Refugee youth are at elevated risk for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other mental health disorders, yet systemic and cultural barriers limit access to care. Scalable, transdiagnostic interventions such as Problem Management Plus (PM+) are promising, but their impact on trauma symptoms is modest. Incorporating brief trauma-focused components may enhance effectiveness.

To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of PM+ with an emotional processing module (PM+EP) for refugee youth aged 16–25 years in the Netherlands.

Refugee youth with elevated psychological distress (K10 > 15) and impaired functioning (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) > 16) were randomised into PM+EP, PM+ with supportive counselling (PM+SC), or care as usual (CAU). Feasibility and acceptability were assessed via recruitment, adherence, fidelity and qualitative interviews. Psychological distress, PTSD symptoms, functioning and self-identified problems were measured at baseline, post-intervention and follow-up. Registered in Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands (OMON; Trial ID: NL-OMON56254).

Fifty-two participants were randomised (PM+EP: n = 17; PM+SC: n = 19; CAU: n = 16). Attendance and fidelity were high, and PM+ interventions were rated as acceptable and culturally appropriate. No significant between-group differences were observed in the primary analyses. Exploratory analyses suggested greater short-term symptom reduction for probable depression in PM+EP versus CAU (b = –0.79, s.e. = 0.38, p = 0.04). Effect size estimates ranged from small to large across outcomes (Hedges’ g = –0.98 to 0.19).

PM+ is feasible, acceptable and safe for refugee youth aged 16 years and older. The potential added value of the EP module remains unclear and warrants further investigation.

The trial was registered in the Dutch clinical trial registration: Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands (OMON) (Trial ID: NL-OMON56254; https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/56254).

Transnational migrant populations face critical barriers to mental health service utilization that perpetuate mental health disparities globally. Overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) number over 2 million globally and 25% are female domestic workers. Structural barriers prevent equitable access to mental health services for this population. Electronic mental health (eMental Health) intervention is a scalable alternative to face-to-face treatment. The current study sought to identify key correlates of intention to use eMental Health within a community of female Filipino domestic workers living and working in Macao (SAR), China.

Respondent-driven sampling implemented at a community field site was used to reach a sample of 1364 female domestic workers. A multivariable adjusted partial proportional-odds (PPO) model was used to assess relevant correlates of intent to use eMental Health.

The majority (62.8%) reported being likely to utilize eMental Health. The adjusted PPO model showed that younger age (18–25, 26–35, 36–45 v. over 55), longer time as an OFW, being likely (v. neutral and unlikely) to seek professional services, willingness to pay for services (v. not), belief that mental health services are a priority (v. low priority), having access to Wi-Fi outside the employer's home (v. not), and higher levels of social support were associated with increased odds of intent to use eMental Health.

eMental Health is a promising intervention with high potential for uptake among OFWs. The majority of the study population owned a smartphone and were able to connect to the Internet or Wi-Fi. Future work will rigorously evaluate eMental Health programs for use among OFWs.