To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In this retrospective cohort study, we assessed the prevalence of post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) and its determinants among six ethnic groups in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. We analysed data from participants of the HELIUS cohort with SARS-CoV-2 infection who answered questions on the presence and duration of COVID-19-related symptoms between May and November 2022. We estimated the prevalence of PCC, defined as having ≥1 of 15 pre-determined COVID-19-related symptoms remaining for at least 3 months after infection, by ethnicity at several timepoints since infection adjusted for age and sex, and assessed determinants of PCC overall using logistic regression. Of 932 infected participants, 31% [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 27%–37%] developed PCC. At 3 months after infection the adjusted prevalence of PCC varied from 17% (95%CI: 13%–24%) in the Dutch-origin group to 41% (95%CI: 34%–48%) in the South-Asian Surinamese group, and was significantly higher among participants of South-Asian Surinamese, Turkish and Moroccan origin compared to those of Dutch origin (all P < 0.001). Participants who were of South-Asian Surinamese origin, older, female, without a vocational education or university degree, or obese were more likely to have PCC. Those of Ghanaian origin or infected during the period of Omicron predominance were less likely to have PCC. There were clear between-ethnic differences in the prevalence of PCC, which was more common in individuals of South-Asian Surinamese, Turkish, and Moroccan origin compared to those of Dutch origin. These differences mirror ethnic differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease severity. Certain factors of PCC emerged, while consistent across ethnic groups.
Sexual minority adolescents consistently exhibit a higher prevalence of suicidality compared with their heterosexual peers. This study aims to decompose the disparity in suicidal ideation by quantifying the extent to which it is attributable to differences in exposure to risk and protective factors between heterosexual and sexual minority adolescents, as opposed to differences in their responses to these factors. In addition, this study addresses the limited evidence from Chinese contexts by examining these mechanisms among adolescents in Hong Kong.
Methods
Data were extracted from a population-based survey conducted among local secondary school students in Hong Kong in 2021, encompassing 6883 adolescents. Logistic regression examined the factors associated with suicidal ideation. Decomposition analysis assessed the contribution of these factors to disparities in suicidal ideation between heterosexual and sexual minority adolescents, as well as disparities between sexual minority boys and girls.
Results
Body dissatisfaction, cyberbullying, sexual harassment, perceptions of family life and academic performance were associated with suicidal ideation among adolescents, irrespective of their sex or sexual orientation. Approximately 31%–45% of the disparities in suicidal ideation were driven by differences in their exposure to risk and protective factors, and 55%–69% were driven by differences in how these factors relate to suicidal ideation and potentially unobserved characteristics. Among these factors, perceptions of family life played the most substantial role. Sex-specific patterns were also observed.
Conclusions
The higher prevalence of suicidal ideation among Chinese sexual minority adolescents appears to reflect both their greater exposure to stress and lower levels of support, as well as their distinct responses to these factors. Family-related factors are crucial for understanding this disparity. The observed sex differences emphasize the necessity for more nuanced approaches to addressing the varied experiences of sexual minority adolescents in Chinese societies.
We must consider how care in the NICU is delivered to improve outcomes for infants and their families. Cultures and practices that support brain maturation, aim to prevent injury, aid in recovery, support the role of the family, and optimize the environment are referred to as developmental, neuroprotective, or neuropromotive care models and are important strategies to optimize the neurodevelopment of vulnerable infants. Neurosupportive care and its full impact on the developing brain has been hard to define due to the range of approaches and confounding factors; therefore, it has been underfunded and underexplored. We review what is known, but there is urgent need for broader recognition of and investment into the many opportunities to improve our care models. We discuss evidence-based care practices that have been shown to impact developmental outcomes, including use of specific care contexts and cultures, a focus on partnerships with families, use of a multidisciplinary team, reduction of pain and stress, and enhancing the sensory environment. Paradigms that adopt an “All Care is Brain Care” approach, center families’ engagement and experience, and employ intentional brain-focused strategies to protect and promote brain development can create a neuroprotective care culture.
To examine the association between long-term poverty exposure and census tract-level food insecurity rates across the USA.
Design:
Cross-sectional study using nationwide census data. Spatial error models were used to estimate differences in food insecurity rates by long-term poverty exposure, adjusting for rurality–urbanicity.
Setting:
All census tracts in the USA.
Participants:
US census tracts with complete data on food insecurity, long-term poverty status and rural–urban classification. Due to historical differences in data availability, sample sizes varied across models.
Results:
In the inclusive framework, tracts classified as Persistent Poverty Since 1990 had food insecurity rates 7·2 percentage points higher than other tracts (P < 0·001); tracts classified as Enduring Poverty Since 1980 had rates 7·1 points higher (P < 0·001); and those classified as Enduring Poverty Since 1970 had rates 6·3 points higher (P < 0·001). In the mutually exclusive framework, where each tract was assigned to only one poverty category based on the earliest qualifying decade, food insecurity was 6·3 points higher in tracts with Persistent Poverty only, 4·7 points higher in tracts with Enduring Poverty Since 1980 only, and 6·3 points higher in tracts with Enduring Poverty Since 1970 only (all P < 0·001). All models adjusted for Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes and accounted for residual spatial autocorrelation.
Conclusions:
Long-term poverty exposure is strongly associated with elevated food insecurity at the census tract level. These findings underscore the importance of integrating historical measures of disadvantage and the value of tract-level analysis for identifying communities at risk of food insecurity.
Food insecurity is prevalent among underserved communities and contributes to maternal–child health disparities. The perinatal period – from pregnancy through 1 year postpartum – provides a critical window of opportunity to identify and address food insecurity. However, perinatal providers face barriers that prevent them from providing screening, referrals and follow-up services. The study aimed to understand barriers perceived by perinatal providers to implement strategies to screen, refer and follow up for food-insecure pregnant people and children living in underserved areas.
Design:
This qualitative phenomenological study explored multi-level barriers perceived by perinatal providers when implementing strategies for screening, referral and follow-up for food insecurity guided by the socio-ecological model.
Setting:
This study was conducted within five zip codes of Southern Nevada (89101, 89106, 89030, 89031 and 89032) selected for their prevalence of food insecurity and health disparities.
Participants:
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fifteen perinatal providers.
Results:
Barriers at the individual provider level included lack of knowledge and education on food insecurity; at the interpersonal level included patient hesitancy to reveal sensitive information to providers; at the institutional level included lack of standard procedures to conduct screening, referrals and follow-up services; and at the community and policy levels identified organisational capacity and historical distrust of healthcare systems as obstacles to offering equitable care for food insecurity in perinatal settings.
Conclusion:
Addressing these multi-level barriers is essential to implementing effective food insecurity mitigation strategies within perinatal care settings. Utilising the created recommendations may promote equitable care for food insecurity within clinical and community perinatal settings.
The Deep South has the highest prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and hypertension in the United States, with marked disparities by race, socioeconomic status, and rurality. Addressing these disparities requires not only effective interventions, but also a translational science workforce equipped to design, implement, and scale solutions in real-world settings. The Forge AHEAD Center was established to improve cardiometabolic health outcomes across the Deep South by advancing both research and scientific workforce development. As a central component of this mission, the Center has developed the “Pilot Plus” model, an integrated framework that combines pilot funding with structured training in translational science, multidisciplinary team-based mentorship, and embedded community engagement. Early-stage investigators are supported through coordinated access to methodological expertise, including dissemination and implantation science and assessment of social determinants of health, while community stakeholders are incorporated into the research process. By aligning funding, training, and infrastructure within a single program, the Pilot Plus model addresses fragmentation in traditional research development approaches and expands access to critical resources across institutions. This model provides an adaptable framework for strengthening translational research capacity and developing a cadre of demographically varied investigators prepared to advance health outcomes in regions with a high burden of chronic disease
To examine parents’ lived experiences of implementing cot-only advice in a contemporary Australian cohort, assess alignment with the international literature on infant sleep and shared sleep practices, and determine whether explicit risk minimization guidelines address information needs identified by parents.
Background:
The risk elimination approach to shared sleeping has dominated public health messaging for decades but has been unsuccessful in reducing Sudden Unexpected Deaths in Infancy (SUDI) rates, while bedsharing rates have remained stable. The risk minimization approach offers an alternative, pragmatic framework for reducing controllable risks.
Methods:
A retrospective, secondary, qualitative directed content analysis of free-text responses related to bed-sharing drawn from the 2017 Infant Care Awareness and Routines Evaluation among Queenslanders (I-CARE Qld Study) cross-sectional survey dataset. 3,341 primary caregivers (97% mothers) of infants aged approximately three months, born in Queensland between April and May 2017. For this secondary analysis, free-text responses related to co-sleeping/bedsharing were extracted and analysed qualitatively in line with study objectives.
Findings:
Queensland parents expressed a desire for more information and non-judgemental education on improving safety while sharing sleep with their baby. Nearly a third of this cohort reported difficulty following advice to sleep their baby separately citing infant temperament/ needs, breastfeeding and caregiver fatigue or exhaustion as top rationales for this difficulty, aligning with earlier international findings. Some awareness by parents of risk minimization strategies to improve shared sleep safety was evident and in alignment with current Queensland Clinical Guidelines. There is an urgent need for public health messaging on safer infant sleep to better align with the lived experiences of parents and families through the adoption of a universal, proactive risk minimization approach to shared sleep. Co-designing guidance with parents may serve to bridge the gap between idealized and real-world implementation of safer infant sleep strategies.
The Deep South has the highest rates of obesity, diabetes, and hypertension in the nation, with marked disparities by race, socioeconomic status, and rurality. The mission of the Forge AHEAD Center is to improve health outcomes and reduce the burden of cardiometabolic diseases across the Deep South, with a particular focus on the prevention and treatment of these chronic diseases. Forge AHEAD is unified thematically by its application of a precision public health approach across the care continuum, defined as delivering the right intervention to the right population at the right time. This approach acknowledges the importance of context and individual beliefs and preferences, as well as the need for multi-level and multi-domain interventions to achieve health improvements. The Center brings together an interdisciplinary team of investigators from 4 institutions in 3 contiguous states in the region, as well as non-academic partners to extend cardiometabolic research into real-world community and clinical settings. Given the high prevalence of cardiometabolic diseases in the Deep South and the strong research base of the partnering institutions, the Forge AHEAD Center is ideally situated to inform research, clinical care, and policy to improve health outcomes in a region of substantial need.
People with intellectual and other cognitive disabilities often face barriers to participating in clinical research, particularly related to the informed consent process. Recent federal policy and legal efforts have advanced strategies to address these challenges, including using supported decision-making. This article discusses this recent progress and the risks and potential opportunities to continuing it in a shifting federal landscape.
Dr. C. Norman Coleman, a distinguished cancer specialist and researcher, brought a passion for addressing health disparities to all of his roles from being on the faculty as a Radiation Oncologist at Stanford, as Chair of the Joint Center for Radiation Oncology at Harvard, as Associate Director of the Radiation Research Program at the U.S. National Cancer Institute, as Senior Medical Advisor to the US Government Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, and as co-founder and Senior Scientific Officer for the International Cancer Expert Corps. With his passing earlier this year, this commentary by his colleagues at the International Cancer Expert Corps presents an overview of his many and significant contributions to addressing cancer disparities globally.
Previous studies indicate that African immigrant women in the United States have lower rates of cervical cancer screening and prevention than other racial and immigrant groups, with additional heterogeneity by country of origin, language proficiency, and length of U.S. residence.
Objectives
This review aimed to (a) summarize barriers and facilitators to screening, (b) examine how existing studies conceptualize African immigrant identity and employ disaggregated analyses, and (c) apply intersectionality and stress process frameworks to highlight structural determinants shaping screening behaviors.
Methods
This systematic review, registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251151600), synthesizes evidence on cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination among African immigrant women in the United States. PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCO, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for peer-reviewed studies published between January 2010 and December 2024. Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria, including cross-sectional surveys (n = 7), qualitative studies (n = 5), mixed-methods studies (n = 3), retrospective cohort analyses (n = 1), and one randomized controlled trial.
Results
Only 11 of the 17 studies disaggregated African immigrant women by country of origin or related subgroup characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative studies. Across studies, African immigrant women consistently faced barriers to screening, including language discordance, lack of insurance, limited HPV awareness, cultural stigma, and unfamiliarity with the U.S. healthcare system. Interventions such as HPV self-sampling and culturally tailored education showed promise in improving screening uptake.
Significance of Results
The findings point to the need for standardized disaggregated data collection, culturally responsive interventions, and theory-driven research to reduce cervical cancer prevention disparities among African immigrant women in the United States.
COVID-19 has shown the world that public policies tend to benefit the most privileged among us, and innovation policy is no exception. While the US government's approach to innovation—research funding and patent policies and programs that value scientists’ and private sector freedoms—has been copied around the world due to its apparent success, I argue that it has hurt poor and marginalized communities. It has limited our understanding of health disparities and how to address them, and hampered access to essential technologies due to both lack of coordination and high cost. Fair and equal treatment of vulnerable citizens requires sensitive and dedicated policies that attend explicitly to the fact that the benefits of innovation do not simply trickle down.
Adults with intellectual disability (ID) experience marked mental health inequities, yet population-wide estimates that capture both primary- and specialist-care diagnoses remain scarce.
Methods
Using nationwide Swedish registries, including primary care, specialist, inpatient, prescription drug, criminal, and suspicion registers, we included all individuals born in Sweden between 1958 and 1997 (N = 3,970,600), including 38,818 individuals with ID diagnoses (0.98%; 49.1% mild, 13.3% moderate, and 9.6% severe/profound). Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the relative risk of lifetime diagnoses of major depression, anxiety disorders (ANX), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), bipolar disorder (BD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), drug use disorder, alcohol use disorder, schizophrenia, and other nonaffective psychosis. Additionally, cohort effects on psychiatric diagnosis risks in adults with intellectual disabilities versus the general population were evaluated.
Results
People with ID were at higher risk for all psychiatric and substance use disorders, with HRs ranging from 1.7–2.0 for major depression and anxiety, drug and alcohol use disorders, 3.5–5.8 for BD, OCD and ADHD, and 10.9–12.7 for schizophrenia and other nonaffective psychosis. Higher prevalence was consistently seen among those with mild versus moderate or severe/profound intellectual disability. Relative risks narrowed modestly in successive birth cohorts, although absolute differences remained substantial.
Conclusions
Across six decades of follow-up, adults with ID faced markedly higher psychiatric and substance-use morbidity – most pronounced for psychotic disorders – than the general population. Whole-system mental-health screening and tailored interventions are required to address this persistent disparity.
To enhance representation in LCS research, we examined associations between participant characteristics and their preferred mode of survey completion among individuals eligible for LCS.
Methods:
Between February 2023 and April 2024, prospective participants were identified using electronic healthcare records from Mass General Brigham and the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences (OUHSC). We offered three modes of survey completion: online, by mail, or by phone. Eligible participants were 50–80 years old, had smoked within the past 15 years, and spoke English or Spanish. We used multinomial logistic regression to estimate relative risk ratios (RRR).
Results:
Outreach to 2,822 individuals resulted in a sample of 315 participants. The mean age was 61.7 years (SD = 10.9). Most respondents were women (63.0%) and identified as White (63.3%), 29.8 % were Hispanic. The most common survey completion mode was mail (37.1%), followed by online (35.9%) and phone (27.0%). Characteristics associated with completion by mail were study site (RRR = 6.86, 95%CI:3.10–15.14), and race (RRR = 3.63, 95%CI:1.53–8.61); with respondents at OUHSC or who did not identify as White being more likely to choose mail over online modality. Characteristics associated with phone completion, included older age (RRR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03–1.20), Spanish language preference (RRR = 9.28, 95%CI:2.38–36.09), and with local government or community insurance (RRR = 9.91, 95% CI:1.92–51.3).
Conclusion:
The current trend toward online surveys may not fully account for individual preferences for LCS research engagement, and could limit the representativeness in LCS studies if offline alternatives are not offered.
Acquiring the skills to obtain extramural funding is a major challenge for early- and mid-career investigators. The Professional Development Core (PDC) of the NIH-funded Mountain West Clinical and Translational Research Infrastructure Network (MW CTR-IN) aims to support early-stage and mid-career investigators pursuing independent careers in clinical and translational science research. Since 2018, the PDC’s Grant Writing Workshops (GWWs) have provided CTR investigators with didactic content and interactive feedback on their NIH grant applications, helping them reach this key career milestone. Four one-day GWWs were offered in person, and two half-day GWWs were offered virtually across two days during the COVID-19 pandemic. Evaluation data for each cohort revealed that participants’ knowledge and confidence in the relevant sections of NIH R-series grants consistently improved following GWW attendance and resulted in notable enhancements in participants’ feelings of positivity toward grant writing, regardless of delivery mode (virtual vs. in-person). Follow-up data showed that 12 GWW participants acquired external funding with a 21% success rate and $12,584,938 in total funding. This manuscript provides a roadmap for planning and implementing a successful virtual or in-person GWW that positively impacts the careers of early-stage and mid-career investigators.
To tailor an existing Person-Centred Integrated Care (PC-IC) approach to the needs of patients with low socioeconomic status (LSES) and chronic conditions in primary care.
Background:
While Disease Management Programs (DMPs) have been introduced to reduce the burden of chronic diseases, their effectiveness for patients with LSES remains uncertain due to insufficient attention to the individual context. A PC-IC approach may enhance patient outcomes by addressing patients’ cultural backgrounds, values, and health literacy needs, because these factors are particularly relevant for patients with LSES.
Method:
A qualitative study was conducted using three co-creation sessions with patients with LSES and chronic conditions, along with general practitioners and practice nurses, to adapt, develop, and test specific elements of the PC-IC approach. Participatory learning and action (PLA) techniques incorporating visual materials were employed to ensure meaningful engagement and input by all participants, including those with limited reading and language skills. Following these sessions, we conducted a validation check by patients on the draft materials.
Findings:
In the co-creation sessions, an existing PC-IC approach was tailored to the needs of LSES patients with chronic conditions in primary care. The adapted PC-IC approach emphasized key elements as trust, being seen as a person in the social context, shared decision-making, and access to clear and easily understandable information. Existing materials needed to be adapted, resulting in a visual conversation tool. This tool covers the physical, social, and mental health domains as well as daily life, each domain with six to eight topics. It helps to get better insight into the patient’s daily life, wishes, and possibilities. It maps medical and psychosocial issues and supports the patient in gaining a better understanding. The adapted PC-IC approach with the conversation tool is being presented in a training for primary care professionals.
Multimorbidity is increasingly common among older adults in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), yet the role of social determinants in shaping its prevalence and outcomes remains underexplored.
Objectives
This review aimed to (a) identify the prevalence, types, and patterns of multimorbidity among older adults in SSA; (b) examine the influence of social determinants such as income, education, healthcare access, and geographic location; (c) evaluate current approaches for prevention and management; and (d) propose directions for future research.
Methods
A systematic search of six databases (PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and Global Index Medicus) was conducted to identify quantitative studies published between 2000 and 2024 on adults aged 50 and above. Of 841 records screened, 16 studies met inclusion criteria and passed quality appraisal. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024607875).
Results
Multimorbidity ranged from 5.4% in Botswana to 71% in Nigeria. Cardiometabolic conditions often co-occurred with infectious and mental disorders. Poverty and low education significantly increased risk (OR: 1.44–7.44). Rural residents faced limited healthcare access, while urban dwellers had higher risks from lifestyle factors. Obesity and food insecurity further heightened vulnerability, especially among women and older adults.
Significance of Results
Findings indicate that social determinants critically shape multimorbidity risk and outcomes in SSA. Integrated care models, targeted interventions, and policies addressing structural inequalities are urgently needed. Future research should apply longitudinal and qualitative approaches to clarify causal pathways and inform context-sensitive strategies.
Social determinants of health (SDHs) exert a significant influence on various health outcomes and disparities. This study aimed to explore the associations between combined SDHs and mortality, as well as adverse health outcomes among adults with depression.
Methods
The research included 48,897 participants with depression from the UK Biobank and 7,771 from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). By calculating combined SDH scores based on 14 SDHs in the UK Biobank and 9 in the US NHANES, participants were categorized into favourable, medium and unfavourable SDH groups through tertiles. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the impact of combined SDHs on mortality (all-cause, cardiovascular disease [CVD] and cancer) in both cohorts, as well as incidences of CVD, cancer and dementia in the UK Biobank.
Results
In the fully adjusted models, compared to the favourable SDH group, the hazard ratios for all-cause mortality were 1.81 (95% CI: 1.60–2.04) in the unfavourable SDH group in the UK Biobank cohort; 1.61 (95% CI: 1.31–1.98) in the medium SDH group and 2.19 (95% CI: 1.78–2.68) in the unfavourable SDH group in the US NHANES cohort. Moreover, higher levels of unfavourable SDHs were associated with increased mortality risk from CVD and cancer. Regarding disease incidence, they were significantly linked to higher incidences of CVD and dementia but not cancer in the UK Biobank.
Conclusions
Combined unfavourable SDHs were associated with elevated risks of mortality and adverse health outcomes among adults with depression, which suggested that assessing the combined impact of SDHs could serve as a key strategy in preventing and managing depression, ultimately helping to reduce the burden of disease.
Anonymous online surveys using financial incentives are an essential tool for understanding sexual networks and risk factors including attitudes, sexual behaviors, and practices. However, these surveys are vulnerable to bots attempting to exploit the incentive. We deployed an in-person, limited audience survey via QR code at select locations in North Carolina to assess geolocation application use among men who have sex with men to characterize the role of app usage on infection risk and behavior. The survey was unexpectedly posted on a social media platform and went viral. Descriptive statistics were performed on repeat responses, free-text length, and demographic consistency. Between August 2022 and March 2023, we received 4,709 responses. Only 13 responses were recorded over a 6-month period until a sharp spike occurred: over 500 responses were recorded in a single hour and over 2,000 in a single day. Although free-text responses were often remarkably sophisticated, many multiple-choice responses were internally inconsistent. To protect data quality, all online surveys must incorporate defensive techniques such as response time validation, logic checks, and IP screening. With the rise of large language models, bot attacks with sophisticated responses to open-ended questions pose a growing threat to the integrity of research studies.
The Making Care Primary (MCP) model represents a sharp shift in Medicare’s approach to primary care, yet its current design risks duplicating failures from prior alternative payment models. Our editorial suggests refinements to address these gaps. To prevent early provider dropout from MCP’s rigid track-based system, we propose a sliding-scale infrastructure payment model that adjusts based on practice needs rather than abrupt phase-outs. Given MCP’s reliance on community-based organisations (CBOs) for social determinants of health interventions, we also advocate for direct, outcomes-based contracts between providers and CBOs, ensuring accountability for patient outcomes rather than passive referrals. We recommend that MCP enforce data-sharing mandates for commercial insurers and Medicaid agencies, drawing from Washington State’s successful Multi-Payer Collaborative, to avoid payer disengagement that plagued previous multi-payer models. To expand beyond conventional quality measures, we propose integrating patient-centred outcomes from the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, making sure MCP captures meaningful clinical impact. Finally, we propose programme adjustments frequently at two- to three-year intervals to refine risk adjustment methodologies. These approaches could enhance MCP’s sustainability, preventing the financial instability and misaligned incentives that undermined past value-based care initiatives.