To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Broad-spectrum micronutrients (BSM) are shown to improve mental health in randomised controlled trials. Robust positive effects are reported for emotional regulation, irritability and aggression. The effect sizes are modest, but comparable to cognitive–behavioural therapy and antidepressants. It is time to consider BSM as an informed choice when treating psychological distress.
Psychostimulant prescribing for individuals with comorbid attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and schizophrenia spectrum disorders appears increasingly common despite limited evidence to guide the practice. This commentary highlights diagnostic and treatment challenges, critiques the current evidence base and argues for cautious prescribing, greater attention to substance use and the development of pragmatic clinical guidance.
The European Psychiatric Association (EPA) undertook a study to investigate treatment preferences of European psychiatrists towards Bipolar Disorder (BD), as part of the Ambassador programme series of surveys.
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional online survey among psychiatrists and psychiatry trainees from 40 European countries. The questionnaire contained clinical vignettes of different phases of BD including manic, rapid cycling, mixed, hypomanic, and depressive episodes, for both initial and subsequent treatment strategies.
Results
The final sample consisted of 654 participants, from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), Southern Europe (SE), Northern Europe (NE), and Western Europe (WE). The majority preferred pharmacotherapy, most commonly as a combination of two or three drugs to treat all phases of the BD, with lithium being the most preferred option in all phases.
Among antipsychotics, olanzapine and quetiapine were the most commonly chosen. Antidepressants were applied in almost 20% of responses for the depressive phase. Psychosocial interventions were not systematically implemented, particularly during manic and mixed episodes, but when recommended, the most common approaches included psychoeducation, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in up to 40% in depressive phase, and lifestyle recommendations. However, latent class analysis identified four different classes of prescribers.
Conclusions
Psychiatrists showed broadly similar pharmacological treatment preferences for BD, with frequent use of lithium-based combination therapies and limited implementation of psychosocial interventions, although latent class analysis revealed distinct prescribing profiles. These findings support the need for enhanced dissemination of evidence-based guidelines and greater integration of psychosocial approaches in BD care.
This article explores the development of ethological research on aggression in late socialist Czechoslovakia, focusing on the work of pharmacologist Miloslav Kršiak (1939–2016) at the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences. Drawing on archival records, personal correspondence, and institutional sources, it examines Kršiak’s international networks and shows how he sustained collaborations with colleagues abroad, as well as the strategies he adopted to navigate the political setting of the Normalization period. The study also demonstrates how ethological approaches were adapted to meet state socialist research priorities, particularly in the study of addiction to over-the-counter analgesics. It suggests that, although pharmacological research on aggression drew on a shared transnational repertoire of methods, its development and uses were shaped by the political structures, institutional routines, and public health priorities of late state socialism. By tracing both transnational exchange and local adaptation, the article contributes to a more differentiated history of Cold War science and to a broader understanding of how biological approaches to aggressive behaviour took shape in different post-war settings.
This article examines the development of antipsychotic medications in the period following the discovery of chlorpromazine in the mid-1950s up to the early 21st century. This era is defined by the identification of dopamine modulation as the central mechanism for treating psychosis, and by the development of a diversity of treatments around this mechanism. This strategy yielded a broad range of effective treatments and transformed clinical care; however, with the notable exception of clozapine, it failed to produce substantial gains in overall efficacy. Newer agents primarily differed in tolerability rather than therapeutic impact. Partial dopamine agonists refined, rather than replaced, this approach. As a result, the dopaminergic era offers a cautionary lesson for psychiatric drug development and underscores the need to move beyond dopamine-based models per se.
The recent introduction of the first non-dopaminergic antipsychotic marks a pivotal moment in psychopharmacology. This article revisits the development of chlorpromazine, the world’s first licensed antipsychotic, and considers what its history reveals about innovation in psychiatric drug discovery. Chlorpromazine emerged in the early 1950s as a treatment for surgical shock. Its subsequent recognition as an antipsychotic transformed psychiatric care, ushering in the modern era of psychopharmacology. This article argues that chlorpromazine’s success was not serendipitous: it depended on specific enabling conditions, including rigorous behavioural neuroscience, astute clinical observation across disciplines, close collaboration between clinicians and industry, and relatively agile regulatory frameworks. Understanding these factors is essential as psychiatry enters a new phase of drug development for the treatment of psychosis.
After more than seven decades in which antipsychotic drug development has been dominated by dopaminergic mechanisms, the recent emergence of a muscarinic receptor-based treatment represents a conceptual shift in the pharmacotherapy of psychosis. This article reviews the history and development of the first clinically effective non-dopaminergic antipsychotic, tracing its origins to unexpected behavioural effects observed during trials of muscarinic agonists developed for Alzheimer’s disease. Early studies of the muscarinic agonist xanomeline demonstrated antipsychotic efficacy, but were limited by poor tolerability due to peripheral cholinergic adverse effects. Subsequent progress depended on the dissociation of central therapeutic effects from peripheral side-effects, through the combination of xanomeline with the peripherally restricted muscarinic antagonist trospium. The development of this treatment highlights several broader lessons for psychiatric drug discovery, including the value of revisiting previously abandoned compounds, the benefits of leveraging existing human safety data on the importance of early-phase translational research and the role of innovative companies.
There is an urgent need for more effective and better-tolerated treatments for mental illness. Achieving this requires responsible collaboration between academia, healthcare professionals, industry and people with lived experience. However, regulatory and compliance frameworks can make early-stage, non-promotional collaboration difficult, particularly when discussions are exploratory and multidisciplinary. Drawing on experience from the UK Research and Innovation Mental Health Platform’s attempted collaboration with an international pharmaceutical company, this article describes how engagement was delayed and constrained by uncertainty over regulatory interpretation, contractual requirements and differing compliance processes across jurisdictions. These barriers risk excluding people with lived experience, narrowing scientific dialogue and reducing opportunities to align innovation with patient priorities. Robust regulation remains essential to protect patients, maintain public trust and prevent inappropriate influence. However, frameworks should better distinguish promotional activity from transparent, pre-competitive scientific exchange enabling proportionate, inclusive and responsible early dialogue between academia, healthcare, industry and patient communities.
In this chapter the author presents a series of impressionistic patient narratives that explore the import of the physician–patient relationship in psychiatric prescribing.
In this chapter the author argues for an increased attunement to iatrogenic harm in psychiatric prescribing that extends beyond the physiological harms that are commonly considered. The author posits that psychological harm from psychiatric prescribing is common and underappreciated and is linked with problems such as medical trauma and stigma that can worsen outcomes in patients with psychiatric illness.
With the dramatic progress in the neurosciences over the past few decades, it is a challenge for psychiatrists to navigate this information in ways that allow incorporation and translation of relevant data into their prescribing habits. In this chapter, the authors present a model framework of how to utilize neuroscientific understanding of psychopathology and mechanistic effects of medications to guide management. Examples include use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for depressive disorders and for trauma- and stressor-related disorders, rooted in discussion of how the nervous system is understood to be dysregulated in these conditions. There is also discussion of the biological impact of psychotherapy and how it intersects with the effects of medications. Importantly, caution is advised in indiscriminately applying neuroscientific data in guiding treatment approaches, as the applicability of this knowledge to everyday clinical settings is a continuously evolving matter. Finally, the authors present how prescribers might incorporate the neurobiological dimension into psychoeducation with patients, allowing them greater agency in decision-making regarding their care.
Social justice in psychiatric prescribing necessarily elevates the personhood of the patient, in the context of the relationship with the provider as well as in the larger societal milieu. Grounded in a historical narrative, we offer practical tools to apply a social justice framework to prescribing practices. Simple steps advise the reader to consider practice context, utilize nuance in formulation, and pursue quality improvement in three common scenarios. At the end of the chapter, we offer reflection questions to encourage ongoing social justice in your psychiatric prescribing practice.
The salience of culture is recognized in psychiatric research and practice as the population grows increasingly diverse and complex. It is therefore of great importance to appreciate cultural humility as an essential framework in psychiatric prescribing to improve patient–physician alliance, effective prescribing and overall patient outcomes. The approach of traditional cultural competence training in medical education is limited, and indirectly perpetuates disparities as physicians and other practitioners assume proficiency in patients’ cultures, but cultural humility emphasizes self-reflection and lifelong learning as key ingredients to understanding our culturally and linguistically complex patient population. The challenge of incorporating cultural humility into existing medical curricula include didactic space constraints, lack of mentors, and difficulty in the designing assessment metrics for cultural humility in medical education.
This chapter briefly describes the fascinating journey from ancient betel nuts to modern muscarinic therapeutics. The composite street drug, colloquially referred to as “betel” or “betel nut” or “betel quid,” is one of the most frequently used psychoactive substances in the world. It carries a cultural legacy spanning over 10,000 years and a current user base numbering in the hundreds of millions. Its primary psychoactive constituent is arecoline, a well-established parasympathomimetic agent. Now, developments in psychopharmacology and our growing understanding of neurochemical brain circuitry have unlocked a new mechanism of action by which arecoline-derived medications interact with dopaminergic processes to improve outcomes for schizophrenia patients. One such medication, xanomeline-trospium (Cobenfy), has emerged as the first such agent to receive FDA approval for the treatment of schizophrenia and represents an entirely new class of pro-cholinergic medication within the field of psychiatry.
In response to the sustained decline in academic psychiatry posts and infrastructure across the UK, the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Academic Strategy proposes seven strategic pillars to rebuild workforce capacity through collaboration and innovation, and argues for revitalising the discipline that is essential for scientific leadership, excellence and mental healthcare.
Anorexia nervosa is a debilitating eating disorder with high mortality and chronicity rates owing to the paucity of effective existing treatments. Several clinical trials using psilocybin therapy have demonstrated therapeutic efficacy and safety in psychiatric conditions, including anorexia nervosa.
Aims
This study aimed to further assess the safety, feasibility and potential efficacy of psilocybin therapy in anorexia nervosa.
Method
This single-blind, within-individual pilot study recruited 21 females with anorexia nervosa, who underwent three dosing sessions with oral psilocybin (COMP360) over 6 weeks in a fixed order (1 mg, 25 mg, 25 mg), alongside talk therapy and adjunctive to treatment as usual. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Primary clinical outcome measures were global Eating Disorder Examination Interview (EDE) and Readiness and Motivation Questionnaire (RMQ) precontemplation scores. Primary time points for the EDE were the 6-week final visit, 3-month follow-up and 6-month follow-up; and for the RMQ, they were the 6-week final visit and comparison between dosing days. Global EDE Questionnaire scores were a key secondary outcome. Key time points were the 6-week final visit and comparison between dosing days. There was a 12-month remote follow-up.
Results
Psilocybin was well tolerated by all participants. The most common adverse events were headache, nausea and dizziness. Two serious adverse events (suicide attempts) were reported for one participant within the 6–12-month period. Relative to baseline, participants displayed significant improvements in their eating disorder symptoms (EDE scores: p < 0.0001, d = 0.98, 6 months) and motivation to change (RMQ scores: p = 0.0017, d = 0.65, 12 months). However, there was a large variation in improvement and maintenance during the follow-up.
Conclusions
This study further provides preliminary support for the feasibility, safety and potential efficacy of this intervention to treat adult females with anorexia nervosa, and warrants further investigation in larger and more rigorously designed studies.
Psychedelics were used for centuries in healing and spiritual rituals, long before the mid-20th century when they became subjects of biomedical research. Although initial trials generated optimism, these were quickly overshadowed by sensationalist media coverage and political backlash. Following decades of inactivity, research on compounds including 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) has resurged, along with the media attention. Investigating this growing interest, Bender et al employed a large-language model, validated against human raters, to analyse 25 years of media articles (2000–2025), quantifying trends in sentiment towards psychedelic therapies. Findings showed a dramatic increase in coverage, with positive sentiment peaking in 2020 followed by a significant decline from 2024, coinciding with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s decision not to approve MDMA-assisted therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder, and echoing the dynamics of the 1960s. The authors emphasise that sustained progress in the field will require reliance on scientific evidence to advance therapeutic applications.