The publisher apologises that within the final paragraph on page 1039 of the published article the 2 listed citations were swapped around altering the interpretation of the authors’ concluding remarks.
The published article incorrectly stated ‘which were deduced to follow the schemes of Redi (1982) and Gent & McWilliams (1990), respectively’.
The correct line should say ‘which were deduced to follow the schemes of Gent & McWilliams (1990) and Redi (1982), respectively’.