No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 April 2003
At the beginning of each year, the CFP staff has its hands full helping place Fellows in congressional staff positions and arranging speakers for the bimonthly Wilson Seminar Series. In past seminars, Fellows have met with discussants from the General Accounting Office, the Congressional Budget Office, the Office of Legislative Counsel, the House Parliamentarian, and other support arms of the Congress to examine the major policy issues facing the institution. Also underway is selection for the 2003–2004 class of Fellows. While the quantity and quality of applicants made it especially difficult for the outside selection panel to select candidates for interviews, longtime supporters of the program were nevertheless delighted at the recent upsurge of interest. In addition, we are in the early stages of determining the viability of a parliamentary exchange with the European Parliament staff. It would be comparable to our two-decades-old Canadian Parliamentary Exchange, which remains a highlight for each class of Fellows.
Meanwhile, the staff has been working on projects connected to this year's 50th anniversary of the APSA Congressional Fellowship Program to be celebrated over the Labor Day Weekend with the Association's centennial at the Annual Meeting in Philadelphia. One major anniversary project has been to prepare a revised Alumni Directory, including office assignments and updated contact information. As the last edition predated the use of email, it is especially important that all former Fellows send us their current position and office address, as well as their home address, phone number, and email address to cfp@apsanet.org.
Another project involves producing a brief chronicle of the program's 50 years. The history of the Fellowship would is largely contained in oral accounts accumulated over the years by long-time supporters like Walter Beach and Fred Holborn. Until the appearance in 1968 of PS, most of the notices about the fellowship appeared in the APSR. These notes tended to repeat only the names of the Fellows and their assignment changes year after year. Even the fellowship's Advisory Committee was notable only for the long tenure of its stalwart friends. It has been a challenge sifting through these scant archives to produce a brief yet stimulating account of the program's history. However, our work is far from finished. We would greatly appreciate any anecdotal material, heavy on good humor, to avoid a dry-as-bones rendition of a program which is seldom dry. Any stories or suggestions may be sent to the email address listed above.
Members of the 2002–2003 class of Congressional Fellows and CFP staff at the International Student House/Philippine Embassy-sponsored “Filipino Night” in February.
We are also in the process of organizing several panels featuring former Fellows at the 2003 Annual Meeting. One such panel would be a decade-by-decade review of the changing views of Congress. Another would focus on the nexus between academic and applied politics and the legislative impact of the discipline. And finally, some sort of dinner uniting current and former Congressional Fellows seems appropriate, albeit daunting in scope. We've tentatively reserved a room at the nearby Union League Club and have written speaking invitations to several high-profile former Fellows and Advisory Committee members.
Should those guests not pan out, an alternative would be to have a former Fellow from each of the fellowship's five decades reminisce briefly on their experiences. While our annual Capitol Hill reception tends to feature DC alumni, dinner at the annual meeting would hopefully draw Fellows from all over the country. We haven't determined the cost of such a dinner, but if interested in an evening of nostalgia on Friday, August 29th or Saturday, August 30th, please let us know. Please address your email: Philadelphia Dinner.
The only constant in the APSA Congressional Fellowship Program is that it is always in flux. The character of each class of Fellows serves as a mirror to changes within individual career paths and the direction of the country as a whole. Where once the typical political scientist was an Americanist specializing in the legislative process, today's Fellows include internationalists keen on the legislative role in foreign policy formulation and judicial specialists curious about influences on the advise and consent role of the Senate. Similarly, a decade ago most Robert Wood Johnson health policy Fellows were doctors from academic settings. Now, one is just as likely to be a public health professional on a Navajo reservation as the chair at a university School of Medicine.
As the Fellows have changed over time, so too has the institution of Congress. Each year brings fresh challenges and rewards to the search for congressional assignments. The CFP staff has typically sent out some 750 letters each year announcing the Fellowship to the House and Senate Chiefs of Staff and the majority and minority committee staff directors. This year, to avoid lingering irradiation delays from last year's anthrax scare, these letters were sent via email. This resulted in much more rapid responses from offices, including many that had never before had a Fellow. The Fellows also adapted their searches electronically by devising a listserv to keep in touch throughout the process and to pass on helpful tips. These messages ranged from the prosaic, “I don't know how the snow will affect resume drop-offs Friday,” to the candid, “Just FYI on this guy… Very young staff with more electoral experience than legislative experience.…”
One obstacle to the search for assignments was presented by the drawn-out reorganization of Congress following the elections, including the switch in the Senate majority. National Security Agency Fellow Ed Garrant, for one, expressed disappointment that freshmen Senators were not in a position to hire immediately. These delays were accompanied by prolonged negotiations over committee assignments and many Fellows found that offices could not make offers until staff and space had been reallocated. Like a number of his colleagues, Bureau of Land Management Fellow Rem Hawes waited more than a month before his top three offices could offer him a position, as the Thanksgiving holiday, the congressional recess, and the closing lame-duck session froze hiring. Yet, as Knight Foundation Fellow Jennifer Crowe discovered, “Patience and persistence were key.” Recognizing that congressional staff were often hard to get in touch with, she learned to “sweet-talk my way behind the wall for an interview.” To counterbalance the effects of “the surplus of free labor,” Political Scientist Fellow Art Ward found that “blanketing the Hill with resumes, emails and phone calls” resulted in success. And although Defense Intelligence Agency Fellow Steve Haaga sometimes got “the sneaking suspicion that 22 year-olds were throwing my resume in the trash as soon as I moved down the hallway,” he was pleasantly surprised by the advice and referral offered by offices that were not in a position to hire.
This year's interview process was particularly marked by the major policy issues facing the nation, including homeland security, the possibility of war with Iraq, divisions within NATO and the UN, threats of terrorist attacks, and the economy's continuing stagnation. As a result, congressional offices actively sought Fellows with expertise in foreign affairs and placed a premium on security clearances. The longtime core of the fellowship, political scientists and journalists, continued to receive favor for their abilities to identify and analyze complex issues, to write cogently and quickly, to handle a wide range of policy issues, and to provide verbal briefings. And, given the increased scrutiny of Congress, press skills were also in high demand. Finally, although land resource expertise prompted many job offers last year, this year health care and Social Security topped the list of domestic policy concerns.
Ironically, at a time when the United States finds itself dealing with the realities of global policy on multiple fronts, more effort was required of our international fellows to secure an assignment than of any other group. Although they offered fresh international perspectives, not to mention expertise, they were often handicapped by not having the security clearances required for many international relations staff positions. They were less conditioned to their voice and email messages not being returned by harried congressional staff, and during interviews, seemed to be more routinely “tested” on their understanding of U.S. policy. As a group, however, they brought that ingredient most essential in securing interviews and eventual assignments: tenacity. Accepting the CFP staff advice to “cast a wide net,” one of our international fellows sent out more than 50 resumes. Their patience paid off as they all found excellent assignments that matched both the needs of their congressional office and their own long-term career goals.
While the search for office assignments was challenging, it was not without its rewards or moments of levity. Matt Hicks described one such anecdote on the subway between the Capitol and Senate: “On board was an older gentleman who asked me where I worked and what I did. I mentioned the fellowship… then asked him who he works for. ‘Well, I'm Senator Kyl of Arizona,’ he said as I was standing up to leave.” Ed Garrant considered his best interview one that took place in an elevator, and described a feeling of awe when seeing Senator Kennedy playing with his dog in the park. As the 50th class of Fellows adapt to life on Capitol Hill, they find themselves quickly becoming valued and necessary members of their respective personal and committee offices.
Sarah Dougherty

Members of the 2002–2003 class of Congressional Fellows and CFP staff at the International Student House/Philippine Embassy-sponsored “Filipino Night” in February.