude ($a$) and phase ($b$) and the accuracy function ($c$). Here $f = 24.59\ \textrm {Hz}$.

Figure 15

Figure 15. Rough extraction of essentially three-dimensional modes in boundary layer in section $C$ ($z'_c = -13.2\ \textrm {mm}$, $x' = 528.8\ \textrm {mm}$). Wall-normal distributions of extracted disturbance amplitude ($a$) and phase ($b$) and the accuracy function ($c$). Here $f = 24.59\ \textrm {Hz}$.

Figure 16

Figure 16. Streamwise evolution of freestream vortices excited by vibrating wire at frequency $f = 24.59\ \textrm {Hz}$ far away from disturbance spanwise non-uniformity (swelling). Wall-normal distributions of disturbance amplitude ($a$) and phase ($b$) and mean velocity profiles ($c$).

Figure 17

Figure 17. Instantaneous fields of $u$ ($a\text {--}c$) and $v$ ($d\text {--}f$) velocity disturbance components measured in freestream vortices in the ($y, z'_c$) plane for three time instants $t/T = 6/16$, 10/16 and 14/16. $f = 24.59\ \textrm {Hz}$, $x' = 438.2\ \textrm {mm}$, $\delta = 2.8\ \textrm {mm}$. DR experiment. Double-wire X-probe measurements.

Figure 18

Figure 18. Instantaneous fields of $u$ ($a\text {--}c$) and $w$ ($d\text {--}f$) velocity disturbance components measured in freestream vortices in ($y, z'_c$)-plane for three time instants $t/T = 6/16$, 10/16 and 14/16. $f = 24.59\ \textrm {Hz}$, $x' = 438.2\ \textrm {mm}$, $\delta = 2.8\ \textrm {mm}$. DR experiment. Double-wire V-probe measurements.

Figure 19

Figure 19. Instantaneous velocity-disturbance vector fields in freestream vortices measured in the ($y, z'_c$) plane for time instants $t/T = 6/16$ and 14/16. Here $f = 24.59\ \textrm {Hz}$, $x'= 438.2\ \textrm {mm}$ and $\delta = 2.8\ \textrm {mm}$. DR experiment. Double-wire measurements.

Figure 20

Figure 20. Instantaneous velocity-disturbance vector fields in freestream vortices measured in the ($y, z'_c$) plane for time instants $t/T = 6/16$ and 14/16. Here $f = 44.78\ \textrm {Hz}$, $x' = 438.2\ \textrm {mm}$ and $\delta = 2.8\ \textrm {mm}$. DR experiment. Double-wire measurements.

Figure 21

Figure 21. Instantaneous fields of disturbance vorticity components $\omega _x$ ($a$), $\omega _y$ ($b$) and $\omega _z$ ($c$) measured in freestream vortices in the ($y, z'_c$) plane for time instant $t/T = 6/16$. $f = 24.59\ \textrm {Hz}$, $x' = 438.2\ \textrm {mm}$ and $\delta = 2.8\ \textrm {mm}$. DR experiment. Double-wire measurements.

Figure 22

Figure 22. Instantaneous fields of disturbance vorticity components $\omega _x$ ($a$), $\omega _y$ ($b$) and $\omega _z$ ($c$) measured in freestream vortices in the ($y, z'_c$) plane for time instant $t/T = 6/16$. Here $f = 44.78\ \textrm {Hz}$, $x' = 438.2\ \textrm {mm}$ and $\delta = 2.8\ \textrm {mm}$. DR experiment. Double-wire measurements.

Figure 23

Figure 23. Spatial shape of the stream tubes of freestream-vortex velocity disturbance. Here $f = 24.59\ \textrm {Hz}$. DR experiment. Double-wire measurements.

Figure 24

Figure 24. Downstream evolution of spanwise distributions of freestream-vortex amplitudes ($a$) and phases ($b$) measured at boundary-layer edge ($y = \delta$) at vortex frequency $f = 44.78\ \textrm {Hz}$. DR experiment.

Figure 25

Figure 25. Downstream evolution of spanwise distributions of amplitudes ($a$) and phases ($b$) of disturbances excited in the boundary layer by a point source. Here $U/U_e = 0.6$ and $f = 44.78\ \textrm {Hz}$. S experiment.

Figure 26

Figure 26. Downstream evolution of spanwise distributions of amplitudes ($a$) and phases ($b$) of disturbances distributedly excited in the boundary layer (at $U/U_e = 0.6$) at frequency $f = 44.78\ \textrm {Hz}$. DR experiment.

Figure 27

Figure 27. Typical spanwise-wavenumber spectrum of distributedly excited boundary-layer disturbances ($a$) and streamwise distributions of spectral amplitudes and phases ($b$) obtained at sections 1, 2 and 3 ($\beta ' = 0.491$, 0.589 and $0.678\ \textrm {rad}\ \textrm {mm}^{-1}$, respectively) marked in spectrum ($a$). Here $U/U_e = 0.6$ and $f = 24.59\ \textrm {Hz}$. DR experiment.