We partner with a secure submission system to handle manuscript submissions.
Please note:
You will need an account for the submission system, which is separate to your Cambridge Core account. For login and submission support, please visit the
submission and support pages.
Please review this journal's author instructions, particularly the
preparing your materials
page, before submitting your manuscript.
Click Proceed to submission system to continue to our partner's website.
To save this undefined to your undefined account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your undefined account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The relationship between nonlinear large-scale dynamo action and the generation and transport of magnetic helicity is investigated at moderate values of the magnetic Reynolds number ($Rm$). The model consists of a helically forced, sheared flow in a Cartesian domain. The boundary conditions are periodic in the horizontal and impenetrable for the vertical. The magnetic field is required to be vertical at the upper and lower boundaries. There are two consequences of this choice; one is that the magnetic helicity is not gauge invariant, the second is that fluxes of magnetic helicity are allowed in and out of the domain. We select the winding gauge, define all the contributions to the evolution of the helicity in this gauge and measure these contributions for various solutions of the dynamo equations. We vary $Rm$ and the shear strength, and find a rich landscape of dynamo solutions including travelling waves, pulsating waves and non-wave-like solutions. We find that, at the $Rm$ considered, the main contribution to the growth of magnetic helicity comes from processes throughout the volume of the fluid and that boundary terms respond by limiting the growth. We find that, in this magnetic Reynolds number regime, helicity conservation is not a strong constraint on large-scale dynamo action. We speculate on what may happen at higher $Rm$.
It is demonstrated that finite-pressure, approximately quasi-axisymmetric stellarator equilibria can be directly constructed (without numerical optimization) via perturbations of given axisymmetric equilibria. The size of such perturbations is measured in two ways, via the fractional external rotation and, alternatively, via the relative magnetic field strength, i.e. the average size of the perturbed magnetic field, divided by the unperturbed field strength. It is found that significant fractional external rotational transform can be generated by quasi-axisymmetric perturbations, with a similar value of the relative field strength, despite the fact that the former scales more weakly with the perturbation size. High mode number perturbations are identified as a candidate for generating such transform with local current distributions. Implications for the development of a general non-perturbative solver for optimal stellarator equilibria are discussed.