1 Introduction
Since the early 2010s, the study of positive scalar curvature metrics has been revived with a new focus on quantitative results (in contrast with the topological results obtained in the 1980s). The usual metric invariants (volume and diameter) cannot be controlled by the scalar curvature alone as the example of
$\mathbb {S}^2\times \mathbb {R}$
shows. Thus, one needs to investigate more subtle invariants. For instance, Bray–Brendle–Neves in dimension 3 [Reference Bray, Brendle and Neves3] and Zhu in dimension at most 7 [Reference Zhu12] have shown the following result.
Theorem 1.1 Let
$2\leq n\leq 7$
and let
$(\mathbb {S}^2\times \mathbb {T}^{n-2},g)$
have
$\mathrm {scal}_g\geq 2$
. Then, there exists a 2-sphere
$\Sigma ^2$
homotopic to
$\mathbb {S}^2\times \{\ast \}$
whose area is at most
$4\pi $
.
Moreover, if any
$2$
-sphere homotopic to
$\mathbb {S}^2\times \{\ast \}$
has area at least
$4\pi $
, then the universal cover of
$(\mathbb {S}^2\times \mathbb {T}^{n-2},g)$
is isometric to the product of the round metric on
$\mathbb {S}^2$
and a flat metric on
$\mathbb {R}^{n-2}$
.
Note that, for
$n=2,$
this follows immediately from the Gauss–Bonnet theorem since, in this case, the scalar curvature is twice the Gauss curvature.
The proof of this result uses stable minimal hypersurfaces. The theorem is actually slightly stronger as it applies to Riemannian manifolds
$(M^n,g)$
with a nonzero degree map
$M^n\to \mathbb {S}^2\times \mathbb {T}^{n-2}$
.
Following Berger [Reference Berger1], the systole
$\mathrm {sys}_h(g)$
of a homology class
$h\in H_k(M)$
with
$(M^n,g)$
a Riemannian manifold is the infimum of the areas of smooth representatives of h. Since
$\pi _2(\mathbb {S}^2\times \mathbb {T}^{n-2})\simeq H_2(\mathbb {S}^2)\subset H_2(\mathbb {S}^2\times \mathbb {T}^{n-2})$
by the Hurewicz theorem, the conclusion of Theorem 1.1 can then be restated as
with the equality case covered.
This suggests that lower bounds on the scalar curvature can under appropriate topological assumptions provide an upper bound on the systole of some classes
$h\in H_2(M)$
or for
$\mathrm {sys}_2(g)=\inf _{h\in H_2(M)\backslash \{0\}}\mathrm {sys}_h(g)$
. Replacing
$\mathbb {S}^2\times \mathbb {T}^{n-2}$
with other manifolds in Theorem 1.1 has remained elusive for a long time, although some progress on the case of
$\mathbb {S}^2\times \mathbb {S}^2$
was made in [Reference Richard7].
More recently, the case of Kähler manifolds was investigated by Sha in [Reference Sha8, Reference Sha9] who showed an optimal upper bound for
$\mathrm {sys}_2(\omega )$
for a closed Kähler surface
$(X^2,\omega )$
with a positive average scalar curvature. This relies on the cohomological nature of the 2-systoles and the average scalar curvature for Kähler manifolds.
A few months later, Cecchini et al. [Reference Cecchini, Hirsch and Zeidler4] as well as Stryker [Reference Stryker10] used Dirac operator methods to prove upper bounds on the slightly weaker stable 2-systole of Riemannian positive scalar curvature metrics on various manifolds, including
$\mathbb {CP}^n$
.
Even more recently, Tsiamis used both complex geometric and index theoretic tools in [Reference Tsiamis11] to obtain optimal upper bounds for
$\mathrm {sys}_2(\omega )$
, where
$(X,\omega )$
is any compact Kähler manifold with a positive scalar curvature as well as refined stable 2-systole bounds for various Riemannian manifolds
$(M^n,g)$
, including, for instance, the case where
$M^n$
is diffeomorphic to a Fano manifold.
This short note describes an inequality which instead of seeking an upper bound on
$\mathrm {sys}_2(\omega )$
for some Kähler manifolds
$(X,\omega )$
relates the systoles
$\mathrm {sys}_{h_i}(\omega )$
for suitably chosen
$h_1,\dots ,h_N\in H_2(X)$
in the presence of a product structure and positive scalar curvature.
To state our main result, we need a definition.
Definition 1.1 A compact complex manifold of complex dimension
$n (X,J)$
is said to have an unconditionally nonpositive total scalar curvature if, for any
$\eta $
in
$\mathcal {K}(X),$
the Kähler cone of X (i.e., the open convex cone in
$H^{1,1}(X)$
of Kähler classes, i.e., classes represented by some Kähler form),
Remark 1.2 Our terminology is justified by the fact that for any Kähler metric
$\omega $
on
$(X,J)$
,
$\int _X\mathrm {scal}_\omega \omega ^n=4\pi n\int c_1(X)\wedge \omega ^{n-1}$
. In complex dimension
$1$
, this is equivalent to the non-vanishing of the genus of X. In higher dimension, this is implied by the nonpositivity of
$c_1(X)$
.
We will focus on compact Kähler manifolds of the form
$X=X_0\times \Pi _{k=1}^N\mathbb {CP}^{n_k}$
and denote by
$L_k\subset \mathbb {CP}^{n_k}$
a generic complex line, and by
$\omega _k$
the Fubini–Study metric on
$\mathbb {CP}^{n_k}$
with a sectional curvature between
$\tfrac {1}{4}$
and
$1$
. We will show, for instance, the following theorem.
Theorem 1.3 Let
$X_0$
be a compact Kähler manifold of complex dimension
$n_0\geq 0$
with an unconditionally nonpositive total scalar curvature; assume further that
$X_0$
is connected if
$n_0=1$
.
Let
$X=X_0\times \Pi _{k=1}^N\mathbb {CP}^{n_k}$
. Let
$\omega $
be any Kähler metric on X such that:
where
$S=\sum _{k=1}^N {n_k(n_k+1)}{}$
.
Then,
Moreover, if equality is achieved, then
$\int _X\mathrm {scal}_\omega \omega ^n= S \int _X\omega ^n$
and
$c_1(X_0)$
vanishes.
Remark 1.4 Note that we allow
$n_0=0$
in Theorem 1.3. This corresponds to setting
$X_0$
to be a point for which the nonpositivity assumption on the curvature is automatic. In this case,
$X=\Pi _{k=1}^N\mathbb {CP}^{n_k}$
.
Note that the constant
$\sum _{k=1}^N {n_k(n_k+1)}{}$
is the scalar curvature of
$\Pi _{k=1}^N\mathbb {CP}^{n_k}$
endowed with the product of the Fubini–Study metrics on each factor. Furthermore, due to the simple connectedness of the complex projective spaces and Knneth formula, any Kähler class on X decomposes as
$\pi _0^*\eta _0+\sum _{k=1}^N a_k\pi _k^*[\omega _k]$
with
$\eta _0$
Kähler class on
$X_0$
,
$a_k>0$
,
$\omega _k$
Fubini–Study metric on
$\mathbb {CP}^{n_k}$
, and
$\pi _k$
the projection on
$X_0$
if
$k=0$
,
$\mathbb {CP}^{n_k}$
if
$k>0$
.
The key ingredient is that the integral of the scalar curvature and the systoles of complex submanifolds can be recovered from purely cohomological data for Kähler manifolds, an idea which is also exploited in [Reference Sha8, Reference Sha9, Reference Tsiamis11].
This can be easily turned into an optimal upper bound for the
$2$
-systole of X.
Corollary 1.5 If
$(X,\omega )$
satisfies the same assumptions as in Theorem 1.3,
In particular,
$\mathrm {sys}_2(\omega )\leq 4\pi $
.
Moreover, if equality is achieved, then
$\omega $
is in the Kähler class of
$\omega _0+\sum _{k=1}^N\omega _k$
, where
$\omega _0$
is a Ricci flat Kähler metric on
$X_0$
.
If we moreover assume a pointwise lower bound on the scalar curvature, we can improve the rigidity part.
Corollary 1.6 If
$(X,\omega )$
satisfies the same assumptions as in Theorem 1.3, and in addition,
and
then
$\omega $
is biholomorphically isometric to
$\omega _0+\sum _{k=1}^N\omega _k$
, where
$\omega _0$
is a Ricci flat Kähler metric on
$X_0$
.
If we assume
$X_0$
carries some definite amount of negative curvature, we can get a scale-invariant inequality between various 2-systoles under a nonnegativity assumption on the scalar curvature. To illustrate this phenomenon, we prove the following proposition.
Proposition 1.7 Let
$X=\Sigma _g\times \mathbb {CP}^n $
, where
$\Sigma _g$
is a smooth projective curve of genus
$g\geq 2$
, and let
$\omega $
be a Kähler metric on X such that
$\int _X\mathrm {scal}_\omega \omega ^{n+1}\geq 0$
; then,
where L is a generic projective line in
$\mathbb {CP}^n$
.
Equality is achieved if and only if
$\omega $
is in a positive multiple of the Kähler class of the product metric
$\frac {n(n+1)}{2}\omega _{FS}+\omega _h$
, where
$\omega _{FS}$
is the Fubini–Study metric on
$\mathbb {CP}^n$
and
$\omega _h$
is the hyperbolic metric on
$\Sigma _g$
.
If equality is achieved and moreover
$\mathrm {scal}_\omega \geq 0$
, then
$\mathrm {scal}_\omega =0$
and
$\omega $
is holomorphically isometric to a positive multiple of
$\frac {n(n+1)}{2}\omega _{FS}+\omega _h$
.
Remark 1.8 These results were obtained between 2022 and 2024 but were shelved hoping to find some time to improve them in the near future, which didn’t happen.
2 Proof of the multi-systole inequality
In this section, we prove Theorem 1.3. Recall that
$S=\sum _{k=1}^N n_k(n_k+1)$
is the scalar curvature of
$\Pi _{k=1}^N\mathbb {CP}^{n_k}$
endowed with the metric
$\omega _1+\dots +\omega _N$
, where
$\omega _k$
is the Fubini–Study metric on
$\mathbb {CP}^{n_k}$
normalized to have a sectional curvature between
$1/4$
and
$1$
.
Proof Let
$\rho $
(resp.
$\rho _i$
) denote the Ricci form of
$\omega $
(resp.
$\omega _i$
). The Knneth formula gives us that
$H_{\mathbb {R}}^{1,1}(X)=\bigoplus _k H^{1,1}_{\mathbb {R}}(X_k)$
. Moreover, we can write in
$H_{\mathbb {R}}^{1,1}(X)$
:
where
$\kappa _0$
is a (1,1)-form such that
$[\kappa _0]=-2\pi c_1(X_0)$
. Note that, by our assumption on
$X_0$
, for any
$\omega _0$
in the Kähler cone of
$X_0$
, we will have
Let
$\eta _0\in H^{1,1}(X_0)$
denote the component of
$[\omega ]$
in
$H^{1,1}(X_0)$
. We can then write the cohomology class of the Kähler form
$\omega $
in
$H_{\mathbb {R}}^{1,1}(X)=\bigoplus _k H^{1,1}_{\mathbb {R}}(X_k)$
as
$[\omega ]=\eta _0+\sum _{k=1}^Na_k[\omega _k]$
for some reals
$a_k>0$
. Let
$n_0=\dim _{\mathbb {C}}X_0$
and
$n=n_0+n_1+\dots +n_N$
. We have
We integrate this identity over X and use that
$\int _X\mathrm {scal}_\omega \omega ^n\geq S\int _X\omega ^n$
to get:
On the one hand,
by expanding the n-th power and keeping only the multiples of the volume form.
On the other hand,
since we left out a positive multiple of:
which is nonpositive by our assumption on
$\kappa _0$
.
Expanding
$\left (\sum _{k=1}^Na_k\omega _k\right )^{n-n_0-1}$
further, we get
Hence,
and
Let
$L_k\subset {X}$
be a holomorphic
$\mathbb {CP}^1$
in the k-th
$\mathbb {CP}^{n_k}$
factor in X. Since
$L_k$
is a complex submanifold, the area of
$L_k$
with respect to
$\omega $
is
and by Proposition A.3, we get
$\mathrm {sys}_{[L_{k}]}(\omega )=4\pi a_k$
.
This observation together with the expression of S gives the inequality.
Moreover, if equality is achieved, we also get that
$\int _{X_0}\kappa _0\wedge \eta _0^{n_0-1}=0$
. Hence,
$[\kappa _0]=2\pi c_1(X_0)=0$
by Lemma A.2.
3 2-Systole upper bounds
We now prove the 2-systole upper bound and the associated rigidity statements.
Proof of Corollary 1.5
Writing this as
$\sum _{k=1}^N\left (\frac {n_k(n_k+1)}{a_k}-n_k(n_k+1)\right )\geq 0$
, we see that one of the
$a_k$
, say
$a_{k_0}=\min _k a_k$
, is at most 1.
Since as in the previous proof
$4\pi a_{k_0}=\mathrm {sys}_{[L_{k_0}]}(\omega )$
, we get the required upper bound.
For the last part of the corollary, assume that
$\min _k a_k=1$
; then since
we get that
$a_1=\dots =a_N=1$
, and thus
Proof of Corollary 1.6
Using the same notations as in the previous proof, let
$\hat \omega $
be the product metric
$\omega _0+\omega _1+\dots +\omega _N$
, which is a constant scalar curvature metric on X.
Under the integral bound
$\int _X(\mathrm {scal}_\omega -S)\omega ^n\geq 0$
, we already know that if
then
$\omega $
is in the Kähler class of the product metric
$\hat \omega $
and
If we furthermore assume the pointwise bound
$\mathrm {scal}_\omega \geq \mathrm {scal}_{\hat \omega }$
, we get that
$\mathrm {scal}_\omega =\mathrm {scal}_{\hat \omega }$
. Hence,
$\omega $
and
$\hat \omega $
are two constant scalar curvature metrics in the same Kähler class. By Berman–Berndtsson’s uniqueness of extremal Kähler metrics in a cohomology class [Reference Berman and Berndtsson2],
$\omega $
and the product metric
$\hat \omega $
are isometric through a biholomorphism.
4 Product of
$\mathbb {CP}^n$
and a projective curve of genus at least 2
We now prove Proposition 1.7.
Proof Let
$\omega _{FS}$
be the Kähler form of the Fubini–Study metric on
$\mathbb {CP}^n$
and
$\omega _h$
be the Kähler form coming from the hyperbolic metric on
$\Sigma _g$
. Then, there exist positive real numbers a and b such that
$[\omega ]=a[\omega _{FS}]+b[\omega _h]$
in
$H^{1,1}(X)$
.
The cohomology class of the Ricci form of
$\omega $
is given by
$[\rho ]=\frac {n+1}{2}[\omega _{FS}]-[\omega _h]$
.
Then, since
$\rho \wedge \omega ^{n}=\frac {1}{2(n+1)}\mathrm {scal}_\omega \omega ^{n+1}$
, the hypothesis
$\int _X\mathrm {scal}_\omega \omega ^{n+1}\geq 0$
gives
We compute
Hence,
$\int _X\mathrm {scal}_{\omega }\omega ^{n+1}\geq 0$
is equivalent to
Moreover, since L and
$\Sigma _g$
are complex curves in X,
and
by Proposition A.3 and the Gauss–Bonnet theorem.
Thus,
$\mathrm {sys}_{[L]}(\omega )\leq \frac {n(n+1)}{2(g-1)}\mathrm {sys}_{[\Sigma _g]}(\omega )$
.
If one has equality, we get that
$a=\frac {n(n+1)}{2}b$
, which shows that
$[\omega ]$
is a multiple of
$[\frac {n(n+1)}{2}\omega _{FS}+\omega _h]$
in
$H^{1,1}(X)$
. If the pointwise condition
$\mathrm {scal}_\omega \geq 0$
is satisfied, then we get that
$\mathrm {scal}_\omega =0$
and the result follows from [Reference Berman and Berndtsson2] as before.
A Some facts from Kähler geometry
We gather here for the convenience of the reader some well-known facts from complex geometry. This may also help to dispel some confusions arising from the existence of various normalizations for the Fubini–Study metric and the scalar curvature. Readers seeking further background can read [Reference Huybrechts6].
A.1 Ricci form and scalar curvature
Let
$g_{FS}$
be the Fubini–Study metric on
$\mathbb {CP}^n$
with a sectional curvature between
$1/4$
and
$1$
; then,
$\mathrm {Ric}_{g_{FS}}=\frac {n+1}{2}g_{FS}$
and the scalar curvature is thus
$n(n+1)$
.
Lemma A.1 Let
$(X,\omega )$
be a Kähler manifold of complex dimension n with Ricci form
$\rho $
; then,
$\rho \wedge \omega ^{n-1}=\frac {1}{2n}\mathrm {scal}_\omega \omega ^n$
.
Proof We will prove that, for any real
$(1,1)$
-form
$\alpha $
,
$\alpha \wedge \omega ^{n-1}= \tfrac {1}{2n}a\omega ^n$
, where a is the real trace of the symmetric form associated with
$\alpha $
.
Since
$\alpha \mapsto \alpha \wedge \omega ^{n-1}$
is linear and
$\Lambda ^{n,n}X$
is generated by
$\omega ^n$
, there is a linear form
$\ell :\Lambda ^{1,1}X\to C^{\infty }(X)$
such that
$\alpha \wedge \omega ^{n-1}=\ell (\alpha )\omega ^n$
. The symmetries of the problem give that
$\ell $
is a multiple of the trace. Evaluating
$\ell $
on
$\omega $
gives the right factor.
We will also need the following lemma.
Lemma A.2 Let
$(X,\omega )$
be a compact Kähler manifold such that:
-
• for any Kähler metric $\omega \in \mathcal {K}(X)$
,
$\int _X c_1(X)\wedge \omega ^{n-1}\leq 0$
; -
• there exists $\omega _0\in \mathcal {K}(X)$
such that
$\int _X c_1(X)\wedge \omega _0^{n-1}= 0$
;
assume moreover that X is connected if it is a curve. Then,
$c_1(X)=0$
in
$H^{1,1}_{\mathbb {R}}(X)$
.
Proof We first treat the
$n=1$
case. Note that
hence, the equivalence between conditions
$\int _X c_1(X)=0$
and
$c_1(X)=0$
.
When
$n\geq 2$
, note that, by assumption, the function
$\omega \in \mathcal {K}(X)\mapsto \int _X c_1(X)\wedge \omega ^{n-1}$
attains its maximum at
$\omega _0$
.
By differentiation, we get that for any
$\eta \in H^{1,1}_{\mathbb {R}}(X)$
we have
Now, by Poincaré duality in compact Kähler context, the map
is non-degenerate, and hence,
$c_1(X)\wedge \omega _0^{n-2} =0$
in
$H^{n-1,n-1}(X)$
. By the Hard Lefschetz theorem [Reference Griffiths and Harris5, Section 0.7], this in turn implies
$c_1(X) = 0$
, as claimed.
A.2 Systoles of Kähler manifolds
The following observation is classic and follows from Wirtinger’s inequality and the Kähler condition.
Proposition A.3 Let
$(X,\omega )$
be a Kähler manifold and
$Y\subset X$
be a compact complex submanifold. Then, for any smooth
$\Sigma \in [Y]$
,
$\mathcal {A}(Y)\leq \mathcal {A}(\Sigma )$
.
Proof Let
$v_\Sigma $
be the area form of
$\Sigma $
; then, Wirtinger inequality implies that for any orthonormal basis
$(e_1,\dots ,e_{2k})$
of
$T_p\Sigma $
:
with equality if and only if
$\Sigma $
is a complex submanifold of X. This implies that:
Since
$\Sigma \in [Y]$
and
$d(\omega ^k)=0$
, the Stokes theorem implies that:
Since Y is a complex submanifold,
$\int _Y \frac {\omega ^k}{k!}=\mathcal {A}(Y)$
, which together with the inequality above, gives the result.
In particular, this implies that
$\mathrm {sys}_{[Y]}(\omega )=\mathcal {A}(Y)$
for any compact complex submanifold
$Y\subset X$
.
Moreover, if
$\tilde \omega $
is another Kähler metric such that
$[\omega ]=[\tilde \omega ]\in H^{1,1}(X)$
, then
$\int _Y \frac {\omega ^k}{k!}=\int _Y \frac {\tilde \omega ^k}{k!}$
; this implies that the systoles of the homology classes of complex submanifolds only depend on the cohomology class of
$\omega $
in
$H^{1,1}(X)$
.
Acknowledgments
We thank the referee for comments which improved the article. This work was completed during H.A.’s stay at the International Research Laboratory CRM-CNRS (IRL 3457 du CNRS) in Montréal and T.R.’s stay at the International Research Laboratory PIMS-CNRS (IRL 3069 du CNRS) in Vancouver, both on “délégation CNRS” leave from their home universities during academic year 2023–2024; the authors thank these institutions for their support.


