To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The conclusion offers an overview of the book’s central arguments. It first reflects on the development of Critical Ethical Naturalism (CEN) within a particular interpretation of Aristotle, showing how this alignment strengthens both its ethical content and its role within Cambridge Social Ontology (CSO). Situating CEN in this way provides a richer ontological grounding for understanding human flourishing and supports the broader project of reviving political economy on realist foundations. The discussion then revisits the comparison between CSO and Amartya Sen, highlighting that while both seek to integrate ethics and economics, they rest on contrasting ontological orientations. Sen’s reluctance to engage systematically with ontology produces conceptual ambiguities that limit the coherence of his framework. The conclusion also considers how Nussbaum’s and Robeyns’s liberal presuppositions reinforce these tensions. It closes by reaffirming the necessity of ontological inquiry for conceptual clarity, ethical critique, and the revival of political economy as a comprehensive social science.
This chapter examines Amartya Sen’s complex relationship with mainstream economics through a Veblenian lens. While Sen’s contributions to development economics and the capability approach are widely seen as transformative, his continued reliance on formal methods reveals an underlying ontological tension. Drawing on Thorstein Veblen’s original use of the term neoclassical, the chapter argues that Sen embodies the same duality Veblen identified in his contemporaries: an implicit recognition of a causal-processual social ontology characteristic of an evolutionary orientation, coupled with a taxonomic conception of science grounded in event regularities. For Veblen, this combination defined the ’neo’ and the ’classical’ aspects of neoclassical economists. Sen’s work, it is argued, remains neoclassical in precisely this Veblenian sense. Analysing this tension helps explain the persistence of ontological inconsistencies across Sen’s corpus and clarifies the diversity of interpretations his work continues to attract within economics.
Financial stability in later life remains a pressing concern in the UK as limited pension contributions leave many individuals financially insecure in retirement. While research has mostly focused on work histories to explain the differences, other structural, cultural, and personal factors have received less attention. Using a lifecourse and capabilities approaches, the aim of this article was to explore factors that influence financial planning for later life. The study employed a photovoice methodology with sixteen participants (forty-five-plus years) from Hampshire, England. The study offers novel insights into factors that either positively or negatively affect financial resilience in later life or the ability to plan for it (financial mindsets and behaviours; access to financial knowledge and guidance; prioritising immediate needs in the cost of living crisis; imagining retirement and preparing financially). The study emphasises the importance of de-homogenising individuals’ experiences and highlights the need for lifelong financial education.
The contributions of Amartya Sen and Cambridge Social Ontology are two important streams in the Cambridge tradition of political economy. Despite significant commonalities, the nature and limits of their convergence remain largely unexamined. Ontology, Ethics and Economics provides the first comparative analysis of these two schools of economic thought. It argues that coherence across economic, social, and ethical theorising can only be achieved when grounded on a solid ontological foundation. While Sen's work has reintroduced crucial ethical dimensions to economics, his reluctance to address ontology systematically has generated tensions that account for the wide and often contradictory interpretations and applications of his work. Offering an explicit account of social reality and its moral implications within a distinctive philosophical framework, this book shows how ontological inquiry can restore political economy's emancipatory orientation and its capacity to offer a genuine alternative to contemporary mainstream economics.
To translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Capability Cards into Spanish for use with adults living with multimorbidity in community health settings.
Background:
Adults with multimorbidity face complex self-management challenges arising from multiple conditions, clinical demands, and everyday priorities. Despite this complexity, tools to support meaningful dialogue and reflection on what individuals are able to do and be in daily life are scarce. Capability Cards support structured conversations on capabilities, well-being, and life goals, fostering empowerment, reflection, and shared decision-making. Cultural adaptation to the Spanish context is essential to ensure relevance and usability in community-based care.
Methods:
A methodological validation study was conducted in Lleida (Spain) following four phases: literature review to inform translation and cultural adaptation, development of instruments to assess content validity and usability, evaluation by expert and community health professional panels, and assessment with the target population. Participants included 12 experts, 19 community health professionals from nursing, physiotherapy, nutrition, and psychology, and 25 adults aged 62–81 years with multimorbidity. Content validity was evaluated using the Content Validity Index (CVI), and usability was assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS).
Findings:
High content validity was observed across all groups, with CVI scores above the recommended threshold (experts: 0.88; professionals: 0.96; target population: 0.98). The SUS indicated excellent usability. The Spanish version of the Capability Cards demonstrated strong content validity, cultural appropriateness, and usability, supporting its suitability as a tool for facilitating structured, person-centred conversations, with potential to promote empowerment and participatory care in community primary health care for adults with multimorbidity.
Children’s growth extends beyond gains in height and weight: it includes non-physical achievements. This paper reviews the research conducted by the International Union for Nutritional Sciences Task Force ‘Towards a Multidimensional Approach to Child Growth’, which developed a Multidimensional Index of Child Growth (MICG) framed within a capability- and human-rights- based conceptualisation of child growth across interconnected dimensions, including physical health, love and care, mental wellbeing, participation, autonomy, mobility, and safety. Qualitative research in Bangladesh and southeastern Tanzania informed the operationalisation of the MICG, showing that caregivers understand child growth as a multidimensional capability set distributed across children, caregivers, and households. Quantitatively, we prototyped the MICG using Young Lives Survey data from Ethiopia, India, Peru, and Vietnam. The MICG reveals patterns of deprivation not captured by anthropometric indicators alone, such as compounded shortfalls in education, mobility, and mental wellbeing among rural girls in Peru, despite similar physical growth profiles. Regression and quantile analyses indicate that community participation in the design of WASH programmes is associated with higher multidimensional achievements, particularly among the most deprived children. To bridge observed achievements and unrealised potential, we extend the MICG using a Bayesian stochastic-frontier approach to estimate context-specific capability distributions and identify children at risk of being left behind. Finally, we propose a spiderweb growth chart for monitoring multidimensional child growth, complementing WHO anthropometric charts. Overall, the MICG offers an equity-sensitive tool for evaluating nutrition interventions, strengthening child growth surveillance, and advancing the Sustainable Development Goal commitment to leave no child behind.
In this introductory chapter, we explain the application of the capability approach (CA) to the work domain. Sen, the founder of the CA, argues that justice and well-being can best be expressed in terms of capabilities. Capabilities are the possibilities or freedoms people have to realise ‘doings and beings they have reason to value’. Our view in this book is that if workers can realise this in their work, then people can be who they want to do the things that add value for themselves and their working environment. This contributes to well-being and flourishing at work. Sen’s starting point from practical situations fits well with work where improvements also occur from the actual context of that work. Concepts such as diversity, contextuality, and inclusivity, which are important aspects of the CA, are also crucial for work where everyone can flourish. The theories and conceptions that are relevant to the foundation and positioning of the approach are briefly discussed. The chapter starts with an anecdote from Sir Christopher Wren, which serves as a metaphor for the topics discussed in the chapter and the book as a whole. The chapter ends with a brief overview of the book.
This chapter applies the capability approach (CA) to the field of human resource management (HRM) by exploring the case of sustainable employability. We elaborate on the interplay between HRM and the CA with respect to sustainable employability at the organisational level by focusing on two key areas of HRM: strategic HRM and inclusive HRM. From a strategic HRM lens, this chapter explores what is necessary for organisations not only to use the CA as a tool to contribute to the capabilities and goals of employees but also to use the CA to contribute to the capabilities and goals of the organisation. From an inclusive HRM lens, this chapter explores how organisations can use the CA as a normative framework for fostering access to work and decent work for vulnerable groups in the labour market. The chapter concludes by outlining future research directions for applying the CA to strategic and inclusive HRM at the individual, organisational, and societal levels.
Markets are widely recognized as sources of material wealth. There is, however, a widely expressed concern that the relationship between markets and human capital is an exploitative one, and the relationship between markets and human flourishing (beyond simply material well-being) is a negative one. We argue, however, that human capital and human flourishing depend on markets in ways that are underappreciated. This essay highlights the positive relationships between markets, human capital, and human flourishing. We first highlight the positive ways that markets foster human capital investments and development and then describe the various ways that markets promote human flourishing. Finally, we introduce Amartya Sen’s capability approach as a plausible and compelling evaluative framework for assessing the moral desirability of certain social arrangements and suggest that markets (on Sen’s terms) are morally desirable social arrangements because they promote human capital development and human flourishing.
The article advances debates on just transition by addressing both conceptual and practical dimensions of justice and development. It proposes an integrated evaluative framework that bridges justice and development perspectives, which are often treated separately in the literature. – Drawing on the capability approach, the framework links normative evaluation with participatory co-production, thereby supporting the design of more transformative just transition policies. Based on an extensive review of the literature, the article identifies seven dimensions of a comprehensive conception of social-ecological justice – distributive, epistemic, restorative, planetary, intergenerational, ecological, and procedural – and distinguish two ideal types of development – growth-driven development and social-ecological development. We argue that the extent to which the dimensions of justice are realised, both in number and degree, determines the scope and depth of shifts from growth-driven to social-ecological development and thereby shapes the transformative potential of just transition policies. The article applies this framework empirically through an evaluation of the International Labour Organisation’s approach to just transition. By grounding the analysis in a capability-based conception of justice and development, our framework positions co-production as central to processes of transformation that seek to be just. As part of this co-production process, the article calls for a more engaged and ethically grounded scholarship that contributes actively to the collective pursuit of just and sustainable futures.
Göran Therborn’s recent book The Killing Fields of Inequality is an opportunity for political scientists to reconnect with a thematic that has for long been the pre-occupation of sociologists: inequality. The killing fields to which Therborn refers in the title of his book are inequalities of wealth, health, education, dignity, and so on. These inequalities are killing fields because they result in millions of premature deaths every year, not just in the Third World, but also in North America and Europe. And even when people survive inequality, their lives are limited by the inequalities they face. In The Killing Fields, Therborn examines the different ‘fields’ of inequality, examining the different ways in which inequality works, for instance through what he terms ‘distanciation’, and he identifies the critical battlefields on which the struggle against inequality has to take place. In their reviews of Therborn’s book, Walden Bello, Joohee Lee and Shujiro Yazawa take a critical look at the different aspects of Therborn’s argument, including the role of the middle classes, the concept of distanciation and Therborn’s use of Amartya Sen’s capability approach.
We examine how social and solidarity economy organizations (SSEOs) generate value for female participants and their community. Our theoretical framework pairs a social utility framework with the capability approach, integrating the perspective of feminist economists to capture value of various types. SSEOs can adopt dimensions of social utility in their activities, including solidarity, identity, sustainable economic development, citizenship, and self-governance. Our study connects these dimensions with value, framed by the capability approach. Findings rely on interviews with participants of Projeto ELAS, a program that promotes socio-productive inclusion of low-income mothers. Participants strengthened their ability to aspire, engage with their community, persevere, feel self-efficacious, and be financially sustained through a process of social interaction, positive identity, and financial growth. Our findings highlight the importance of relational processes within SSEOs and open avenues for research that uses a social utility framework to analyze social value and territorial impact by SSEOs.
This chapter nuances the widespread view that human rights became the world’s global morality in the post–Cold War era. Investigating examples from international human rights law and intellectual history, it demonstrates that economic and social human rights did not come to enjoy the same status as civil and political rights. The mid-1970s to the 1980s was a period of frustration for economic and social human rights. Within a few years, hopes for a more egalitarian international world order with international obligations to promote economic and social human rights were shattered. Major factors were the dynamics of postcolonialism, the global Cold War and state power logics, and neoliberalism. Partly as a testimony to this, intellectuals such as Amartya Sen were concerned with basic rights. The post–Global Cold War period was marked by a premature sentiment of human rights triumphalism, though there were important efforts to strengthen economic and social human rights. As witnessed from the backlashes against these rights in the twenty-first century, their wider legitimacy and influence has remained much weaker than their advocates have hoped for.
This article provides a capabilities analysis of the financial behaviour of United Kingdom-based Zimbabwean senders of international remittances to Zimbabwe. It elaborates an expanded analytical framework of financial capability to investigate the effects of remitting on the financial capabilities of the senders of remittances. The data presented draw on the findings of a survey (n = 347) and semi-structured interviews (n = 23) conducted with Zimbabweans in the United Kingdom. The data reveal adverse effects of remitting on the respondents’ personal financial practices in respect of budgeting, saving and preparing for their retirement. It also shows the limits of FinTech services in transferring remittances and provides insights into how personal finance and -related capabilities constitute a social remittance. Overall, discourses on migration and development need to incorporate an expanded financial capabilities perspective to understand better how remittance fields are structured and to contribute to public policy reforms aiming to enhance the efficacy of remittances.
The introductory chapter briefly describes the book’s somewhat unorthodox objects of (legal) inquiry, namely, the IFIs’ environmental and social policies and the independent accountability mechanisms, and explains how they are interpreted in the book. The chapter contextualizes the research question within the broader themes and debates about "soft law" and subjecthood or participation in the international legal order. It also sketches an analytical framework for finding the place of development, its sustainability, and non-State actors like individuals within international law, before proceeding to present the elements of the main claim: IFIs are lawmakers in the field of sustainable development, but their weak accountability to non-State actors harmed by noncompliance with their own environmental and social policies undermines the performance of their sustainability-oriented and do-no-harm legal mandates
This article reports from an interdisciplinary, archaeological and philosophical research project developing and using an analogue model in archaeological research. With prominent uses outside of archaeology, analogue models can offer a unique participatory perspective to prehistoric processes. As such the paper contributes to recent discussions in this journal and elsewhere on the role of games, play and gamification in archaeological research, teaching and cultural heritage. Our analogue model critically discusses cultural-evolution-based models of selected European Neolithic and Bronze Age models and develops a perspective based on the life history and the Capability Approaches. In times of climate and war stress, our model can offer a hopeful perspective of the human past, present and future without compromising on scientific insights.
This scoping review synthesizes existing literature on the application of the capability approach (CA) to address the health and well-being of Indigenous Peoples across the globe. Academic and grey literature searches led to the identification of 20 papers for inclusion in the review. Findings reveal a growing interest in applying the CA to Indigenous health and well-being research, highlighting its potential to guide interventions and policies. The included studies indicate that the CA has been applied to individual capabilities such as facilitating access to services and collective capabilities linked to identity and traditional knowledge preservation. A key finding across the reviewed literature is the importance of incorporating Indigenous values into defining programmes and policies aimed at improving Indigenous Peoples’ well-being. The review underscores the varied application of the CA by researchers aligning with the position of either Sen or Nussbaum, leading to contrasting methodological approaches. Results underscore the CA’s potential as a culturally sensitive framework for participatory and locally embedded development of well-being interventions and policies.
Affordable, good quality childcare creates opportunities for many parents to better reconcile work and care or reduces family care to enable other valuable contributions to society. However, childcare studies often overlook parents of children with additional or complex care needs. These parents spend a greater amount of time on caregiving, providing care that goes beyond that of parents of typically developing children. As such, their opportunities beyond caregiving can be limited. Resources, like childcare services, can be crucial in supporting the reconciliation of care with other valued activities in life. This article contributes to the cross-national childcare policy literature by conceptualizing comparative indicators to assess the availability, accessibility, and affordability of childcare policy design for children with additional or complex care needs. It then applies these indicators to a comparison of childcare policy design in England and the Netherlands, providing an operationalization for further empirical analysis.
In this chapter, the authors study the applicability of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) within the best-known extra-welfarist framework, Sen’s capability approach. They propose a procedure to value capability sets and provide a foundation for QALYs within Sen’s capability approach. They show that, under appropriate conditions, the ranking of capabilities can be represented locally by a QALY measure and that a willingness to pay for QALYs can be defined. The validity of QALYs as a general measure of health requires the same stringent conditions as in a welfarist framework. They consider the application of the proposed approach to the analysis of public health measures adopted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The idea that every society ought to ensure each of its citizens an adequate standard of living is widely accepted. Martha Nussbaum has argued that such a standard should be understood as a set of capabilities adequate for a life of human dignity, an ample minimum that can be ascertained through public reasoning in each society.In this chapter the author shows why public reasoning about capabilities can be expected to support a higher standard that is optimal rather than minimal: the highest capability levels that could be sustained for everyone by the productive capacity of their society. The argument rests on a conception of equal dignity among human beings striving to live well, each in his or her own way. The first and most urgent step towards reaching this social optimum consists, at a lower level, in overcoming hardships.