Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T11:21:41.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonideality sources and implementation considerations in polar transmitters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2009

José A. García*
Affiliation:
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. (Email: joseangel.garcia@unican.es)
José C. Pedro
Affiliation:
Institute of Telecommunications, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal. (Email: jcpedro@ua.pt and pcabral@ua.pt)
Pedro Miguel Cabral
Affiliation:
Institute of Telecommunications, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal. (Email: jcpedro@ua.pt and pcabral@ua.pt)
Christian Fager
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden. (Email: christian.fager@chalmers.se and mashadne@chalmers.se)
Hossein Mashad Nemati
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden. (Email: christian.fager@chalmers.se and mashadne@chalmers.se)
Anding Zhu
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. (Email: anding.zhu@ucd.ie)
Paolo Colantonio
Affiliation:
University of Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. (Email: paolo.colantonio@uniroma2.it)
*
Corresponding author: José A. García Email: joseangel.garcia@unican.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, the main nonidealities appearing in polar transmitters will be addressed, together with several implementation considerations. Special attention will be paid to the role of AM modulation nonlinearity and parasitic AM-to-PM conversion, once architecture mechanisms such as time-delay mismatch between branches or limited bandwidth in the amplitude path are controlled. The device limiting factors for a highly efficient switched mode operation and a linear amplitude modulation will be identified. Some circuit design and implementation guidelines for the RF modulating stage and the envelope amplifier will be discussed, to finish with system-level analysis considerations under two-tone and real communication signal excitations.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. System model of a wireless Tx with polar architecture.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Idealized switch models: (a) series inductance loss model and (b) parallel capacitance loss model.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Circuit schematic of a class E PA.

Figure 3

Table 1. Device technology comparison for switched mode operation

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Evolution of (a) m1 and (b) p1 for a PHEMT-based Tx line class E PA.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Measured and modeled (a) vDD(t)-to-ay(t) and (b) vDD(t)-to-φy(t) characteristics of the PHEMT-based class E PA circuit.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Modulating stage linearity evolution with the RF power level.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Fractional energy content versus bandwidth for the envelope of a 5 MHz WCDMA signal.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. (a) Class S and (b) switch mode-assisted linear amplifiers.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. EA PCB layout with switching, linear, and current sensing stages included.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Measured and simulated fundamental, third-, and fifth-order IMD, when τ was varied from 0 up to 5 µs [2π/(4ωm)], including both the vDD(t)-to-ay(t) and vDD(t)-to-φy(t) nonlinearities.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. Measured and simulated fundamental, third-, and fifth-order IMD, when the pass-band edge frequency of the reconstruction filter was varied from Ω = ω0/ωm = 2 up to 20, including both the vDD(t)-to-ay(t) and vDD(t)-to-φy(t) nonlinearities.

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Plot of (a) ACPR and (b) EVMs versus delay and cut-off frequency for WCDMA.

Figure 13

Table 2. Impact of differential delay