To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The main claims of Kant’s Mathematical World are that for Kant mathematics is a science of magnitudes, the world of experience is a world of magnitudes, and there is an essential role for intuition in representing magnitudes. This paper critically examines the argument for these main claims. It articulates an eight-step “Master Argument” that connects magnitude to mathematics through a series of intermediary concepts. Some of these steps are left unclear in Kant’s Mathematical World, and I argue that the book’s silence on syntheticity and the role of intuition in proof is a partial cause for this unclarity.
The Latin slogan iudex non calculat is on the rise. It appears in well over thirty English-language journals and a federal court decision in the United States; in Germany, more than sixty law journal articles mention the phrase in their titles alone, and German members of parliament have used it more frequently in the years 2020–2023 than in most previous decades combined. The phrase gets invoked as an “ancient”, “antique”, or “Roman” maxim of legal and political practice in Europe and the U.S. alike. Does this show how shared history unites even dissimilar legal systems? Hardly so. There is no general understanding of what the maxim is supposed to mean, or where it actually originated, or what rhetorical effect it serves. An exploration of these questions reveals a fascinating story of intellectual export across the Atlantic: The phrase is not, as commonly assumed, of Roman or antique origin, although it must be considerably older than 1850. It must have originated in Germany, where we find the oldest occurrences and whose authors, topics, and journals clearly drive its international propagation since 1947. There are at least four different interpretations of the maxim, each with opposing connotations, making it a versatile tool in lawyers’ rhetorical kit. While academics seem to use it mostly to produce an aura of erudition and epistemological authority, politicians employ it as an offensive or defensive quip mostly among male conservatives. Among German law students, it is by far the best-known principle, maxim or proverb related to law and numbers, although students, too, disagree about its exact meaning. While they acknowledge that the maxim has become part of German lawyers’ professional identity, many wish it were otherwise.
The problem of perception – how far we can trust the senses, and how we come to believe what we think we know about the external world – goes back to the ancient Greeks. Naive realism – that we immediately know reality in what we see – is refuted by cases in which appearances are obviously distorted by perceptual artifacts, like the black drop in the case of transits of Venus. Perhaps the most famous case of the difficulty in visual telescopic observations is that of the canals of Mars, which led to a long-running controversy, not only among observers but engaging the wider public as well, about the nature of the actual surface markings of the red planet. In the end, there proved to be no canals in the artifactual sense, and instead the subtleties of perception revealed themselves – which include the nature of the visual system, the way that sense-information is processed in the brain, and the way the brain uses guided perception and prediction to make “sense” of the sense perceptions.
Chapter 16 examines what it means to be a primary mathematics teacher in a professional context. It considers the attributes of effective mathematics educators, the requirements for professional accreditation, and the value of professional learning and engagement with mathematics education networks. You will also reflect on your preparation for the LANTITE and how to continue developing your identity as a confident and capable mathematics educator.
Chapter 13 explores the concept of mathematical identity and how both students and teachers come to see themselves in relation to mathematics. It examines the impact of maths anxiety – particularly in the early years of teaching – and how identity is influenced by community, context, and experience. The chapter highlights the importance of understanding and responding to diverse school settings, including rural, regional, and remote communities. You will also consider how to meaningfully embed the Australian Curriculum cross-curriculum priorities – Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories and cultures, Asia and Australia’s engagement with Asia, and sustainability – within mathematics lessons.
Chapter 15 explores the foundational practices of planning, assessing, and using data in mathematics education. It unpacks the essential components of effective mathematics lessons and outlines strategies for designing learning sequences that are responsive to student needs. The chapter introduces formative and summative assessment practices, the role of feedback, and how student learning data can be used to inform, adapt, and improve teaching and learning.
Chapter 14 focuses on diversity in the primary mathematics classroom and the need to create inclusive and responsive learning environments. It examines strategies to recognise and value students’ diverse cultural, linguistic, and learning needs, and offers practical approaches for differentiation and equitable participation in mathematics. You will explore how inclusive pedagogy supports all learners in developing confidence and capability as mathematical thinkers.
Chapter 5 explores computational thinking and how digital tools and processes – such as decomposition, abstraction, and algorithmic thinking – can support students’ mathematical understanding. You will consider how robotics, apps, and modelling can be used to promote logical reasoning and real-world application.
Chapter 7 introduces the interrelated strands of Number and Algebra (Foundation to Year 2) and explores how young children build informal understandings of number through everyday experiences. The chapter focuses on early numeracy skills such as magnitude, counting, number order, and using numbers in real-world contexts. Thinking and working mathematically is foregrounded through rich tasks that encourage flexible thinking and build foundational knowledge for later learning.
Chapter 9 focuses on how students develop foundational understandings of Measurement and Space in the early years (Foundation to Year 2). It explores how young learners engage with concepts such as length, area, time, and mass through hands-on experiences and everyday contexts. You will consider how to structure learning experiences that build conceptual understanding, support spatial reasoning, and introduce key mathematical vocabulary and thinking processes.
Chapter 3 introduces the concept of Big Ideas in mathematics—such as number sense, algebraic thinking, and spatial reasoning—and how these support deep learning. You will consider ways to develop and connect key mathematical ideas, using strategies like Fermi problems to promote critical and creative thinking.
Chapter 1 introduces the structure and purpose of the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics (Foundation to Year 6), exploring the importance of mathematics in education and everyday life. You will examine what it means to think, reason, and work mathematically, including the roles of inductive and deductive reasoning. This chapter also highlights how reasoning skills develop across the primary years and clarifies the relationship between numeracy and mathematics in the curriculum. These understandings form the basis for designing meaningful learning experiences that connect curriculum content with students’ developing mathematical reasoning.
Chapter 6 delves into experiments, models, and simulations in mathematics, introducing powerful strategies for inquiry and representation. You will learn how to scaffold students’ understanding of mathematical concepts through modelling frameworks and interactive tools, enhancing conceptual understanding and problem-solving.
Chapter 2 focuses on the role and potential of technology in the mathematics classroom. You will be introduced to the TPACK and SAMR frameworks, which support effective planning and teaching with digital tools. This chapter demonstrates how technology can enhance engagement, feedback, personalisation, and collaboration, while providing guidance on selecting high-quality digital resources aligned with the cross-curriculum priorities. The integration of technology is framed to enrich pedagogical practice and support diverse learners.
Chapter 10 builds on earlier learning and explores how students extend their understanding of Measurement and Space in the middle and upper primary years (Years 3 to 6). It focuses on the development of key concepts such as units of measure, angles, transformations, and geometric properties. You will investigate strategies for using precise mathematical language, addressing common misconceptions, and applying spatial and measurement thinking to solve purposeful, real-world problems.
Thinking and Working Mathematically in Australian Primary Classrooms equips pre-service teachers and educators with the knowledge and skills to confidently teach mathematics to children from Foundation to Year 6. Disproving the myth that mathematics must be challenging, the authors present the subject as accessible, engaging and fun. Supporting all educators, including those who may lack confidence in their mathematical ability, the book is rich with images that clarify concepts and is closely aligned with the latest version of the Australian Curriculum. The book connects theory to practice by highlighting the importance of mathematics in real-world contexts, integrating current research with practical activities to support effective classroom teaching. Visually engaging and easy to read, Thinking and Working Mathematically in Australian Primary Classrooms is a practical, contemporary and meaningful resource, designed to support teachers from their studies into professional practice.
Chapter 1 is mainly devoted to articulating Wittgenstein’s normativism. This label reflects what I consider to be Wittgenstein’s fundamental insight: that mathematical sentences actually serve to formulate norms, or rules; furthermore, as rules, they lack truth-values. (However, in my reading, he also accepts that these sentences can make truth-apt assertions.) The chapter also sketches the two doctrines relevant to the subsequent discussion – platonism and conventionalism – and highlights the eliminativist aspect of normativism while emphasizing its therapeutic consequences: by eliminating problems, one achieves ‘peace of mind.’
The Introduction sets the stage for the project. It situates the idea of the book in the scholarly landscape, by explicating the main directions of the present account and how it relates to other accounts. It briefly introduces some of the central positions appearing in the text (e.g., ‘normativism,’ ‘eliminativism,’ ‘(non)revisionism’), presents the methodological commitments of the work, and gives summaries of the chapters.
This final chapter provides a summary of the book, together with some additional clarifications. Along the way, I will highlight several open questions and difficulties faced by the present account – and, if the account offered here is accurate, by Wittgenstein’s own position.
Virtue epistemologists have analyzed individual intellectual virtues such as intellectual humility and perseverance, but intellectual generosity remains relatively under-explored. This may be because intellectual generosity seems simpler and less impactful than other virtues, but in this paper, I argue it is more complex and significant than it might first appear. More precisely, I use case studies from mathematics to show that sharing intellectual goods, the core activity of intellectual generosity, is often complicated and challenging, especially when sharing with large groups. Further, I show that intellectual generosity can have important and long-lasting beneficial consequences for entire research areas, both in terms of generating new discoveries and improving the intellectual climate. Additionally, I suggest a practical way for agents to cultivate intellectual generosity and show that there is a connection between intellectual generosity and intellectual courage in the context of mathematics.