To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
It is unclear if stroke occurring after cardiac procedures is more severe than stroke associated with cardiac conditions without procedures. We compared in-hospital acute ischemic stroke patients admitted with a cardiac diagnosis who did versus did not undergo cardiac procedures.
Methods:
In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed adults with in-hospital stroke admitted with a primary cardiac diagnosis in Alberta (2018–2022). Patients were categorized into no prior cardiac procedure, cardiac procedure, or cardiac surgery within 30 days of stroke diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between exposure groups and outcomes.
Results:
Among 499 patients (median age 70 years IQR [62–77], 36.7% women), 116 (23.2%) underwent a cardiac procedure, and 227 (45.5%) underwent cardiac surgery prior to stroke diagnosis. Median time from procedure to stroke diagnosis was 1.75 days (IQR 0.87–3.83). In-hospital mortality was 34.6%, 24.1% and 22.5% in patients with no prior procedure, cardiac procedures and cardiac surgery, respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, facility level and comorbidities, no significant differences were observed in mortality (cardiac procedure vs no procedure: aOR 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40–1.33; cardiac surgery vs no procedure: aOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.42–1.45). Among procedural patients, strokes recognized ≥2 days post-procedure were associated with higher mortality (2–7 days: OR 2.31, [1.18–4.52]; 8–30 days: OR 3.23, [1.59–6.59]).
Conclusions:
Adjusted mortality did not differ by cardiac procedural status, although residual confounding is possible. Later stroke recognition after cardiac procedures was associated with higher mortality, identifying a high-risk monitoring window.
Patients with stroke while hospitalized experience important delays in symptom recognition. This study aims to describe the overall management of an in-hospital stroke population and how it compares with an out-of-hospital community-onset stroke population.
Methods:
In this retrospective observational study, we included consecutive patients with in-hospital and out-of-hospital strokes (both ischemic and hemorrhagic) over a period of one year treated at a comprehensive stroke center. Demographic and clinical data were extracted, and patient groups were compared with regard to stroke treatment time metrics.
Results:
A total of 362 patients diagnosed with acute stroke were included, of whom 38 (10.5%) had in-hospital and 324 (89.5%) had out-of-hospital strokes. The median delay to stroke recognition (time between the last time seen well and first time seen symptomatic) was significantly longer in in-hospital compared to out-of-hospital strokes (77.5 [0–334.8] vs. 0 [0–138.5] min, p = 0.04). The median time interval from stroke code activation to the arrival of the stroke team at the bedside was significantly shorter in in-hospital versus out-of-hospital cases (10 [6–15] vs. 15 [8–24.8] min, p = 0.01). In-hospital strokes were less likely to receive thrombolysis (12.8% vs. 45.4%, p < 0.01) with significantly higher mortality (18.2% versus 2.6%, p < 0.01) and longer overall median hospital stay (3 [1–7] vs. 12 days [7–23], p < 0.01) compared to out-of-hospital strokes.
Conclusion:
This study showed significant delays in stroke symptom recognition and stroke code activation for in-hospital stroke patients despite comparable overall stroke time metrics. Development of in-hospital stroke protocols and systematic staff training on stroke symptom recognition should be implemented to improve care for hospitalized patients.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.