To evaluate the ability of a new apparatus (Dipsys 25, Société SGN, Bagnols sur Cèze, France) to disinfect biomedical waste, including both potentially infectious agents and the normal saprophytic flora of the waste.

Disinfection was assessed using standard methods (reference strains were fixed on reference carriers according to the French AFNOR methods) and nonstandard assays. Assays in conditions of hospital use, evaluations of bacterial survival during storage, sporicidal effect, and spore survival during storage were performed in parallel. Finally, bactericidal effect in extreme conditions (association of high contamination and high bacterial protection conditions) was tested with normal fecal flora. Bacterial counts were performed after treatment by the apparatus and without treatment (controls). All tests were carried out in triplicate.

In all treated carriers, a bacterial population decrease of at least 5 log10 was obtained. Assays performed in hospital-use conditions did not show any bacterial growth. Concerning the evaluation of sporicidal effect and spore revival during conservation, a minimum reduction of 5 log10 was observed in all assays performed, without survival. Finally, concerning assays in extreme conditions, the decrease of bacterial population was between 5 log10 and 10 log10 for vegetative anaerobes of normal fecal flora.

Under our study conditions, the study apparatus reduced the tested microbial populations by a minimal factor of 5 log10. The main advantage of the apparatus is the opportunity to treat contaminated waste inside hospital wards, at the point of initial collection, without pulverization, by nonspecialized staff.

To investigate the use of the formula of Rhame and Sudderth for the interconversion of prevalence and incidence data on the frequency of nosocomial infections.

Comparison of observed and calculated incidence data and prevalence data.

One 8-week incidence investigation in the surgical and intensive care units of eight medium-sized hospitals; three separate point-prevalence studies in the same units.

The overall prevalence observed after the three prevalence studies in 2,169 patients was 6.8% (95% confidence interval [CI95], 5.7-8.0). In 2,882 discharged patients observed during the incidence study, the mean hospitalization was 9.8 days; patients with one or more nosocomial infection had a mean hospitalization time of 22.3 days and a mean interval of 8.2 days from admission to the first day of infection. Based on these data, the overall calculated incidence was 4.7%, whereas the observed incidence was 4.3% (CI95, 3.6-5.2). Vice versa, an overall prevalence of 6.2% was found when calculated from the observed incidence data.

The approximate mathematical relationship between the prevalence and incidence data of nosocomial infection is confirmed by this study. However, although it is theoretically possible, we would not recommend the conversion of prevalence into incidence data or vice versa.

To determine the fraction of hospital deaths potentially associated with nosocomial infection (NI).

A matched (1:1) case-control study.

An 800-bed, tertiary-care, teaching hospital.

All patients older than 14 years who were admitted to the hospital between January 1, 1990, and January 1, 1991, were eligible. All 524 consecutive deaths that occurred in the hospital comprised the case group. For each case, a control patient was matched for primary admission diagnosis and admission date.

The proportion of hospital deaths potentially associated with NI was estimated from the population attributable risk (PAR) adjusted for age, gender, service, severity of illness, length of stay, and quality of the medical record.

For stays longer than 48 hours, the PAR for all NIs was estimated to be 21.3% (95% confidence interval [CI95], 16.8%-30.5%). The greatest proportion of deaths potentially associated with NIs was observed in patients with only one infection (PAR, 15.0%; CI96, 10.9%-22.6%) and bacteremia or sepsis (PAR, 7.7%;CI95,4.6%-11.6%).

NIs are associated with a large proportion of intrahospital deaths. This information may help clinicians and healthcare managers to assess the impact of programs for the prevention and control of NIs on intrahospital death.

To compare the performance of three purified protein derivative (PPD) formulations: Tubersol (Connaught); RT23, Statens Serum Institut (SSI); and RT23, Mexico, tested in Mexican populations at low and high risk for tuberculosis (TB).

A double-blinded clinical trial.

A university hospital in Mexico City.

The low-risk population was first or second-year medical students with no patient contact; the high-risk population was healthcare workers at a university hospital.

Each of the study subjects received the three different PPD preparations. Risk factors for TB, including age, gender, occupation, bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) status, and TB exposure, were recorded. A 0.1-mL aliquot of each preparation was injected in the left and right forearms of volunteers using the Mantoux technique. Blind readings were done 48 to 72 hours later. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated at 10 mm of induration using Tubersol as the reference standard. The SSI tested the potency of the different PPD preparations in previously sensitized guinea pigs.

The low-risk population had a prevalence of positive PPD of 26%. In the low-risk population, RT23 prepared in Mexico, compared to the 5 TU of Tubersol, had a sensitivity of 51%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 86%. The RT23 prepared at the SSI had a sensitivity of 69%, a specificity of 99%, a positive predictive value of 95%, and a negative predictive value of 90%. In the high-risk population, the prevalence of positive PPD was 57%. The RT23 prepared in Mexico had a sensitivity of 33%, a specificity of 100%, and a positive predictive value of 53%; the RT23 prepared at the SSI had a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 98%, a positive predictive value of 98%, and a negative predictive value of 89%. RT23 used in Mexico had a potency of only 23% of that of the control. There was no statistical association among those with a positive PPD, irrespective of previous BCG vaccination (relative risk, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.3; P=.78).

Healthcare workers had twice the prevalence of positive PPD compared to medical students. RT23 prepared in Mexico had a low sensitivity in both populations compared to 5 TU of Tubersol and RT23 prepared at the SSI. Previous BCG vaccination did not correlate with a positive PPD. Low potency of the RT23 preparation in Mexico was confirmed in guinea pigs. Best intentions in a TB program are not enough if they are not followed by high-quality control.

To determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, surgical-site infections (SSIs).

Prospective observational study of all patients undergoing surgery during a 3-month period.

Two urban hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam.

All 697 patients admitted for emergent and elective surgery.

Data were collected on all patients undergoing surgery during a 3-month period at each hospital. We stratified the data by type of surgery, wound class, and Study on the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control (SENIC) risk index. The analysis was done with the data sets from each hospital separately and with the combined data. The risk factors for SSI were identified using a logistic-regression model.

During the period of observation, 10.9% of 697 patients had SSI. The SSI rate was 8.3% for clean wounds, 8.6% for clean-contaminated, 12.2% for contaminated, and 43.9% for dirty wounds. The lowest rate of SSI (2.4%) was found in obstetric-gynecologic procedures and the highest rate (33.3%) in cardiothoracic operations. Using the SENIC risk index, the incidence of SSI in low-risk patients was 5.1%; for medium-risk patients, 13.5%, and high-risk patients, 24.2%. In a logistic-regression model, abdominal surgery (odds ratio [OR], 4.46; P<.01) and wound class IV (OR, 5.67; P<.01) were significant predictors of SSI. All patients were treated with prolonged courses of perioperative antibiotics. Overall infection control practices were poor as a result of deficient facilities, limited surgical instruments, and a lack of proper supplies for wound care and personal hygiene.

There was a higher incidence of SSI in low-risk patients in Vietnam compared with developed countries. Excessive reliance on antimicrobial therapy as a means to limit SSI places patients at higher risk of adverse effects from treatment and also may contribute to worsening problems with antimicrobial resistance. Establishment of an infection control program with guidelines for antimicrobial use should improve the use of prophylactic antibiotics and attention to proper surgical and wound-care techniques. These interventions also should reduce the incidence of SSI and its associated morbidity and costs.