1 Introduction
Let
$\mathbb {Z}$
be the set of all integers. For
$C,W\subseteq \mathbb {Z}$
and an integer a, we define
For integers a and b,
$[a, b]$
denotes the set of all integers between a and b. For a positive integer m and a set A, we define
If there exists a positive integer T such that
$x+T\in X$
for all sufficiently large integers
$x\in X$
, then we call X eventually periodic with period T. The set C is called an additive complement to W if
$C+W=\mathbb {Z}$
. If no proper subset of C is an additive complement to W, then the set C is called a minimal additive complement to W.
In 2011, Nathanson [Reference Nathanson8] initiated the study of minimal complements in infinite abelian groups. He proved the following theorem.
Theorem 1.1 [Reference Nathanson8, Theorem 8].
Let W be a nonempty finite set of integers. In
$\mathbb {Z}$
, every complement to W contains a minimal complement to W.
The study of minimal complements is related to problems in coding theory (see, for example, [Reference Cohen, Honkala, Litsyn and Lobstein5]). The question of determining which subsets W of
$\mathbb {Z}$
admit minimal complements has received considerable attention. In 2012, Chen and Yang [Reference Chen and Yang4] showed that
$W\subseteq \mathbb {Z}$
has a minimal complement if it is unbounded both above and below.
Theorem 1.2 [Reference Chen and Yang4, Theorem 1].
Let W be a set of integers with
$\inf W=-\infty $
and
$\sup W=+\infty $
. Then, there exists a minimal complement to W.
There is a basic result that
$\mathbb {N}$
does not have a minimal additive complement. Chen and Yang [Reference Chen and Yang4] showed that removing an extremely sparse set from
$\mathbb {N}$
can still yield a set that does not have a minimal additive complement.
Theorem 1.3 [Reference Chen and Yang4, Theorem 2].
Let
$W=\{1=w_1<w_2<\cdots \}$
be a set of integers and
$\overline {W}=(\mathbb {Z}\cap (0,+\infty ))\setminus W=\{\overline {w_1}<\overline {w_2}<\cdots \}$
.
-
(a) If
$\lim \sup _{i\rightarrow +\infty }(w_{i+1}-w_i)=+\infty $
, then there exists a minimal complement to W. -
(b) If
$\lim _{i\rightarrow +\infty }(\overline {w_{i+1}}-\overline {w_i})=+\infty $
, then there does not exist a minimal complement to W.
In 2019, Kiss et al. [Reference Kiss, Sándor and Yang6] studied the existence of minimal complements for eventually periodic subsets of
$\mathbb {Z}$
. Suppose that W is an eventually periodic set and m is a positive period. By shifting a number, we may assume that W has the structure
where
$X_m\subseteq \{0,1,\ldots ,m-1\}$
,
$Y^{(0)}\subseteq \mathbb {Z}^{-}$
and
$Y^{(1)}$
are finite sets with
${Y^{(0)}\pmod {m}\subseteq X_m}$
and
$(Y^{(1)}\pmod {m})\cap X_m=\emptyset $
. They gave conditions to ensure the existence of a minimal complement to W.
Theorem 1.4 [Reference Kiss, Sándor and Yang6, Theorem 1].
Let W be defined as in (1.1). If there exists a minimal complement to W, then there exists
$C\subseteq \{0,1,\ldots ,m-1\}$
such that the following two conditions hold:
-
(a)
$C+(X_m\cup Y^{(1)})\ \mod {m}=\{0,1,\ldots ,m-1\}$
; -
(b) for any
$c\in C$
, there exists
$y\in Y^{(1)}$
such that
$c+y\not \equiv c'+x\pmod {m}$
, where
$c'\in C$
,
$x\in X_m$
.
Recently, there has been some progress on these problems in infinite abelian groups other than
$\mathbb {Z}$
. For related problems, see [Reference Alon, Kravitz and Larson1–Reference Burcroff and Luntzlara3, Reference Kwon7, Reference Zhou9].
With these results established, the next problem to consider concerns sets of integers that are bounded below and have bounded gaps between consecutive elements. In 2019, Kiss, Sándor and Yang obtained the following result.
Theorem 1.5 [Reference Kiss, Sándor and Yang6, Theorem 4].
There exists an infinite, not eventually periodic set
${W\subseteq \mathbb {N}}$
such that
$w_{i+1}-w_i\in \{1,2\}$
for all i and such that there exists a minimal complement to W.
We study the existence of a minimal additive complement to W when W is not eventually periodic and
$w_{i+1}-w_{i}\in \{2,3\}$
for all i. We obtain the following result.
Theorem 1.6. Let
$\{b_{i}\}^{\infty }_{i=1}, \{V_{i}\}^{\infty }_{i=1}$
and
$C=\{c_{i}\}^{\infty }_{i=1}$
be such that:
-
(i)
$b_{1}=-1, V_{1}=\{1,2,\ldots ,12\},c_{1}=-6$
; -
(ii)
$b_{i}$
is the largest negative integer
$\notin V_{i-1}+\{c_{1},\ldots ,c_{i-1}\}$
for
$i\geq 2$
; -
(iii)
$c_{i}<b_{i}+2c_{i-1}-3$
for all
$i\geq 2$
; -
(iv)
$V_{i}=V_{i-1}\cup ([-2c_{i-1},-2c_{i}-1]\setminus \bigcup _{j=1}^{i-1}\{-c_{i}+b_{j}\})$
for
$i\geq 2$
.
There exists a not eventually periodic set
$W=\{w_{i}\}_{i=1}^{\infty }$
such that
$b_i-c_i\in W$
and
${{w_{i+1}}-{w_{i}}\in \{2,3\}}$
for all i. In particular, if
$|\mathbb {Z}\setminus (C+W)|<+\infty $
, then there exists a minimal complement to W.
2 A lemma
Lemma 2.1. Let
$I \subseteq [a,b]$
be an integer set with
$a,b\in I$
and
$b-a\geq 8$
. Write
${U:=[a,b]\setminus I}$
. If
$|U|\geq 2$
and the distance of any adjacent integers of U is no less than 5, or if
$|U|\leq 1$
, then there exists a set
$J=\{j_i: i\geq 1\}\subset I$
with
$a,b\in J$
and
$j_{i+1}-j_{i}\in \{2,3\}$
.
Proof. We divide the proof into three cases.
Case 1:
$|U|=\emptyset $
. Choose
Case 2:
$|U|=1$
. Write
$U=\{u_{1}\}$
. If
$u_1-a$
is odd, choose
If
$b-a$
and
$u_1-a$
are even, choose
If
$b-a$
is odd and
$u_1-a$
is even, choose
Case 3:
$|U|\geq 2$
and
$u_{i+1}-u_{i}\geq 5$
for any adjacent integers
$u_{i}, u_{i+1}\in U$
. If
$b-a=8, 9$
or
$10$
, then
$|U|=2$
. Write
$U =\{u_{1}, u_{2}\}$
.
Case 3.1:
$b-a=8$
. Then,
$\{u_{1}, u_{2}\}=\{a+1, a+6\}, \{a+1, a+7\}\text { or }\{a+2, a+7\}$
. We can choose
$J=\{a, a+3, a+5, a+8\}$
.
Case 3.2:
$b-a=9$
. Then,
$\{u_{1}, u_{2}\}$
is one of
$\{a+1, a+6\}, \{a+1, a+7\}, \{a+1, a+8\}$
,
$\{a+2, a+7\}, \{a+2, a+8\}$
or
$\{a+3, a+8\}$
. We can choose
Case 3.3:
$b-a=10$
. Then,
$\{u_{1}, u_{2}\}$
is one of
We can choose
From this point on, we can use induction on
$b-a$
. If
$b-a=11$
, then
$|U|\geq 2$
. If
$a+2 \in U$
, then
$a+3 \notin U$
. By Case 3.1, we can choose
with
$a+3, a+11\in \widetilde {J}$
and
$\widetilde {j}_{i+1}-\widetilde {j_{i}}\in \{2,3\}$
, and we take
$J=\{a\}\cup \widetilde {J}.$
If
$a+2 \notin U$
, then by Case 3.2, we can choose
with
$a+2, a+11\in \widetilde {J}$
and
$\widetilde {j}_{i+1}-\widetilde {j_{i}}\in \{2,3\}$
, and we take
$J=\{a\}\cup \widetilde {J}.$
Assume that the result holds whenever
$8\leq b-a\leq m$
, where
$m\geq 11$
. Now, we consider the case
$b-a=m+1$
. If
$a+2 \in U$
, then by the hypothesis, we can choose
with
$a+3, a+m+1\in \widetilde {J}$
and
$\widetilde {j}_{i+1}-\widetilde {j_{i}}\in \{2,3\}$
, and we take
$J=\{a\}\cup \widetilde {J}.$
If
$a+2 \notin U$
, then by the hypothesis, we can choose
with
$a+2, a+m+1\in \widetilde {J}$
and
$\widetilde {j}_{i+1}-\widetilde {j_{i}}\in \{2,3\}$
, and we take
$J=\{a\}\cup \widetilde {J}.$
By induction, we see that there exists a set
$J=\{j_i: i\geq 1\}\subset I$
with
$a,b\in J$
and
$j_{i+1}-j_{i}\in \{2,3\}$
. This completes the proof of Lemma 2.1.
3 Proof of Theorem 1.6
For
$i\geq 2$
, write
Let
$$ \begin{align*}V=\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{\infty}V_{i}, \quad \text{Gap}(V)=\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{\infty}\text{Gap}(V_{i}).\end{align*} $$
Then, we have the following three basic facts.
Fact A:
$b_{i+1}-b_{i}\leq -5$
for all integers
$i\geq 1$
. Clearly,
$b_{2}=-6, b_{2}-b_{1}=-5$
. Suppose that
$b_{i+1}-b_{i}\leq -5$
for all integers
$i<k$
, where
$k\geq 2$
. By item (ii),
$\{b_{i}\}^{\infty }_{i=1}$
is a decreasing sequence. By item (iv), for any
$k\geq 2$
,
By item (iii),
Thus,
and so
Again, by the definition of
$b_{k+1}$
, we have
$b_{k+1}-b_{k}\leq -5$
.
Fact B:
$C+V=\mathbb {Z}$
. By item (iv),
$v_{j+1}-v_{j}\in \{1,2\}$
. Since
$b_{k}\rightarrow -\infty $
, by item (ii), we have
For any integer
$n\geq 7$
, there exists an i such that
$-c_{i-1}\leq n<-c_{i}$
. Hence,
and so
$n-c_{i}\in V_{i}$
, that is,
$n\in c_i+V_{i}$
. Therefore,
$C+V=\mathbb {Z}$
.
Fact C: if we write
$b_{s}=c+v$
for
$s\geq 1, c\in C$
and
$v\in V$
, then
$c=c_{s}$
. For any
$k>s$
, by item (iv),
$b_{s}-c_{k}\notin V$
. Thus,
$c\neq c_{k}$
for all
$k>s$
. For any
$k\leq s-1$
, noting that
$-2c_{s-1}=\min (V\backslash V_{s-1})$
and
we have
$b_{s}-c_{k}\notin V\backslash V_{s-1}$
. Moreover, by item (ii),
Thus,
$c\neq c_{k}$
for all
$k\leq s-1$
.
It follows that C is a minimal complement to V. Write
By Fact C,
$d_i\in V$
for all
$i\geq 1$
. We prove that
$d_{i+1}-d_{i}\geq 8$
for all
$i\geq 1$
. Since
${c_{i+1}<b_{i+1}+2c_{i}-3}$
and
$b_{i+1}<0,c_{i+1}<0$
, we have
Hence,
Fix
$i\geq 2$
. By Fact A, for
$1\leq j\leq i-1$
,
Moreover, by item (iii),
$$ \begin{align} h_{i}^{(i+1)}-h_{1}^{(i)}=-c_{i+1}+b_{i}-(-c_{i}+b_{1}) &=c_{i}-c_{i+1}+b_{i}+1\nonumber\\ &>c_{i}-b_{i+1}-2c_{i}+3+b_{i}+1 \nonumber\\ &=-c_{i}+(b_{i}-b_{i+1})+4\geq15. \end{align} $$
By (3.1) and (3.2), the distance of all adjacent integers of
$\text {Gap}(V)$
is no less than 5. For
$i\geq 1$
, write
By Lemma 2.1, there exists a set
such that
$w_{j+1}^{(i)}-w_{j}^{(i)}\in \{2,3\}$
and
$d_{i}, d_{i+1}\in W^{(i)}$
. Put
$$ \begin{align*}W=\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{\infty}W^{(i)}.\end{align*} $$
Then,
$W=\{w_{i}\}_{i=1}^{\infty }$
satisfies
${w_{i+1}}-{w_{i}}\in \{2,3\}$
for all i.
Furthermore, by item (iii), we can choose suitable
$c_{i}$
such that W is infinite and not eventually periodic. Since
$|\mathbb {Z}\setminus (C+W)|<+\infty $
, we may assume that
Since
$C+V=\mathbb {Z}$
, for
$i=1,\ldots ,k$
, there exist
$c_{s(n_i)}\in C$
and
$v_{s(n_i)}\in V$
such that
Hence,
$v_{s(n_i)}\notin W$
for all
$i=1,\ldots ,k$
. By the construction of W,
$v_{s(n_i)}+1\in W$
or
${v_{s(n_i)}-1\in W}$
. Put
$$ \begin{align*} l_i= \begin{cases} c_{s(n_i)}-1 &\text{if}\ v_{s(n_i)}+1\in W,\\ c_{s(n_i)}+1 &\text{otherwise}. \end{cases} \end{align*} $$
The
$l_i$
may appear repeatedly. Without loss of generality, we may assume that
Then,
$m\leq k$
. By item (iii),
$l_i\not \in C$
for all
$1\leq i\leq m$
. Write
Since
$\{b_{i}\}^{\infty }_{i=1}$
,
$\{c_{i}\}^{\infty }_{i=1}$
are decreasing sequences and
$b_1=-1$
,
$c_1=b_2=-6$
, there exists an integer
$h(n_i)\geq 2$
such that
Write
For
$j=1,\ldots , t(k)$
, let
$$ \begin{align} C_{j}= \begin{cases} C_{j-1}\setminus \{c_{j}\} &\text{if}\ C_{j-1}\setminus \{c_{j}\}+W=\mathbb{Z},\\ C_{j-1}&\text{otherwise}. \end{cases} \end{align} $$
For
$\mu =1,\ldots ,m$
, let
$$ \begin{align} C_{t(k)+\mu}= \begin{cases} C_{t(k)+\mu-1}\setminus \{l_{\mu}\} &\text{if}\ C_{t(k)+\mu-1}\setminus \{l_{\mu}\}+W=\mathbb{Z},\\ C_{t(k)+\mu-1}&\text{otherwise}. \end{cases} \end{align} $$
Write
Then,
$C^{*}+W=\mathbb {Z}$
. Now we shall prove
$C^{*}$
is a minimal complement to W.
If there exists an integer
$c_{j}\in C^{*}$
with
$1\leq j\leq t(k)$
, then by the construction of
$C_{j}$
in (3.4),
Thus,
$C^{*}\setminus \{c_{j}\}+W\neq \mathbb {Z}$
. If there exists an integer
$l_{\mu }\in C^{*}$
for some
$1\leq \mu \leq m$
, then by the construction of
$C_{t(k)+\mu }$
in (3.5),
Thus,
$C^{*}\setminus \{l_{\mu }\}+W\neq \mathbb {Z}$
.
Next, we shall show that for all
$j>t(k)$
,
In fact, if
$b_{j}=(c_{s(n_i)}-1)+w$
for some
$c_{s(n_i)}-1\in C^{*}$
and
$w\in W$
, then
By (3.3) and the fact that
$\{b_{i}\}^{\infty }_{i=1}$
is a decreasing sequence, we see that the above inequality cannot hold. Similarly,
for any
$c_{s(n_i)}+1\in C^{*}$
and
$w'\in W$
. Since
$C^{*}+W=\mathbb {Z}$
, there exist
$c\in C, w\in W$
such that
By Fact B,
$c=c_{j}$
. Thus,
$C^{*}\setminus \{c_{j}\}+W\neq \mathbb {Z}$
for all
$j>t(k)$
. Therefore,
$C^{*}$
is a minimal complement to W. This completes the proof of Theorem 1.6.
Acknowledgements
We sincerely appreciate the inspiring discussions between Mr. Chen Zhuhang and the first author during the process of preparing this paper. The authors would like to thank the referees for helpful comments and valuable suggestions.


