To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter considers how the structure and processes of the regulatory systems that govern the legal profession are relevant to lawyers’ ethics and behaviour – that is, the significance of ‘institutions’ for lawyers’ ethics.We consider ways in which the ethics demonstrated by the legal profession as a whole are likely to affect lawyers’ individual and personal ethics. We first consider the ethical dimensions of different models of regulation of the legal profession – self-regulation, co-regulation and independent regulation. We then trace the development of these regulatory approaches across Australia and map today’s landscape. We examine the specific effects of these regulatory approaches on the formulation of rules of ethical conduct, reservation of legal work and how we admit people to the legal profession, and professional discipline processes and principles.In this chapter we focus on the ‘law of lawyering’ – rules and regulatory regimes that have been created to apply specifically to lawyers under the legislation and case law governing the legal professions of each of the States and Territories.
Standard applications of psychology to addressing poverty involve the facilitation of decision-making orientations associated with flourishing, such as feeling high personal efficacy and regulating one’s behavior to fit long-term goals. Although such versions of agency and self-regulation may be helpful in Euro-American middle-class settings, their suitability is rarely considered for the kind of non-Western, nonaffluent settings in which the majority of the world’s population lives. In addressing this, we recommend analyzing how the accessibility and suitability of decision-making processes are shaped by the socioecological context in which decision-making takes place. Drawing on socioecological, cultural, and political psychology, we present a multilayered framework in which optimal decision-making mindsets are shaped by the material conditions, interpersonal relations, and societal discursive frames in which people are embedded. We illustrate the framework through the case study of migrant workers who caste marginalized in India, an emerging economy that is host to many behavioral anti-poverty efforts.
This study investigates the serial mediation effect of motivated behavior on L2 grammar attainment, mediated by self-efficacy and self-regulation, among Polish and Iranian university students. A total of 766 participants, 380 Polish and 386 Iranian L2 learners, were recruited to explore these relationships. Data were collected by means of self-report instruments and a researcher-developed grammar test. Descriptive statistics, measurement invariance testing, and structural equation modeling (SEM) were used to analyze the data. The findings revealed a positive direct effect of motivated behavior on self-efficacy and self-regulation, which in turn exerted a positive influence on grammar attainment. Measurement invariance testing confirmed that the constructs were interpreted similarly across both cultural groups. These results support the proposed serial mediation model, suggesting that motivated behavior fosters grammar learning through the development of self-efficacy and self-regulation. The study contributes to a deeper understanding of the psychological mechanisms underlying L2 grammar learning and offers valuable insights for pedagogy.
This article develops the concept of delegated gatekeeping to explain regulatory systems where a primary gatekeeper (the “principal”) delegates revocable roles of support withholder or provider to other gatekeepers (“agents”). Delegation requires that agents assume non-traditional gatekeeping roles such as reputational stewardship (safeguarding the principal’s reputational capital). To illustrate delegated gatekeeping concretely, this article conducts a detailed case study of the London Stock Exchange’s Alternative Investment Market (“AIM”). It argues that reputational incentives can partially alleviate agent gatekeepers’ conflicts of interest, and that these incentives have strengthened on AIM relative to historic levels.
Chapter six examines how ridesharing companies confronted public safety concerns that became inseparable from their business models. As platforms scaled rapidly, traditional regulatory categories failed to address insurance coverage, background checks, and accountability.
The chapter traces how firms developed comprehensive safety frameworks that included standardized insurance rules, continuous monitoring, and public reporting. These systems were not voluntary add-ons. They were necessary to sustain operations across jurisdictions with conflicting expectations.
The case study shows how companies engaged in rule formation through consultation with insurers, regulators, and advocates. Executive decision-making was disciplined through disclosure of safety data. Monitoring systems tracked incidents and enabled adjustment.
The chapter demonstrates how these private governance systems later shaped public law. States adopted insurance frameworks and reporting requirements modeled on corporate practices.
This chapter illustrates corporate ordering at work in a domain where business viability and public safety could not be separated. It shows both the potential and limits of private governance and highlights the conditions under which corporate ordering can support legitimate regulatory outcomes.
Chapter three develops the concept of corporate ordering as a general framework for understanding how corporations govern social conflict. Corporate ordering refers to internal systems that allow firms to make rule-like decisions that affect large populations under conditions of disagreement and uncertainty.
The chapter introduces a tripartite framework consisting of rule formation, executive decision-making, and monitoring. Each function addresses a different governance challenge. Rule formation allows firms to set standards before conflicts arise. Executive decision-making implements those standards in real time through choices that require justification. Monitoring evaluates whether practice aligns with principle and enables revision.
The chapter explains why no single mechanism is sufficient. Consultation without monitoring produces symbolic commitments. Disclosure without standards produces inconsistency. Monitoring without authority produces reports without consequences. Corporate ordering emerges when these functions operate together.
Drawing on legal theory and institutional analysis, the chapter distinguishes corporate ordering from regulation, contract, and hierarchy. It argues that corporate ordering is neither a substitute for public law nor a form of private sovereignty. It is a practical response to the limits of existing governance frameworks.
Corporate Ordering explains how modern corporations navigate social conflict when law is incomplete, politics are polarized, and shareholders disagree about corporate purpose. Drawing on original case studies from ridesharing, climate sustainability, and artificial intelligence companies, the book reveals the internal governance systems corporations use to set standards, justify decisions, and monitor their impact. Moving beyond the familiar debates between shareholder primacy and stakeholder capitalism, the book offers a clear framework for understanding how corporate power actually operates in practice. Written for scholars, practitioners, policymakers, and informed general readers, it provides a timely guide to corporate governance in a world where business decisions increasingly function as social policy.
Musical experience can reveal dimensions of the self, relationships and flourishing that can challenge assumptions about the lives of people with disabilities. The Adaptive Music Bridging Program engages students aged 8–14 years with a disability in ensemble-based instrumental lessons, cultivating musical skills and literacies through weekly participation. A case study explores participatory pedagogies that promote self-regulation, the meeting of students’ musical goals, empowerment from participation and community music engagement. The study challenges music teachers to approach their profession with access and equity at the heart of what they do, who they teach and what they aspire for their students.
How to develop good character is a question that resonates with many people. Parents wonder how to instill virtues in their children, educators seek effective ways to build character in their students, and researchers study how moral qualities can be cultivated in citizens. This broad interest reflects a fundamental human concern: can we intentionally develop better character? Although different stakeholders may emphasize different aspects-from parental focus on raising ethical children to organizational interest in developing principled leaders; to therapists and counselors focused on individual self-improvement; as well as software developers considering how games and online learning environments support curiosity, interest, and knowledge —they share a common goal of understanding how to foster positive character development. This Element speaks to these varied interests by examining how insights from personality psychology and intervention science can inform practical approaches to character development.
Randy Brazie, NeuroConsulting Group LLC,Geoffrey Vanderpal, NeuroConsulting Group LLC and Purdue Global,Abi Blakeslee, NeuroConsulting Group LLC and Somatic Experiencing International
Chapter 1 ventures into the heart of the PVT, revealing its profound implications for healthcare organizations. The polyvagal theory fundamentally reimagines our approach to the ANS by ushering in an era where the three states of ANS function – the ventral vagal, sympathetic, and dorsal vagal – are considered allies for promoting our overall well-being. The polyvagal ladder is a visual roadmap to these states, showing how we can ascend the ladder through innovative interventions, offering patients and healthcare professionals the power to self-regulate and shift toward the ideal ANS state of safety and social engagement.
This chapter explores how understanding and supporting working memory can lead to measurable performance improvements, particularly in educational and workplace settings. The authors clarify that while the core capacity of working memory is difficult to expand through training, strategic interventions can significantly enhance performance on memory-reliant tasks. Emphasis is placed on improving task execution through environmental adaptations, the use of compensatory strategies, and supporting executive functions such as time management, sequencing, and planning. The chapter criticises commercial brain-training programmes for their lack of generalisability, instead advocating for applied, context-specific approaches that improve real-world functioning. Techniques such as spaced rehearsal, verbal self-instruction, and chunking are discussed as effective methods for enhancing working-memory efficiency in meaningful tasks. The chapter also highlights the importance of supportive environments – including informed educators and employers – to optimise task demands and reduce unnecessary cognitive load. Ultimately, performance improvement is presented not as a by-product of innate memory enhancement but as a result of deliberate, structured support that enables individuals with dyslexia to apply their strengths and manage their limitations more effectively.
To assess the exposure of Austrian children to TV high in fat, sugar and/or salt (HFSS) food and beverage ads and identify changes in HFSS food advertising after the implementation of self-regulatory measures of marketing restriction.
Design:
All ads shown on five popular TV channels for Austrian children/teenagers were coded over 4 d (360 h) using the WHO TV Monitoring Protocol, to identify food/beverage marketing, marketing strategies, target audience and presence in peak viewing times. Nutrient analysis was performed using nutrient profile models (NPM), which classify foods as permitted or not permitted for marketing to children: WHO EURO NPM for international comparability and Austria’s NPM for local regulatory compliance. Results were compared with pre-regulatory Austrian TV monitoring data.
Setting:
Austria.
Participants:
None.
Results:
Of 9099 ads captured, 17·0 % were for foods and beverages. Most promoted products not permitted for marketing to children according to WHO EURO NPM (81·8 %) and Austria’s NPM (83·8 %). On all channels, the advertising rate for food ads rose throughout the day, culminating during child/teen peak viewing times in the evening. A mix of marketing strategies and persuasive appeals was used; emotional themes (e.g. friendship, holidays and enjoyment) were more common in not permitted ads, compared with permitted ads. Not permitted ads featured elements appealing to children/teenagers significantly more often than permitted ads.
Conclusions:
Despite self-regulatory measures of marketing restriction, children and teenagers in Austria are still exposed to a high number of advertisements for HFSS foods using impactful emotional marketing strategies on TV. To protect children from this influence, further regulations are called for.
New military recruits, typically emerging adults, must rapidly adapt to the stressors of basic combat training (BCT) – a developmentally significant and intentionally stressful experience. Drawing on a developmental psychopathology framework of risk and resilience, we prospectively examined predictors of psychological adaptation in a longitudinal sample of recruits (age mean = 19.0, SD = 3.0) assessed before and after BCT (59.7% of those eligible for follow-up; N = 657). Pre-registered hierarchical linear regressions tested direct and moderating effects of individual difference variables previously linked to risk and resilience. Higher levels of prior adversity, worse self-regulatory difficulties, and (unexpectedly) higher general cognitive ability at baseline were associated with worsening post-BCT internalizing distress, after accounting for baseline symptoms. Gender, baseline social support, and baseline Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) scales were not associated with longitudinal changes in internalizing distress, and no moderation effects were found. Our findings suggest that bolstering emotion regulation skills, especially among those with prior adversity, may be important for preventing the emergence of psychopathology and promoting more successful adaptation to military roles. The unexpected association between cognitive ability and distress may reflect context sensitivity, suggesting that the demands of BCT may alter the typical adaptive function of cognitive strengths.
Executive attention, an underlying mechanisms enabling self-regulation, can be behaviorally indicated by post-error slowing (PES) – a delay in reaction time following an error. PES develops during early childhood – plausibly shaped by genetic and environmental factors. We tested whether mothers’ and children’s PES predicted their post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms during a real-life stressful situation, and how each one’s PTSD symptoms moderated the other’s. Ninety-five kindergarten-aged children and mother pairs participated. In T1, participants’ PES was measured during a laboratory task. About 1.5 years afterwards, six months after a national traumatic event, mothers reported their own and their child’s PTSD symptoms (T2). Key findings show that for mothers with high PTSD symptoms, children with more developed PES at T1 showed less PTSD symptoms at T2. In contrast, for mothers with low PTSD symptoms, children’s PES was unrelated to their PTSD symptoms. For mothers of children with high PTSD symptoms, those with less developed PES at T1 showed high PTSD symptoms at T2. Mothers of children with low symptoms showed no such relation. The models explained 61.1% of children’s and 51% of mothers’ PTSD symptoms. These findings provide evidence for the protective effect of self-regulation against PTSD, and the mutual dyadic moderating effects of its manifestation.
The INGO Accountability Charter is the only global, cross-sectoral regulatory initiative for international NGOs. This is the first independent study of perceptions of its effectiveness, based upon 26 in-depth semi-structured interviews with key individuals from 11 leading international NGOs. Firstly, it analyzes interviewees’ beliefs about the motivations of NGOs in joining the Charter. The findings contribute to the scholarly debate about the key drivers for voluntary regulation between ‘club theorists’ and ‘constructivists’ by demonstrating that NGO behavior in this regard is both self-interested and norm-guided. Secondly, it investigates the extent to which the interviewees believe that the Charter has been effective in enhancing the accountability of its members. Their responses further underline the applicability of club theory and constructivist explanations of NGO behavior, and lead to several policy recommendations about the future direction of Charter.
The regulation of charitable fundraising is no longer just about the regulation of fundraising but about good governance, and increasingly involves co-regulatory regimes which blend elements of self- and state regulation. Canada’s charitable sector has undertaken a bold experiment in creating a comprehensive certification system for good governance, including fundraising, which reframes the target of regulation from the informed donor to the well-performing charity and has the ambitious goal of building a community of practice for self-improvement. At the same time, the federal government has introduced new guidance on fundraising that not only outlines accepted cost to revenue ratios but also specifies standards of good governance. It is an open question as to whether this new self- and state regulation will remain as dual systems or evolve into a hybrid co-regulatory regime in which government integrates sector certification into its own risk management.
While the principled case for humanitarian accountability is relatively straightforward, the practice is demonstrably more complicated, necessitating constant negotiation among stakeholders. However, despite the wave of research into nongovernmental accountability, few empirical studies have grappled with the phenomenon’s inherently contested nature. This paper foregrounds tensions arising in the elaboration of nonprofit accountability. Its approach is informed by critical constructivist theory, an international relations approach attuned to social power, identity and exclusion, and conceptual contestation; its conclusions are supported by interview data with key stakeholders. Focusing on the Humanitarian Accountability Partnership (HAP) International, it finds that initial consensus on the desirability of beneficiary (downward) accountability quickly gave way to principled disagreements and operational difficulties. Specifically, the initiation stage of HAP was marked by two conflicts—a debate about enforcement and a turf war over control—culminating in rebranding and relocation. The implementation stage was characterized by tensions over certification and intra-organizational struggles over leadership. The contemporary practice of accountability is shown to be a contingent and contested social process, with humanitarian identity and practice ultimately at stake.
Infant self-regulation is shaped by early physiological systems and caregiver-infant co-regulatory interactions. Maternal perinatal (pre- and/or postnatal) depression may affect these processes and infants’ development of this critical construct. However, literature addressing the association between maternal perinatal depression and infant self-regulation has been mixed. We conducted a pre-registered meta-analysis of the association between maternal perinatal depression and several self-regulation constructs (e.g., effortful control, executive function) measured during the first 2 years of life. We included 68 reports comprising 193 effect sizes and 16,722 mother-infant dyads. On average, studies included an equal number of male and female infants, and, for most (68%) studies, most participants were White. Average infant age ranged from 0 – 16 months. Three-level random effects meta-analytic models indicated a small, significant overall association, with higher levels of depression associated with lower self-regulation (r = −.10, 95% CI = −.14, −.06, p < .001). There was substantial heterogeneity in this pooled effect. Subsequent analyses indicated moderation by methodological and conceptual variables. Evidence that maternal perinatal depression is associated with lower infant self-regulation underscores the importance of supporting dyads experiencing perinatal depression. Clarifying this association highlights a critical next step of examining potential causal processes linking maternal and infant well-being.
Chapter 1 introduces the challenges of trusting public cooperation without monitoring and coercion, considers current research on the relationship between concepts such as cooperation and honesty, and examines the effectiveness of voluntary compliance.