To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) may be overlooked when the therapist does not occupy the role of primary attachment object. In such cases, characteristic borderline dynamics emerge chiefly in external relationships rather than within psychotherapy, leading clinicians to underestimate the disorder. Drawing on Gunderson’s original ego psychology–object relations model, this paper argues that BPD is fundamentally organised around relationships with emotionally significant others. Diagnostic formulations that rely heavily on transference dynamics may therefore miss BPD in seemingly organised patients whose central conflicts are enacted outside treatment. Gunderson’s model thus remains essential for understanding the interpersonal core of borderline psychopathology.
The foundation of the chapter is the distinction between regulation and control, and the link between them. The distinction is exemplified by the regulation of body temperature by means of control actions;for example, shivering, sweating, and changing the relation with the environment. The latter reflects motivation. The discussion then goes on to document a number of phenomena that also illustrate regulation and control: non-suicidal self-injury, hair pulling, skin picking, addictions of various sorts, and borderline personality disorder.
The care of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) places a significant burden on emergency inpatient mental health services. The aim of this study was to investigate predisposing risk factors for early rehospitalization over 12 months.
Methods
A total of 117 inpatients with BPD were included. The Beck Hopelessness Scale, Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile, Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (COPE), and Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) were administered.
Results
Forty-seven percent of the sample was rehospitalized. Divorced marital status, current substance abuse, a higher score on the TAS-20 externally oriented thinking score and on the COPE Alcohol and drug disengagement subscales, and a lower score on the COPE. Use of social–emotional support subscale were significantly associated with rehospitalization. Therefore, alcohol and substance misuse, impaired social support, and alexithymia were the most relevant predictors for rehospitalization.
Conclusions
Maladaptive coping, depressive symptoms, and history of high service utilization and multiple high-lethality suicide attempts were also found to be more common in readmitted subjects. Further research could help to better define potential different therapeutic interventions.
Despite being common and linked to significant morbidity and mortality, personality disorders (PD) are underdiagnosed. Stigma, professionals’ therapeutic nihilism and lack of effective treatments are contributing factors. This survey aimed to explore the experiences of a service user group of being assessed for and receiving a diagnosis of personality disorder and to examine the impact of the diagnosis and the disorder on their life.
Methods:
Patients under the care of two consultant-led teams who had received a diagnosis of personality disorder using Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 PD (SCID-5-PD) in 2019 and 2020 were invited by email to complete a qualitative survey. Responses were analysed using thematic analysis.
Results:
Participants were predominantly aged 41–50 years, with most discharged over three years previously. Borderline personality disorder was most commonly reported. Thematic analysis identified three themes: Understanding and Being Understood – highlighting variable levels of comprehension and agreement with the diagnosis; A turning point – describing both abandonment and access to targeted treatment; and Restriction – capturing stigma, secrecy, and perceived negative impacts on care, relationships, and functioning.
Discussion:
Findings highlight the complexity of delivering diagnoses in a meaningful and therapeutic way. Participants reported limited understanding, underscoring the need for clear, repeated psychoeducation and collaborative formulation while others described positive experiences leading to self understanding and recovery. Many were relieved to get the diagnosis after significant delays and lack of appropriate treatment. Revisiting formulation over time and linking diagnosis to treatment pathways appear crucial for acceptance, empowerment, and positive outcomes.
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a clinically significant and extensively studied personality disorder (PD), associated with substantial impairment, risk, treatment needs, and health-system burden. Contemporary debates about its classification now occur within diagnostic systems that already move beyond purely categorical models, including ICD-11 and the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. The central question is therefore not simply whether dimensional assessment should be incorporated into PD diagnosis, but how general personality disorder diagnosis, named categorical patterns, dimensional characterization, and outcome/risk assessment should be clinically coordinated. This article examines BPD as a focal case for this broader categorical-dimensional problem. We review the clinical contributions and limitations of categorical and dimensional approaches, consider evidence supporting the reliability, validity, clinical utility, and treatment relevance of BPD, and propose a clinical sequencing model for PD assessment. The model is not intended as a new diagnostic architecture or diagnostic algorithm. Rather, it begins with establishing the presence of general personality disorder, then asks whether a named PD pattern is clinically meaningful, before proceeding to dimensional characterization and outcome/risk assessment. We argue that dimensional progress does not require the abandonment of named personality disorder diagnoses when they remain clinically and empirically meaningful. Within this framework, BPD can remain an organizing construct while categorical diagnosis is prevented from becoming the endpoint of clinical formulation.
What is the next step in treating a primary psychotic illness with aggression when high-dose/high-level clozapine treatment only provides a partial response?
This guest editorial highlights the importance of external validity in randomised clinical trials in psychiatry, using patients with borderline personality disorder as an example. We suggest strategies to improve the external validity of trials, including adjusting randomisation procedures and implementing detailed screening logs at the referral stage.
The co-occurrence of psychotic disorders and borderline personality disorder (BPD) complicates clinical management, with overlapping symptoms exacerbating morbidity and impairing therapeutic outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prevalence of psychotic disorders and BPD co-occurrence, including with first-episode psychosis (FEP) and to describe associated sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.
Methods
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, four databases were systematically searched from inception to June 2025. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction and quality appraisal (Effective Public Health Practice Project tool) were conducted independently by two reviewers. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated pooled prevalence rates.
Results
The pooled prevalence of BPD in people with psychotic disorders was 22.7% (95% CI: 14.2–34.3%), while 14.3% (95% CI: 5.5–32.1%) of individuals with BPD had a comorbid psychotic disorder. In FEP samples, 40.0% (95% CI: 21.9–61.3%) met the criteria for BPD. People with both conditions, often young women, showed greater emotional dysregulation, suicidality, psychotic symptoms, and social dysfunction. Trauma, dissociation and substance use emerged as frequent vulnerability factors. However, most studies were cross-sectional, with small samples and high heterogeneity (I2 > 80%), limiting generalizability.
Conclusion
This co-occurrence constitutes a distinct clinical subgroup with complex needs. Categorical diagnostic approaches may fail to capture the dimensional nature of overlapping affective and psychotic symptoms. Integrative and personalized care pathways, especially in early intervention settings, are warranted. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024577525).
Debate about borderline personality disorder (BPD) has intensified, with some proposing its absorption into complex post-traumatic stress disorder and others questioning whether the diagnosis is harmful. These debates often obscure the central issue of construct validity. This paper evaluates whether BPD constitutes a coherent clinical entity. Drawing on Robins and Guze’s classic diagnostic validators – symptom specificity, heritability, course of illness, biological markers and treatment response – the evidence demonstrates that BPD is a robustly validated psychiatric disorder that should be retained in future classification systems. Concerns about stigma and dimensional models are considered but do not undermine its empirical grounding.
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterised by instability in interpersonal relationships, self-image, and affect. Dysregulated negative emotional processing involving prefrontal and limbic circuits is considered a neural basis of BPD. However, it remains unclear how prefrontal modulation of social decision-making in BPD differs from non-psychiatric controls.
Methods:
To investigate social decision-making in response to unfairness, we conducted an functional magnetic resonance imaging study involving adults with a diagnosis of BPD (n = 77) and healthy controls (HCs; n = 60). Using an inequality aversion model, we derived parameters of social norm adaptation and inequality sensitivity from behavioural data during a modified ultimatum game designed to measure responses to offer norm shifts. Valence and salience signal-processing models isolated prefrontal activations related specifically to social norm prediction error.
Results:
Cumulative rejection rates indicated that individuals diagnosed with BPD exhibited consistent differences in overall offer rejection rates but similar adaptation to HC when responding to norm shifts. Preservation of normative social decision-making in BPD (no significant difference vs. HC) was evident in regression analyses of rejection rates and in reinforcement learning models, with no group differences observed in Rescorla–Wagner parameters. Furthermore, we detected no significant neural activation differences between groups, although ventral regions of the medial prefrontal cortex were preferentially involved in valence-related rather than salience-related polynomial modulation.
Conclusion:
Contrary to our hypotheses, neither behavioural nor neural responses to economic norm violations differed significantly between BPD and HC groups across one-shot games involving unknown partners. Future research could explore whether more personally relevant or higher-stress social contexts elicit differences not observed here.
While increasing research is reporting a higher presence of autistic traits (AT) in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD), both autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and BPD have been associated in literature with a vulnerability to trauma and eating disorders.
Aim
The present study aimed at evaluating trauma-related symptoms and eating disorder symptoms in BPD patients with or without significant AT.
Methods
A sample of 73 BPD patients was assessed with the adult autism subthreshold (AdAS) Spectrum, trauma and loss spectrum-self report (TALS-SR), and EDI-2 questionnaires.
Results
The findings revealed that BPD patients with autistic traits (BPD-AT) scored significantly higher on the eating disorder inventory (EDI-2) and trauma and loss scale (TALS-SR) compared to those without AT. Moreover, while both AdAS Spectrum and TALS-SR scores predicted higher EDI-2 scores, a significant mediating effect of TALS-SR on the relationship between AdAS Spectrum and EDI-2 scores was reported.
Conclusion
These results suggest that AT may imply more severe clinical correlates in the BPD population, including an enhanced vulnerability toward psychopathological traits frequently reported in BPD patients such as eating disorders and trauma-related symptoms, stressing the need to clarify the complex interactions among these disorders and the factors that may shape specific illness trajectories.
Alterations in the central and peripheral energy metabolism are increasingly recognized as key pathophysiological processes in psychiatric disorders. We investigated mitochondrial respiration and density linked to cellular energy metabolism and oxidative DNA damage in borderline personality disorder (BPD).
Methods
This cross-sectional case–control study compared three groups matched for age and body mass index: women with acute BPD, remitted BPD, and female healthy controls (n = 32, 15, 29). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were investigated for differences in mitochondrial respiration, density, and markers of oxidative DNA damage.
Results
Participants with acute BPD showed significantly reduced and less efficient mitochondrial ATP production compared to both remitted individuals and controls. Mitochondrial coupling and respiration were inversely associated with oxidative DNA damage, although DNA damage levels did not differ significantly across diagnostic groups. Sensitivity analyses indicated that comorbid major depressive episodes and antidepressant use did not account for the results.
Conclusions
These findings indicate mitochondrial alterations accompany acute symptom severity in BPD and may improve with remission. Unraveling causes and consequences of mitochondrial downregulation and its interplay with DNA maintenance in the context of stress and psychopathology could contribute to novel models and treatment strategies in BPD and related severe psychiatric disorders.
Structural imaging studies of borderline personality disorder (BPD) have identified regions of reduced and increased cortical volume, as well as volume reductions in the hippocampus and amygdala, although with considerable variability across studies. Examining adolescent patients with the disorder can reduce potential confounding effects such as later development of affective and other comorbid disorders.
Methods
Fifty-one adolescents (48 females, 3 males) with BPD and without comorbid disorders and with 43 matched healthy controls underwent whole-brain voxel-based morphometry (VBM). Hippocampus and amygdala volumes were also measured using conventional volumetric techniques.
Results
At a threshold of p = 0.05 corrected, the BPD patients exhibited a cluster of grey matter volume reduction in the left temporo-parietal junction (TPJ). No evidence of volume reductions in the hippocampus or amygdala was found. Comparison between the female-only subsamples (48 BPD patients and 37 controls) yielded similar findings. The cluster of volume reduction in the left TPJ continued to be seen in 37 drug-naïve patients.
Conclusions
According to this study, the initial stage of BPD is characterized by decreased grey matter volume in the left TPJ, a region that is implicated in various aspects of social cognition. Given that the volume loss was detected prior to adulthood, in individuals without comorbidities, and among patients who were drug naïve, this finding could be significant for understanding the developmental trajectory of the disease.
A variety of computer-mediated health support groups populate the internet. The aim of Chapter 5 is to compare the ways to do emotions and to display empathy in two online mental health forums: one dedicated to borderline personality disorder (BPD) and the other to eating disorders (ED). The analysis focuses on the use of the perceptual verb ‘to feel’ in both sites. Two patterns of expression of emotions, related to the particularities of each mental health condition, emerged. For the participants in the ED forum, bodily sensations superseded emotions, to the point that the discursive construction of the self was dependent on their physical perceptions. In the BPD group, emotionally bounded states were the main concern shared by members to relate to each other and to somehow anchor an unstable sense of self. In both communities, feelings and emotions were embedded in empathic displays when providing highly person-centred support.
Howard CH Khoe, National Psychiatry Residency Programme, Singapore,Cheryl WL Chang, National University Hospital, Singapore,Cyrus SH Ho, National University Hospital, Singapore
Chapter 34 covers the topic of dependent personality disorder. Through a case vignette with topical MCQs for consolidation of learning, readers are brought through the management of a patient with dependent personality disorder from first presentation to its assessments and subsequent management. Things covered include the symptoms, diagnosis, differential diagnoses, management and relationship with folie à deux.
Howard CH Khoe, National Psychiatry Residency Programme, Singapore,Cheryl WL Chang, National University Hospital, Singapore,Cyrus SH Ho, National University Hospital, Singapore
Chapter 31 covers the topic of borderline personality disorder. Through a case vignette with topical MCQs for consolidation of learning, readers go through the management of a patient with borderline personality disorder from from first presentation to subsequent complications of the condition and its treatment. Topics covered include symptoms and diagnosis of borderline personality disorder, risk factors, co-morbidities, non-pharmacological management involving different psychotherapies and pharmacolgical management.
To determine the most acceptable term for borderline personality disorder (BPD). We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients who know what it feels like to be diagnosed with a mental disorder. The main outcome measures were the proportion of participants offended and confused by alternative terms for BPD.
Results
Seventy-two people participated in the study. Being diagnosed with a condition was more offensive than being diagnosed with a disorder (χ2 = 41.18, d.f. = 1, P < 0.01). Fluxithymia offended the fewest participants (13%), but was the most confusing term (31%). Emotionally unstable personality disorder was the most offensive term (63%). After fluxithymia, emotional intensity disorder was the least offensive term, and not especially confusing (11%). Changing BPD to emotional intensity disorder would avoid an offensive event every 3.6 diagnostic announcements.
Clinical implications
The diagnostic term BPD should be replaced with emotional intensity disorder, because this term provides a balance of clarity and inoffensiveness.
Values are closely linked to emotions and patients with BPD experience significant fluctuations in their emotions. Psycho-education about the hierarchy, proximity, and temporality of values offers an opportunity to reduce impulsivity and increase hope.
Most effective forms of therapy address personal agency. For this, the clinician needs to create a non-blaming, non-judgemental, and compassionate milieu which can enable the patient to take responsibility for their actions. Values-based interventions can improve agency, increase motivation, and help the patient find meaning, which is negatively associated with depression, suicidality, and self-harm. Early empirical evidence supports the usefulness of working with the patient’s values in therapy using acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), a modality that focusses on acting in accordance with one’s stated values. Empirical evidence from longitudinal observation suggests that an increase in agency in the patient’s life narrative is part of the recovery process.
Patients with BPD follow a different path in terms of recovery. Patients often find the word ‘recovery’ problematic and many feel that ‘discovery’ describes their journey more accurately. A significant proportion of people with BPD feel that they are not ill in the same way as people with other major mental illnesses but that they need help and support.
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) has a bad reputation, and its diagnostic criteria are notably vague. In this chapter, we focus on the “inappropriate anger criterion” and highlight different ways of understanding it considering philosophical accounts of the nature of anger. We submit that the openness of the criterion heightens the risk that patients’ anger is assumed to be unreasonable in a way that disrespects their moral standing. We tentatively analyze this situation as one of testimonial injustice, where negative prejudices about a bearer’s identity lead interlocutors to deflate the bearer’s credibility. Although this captures part of the picture, it does not capture all of it. We propose that the case at hand often also involves affective injustice, broadly defined as a wrong done to someone in their capacity as an affective being. The injustice here is typically the injustice of unjustifiably dismissing BPD patients’ anger as merely symptomatic of an underlying pathology and not fitting given the way they are being treated or, more generally, given their situation. Plausibly, persistent exposure to this kind of injustice can undermine patients’ moral agency when they internalize the disrespectful idea that they are unable to experience justified anger in response to moral offense.
The comorbidity of personality disorders and mental disorders is commonly understood through three types of theoretical models: either (a) personality disorders precede mental disorders, (b) mental disorders precede personality disorders, or (c) mental disorders and personality disorders share common etiological grounds. Although these hypotheses differ with respect to their idea of causal direction, they all imply a latent variable perspective. In this chapter, we aim to provide another meta-theoretical and methodological perspective on this issue. We start this chapter by explicating a relationalist ontology of this type of comorbidity in which we understand mental states and personality traits as ontologically related systems. Using psychometric network models, we endeavor to bridge to the empirical and clinical world and provide an example of a network model of the relations between major depression disorder (MDD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD). The results identify direct associations between symptoms of MDD and BPD.