To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Long-term care (LTC) is an increasingly crucial part of Canada’s healthcare system, particularly in Atlantic Canada, which has some of the highest current proportions and future projections of adults over the age of 65 nationwide. Most of the direct care within LTC homes is provided by care aides, yet little is known about this critical workforce. In this study, we explore cross-sectional data from 1,338 care aides from the four Atlantic provinces, which were collected through the Atlantic Research Collaboration on Long-term Care (ARC LTC). Overall, we find that these workers are primarily middle-aged women with almost a decade of experience in the sector. While care aides in the region appear to like their work, their commitment is undermined by significant personal and professional strain, with over half at high risk of burnout, nearly a third reporting below-average mental health scores, and one-in-three considering quitting their job.
Care homes are vulnerable to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) outbreaks, with residents at risk of severe disease outcomes, though surveillance studies are lacking. In September 2024, RSV vaccination was introduced for adults in England aged 75–79 years, excluding most residents (median age 86 years). Between October 2024 and March 2025, we prospectively extracted information on RSV outbreaks in English care homes reported to UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). Enhanced surveillance questionnaires (ESQs) were completed for a sample of outbreaks, including information on symptomatic residents, testing, and outcomes. Acute respiratory infection (ARI) cases were defined symptomatically, RSV cases based on test-positive RSV (≤5 residents tested per home), and RSV outbreaks as ARI outbreaks including ≥1 RSV case. We described outbreak trends, attack rates, hospitalizations, and deaths. Of 2419 ARI outbreaks in care homes, 222 (9%) were RSV outbreaks, with additional respiratory viruses identified in 69 (31%). Among 48 (22%) RSV outbreaks completing ESQs, the median ARI attack rate was 15% (IQR 10%–24%). Of 350 ARI cases, 32% (112) were confirmed RSV cases on routine testing, 20% (71) were hospitalized, and 6% (20) died. These findings demonstrate the vulnerability of care home residents to RSV infection, hospitalization, and death, which are potentially preventable through vaccination.
Person-centered care that honors individual preferences can improve the well-being of nursing home (NH) residents with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD). However, preferences such as going outside independently are often restricted due to perceived safety risks. There is a critical need for strategies that help NH staff balance safety concerns with residents’ autonomy.
Materials and methods:
We developed the Decision-making In aGing and demeNtIa for autonomy (DIGNITY) intervention using the Community-Engaged Intervention Mapping (CEIM) Model. This multilevel, theory informed program was codesigned with NH stakeholders to support shared decision-making and promote preference-congruent dementia care.
Results:
A total of 53 stakeholders participated in focus groups and engagement sessions. Feedback informed six key refinements to the DIGNITY program: manual formatting, communication strategies, staff role delineation, addressing resident decision-making capacity, and identifying implementation barriers and facilitators. The final intervention includes a structured manual, decision-making tools, and a training and coaching program to support NH staff in honoring resident preferences while managing perceived risks.
Conclusion:
DIGNITY is a novel, stakeholder-informed intervention designed to support preference-based dementia care in rural NHs. Future research should assess its feasibility, acceptability, and impact on staff attitudes and resident outcomes.
Nonprofit, public, and for-profit welfare institutions have different operational logics. The distinctiveness of a nonprofit institution is more prominent in some circumstances than in others. This paper is based on case studies conducted in Norwegian municipalities to understand when and why nonprofits operate with distinctive steering mechanisms. Based on the framework of hybrid organizations, I analyze the interaction among institutions in the public sector that have democratic legitimacy through a hierarchical organization, the for-profit sector that seeks efficiency to compete in the market, and the nonprofit sector that has civil society logic. The study revealed how more detached demand-driven regulation of nonprofit schools gives them more room to pursue goals different from those of the public sector institutions, which can be contrasted with the supply-driven regulation of nursing homes that have far less room for steering independent of the municipalities. Surprisingly, the results also suggested that small close-knit communities influence institutions in ways that diverge from the hierarchical steering, and that this happens across the sector split. Moreover, regulation and alternative sources of income contribute to making the organization more hybrid, in the sense that the hierarchical steering is challenged.
People with dementia have complex needs and priorities that change along the condition’s trajectory. Attending to these needs requires person-centred long-term care and support to be sensitized to the experiences and subjective realities of people with dementia. Regulators assessing the quality of care and support are important change agents in the health system. Research on regulatory assessments of care and support at home is, however, scarce. This qualitative research aimed to gain insight into the experiences of people with dementia receiving person-centred care and support at home, and to explore how regulators assess the quality of care and support provided in clients’ homes. Using the emotional touchpoint method, we found that people with dementia often experience a tension between wanting to maintain a sense of agency and having to accept increasing dependence on others. Using interviews and document analysis, we identified that regulators found it difficult to include the knowledge gained from clients’ experiences of care and support in their assessments. In regulatory assessments, objective risks are prioritized and assessment criteria are based on a largely positivistic epistemology, favouring measurable criteria. This results in regulators assessing observable or documentable aspects of care that do not acknowledge the necessary nuances and emotional aspects that are most important to people with dementia. We conclude that alternative approaches to regulatory assessments are necessary to evaluate person-centred long-term care and support in a way that reflects the experiences and needs of people with dementia and promotes person-centred practices.
Behavioral health needs are highly prevalent among individuals receiving long-term services and supports (LTSS), yet palliative care (PC) models in these settings often underemphasize psychiatric symptom management. This study explores interdisciplinary staff perspectives on behavioral health as a core domain of PC across nursing home and Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) sites.
Methods
We conducted a secondary analysis of a multi-site survey assessing PC needs across 13 LTSS sites within a large health system in New York State. We examined 5 survey items related to psychiatric symptom management, analyzing frequency, comfort, perceived benefit, and training interest. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between staff characteristics and behavioral health-related outcomes.
Results
Among 597 respondents, 60.5% reported that over half of their patients could benefit from psychiatric symptom management, and nearly half (49.2%) reported managing such symptoms weekly or more. Forty percent identified psychiatric symptom management as one of the top three ways PC specialists could help their patients, and 44.6% expressed interest in further behavioral health training as part of further PC training. Prior professional experience with PC was associated with greater recognition of behavioral health needs among patients (aOR 1.6), greater likelihood of managing psychiatric symptoms (aOR 2.0), and greater comfort doing so (aOR 1.5).
Significance of results
Behavioral health emerged as a salient and frequently encountered domain of serious illness care among LTSS staff, particularly in nursing home and PACE settings. Staff with prior PC experience were more engaged and confident in addressing psychiatric symptoms. Findings underscore the need for PC models in LTSS to better integrate behavioral health – through training, interdisciplinary collaboration, and care delivery redesign – to meet the complex needs of medically and psychiatrically vulnerable populations.
Approximately 25% of older adult residents who experience an acute change in health status are transferred from Long-Term Care (LTC) to Emergency Departments (ED). We explored the use of an intervention (i.e., LTC to ED) care and referral pathway, INTERACT® Change in Condition cards, and STOP AND WATCH tool, in informing decision making regarding resident transfers. We conducted 22 semi-structured interviews with Health care Providers (HCPs) involved in the LTC to ED care pathway in Western Canada. Thematic analysis of the qualitative interviews was used to evaluate the use of the pathway and tools. We identified six themes influencing decision making around resident transfers including interprofessional practice and conflict, ambiguous and clear medical cases, ageism, health care providers’ goals, family involvement in resident care, and intervention tools. The intervention may be useful in streamlining, documenting, and increasing transparency in complicated LTC resident care and transfer decisions.
There is a substantial difference between the housing that older Americans prefer and the housing that the market supplies. While market failures and seniors’ resource constraints explain part of this mismatch, zoning laws, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement policies, and health law also loom large. Older Americans strongly prefer to age in place, in home-like environments. This chapter focuses on two types of housing that facilitate that manner of aging: Green House nursing homes and accessory dwelling units. The chapter discusses the substantial benefits for seniors who rely on others for care, and those who can live independently, in these respective kinds of housing. These benefits include substantial health and quality-of-life advantages as well as the ability to maintain connectedness within existing social networks. The chapter further examines the legal impediments to the proliferation of these housing types and the measures that some forward-looking jurisdictions are taking to facilitate their growth.
The federal government does not provide universal social insurance for the risk of needing nonmedical custodial care in old age. A majority of individuals aged sixty-five or older will require long-term care (LTC, also known as long-term services and supports) at some point in their lives. LTC includes assistance with activities of daily living, such as eating, bathing, dressing, getting in and out of a chair or bed, walking, toileting, and continence. This chapter explores the implications – for current and future seniors and their caregivers – of increased longevity and other trends on unpaid LTC and on publicly funded and privately funded paid LTC. In addition to addressing alternative means of accessing and funding LTC, this chapter highlights recent LTC innovations, new developments in the law, and federal LTC reform proposals.
Nursing Home residents are among the most at-risk populations during disasters. This study aimed to examine changes in nursing home non-COVID-19 mortality in Texas during Winter Storm Uri.
Methods
Publicly available datasets were examined to determine whether nursing homes in Texas were associated with a change in non-COVID-19 nursing home mortality and a change in non-COVID-19 mortality differences compared to all other states in the 4 weeks following Winter Storm Uri. This study conducted a mixed-effects negative binomial spline analysis of non-COVID-19 mortality during the timeframe.
Results
Although Texas suffered fewer deaths overall compared to the rest of the country, Texas experienced a 20% increase in non-COVID-19 deaths in the first 7 days of Winter Storm Uri, and a reduction in the change of deaths compared to all other states, indicating a 19% decrease in the difference between the 2 directly following the storm.
Conclusions
Texas suffered a significant increase in non-COVID-19 nursing home mortality during Winter Storm Uri, but overall lower levels of mortality compared to the rest of the nation. Future research should examine other states or counties that experienced significant energy outages for a more comprehensive understanding of the storm’s effects.
The United States has more than 15,000 nursing homes that care for more than 1.3 million residents. More than 70 percent of these facilities are for-profit, and about 9 percent are owned by private equity funds. Nursing home residents are vulnerable – and yet too many nursing homes have inadequate staffing levels, poor infection control, failures in oversight, and deficiencies that harm residents. Government enforcement has proved inadequate. Private law tools can force transparency of ownership, strengthen litigation by families of injured patients, and create expanded fiduciary tools to claw back excess profits.
What is Private Law? It has two components in the nursing home setting. First, the tort doctrine of corporate negligence, which first applied tort liability to hospitals, treats nursing homeowners as responsible for their residents. Corporate negligence principles expand the reach of tort against a secretive industry that conceals ownership to avoid suit. Second, fiduciary law principles likewise apply perfectly to nursing home owners: Residents are vulnerable physically, lack the cognitive skills to protect themselves, do not choose their home, and require heightened care. Fiduciary law duties add to tort damages future-looking equitable tools that change the ownership calculus for those who invest in and run nursing homes. Fiduciary law identifies power imbalances and vulnerability, allowing vulnerable beneficiaries to demand proper care or be forced out of business.
The devastating impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the missing voices of families and residents in long-term care (LTC) decision-making and policy processes. Family and resident councils constitute one method of raising these voices, but there is currently a gap in evidence of how to promote the effectiveness of these councils. We conducted five focus groups and two interviews with LTC home leaders, residents, family members, and advocates in British Columbia using a participatory approach integrating knowledge-users throughout the research process. Using a framework analysis, we found modifiable (communication, structure, recruitment/engagement, council leadership, culture/attitudes, and resources/supports) and non-modifiable factors (medical complexity of residents and short lengths of stay) affecting council effectiveness. We discuss strategies implemented by knowledge-users to address modifiable effectiveness factors and construct a preliminary tool (a 35-question survey) that operationalizes and identifies areas that can increase council effectiveness in practice to ensure that their voices are heard in LTC decision making.
Pandemic-related restrictions in nursing homes have undermined the critical role that family and friend caregivers play in enhancing resident quality of life. We examined how family caregiver access restrictions in nursing homes were implemented and how they impacted the mutual well-being of and relationships between residents and their caregivers over time. Between March 2021 and March 2022, 24 ‘designated caregivers’ in Atlantic Canada were interviewed three times. We identified changes in family relationships and activities over time, constricted support networks, the increasing need for advocacy and monitoring, and the generally negative cumulative impacts of restrictions, especially during residents’ end-of-life. Subsequent adaptations to access restrictions allowed caregivers to contribute to essential monitoring, care relationships, and advocacy roles. We argue that the role of designated caregivers in nursing homes must be maintained during public health emergencies to ensure resident’s supportive family relationships and general well-being.
Scabies outbreaks cause significant morbidity and disruption in aged care facilities and other institutional settings. Failure to manage scabies outbreaks may be attributable to low awareness amongst healthcare workers. A survey was distributed to healthcare workers across aged care facilities in South-East Queensland, Australia. The survey captured demographics, prior scabies experience, knowledge-based questions, and attitudes. Scabies was common in aged care facilities, with 41% of 128 respondents encountering the disease while working in aged care. Participants demonstrated sound theoretical knowledge regarding scabies (median knowledge score 82%). Scabies knowledge was not associated with years of experience in the sector or educational level but was associated with respondent age (p = 0.017). Knowledge gaps were evident regarding diagnosis, incubation periods, and treatment. Respondents demonstrated an inconsistent ability to identify atypical clinical presentations of scabies, showing discordance between theoretical knowledge and its practical application. The ability to identify crusted scabies was low, reflecting the high frequency of misdiagnosis of index cases in scabies outbreaks. Respondents considered scabies to be a problem and were supportive of improved management guidelines. These study outcomes will inform the design of accessible, targeted educational resources for scabies to help prevent and reduce the impact of outbreaks.
This article proposes ethical — and legal — accountability for lawyers representing clients such as private equity (PE) firms who create ownership structures for nursing home systems. Using PE ownership as a case study, I will show that nursing home residents are often harmed and Medicaid costs inflated. I propose private law provides tools to compel such accountability, through (1) aiding and abetting doctrines and (2) fiduciary doctrines that require that the fiduciary be responsible for its vulnerable beneficiaries, not just ethically but for damages and equitable relief. I further propose that the teaching of Professional Responsibility needs to be changed to force law students to consider the effect of legal practice on third parties in situations like health care financing.
This paper contributes to the legal and socio-legal literature on long-term care (LTC) facilities (also known as nursing homes) by drawing from the responsive regulation literature and empirical research conducted in 2021 and 2022. Enforcement is an under-explored aspect in the legal and socio-legal literature on LTC. This research asks how the regulator’s enforcement activities shape compliance of LTC homes in Ontario. This paper reports the results from eleven semi-structured key informant interviews with associations that represent LTC facilities, advocacy organizations, unions, and professionals, such as lawyers. The current enforcement activities do not appear to evoke responsiveness in at least some of the LTC homes because the regulator’s approach is not dynamic: the regulator does not change its mix of “persuasion” and “coercion” in order to respond to the motivations and behaviours of homes. Inspection and enforcement activities have had little impact on how homes respond to rules.
To reduce sleep problems in people living with dementia using a multi-component intervention.
Design:
Cluster-randomized controlled study with two parallel groups and a follow-up of 16 weeks.
Setting:
Using external concealed randomization, 24 nursing homes (NH) were allocated either to the intervention group (IG, 12 clusters, 126 participants) or the control group (12 clusters, 116 participants).
Participants:
Participants were eligible if they had dementia or severe cognitive impairment, at least two sleep problems, and residence of at least two weeks in a NH.
Intervention:
The 16-week intervention consists of six components: (1) assessment of sleep-promoting activities and environmental factors in NHs, (2) implementation of two “sleep nurses,” (3) basic education, (4) advanced education for staff, (5) workshops to develop sleep-promoting concepts, and (6) written information and education materials. The control group (CG) received standard care.
Measurements:
Primary outcome was ≥ two sleep problems after 16 weeks assessed with the Sleep Disorders Inventory (SDI).
Results:
Twenty-two clusters (IG = 10, CG = 12) with 191 participants completed the study. At baseline, 90% of people living with dementia in the IG and 93% in the CG had at least two sleep problems. After 16 weeks, rates were 59.3% (IG) vs 83.8% (CG), respectively, a difference of −24.5% (95% CI, −46.3% – −2.7%; cluster-adjusted odds ratio 0.281; 95% CI 0.087–0.909). Secondary outcomes showed a significant difference only for SDI scores after eight and 16 weeks.
Conclusions:
The MoNoPol-Sleep intervention reduced sleep problems of people living with dementia in NH compared to standard care.
This chapter examines the impact of Covid-19 on residents of nursing homes and other long-term care institutions, how ageism and other factors shape that impact, and what this suggests for regulatory approaches to ensuring high-quality, long-term care. The paper shows that weak regulatory enforcement mechanisms, a failure to mandate minimum staffing requirements, and a willingness to tolerate inhumane conditions for older adults has led to a situation in which systemic neglect is the norm in nursing homes. It will then outline what an alternative, humane, and pandemic-resilient system for providing long-term care could look like going forward, and the regulatory changes needed to achieve this alternative approach.
Not only care professionals are responsible for the quality of care but other stakeholders including regulators also play a role. Over the last decades, countries have increasingly invested in regulation of Long-Term Care (LTC) for older persons, raising the question of how regulation should be put into practice to guarantee or improve the quality of care. This scoping review aims to summarize the evidence on regulatory practices in LTC for older persons. It identifies empirical studies, documents the aims and findings, and describes research gaps to foster this field.
Design:
A literature search (in PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, APA PsycInfo and Scopus) was performed from inception up to December 12th, 2022. Thirty-one studies were included.
Results:
All included studies were from high-income countries, in particular Australia, the US and Northwestern Europe, and almost all focused on care provided in LTC facilities. The studies focused on different aspects of regulatory practice, including care users’ experiences in collecting intelligence, impact of standards, regulatory systems and strategies, inspection activities and policies, perception and style of inspectors, perception and attitudes of inspectees and validity and reliability of inspection outcomes.
Conclusion:
With increasingly fragmented and networked care providers, and an increasing call for person-centred care, more flexible forms of regulatory practice in LTC are needed, organized closer to daily practice, bottom-up. We hope that this scoping review will raise awareness of the importance of regulatory practice and foster research in this field, to improve the quality of LTC for older persons, and optimize their functional ability and well-being.
In considering choices, think about your needs, now and in the future. How can you remain socially engaged and not isolated? What can you afford? What about health issues over time? What activities are important to you? What things do you value the most?