To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
We construct a model for weak $(\infty ,0)$-categories based on the theory of opetopes. The combinatorial complexity of opetopes, even just positive ones, presents a significant obstacle to developing model structures on the corresponding presheaf category. We overcome this by defining a full subcategory $\widehat {\textsf{pOpe}_{\iota}}_{EZ}$ of $\widehat{\textsf{pOpe}_\iota}$, which we prove to be a reflective subcategory of presheaves on $\textsf{pOpe}_\iota$ and possesses the regularity needed for homotopical arguments.
Our main results are the following:
• The category $\widehat{\textsf{pOpe}_\iota}_{EZ}$ carries a cofibrantly generated model structure for $(\infty ,0)$-categories, constructed via a modification of the Cisinski–Olschok theory.
• This model structure is Quillen equivalent to the Kan–Quillen model structure on $\textsf{sSet}$.
These results establish $\widehat{\textsf{pOpe}_\iota}_{EZ}$ as a valid opetopic model for spaces, while the underlying combinatorial framework provides a foundation for future development of opetopic weak $(\infty ,1)$-model.
We introduce in this paper a definition of (non-necessarily positive) opetopes where faces are organised in a poset. Then, we show that this description is equivalent to that given in terms of constellations by Kock et al. (2010).
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.