To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Patients with cyanotic CHD and those with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease are at risk of liver fibrosis. We compared hepatic extracellular volumes and native T1 values to better understand the burden of liver disease in these populations.
Methods:
The sample comprised 136 patients in 5 groups: control (n = 23), metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease [mild (F0–F1) and significant (F2–F4) fibrosis; n = 45], repaired tetralogy of Fallot (n = 30), and Fontan circulation (n = 38). Differences were assessed using linear regression models, with adjustment for the body mass index and sex.
Results:
The hepatic extracellular volume was significantly larger in the Fontan group (43.96% ± 4.22%) than in the other groups, even with adjustment. Patients with Fallot had significantly larger extracellular volumes (36.77% ± 5.63%) than did controls and mild liver disease (p < 0.001 and p = 0.011, respectively), although smaller extracellular volumes than patients with significant liver disease (p = 0.042). These trends were corroborated by native T1 values, which were highest in patients with Fontan (1013.7 ± 86.1 ms), although not significantly different from patients with F2–F4 steatotic liver disease.
Conclusions:
The potential burden of CHD-related hepatic injury and steatotic liver disease highlights the importance of early identification. Given the possible additional risk of liver fibrosis in patients with coexisting metabolic dysfunction and CHD, comprehensive clinical management should prioritise regular metabolic risk assessment and the promotion of a healthy lifestyle to reduce the likelihood of liver disease development in this vulnerable population.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.