To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chinese law provides compensation to enterprises when their financial interests are affected by legal transitions. While statutes broadly guarantee this compensation, court decisions on such matters vary from case to case. Empirical evidence suggests that courts generally offer stronger protection to enterprises in the manufacturing and real estate sectors than to those in the coal mining industry. This chapter applies the theory of regulatory costs to explain these varying levels of protection across different sectors. It argues that in sectors where the boundaries between public power and private property are more difficult to define, regulatory costs tend to be higher, leading to weaker legal protection. Consequently, the protection offered to private enterprises is hierarchical rather than equal – it is stronger in some sectors than in others, depending on the need for intense regulation and frequent policy adjustments. Under China’s legal system, the regulatory costs are likely to be borne by private investors in the regulated sectors, which discourages private investment and amplifies the role of state-owned enterprises.
This chapter explores the roles of different generations of lawyers in Estonia’s post-1991 democratic transformation. Focused on young, progressive lawyers familiar with Western legal culture and established leaders educated under the Soviet regime, the study draws on extensive interviews and document analysis to trace how these actors shaped the nation’s transition from Soviet legal structures to a contemporary democratic framework. The findings highlight the critical importance of individual efforts in redefining legal practices, emphasising the dual impact of innovative youth and experienced mentors in driving significant legal and institutional reforms. The study enhances understanding of the dynamics of legal transitions in post-Soviet states, highlighting the essential blend of innovation and experience necessary for successful legal reform.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.