The development of temporal extensions of Answer Set Programming (ASP) has led to the emergence of non-monotonic linear-time ($\textrm {TEL}$), dynamic ($\textrm {DEL}$), and metric ($\textrm {MEL}$) temporal equilibrium logics. However, the inherent rigidity of highly optimized ASP systems often hinders the rapid exploration and implementation of alternative logical designs. In this work, we propose a flexible meta-programming framework that operationalizes the semantics of varied temporal logics through a unified, declarative framework. Our approach extends standard ASP meta-programming by augmenting clingo’s theory grammar with formal type specifications and nesting capabilities. To ensure semantic correctness, we introduce a transformation pipeline that protects nested modalities from stable-model-based simplifications during grounding. We demonstrate the extensibility of our framework by implementing meta-encodings for $\textrm {TEL}$, $\textrm {MEL}$, and $\textrm {DEL}$. We provide a comprehensive account of $\textrm {TEL}$ and highlight the key features for managing the interval constraints of $\textrm {MEL}$ and the Fischer–Ladner closure in $\textrm {DEL}$. Finally, we introduce the metasp system, a versatile tool that encapsulates this workflow.

The power grid is a critical infrastructure underpinning all aspects of modern society and its services. Maintaining its effectiveness requires continuous adaptations. In particular, addressing sustainability targets, demand patterns, and urbanisation trends requires implementing changes to the network. Actual developments can potentially span over a decade, with supply continuity and service quality that must be preserved throughout by ensuring conformance to several topological and combinatorial invariants. Long-term power grid planning deals with the above process, and although planning languages could be a natural choice, the kind of properties and invariants needed are cumbersome to express in such languages; on the contrary, they can be elegantly and succinctly encoded in answer set programming (ASP). In this paper, we propose the first approach to automate and optimise the long-term power grid planning process using ASP. Experimental evaluations conducted on synthetic and real-world grid data confirm the expressive power of the proposed ASP-based approach and demonstrate its effectiveness.

In strongly typed languages, types are verified at compile time, while dynamically typed languages, such as Prolog, perform type consistency checks entirely at run-time. Extending dynamic languages with assertions allows expressing both classical types and more general properties, providing high expressiveness, but at the cost of run-time overhead. Abstract interpretation allows safely approximating such program properties at compile time, which has been used to reduce the number of properties that require run-time checks, while still reporting unverified properties that can guide further static analyses, testing, or domain refinement. In this work, we first study how to selectively integrate the run-time semantics of assertion properties into a multivariant, top-down, goal-directed abstract interpretation algorithm. We then show how multiple inferred calling patterns can be exploited to reduce the number of properties that must be checked at run-time, thus minimizing the overhead. Finally, we report on an implementation of our approach in the Ciao system and provide performance results showing improvements over previously reported techniques.

Logic rules allow analysis of complex relationships to be expressed easily, especially for transitive relations in critical applications. However, understanding and predicting the efficiency of different inference methods remain challenging, even for simplest rules given different kinds of input data. This paper analyzes the efficiency of all three types of well-known inference methods – query-driven, ground-and-solve, and fact-driven – along with their respective optimizations, and compares with optimal complexities for the first time, for analyzing transitive graph relations. We also experiment with rule systems widely considered to have the best performance. We analyze all well-known rule variants and widely varying input graphs. The results include precisely calculated optimal time complexities; comparative analysis across different inference methods, rule variants, and graph types; confirmation with performance experiments; as well as discovery of a performance bug.

Generating accurate and executable code using Large Language Models (LLMs) remains a significant challenge for underrepresented programming languages, such as Prolog and Lisp, due to the scarcity of public training data compared to high-resource languages like Python. This paper introduces a generalizable Reinforcement Learning (RL) approach that combines small-scale versions of the Qwen2.5-Coder model with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to enable effective code generation through reasoning. To address the limitations of sparse datasets, we integrate execution-driven feedback directly into the RL loop, utilizing a reward system that exploits both logical correctness and structural formatting. Experimental results on GSM8K dataset demonstrate significant improvements in reasoning quality and code accuracy across underrepresented languages. These findings underscore the potential of our approach to benefit a wide range of programming languages lacking extensive training resources by leveraging symbolic reasoning and interpreter-based feedback.

Neurosymbolic AI combines neural networks with symbolic programs to create robust and explainable predictions. One such framework is NeurASP, which trains a neural network to predict concepts and reasons over them using rules written in answer set programming (ASP) to solve downstream tasks. Crucially, labels are only provided for the downstream prediction produced by the symbolic rules, not for the latent concepts themselves. Backpropagation through the non-differentiable ASP component requires expensive probability and gradient calculations, which has hindered scalability to more sophisticated tasks. In this paper, we address the current limitations of NeurASP by improving its computational performance through vectorization, batch processing, and caching of intermediate computations during training. We compare computation speeds between the original and our new implementation of NeurASP and report speedups of multiple orders of magnitude for larger tasks. To this end, we propose a new dataset of difficult tasks involving playing cards, which we use to test the capabilities of NeurASP’s enhanced learning function.

Logica is an open-source logic programming language that compiles to SQL and runs on platforms including DuckDB, SQLite, PostgreSQL, and BigQuery. Unlike classic Datalog, Logica permits the free combination of recursion and aggregation, enabling concise formulations of algorithms from shortest paths to PageRank. This expressiveness introduces fundamental semantic challenges: aggregate predicates are updated by replacement rather than accumulation, evaluation is sensitive to rule scheduling, and programs may converge to meaningful results without ever reaching a fixpoint, placing them outside the scope of traditional fixpoint semantics. We address these challenges with Defendant-Opponent (DO) semantics, a stabilization-based framework for nonmonotonic logic programs. Program evaluation is modeled as a rewrite system over derivation states. A ground atom is true if, from every reachable state, there exists a continuation after which the atom persists in all further derivations. This notion admits two equivalent characterizations: (1) game-theoretically, truth is what a Defendant can defend against any Opponent in a three-turn derivation game; and (2) modally, a formula $t$ is a theorem precisely when the condition $\Box \mkern 1.33mu{\LARGE \Diamond }\Box \mkern 1.33mu\,t$ holds in the derivation graph viewed as a Kripke structure. We show that DO semantics coincides with classic least fixpoint semantics for positive Datalog programs and is compatible with both the Well-Founded Semantics (the two never disagree on definite answers) and the Stable Model Semantics (every stable model is a DO interpretation). For programs that converge without reaching a fixpoint, we introduce $\omega$-limit interpretations, giving rigorous meaning to iterative computations such as PageRank. DO semantics thus offers a coherent framework that complements existing logic programming semantics while supporting recursive aggregation.

Event Calculus (EC) implemented in Answer Set Programming (ASP) has proven suitable for specifying requirements on safety-critical systems thanks to its elegant representation of both discrete and continuous changes and its semantic closeness to semi-formal natural language. However, continuous changes and the size of value domains of time and system properties (fluents) pose significant challenges. Grounding-based ASP solvers, for example, clingo, which implement Discrete EC (DEC), lead to combinatorial explosion in program size and inaccurate representation. The grounding-free s(CASP) does not discretize but struggles with non-termination due to its top-down execution. This paper introduces Hybrid EC, an extended axiomatization of DEC, that tackles the challenges via functional fluents and a mapping of time to abstract steps. We implement it using clingcon and clingo-lpx (Hybrid ASP systems over integers and rationals, respectively) where the value (dense) domains of fluents and time are represented as linear constraints and evaluated by external solvers, while ensuring termination whenever solutions exist. We validate both implementations on a number of examples and observe that they are unaffected by the size of the domains and that handling rationals does not impact scalability. Most importantly, the ability of clingo-lpx to handle dense domains enables accurate modeling of continuous change.

Distributed applications increasingly support local-first collaboration over shared data, allowing multiple users to perform updates concurrently without global coordination. Such collaboration requires careful design to capture the intended semantics of the concurrent interactions. We introduce a declarative framework for specifying and reasoning about the semantics of conflict-free replicated data types (CRDTs) and CRDT-based applications in Datalog. The framework models CRDT semantics as executable logic programs over operation contexts, making concurrency explicit and compositional, and thus amenable to automated analysis. As one application, we use property-based testing to compare implementations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to systematically use Datalog as a foundation for prototyping and analyzing complex CRDTs and their compositions. We evaluate our methodology using a collaborative graph data editing case study and report experimentation results assessing correctness validation and scalability with an increasing number of operations and replicas.