To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Family caregivers play a fundamental role in addressing the spiritual needs of patients receiving palliative care, particularly in cultures where spirituality is deeply embedded in daily life. This study explored how Hindu family caregivers perceived spiritual care, the ways they incorporated spiritual practices into caregiving, and the challenges they experienced while supporting relatives with palliative care needs.
Methods
A descriptive qualitative study was undertaken with 12 Hindu family caregivers recruited through purposive and snowball sampling in Kuantan, Malaysia. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted, and the data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns across participants’ experiences.
Results
Three interconnected themes emerged: Perceiving Spiritual Care as a Source of Meaning and Hope, Integrating Spiritual Practices into Family Caregiving, and Navigating Emotional and Practical Challenges in Spiritual Caregiving. Participants described spiritual care as fostering inner peace, hope, and acceptance through practices such as prayer, temple worship, chanting, and family support. Caregivers viewed themselves as facilitators of both spiritual and emotional well-being while simultaneously facing emotional exhaustion, caregiving demands, and limited access to spiritual support services.
Significance of results
The findings demonstrate that spiritual care is a shared responsibility between healthcare professionals and family caregivers in palliative care. Recognizing and supporting culturally grounded spiritual practices may strengthen holistic nursing care, promote family-centered care, and enhance the quality of palliative services for culturally diverse populations.
This study evaluated the effect of structured grief counseling on grief responses in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients from the terminal phase through early bereavement, and may inform bereavement care in oncology and hospice settings.
Methods
We conducted a randomized controlled trial from October 2024 to November 2025 among family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer. Participants were assigned to structured grief counseling (intervention group, n = 55) or only psychological materials (control group, n = 56). Counseling began before the death and continued for 3 months after the death. Outcomes were assessed at enrollment, at the end of the intervention, and at 1 and 3 months after the death. Measures included grief, guilt, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic growth, and health-related quality of life. Linear mixed-effects models estimated group differences over time.
Results
Compared with control, the intervention produced lower Anticipatory Grief Scale scores over time (estimates = −9.31, P < 0.001). The intervention also yielded higher Post-traumatic Growth Inventory scores and Short-Form 36 Health Survey scores (estimates = 6.02 and 5.97, respectively; P < 0.001). Between-group differences for Bereavement Guilt Scale scores, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale scores, and Self-Rating Depression Scale scores were not significant.
Conclusion
Structured grief counseling provided to family caregivers from the patient’s terminal phase through the early bereavement period effectively improves grief status, post-traumatic growth, and health-related quality of life. These findings support the integration of standardized, family-centered bereavement support systems into oncology and hospice care services.
This study examined the associations among supportive care needs, perceived social support, and quality of life among family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer and explored caregivers’ lived experiences of the caregiving process.
Methods
A convergent mixed-methods study was conducted at a university oncology center in Türkiye. Quantitative data were collected from 328 family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer using the Supportive Care Needs Survey–Caregivers (SCNS-C), the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and the SF-12 Health Survey. Qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with 22 caregivers and analyzed using Colaizzi’s phenomenological approach.
Results
Higher supportive care needs were significantly associated with poorer physical and mental quality of life, whereas higher perceived social support was significantly associated with better quality of life. Supportive care needs demonstrated negative correlations with both physical and mental health-related quality of life, while perceived social support demonstrated positive correlations with these outcomes (all p < .05).
Qualitative findings generated two overarching themes
Impacts of the Caregiving Process and Emotional and Psychological Dimensions of Caregiving. Caregivers described disruptions in family and social life, financial strain, unmet support needs, emotional distress, reliance on family and community support, religious coping, and fluctuating feelings of hope and despair.
Significance of Results
The findings suggest that supportive care needs and perceived social support are associated with caregiver well-being. Integrating caregiver assessment, psychosocial support, and interventions into palliative care services may help address unmet needs and improve quality of life among caregivers of advanced cancer patients.
The breath counting task (BCT) has shown evidence of validity as a behavioral measure of mindfulness in healthy populations but remains largely untested in clinical contexts. The BCT is a computerized measure of present-moment awareness based on breath-counting accuracy. This study provides a preliminary evaluation of its validity in adults with advanced cancer and their family caregivers.
Methods
Fifty-five patient-caregiver dyads were randomized to a 6-week mindfulness intervention or usual care. Participants completed the BCT and self-report surveys at baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up. The BCT’s construct validity was examined through: (1) sensitivity to mindfulness intervention using linear mixed models, (2) convergent validity via correlations with self-reported mindfulness and theoretically related constructs (e.g., inner peace), and (3) criterion validity via correlations with clinical outcomes (e.g., quality of life).
Results
Findings differed for patients and caregivers. Among caregivers, the BCT demonstrated sensitivity to intervention; breath-counting accuracy on the BCT increased over time in the mindfulness condition and remained stable in the usual care condition. Among patients in the mindfulness condition, greater breath-counting accuracy was moderately associated with better quality of life at follow-ups, including a significant correlation at 1 month (r = .57, p < .05), supporting its criterion validity. Evidence of convergent validity was limited. However, for patients and caregivers, greater breath-counting accuracy was moderately associated with higher self-reported mindfulness facets following intervention.
Significance of results
Preliminary findings suggest the BCT may capture certain attentional aspects of mindfulness in patients with advanced cancer and caregivers; however, patterns varied across groups, highlighting the need for further evaluation of its validity in clinical contexts.
To evaluate the impact of a tailored organizational intervention on the support for family caregivers.
Methods
A convergent mixed-methods study was conducted in 17 organizations (6 hospices, 5 home care organizations, 3 nursing homes, 2 hospitals, 1 transmural organization) between November 2021 and August 2023. The intervention comprised a structured practice improvement trajectory during which each organization conducted a structured workshop to define organization-specific goals to improve their support for family caregivers and to develop an action plan to achieve those goals. The action plan was implemented over 1 year with intermittent evaluations. Pre- and post-intervention surveys were distributed among healthcare professionals (paired) and bereaved family caregivers (non-paired) to assess provided and received support. Data were analyzed with mixed models and regression analyses. Post-intervention focus groups with project team members and final evaluation reports were analyzed with qualitative content analysis.
Results
Survey respondents were 97 healthcare professionals (83% nursing staff), 123 family caregivers pre-intervention, and 99 family caregivers post-intervention. Only healthcare professionals of home care organizations reported a significant increase in attending to family caregivers’ wellbeing and needs (scale 0–20; β = 3.65; 95%CI: 1.33–5.97). Family caregivers’ reports of healthcare professionals attending to their wellbeing and needs did not change (scale 0–2; β = 0.17; 95%CI: −0.04–0.38). Across settings, healthcare professionals evaluated the care they provided more positively post-intervention (scale 0–8; β = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.38–0.97). In home care, family caregivers also evaluated care more positively (scale 0–8; β = 2.12; 95%CI: 0.89–3.34). Four focus groups and 17 evaluation reports indicated improvements at 3 levels: the support for family caregivers (increased awareness of healthcare professionals, changes in work processes, more structured support), the healthcare team (more skills, confidence, available tools), and the organization (fostering sustainability).
Significance of results
A tailored organizational intervention can strengthen the support of family caregivers in healthcare organizations.
Critical illness is a life-altering experience for both patients and families. Although patients and families have shared priorities for recovery, they also have unique lived experiences that require individualized attention and validation after critical illness. Patient and family needs are dynamic and evolve over successive phases of critical illness recovery. In general, patients and families desire structured, proactive supports that address distinct informational, emotional, appraisal, instrumental, social, and spiritual needs. Timely, consistent, and clear communication across all phases of recovery is key to fostering trust and resilience. The “Timing-it-Right” framework is a useful model to guide recovery-oriented care programs from the hospital ward to community setting. Critical illness recovery programs should be holistic, coordinated, and prioritize functional goals and quality of life. Future research on critical illness recovery should engage diverse patient and family perspectives and incorporate quality of life outcomes that matter to patients and families. Common themes in patient and family experience may provide guidance for clinicians, researchers, and health systems looking to support critical illness recovery.
Patients with a life-threatening illness and their family caregivers are often affected by biopsychosocial factors that contribute to suffering and burden-sharing and affect quality-of-life.
Objectives
To compare anxiety and depression levels between patients with incurable cancer and caregivers, investigate the association between perceived burdensomeness and psychological outcomes over time, and evaluate factors associated with perceived burden.
Methods
Secondary analysis of a larger prospective, longitudinal study. Patients with incurable cancer and their family caregivers were interviewed every 3 months, from study enrollment to 12 months, to assess psychological factors. Anxiety and depression were measured with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and perceived of burden was assessed using distinct questions directed to patients and caregivers about feeling or perceiving caregiving as a burden. For the data analysis, generalized estimating equations were applied to assess the impact of patient and family caregiver related variables on HADS over time, considering anxiety and depression scores as binary variables.
Results
A total of 190 patient-family caregiver dyads were included. Anxiety was more frequent among family caregivers than patients across all follow-up moments. No significant difference was found in mean depression scores. Feeling like a burden to their family (32.6%) was significantly associated with higher anxiety [odds ratio (OR) = 4.45] and depression scores (OR = 2.73). Poor health perception increased the likelihood of anxiety and depression for patients (OR = 11.00; OR = 38.81) and FC (OR = 2.73; OR = 4.30). Family caregivers demonstrated higher psychological distress, with active employment reducing anxiety (OR = 0.54) and depression (OR = 0.43).
Significance of results
The perceived burden experienced by patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers over time were factors relevant in the disease process. The feeling of being a burden and poor health perception were key factors contributing to psychological distress, underlining the need for specific interventions in palliative care.
This chapter focuses on the challenges and experiences of caregiving in dementia, emphasizing the importance of protecting caregiver health and well-being. It discusses effective communication strategies, provides a list of useful web-based educational resources for caregivers, and explores direct and indirect caregiver support interventions. The chapter highlights the need for better support and resources for caregivers, including access to respite care and palliative care services. It also provides strategies for healthcare providers to better engage and support caregivers. Overall, the chapter emphasizes the need to prioritize caregiver health and well-being in dementia care to improve outcomes for both caregivers and individuals with dementia.
The diagnosis of an advanced life-threatening illness brings with it existential challenges that activate the attachment system and different attachment styles influence coping with advanced illness.
Objectives
The objective of this work were (a) to analyze the influence of attachment styles of patients with advanced disease and their relatives on emotional distress and other psychological and existential aspects, and (b) to identify the most used assessment instruments to measure it, highlighting those with better psychometric properties in palliative care contexts.
Methods
Articles on attachment published from October 2005 to February 2025 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guide (PRISMA) were identified by searching PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, SCOPUS, Dialnet, and the Web of Science databases.
Results
Of 1847 studies identified, 24 were included (21 quantitative and 53 qualitative). Quality assessment revealed low risk of bias and high methodological quality. The main results indicated that a secure attachment style was associated with better coping, adaptation and adjustment strategies to the experience of illness, causing a buffering effect on suffering at the end of life. In contrast, patients with insecure attachment styles presented higher levels of emotional distress, demoralization, existential loneliness, death anxiety and showed a poorer psychological adaptation to cancer. Almost two-thirds of the studies (65.1%) used some version of Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR) scale.
Significance of results
The attachment theory appears to offer a valuable conceptual framework for understanding how individuals may respond to the emotional and relational demands associated with advanced illness and end-of-life care. Its contributions have been increasingly considered in literature addressing psychosocial adjustment and coping in palliative contexts
For the assessment of attachment styles in a palliative context, the most used instrument is the original ECR-M16 scale or its iderived versions.
Family caregivers (FCGs) may experience numerous psychosocial and practical challenges with interpersonal relationships, mental health, and finances both before and after their care recipient (CR) dies. The specific challenges affecting rural FCGs who often have limited access to palliative care services, transitional care, and other community resources are not well understood. The purpose of this paper is to quantify the challenges rural FCGs experienced immediately before the death of a CR and continuing into the bereavement period.
Methods
A secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial was conducted. The 8-week intervention included video visits between a palliative care research nurse and FCGs caring for someone with a life-limiting illness. Data were from structured interviews during nurse visits with FCGs in the intervention arm whose CR died during the intervention period.
Results
Ninety (41.8%) of the 215 FCGs experienced the death of their CR. The majority of FCGs were female (58.9%), White (97.5%), spouses or partners (55.6%) and lived with the CR (66.7%). Most FCGs (84%) continued with intervention visits by the study nurse after the CR’s death. Visits resumed on average 7.2 days post-death. The majority of FCGs experienced challenges with grief/coping skills (56%) and interpersonal relationships/support systems (52%) both pre- and post-death of the CR. FCGs also experienced practical challenges with income/finance, housing, and communication with community resources both pre-and post-death.
Significance of results
Bereavement support should extend beyond a focus on grief to include practical challenges experienced by FCGs. Because challenges experienced in the bereavement period often begin before a CR’s death, there is benefit in continuity of FCG support provided by a known clinician from pre- to post-death. When given an option, many rural FCGs are open to bereavement support as early as a week after the death of a CR.
Supporting a family member with cancer poses significant challenges for family caregivers, who have unmet supportive care needs. Psychosocial oncology professionals (PSOP) are often the primary source of support for cancer caregivers in Iran. Given the lack of supportive care resources, innovative strategies are needed to support caregivers. This study explores the views of PSOP and caregivers regarding the challenges, potential solutions, and the role of digital technologies in supporting caregivers.
Methods
Employing a qualitative descriptive design, we conducted individual interviews and focus groups with 30 participants (15 PSOPs and 15 caregivers), recruited from five settings in Tehran, Iran(2023-2024). All sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results
PSOP identified challenges in delivering psychosocial care to caregivers , including inconsistency, uncertainty, and fragmented use of technology. Their recommendations included flexible psychosocial care via blended multi-modal digital technologies, professional development opportunities, and formal recognition and integration within the oncology setting. Caregivers experiencing frustration with the healthcare system expressed a need for family-centered care, flexible psychosocial care, and organized peer support networks.
Significance of results
Current psychosocial care in Iran is insufficient and misaligned with the preferences of PSOP and caregivers. PSOP and caregivers advocate for flexible psychosocial care through blended digital strategies. Public health strategists in Iran, as a low-resource setting with a family-centered context, should optimize resource utilization by prioritizing the training of PSOP, developing blended digital interventions, and leveraging trained peers to provide navigation and support to families, thereby easing the PSOP workload.
The present study investigated the associations among pre-loss grief, relational closeness, attachment insecurities, continuing bonds (CBs) with the deceased person, and the post-loss adjustment of the caregivers of patients with terminal cancer.
Methods
Data were collected in the hospice department of a cancer center in northern Taiwan; 66 bereaved caregivers completed both pre-loss and post-loss scales. The measures used for the pre-loss phase included the Hogan Grief Reaction Checklist (HGRC; pre-loss version), the Experiences in Close Relationship – Relationship Structures Questionnaire (ECR-RS), and the Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale. The measures used 6–12 months after the death of the patients were the HGRC (post-loss version) and the Continuing Bond Scale (CBS).
Results
Pre-loss grief and externalized CBs had a significant impact on the amount of post-loss grief, indicating that pre-loss grief and ongoing transformation of relationships after patients’ death may be predictors of caregivers’ post-loss grieving.
Significance of results
This longitudinal study provides preliminary evidence that pre-loss grief and the relationship with the patient are key to caregivers’ post-loss adjustment, suggesting that psychosocial intervention focuses on caregivers’ pre-loss grief and relationship quality with the patient during palliative care.
Family caregivers play a critical yet often overlooked role in healthcare, facing the dual challenge of providing clinical care while managing their emotional well-being. Although several studies have investigated the supportive care needs and services for caregivers of advanced cancer patients integrated into specialized palliative care inpatient units, little is known about cancer caregiver integration and support structures in German outpatient cancer care. This qualitative study addresses this gap by exploring the experiences of family caregivers in Germany, using a dyadic approach to assess their needs, identify referral strategies, and evaluate oncologists’ perspectives on improving caregiver integration and support.
Methods
Thematic analysis was conducted on semi-structured interviews with 14 advanced cancer patients, 15 family caregivers, and 3 oncologists. MAXQDA software facilitated the identification of key themes and codes.
Results
Three interconnected themes emerged: (1) The Impact of Illness on the Dyadic Relationship, (2) Communication with Physicians and Understanding of Healthcare Information, and (3) Challenges and Preferences in Navigating Healthcare Services and Psychosocial Support.
Significance of results
The findings highlight the need for enhanced support in caregiving to improve cancer care quality, emphasizing that early palliative care integration is vital for addressing caregiver needs as a core component of comprehensive cancer care. Healthcare practices should adopt personalized, proactive support strategies from diagnosis, implement regular needs assessments, and leverage digital healthcare tools to enhance the efficacy and efficiency of caregiver support.
Family caregivers influence realization of home death among advanced cancer patients. However, little is known about the caregiver factors influencing patients’ preferred and actual place of death. We aimed to assess caregiver factors associated with both caregivers’ and patients’ preferred place of death, and the association between their preferred and actual place of death.
Methods
From a prospective cohort of 600 patients with stage IV solid malignancy, and 311 caregivers, we analyzed data for 227 patient–caregiver dyads of deceased patients who responded to the question on preferred place of death for patients at least once within the last 3 years before death. We assessed the association of patients’ and caregivers’ preferred place of death for patients with caregivers’ competency, employment, relationship quality with the patient, their relationship with the patient, family support, and the presence of a domestic helper. We controlled for relevant patient factors and utilized the actor–partner interdependence framework for analysis.
Results
Overall, 67% patients and 74% caregivers preferred a home death for patients during the last 3 years prior to patient’s death. Patients whose caregivers reported greater caregiving competency were more likely to prefer a home death (average marginal effect: 0.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.003–0.04). Spousal caregivers were less likely to prefer a home death (−0.10 (−0.19, −0.004)). Caregivers lacking family support were more likely to prefer an institutional death (0.04 (0.002–0.08)). While caregivers’ preferences had a marginally significant association with patients’ actual place of death (p-value < 0.10), we did not find any association between patients’ preferred and actual place of death.
Significance of results
Caregivers play a crucial role in shaping patients’ preferred and actual place of death. Supporting caregivers, particularly spousal caregivers, and enhancing their caregiving competency could potentially help achieve a home death for the patient.
Dignity is perceived as being valued and respected. Maintaining dignity throughout illness is a fundamental principle of palliative care. Dignity can be influenced through family caregiver’s communication, support, and acts of empathy or indifference among other factors. The perception of dignity and the practices adopted by family caregivers to preserve the dignity of their ill relative with serious illness in Lebanon are explored in this paper.
Methods
This is a part of a larger study that explored the understanding of dignity from patients’ and family caregivers’ perspectives in a palliative care context. Data collection involved in-depth interviews with 15 family caregivers. Interviews were analyzed using reflective thematic analysis.
Results
Four main themes, that explained how family caregivers understand, and uphold their relative’s dignity during illness, were developed:
(a) Familial duty expressed through presence and compassion;
(b) Holistic care and financial stability;
(c) Social connection and family roles;
(d) Compassionate services and communication.
Family caregivers maintained the dignity of their ill relatives through being there, compassionate communication, supporting the personal and medical needs of the patient, and helping them preserve their family role. Family caregiving was often underpinned by religious values and a sense of duty. Compassionate services and effective communication were essential to preserve dignity of the ill relative during hospitalizations.
Significance of results
Family caregivers assume multiple roles in fostering the dignity of relatives with serious illnesses. It is crucial that family caregivers are supported by policies, healthcare systems, and community initiatives as patients cannot thrive nor sustain dignity without their support.
Supporting family caregivers (FCs) is a critical core function of palliative care. Brief, reliable tools suitable for busy clinical work in Taiwan are needed to assess bereavement risk factors accurately. The aim is to develop and evaluate a brief bereavement scale completed by FCs and applicable to medical staff.
Methods
This study adopted convenience sampling. Participants were approached through an intentional sampling of patients’ FCs at 1 palliative care center in Taiwan. This cross-sectional study referred to 4 theories to generate the initial version of the Hospice Foundation of Taiwan Bereavement Assessment Scale (HFT-BAS). A 9-item questionnaire was initially developed by 12 palliative care experts through Delphi and verified by content validity. A combination of exploratory factor analysis (EFA), reliability measures including items analysis, Cronbach’s alpha and inter-subscale correlations, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to test its psychometric properties.
Results
Two hundred seventy-eight participants conducted the questionnaire. Three dimensions were subsequently extracted by EFA: “Intimate relationship,” “Existential meaning,” and “Disorganization.” The Cronbach’s alpha of the HFT-BAS scale was 0.70, while the 3 dimensions were all significantly correlated with total scores. CFA was the measurement model: chi-squared/degrees of freedom ratio = 1.9, Goodness of Fit Index = 0.93, Comparative Fit Index = 0.92, root mean square error of approximation = 0.08. CFA confirmed the scale’s construct validity with a good model fit.
Significance of results
This study developed an HFT-BAS and assessed its psychometric properties. The scale can evaluate the bereavement risk factors of FCs in clinical palliative care.
Caring for children with solid tumors (STs) can impact caregiver’s physical and mental health. Caregiver mastery, which influences psychological well-being, is vital in improving outcomes for both caregivers and children. The study aimed to investigate the relationship between caregiver mastery, anxiety, depression, fear of disease progression (FoP), caregiver burden, and the quality of life (QOL) of children with ST.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2022 to April 2023 at a Grade A tertiary hospital in Shandong. Family caregivers of children with ST completed several validated measures, including the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 3.0 Cancer Module, the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-parent version (FoP-Q-SF/PR), the Zarit Burden Interview Scale (ZBI), the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), and the Caregiver Mastery Scale. Multiple linear regression analyses assessed the relationships between FoP, caregiver burden, anxiety, depression, caregiver mastery, and children’s QOL. Results were expressed as β and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
A total of 454 caregivers participated. Caregiver mastery was positively correlated with children’s QOL (β = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.20 to 1.39). Depression (β = −0.64, 95% CI: −0.83 to −0.45), anxiety (β = −0.67, 95% CI: −0.85 to −0.49), caregiver burden (β = −1.20, 95% CI: −1.60 to −0.80), and FoP (β = −0.04, 95% CI: −0.05 to −0.03) were negatively related to children’s QOL. Caregiver mastery moderated the associations between depression, caregiver burden, FoP, and children’s QOL, while also improving the effect of mild anxiety on QOL.
Significance of results
The study underscores the importance of fostering caregiver mastery to mitigate the negative impact of caregiver distress on children’s QOL and improve outcomes for both caregivers and children with solid tumors.
Conclusion
Caregiver mastery moderates the effects of anxiety, depression, FoP, and caregiver burdenon children’s QOL. Supporting caregiver mastery can alleviate caregiver burden and enhance both caregiver and child well-being.
In home-based care for severely ill patients, family caregivers’ contributions are crucial. This study aimed to explore how a web-based psychoeducational intervention influences family caregivers’ experiences in addressing challenges while caring for a patient with life-threatening illnesses during specialized home care.
Methods
This qualitative study undertook semi-structured interviews with family caregivers of patients with life-threatening illness receiving specialized home care. Family caregivers participated in a randomized controlled trial evaluating a psychoeducational intervention delivered through a website. Interviews were performed with 17 family caregivers; 13 spouses, 2 adult children, 1 parent, and 1 sibling, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
Results
The results indicate that the intervention resonated with the family caregivers’ situation which gave them comfort and awareness. It inspired self-reflection on the caregiver role that provided new insights and encouraged communication with the patient. The intervention prepared family caregivers for the patient’s progressing illness and death. While preparing was a help for some, others did not feel ready to face this, which led them to avoid parts of the website.
Significance of results
This psychoeducational web-based intervention guided family caregivers as they addressed challenges in caregiving and prepared for the future, and they valued having access to such an intervention. In a time of decreasing healthcare resources, web-based support may be a useful alternative to in-person interventions. It is important to continue developing, evaluating, and implementing web-based interventions to meet the needs of family caregivers.
Pandemic-related restrictions in nursing homes have undermined the critical role that family and friend caregivers play in enhancing resident quality of life. We examined how family caregiver access restrictions in nursing homes were implemented and how they impacted the mutual well-being of and relationships between residents and their caregivers over time. Between March 2021 and March 2022, 24 ‘designated caregivers’ in Atlantic Canada were interviewed three times. We identified changes in family relationships and activities over time, constricted support networks, the increasing need for advocacy and monitoring, and the generally negative cumulative impacts of restrictions, especially during residents’ end-of-life. Subsequent adaptations to access restrictions allowed caregivers to contribute to essential monitoring, care relationships, and advocacy roles. We argue that the role of designated caregivers in nursing homes must be maintained during public health emergencies to ensure resident’s supportive family relationships and general well-being.