To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is a common and debilitating condition marked by intense fear of negative evaluation in social situations. It often co-occurs with other psychiatric disorders, and in particular Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The exact cause of SAD is unclear, though biological, environmental, and genetic factors are believed to contribute. Recent research highlights the involvement of neuropeptides, neurohormones, and immune system components in SAD development, suggesting complex interactions between psychological and biological factors, with a growing focus on inflammation’s role. This study aimed to investigate potential biochemical correlates of SAD in individuals with ASD, their first-degree relatives (BAP group), and healthy controls (HCs), focusing on inflammatory markers, neuropeptides, and growth factors.
Methods
Twenty-four adults with ASD, their relatives, and HCs, for a total of 72 participants, were assessed. Biochemical parameters were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), and social anxiety symptoms were evaluated via the Social Phobia Spectrum—Self Report (SHY-SR) questionnaire.
Results
Individuals with ASD exhibited significantly higher SHY-SR scores compared to the BAP and HCs. Subjects in the ASD group tended to make greater use of anxiolytics in order to improve their social interaction skills. Additionally, a specific pattern of correlation and association was found between biochemical variables and specific SAD symptoms, suggesting a potential role of inflammatory pathways in SAD pathophysiology.
Conclusions
Our results confirm the presence of greater social phobic symptoms in subjects with ASD, and support the hypothesis of a role of the inflammatory cascade in the maintenance of the disorder.
Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is one of the most common anxiety disorders and is associated with significant impairment and societal costs. The association between SAD and mortality remains poorly understood, partly because in epidemiological research it is rarely studied independently from other anxiety disorders. In this population-based matched cohort and sibling control study, we estimated the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in individuals with SAD.
Methods
From a population of individuals born from 1932 and living in Sweden between 1997 and 2020, we identified all cases of SAD (Swedish ICD-10 code F40.1) in the National Patient Register. Each of these individuals was matched on sex, birth year and county of residence with 10 individuals who had never received a diagnosis. Mortality data were extracted from the Cause of Death Register. Risks were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Models adjusted for sociodemographic covariates and other lifetime psychiatric disorders. We also identified all clusters of full siblings and conducted within-sibling comparisons to account for unmeasured familial confounding.
Results
The matched cohort included 57,360 individuals with SAD and 573,600 unexposed individuals. During the follow-up, 2355 deaths were registered within the exposed cohort vs. 7800 deaths in the matched cohort (crude mortality rates, 5.25 and 1.73 per 1000 person-years, respectively). The full cohort was followed up for a mean of 7.87 years (standard deviation 5.23). In models adjusting for sociodemographic variables, individuals with SAD had a 2.24-fold increased hazard of all-cause mortality (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.13–2.35). The increased risk was observed for both natural (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95% CI 1.52–1.72) and unnatural causes of death (HR, 4.18; 95% CI 3.82–4.58). The results were robust to additional adjustment for psychiatric comorbidities, but the magnitude of the associations was attenuated, particularly when adjusting for substance use disorders. In the sibling cohort, 39,993 individuals with SAD were compared with their 64,640 unaffected siblings. While the estimates were also attenuated, they remained statistically significant (HR for all-cause mortality, 1.40; 95% CI 1.36–1.45).
Conclusions
Individuals with SAD face an increased risk of mortality, attributable primarily to unnatural causes of death, such as suicide, but also to natural causes, even after adjusting for socioeconomic variables. Psychiatric comorbidities, particularly substance use disorders, and shared familial factors may also contribute to this excess death. Further study of underlying mechanisms may inform prevention and early intervention strategies to reduce mortality in this vulnerable population.
The Kahramanmaras Earthquakes (2023) are the largest and most devastating earthquakes in the history of the Republic. The effects of these earthquakes are particularly deeply felt among younger generations and trigger various psychological factors. Therefore, the aim of this study is to measure the levels of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), social phobia (SP), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and depression on separation anxiety disorder (SAD) among adolescent earthquake survivors affected by the Kahramanmaras Earthquakes (2023).
Methods
In the study, the data were obtained using a survey method. A total of 605 adolescent earthquake survivors exposed to the Kahramanmaras earthquakes were reached. The research was analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM).
Results
Surprisingly, according to the research findings, there was no significant and positive relationship between SP (β = −0.006, P > 0.05) and Depression (β = −0.117, P > 0.05) on SAD.
Conclusions
Consequently, while PTSD and GAD had significant and positive effects on SAD in those adolescent earthquake survivors affected by the Kahramanmaras Earthquakes (2023), SP and Depression did not have significant and positive effects on SAD. Therefore, it is recommended that future studies examine the effects of SP and Depression on SAD more comprehensively and in detail through qualitative research.
Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is rightly considered a first-line psychological treatment for a plethora of psychological disorders due to its extensive research base. Evidence for schema therapy (ST) as a first-line treatment is strongest where personality disorders are concerned. With other high-occurrence disorders, once known as ‘axis 1 disorders’ (e.g. depression, anxiety disorders), evidence is now emerging for ST as a second-line treatment in its own right. From a schema therapy point of view, in focusing treatment on presenting ‘axis 1’ problems, patterns of avoidance and rigidity characteristic of underlying personality disorder pathology often remain unaddressed and can drive treatment non-response. In this chapter, we outline a ST approach to mood and anxiety disorders where ST may be considered as a second-line treatment option in those cases where there is (a) an inadequate response to first-line treatment (e.g. CBT) and/or (b) where significant symptoms of personality disorder, or traits thereof, are assessed to be maintaining the severity and/or chronicity of illness, including the engagement with and response to any treatment.
Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is a common mental health condition that is characterised by a persistent fear of social or performance situations. Despite effective treatments being available, many individuals with SAD do not seek treatment or delay treatment seeking for many years. The aim of the present study was to examine treatment barriers, treatment histories, and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) delivery preferences in a sample of women with clinically relevant SAD symptoms. Ninety-nine women (Mage = 34.90, SD = 11.28) completed the online questionnaires and were included in the study. Participants were recruited from advertisements on community noticeboards and posts on social media. The results demonstrated that less than 5% of those who received psychological treatment in the past were likely to have received best-practice CBT. The most commonly cited barriers to accessing treatment for women with SAD related to direct costs (63%) and indirect costs (e.g., transport/childcare) (28%). The most preferred treatment delivery method overall was individual face-to-face treatment (70%). The study demonstrates a need to provide a variety of treatment options in order to enhance access to empirically supported treatment for women with SAD.
Anxiety disorders are frequent comorbidity in patients with schizophrenia. Their frequency in late-onset psychosis is unknown.
Objectives
We aimed to study life-time anxiety disorders as well as other psychiatric pathology in patients with late-onset schizophrenia (LoS) and late-onset delusional disorder (LoDD).
Methods
42 patients with LoS (age 64,1±9,2, 12% males) and 15 patients with LoDD (n=15; age 69,9±10,9, 14% males ) underwent clinical assessment (PANSS, HDRS-17), cognitive examination (MMSE, MoCA), structured interviewing on life-time pathology. Control group included 24 subjects with no signs of depression or psychosis (age 58,1±10,8, 50% males). Kruscal-Wallis and χ2statistic was used.
Results
Patients with LoS and LoDD had higher frequency of social phobia (50% and 30% compared to 16,7 in control group, χ2 (2)= 6,834, p= 0,033) and more animal phobias (KW χ2 (2)=15,536, p<0,001). The number of habitual anxiety reaction was increased in LoS but not LoDD patients compared to controls (KW χ2 (2)=7,275, p= 0,026) with more severe motor (KW χ2 (2)=8,516, p= 0,014), vegetative (KW χ2 (2)=8,633, p= 0,013 and ideatory symptoms (KW χ2 (2)=6,969, p= 0,031) of anxiety. There was no group difference in life-time frequency of depression. Patients and controls had similar rate of complicated grief, but controls had often no reaction in response to loss and LoS patients responded to loss with manifestation of psychosis (χ2 (6)= 14,473, p= 0,025).
Conclusions
Social phobia and other anxiety disorders are frequent in late-onset psychosis. Symptoms of generalized anxiety are more specific to LoS than to LoDD.
Social phobia is frequent comorbidity in schizophrenia. It`s clinical correlates and consequencies for clinical practice in late-onset schizophrenia (LoS) are unclear.
Objectives
The study aimed to compare clinical correlates and therapeutic options in LoS patient with and without social phobia.
Methods
16 LoS patients with social phobia (ICD-11 diagnosis, age 59,6±6,2, 25% males) were compared with 16 LoS patients without social phobia (69,9±10,9, 0% males). Results of clinical assessment (PANSS, HDRS-17), cognitive examination (MMSE, MoCA), CT data were analysed. Type of antipsychotics (conventional\conconventional) was registed, dose of antipsychotics and antidepressants was randed from 1 (low) to 3 (high). Mann-Whitney test and χ2statistic was used.
Results
There was no group differences in age, age manifestation, illness duration, number of psychotic episodes, PANSS and HADRS scores, rates results of cognitive tests, atrophy scores, length of hospital state, types of received antipsychotics. LoS patients with social phobia received more frequently medium and high doses of antipsychotics than LoS patient without social phobia (χ2 (2)=6,432, p=0,040).
Conclusions
Increased doses of antypsychotics in patients with social phobia don`t correlate with severity of psychotic symptoms and nay reflect some treatment resistance as well as misinterpretation of symptoms of social phobia as insufficient retreat of the psychosis. Active detection of social phobia is significant for treatment optimization.
This chapter begins with background on social anxiety disorder (SAD) and a review of a cognitive behavioral model of SAD. Next, we discuss the core components of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for SAD and give an overview of literature. We then describe the diagnostic and assessment process, reviewing common clinician-administered and self-report measures. The latter portion of the chapter follows a case vignette of an individual with SAD seeking CBT. Using this illustration, we delineate the process of case formulation and conceptualization and present the use of a specific CBT protocol for SAD, reviewing each principal phase of treatment. This CBT protocol begins with psychoeducation and client socialization. It then advances to cognitive restructuring and behavioral exposure practice, and culminates with advanced cognitive work geared toward core beliefs. Treatment ends with a discussion of helpful ways to prevent relapse and preparing the client for termination.
Clark and Wells advanced a cognitive model of social anxiety disorder (SAD) that has received substantial empirical support. The model accounts for the persistence of SAD with reference to a set of specific cognitive behavioral mechanisms involving feedback cycles that are responsible for maintaining the problem. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) derived from this model aims to address these mechanisms, which include, among others, maladaptive self-processing and styles of coping consisting of safety behaviors and anticipatory and post-event processing. The treatment is recognized as the treatment of choice in clinical guidelines. We present the Clark and Wells’s model of SAD in detail and describe how SAD can be treated with CBT. Furthermore, we address topics such as clinical management and assessment, research supporting CBT for SAD, and further developments based on the metacognitive model.
Our aim was to develop a brief cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) protocol to augment treatment for social anxiety disorder (SAD). This protocol focused specifically upon fear of positive evaluation (FPE). To our knowledge, this is the first protocol that has been designed to systematically target FPE.
Aims:
To test the feasibility of a brief (two-session) CBT protocol for FPE and report proof-of-principle data in the form of effect sizes.
Method:
Seven patients with a principal diagnosis of SAD were recruited to participate. Following a pre-treatment assessment, patients were randomized to either (a) an immediate CBT condition (n = 3), or (b) a comparable wait-list (WL) period (2 weeks; n = 4). Two WL patients also completed the CBT protocol following the WL period (delayed CBT condition). Patients completed follow-up assessments 1 week after completing the protocol.
Results:
A total of five patients completed the brief, FPE-specific CBT protocol (two of the seven patients were wait-listed only and did not complete delayed CBT). All five patients completed the protocol and provided 1-week follow-up data. CBT patients demonstrated large reductions in FPE-related concerns as well as overall social anxiety symptoms, whereas WL patients demonstrated an increase in FPE-related concerns.
Conclusions:
Our brief FPE-specific CBT protocol is feasible to use and was associated with large FPE-specific and social anxiety symptom reductions. To our knowledge, this is the first treatment report that has focused on systematic treatment of FPE in patients with SAD. Our protocol warrants further controlled evaluation.
Remote delivery of evidence-based psychological therapies via video conference has become particularly relevant following the COVID-19 pandemic, and is likely to be an on-going method of treatment delivery post-COVID. Remotely delivered therapy could be of particular benefit for people with social anxiety disorder (SAD), who tend to avoid or delay seeking face-to-face therapy, often due to anxiety about travelling to appointments and meeting mental health professionals in person. Individual cognitive therapy for SAD (CT-SAD), based on the Clark and Wells (1995) model, is a highly effective treatment that is recommended as a first-line intervention in NICE guidance (NICE, 2013). All of the key features of face-to-face CT-SAD (including video feedback, attention training, behavioural experiments and memory-focused techniques) can be adapted for remote delivery. In this paper, we provide guidance for clinicians on how to deliver CT-SAD remotely, and suggest novel ways for therapists and patients to overcome the challenges of carrying out a range of behavioural experiments during remote treatment delivery.
Key learning aims
(1) To learn how to deliver all of the core interventions of CT-SAD remotely.
(2) To learn novel ways of carrying out behavioural experiments remotely when some in-person social situations might not be possible.
Disease trajectories of patients with anxiety disorders are highly diverse and approximately 60% remain chronically ill. The ability to predict disease course in individual patients would enable personalized management of these patients. This study aimed to predict recovery from anxiety disorders within 2 years applying a machine learning approach.
Methods
In total, 887 patients with anxiety disorders (panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, agoraphobia, or social phobia) were selected from a naturalistic cohort study. A wide array of baseline predictors (N = 569) from five domains (clinical, psychological, sociodemographic, biological, lifestyle) were used to predict recovery from anxiety disorders and recovery from all common mental disorders (CMDs: anxiety disorders, major depressive disorder, dysthymia, or alcohol dependency) at 2-year follow-up using random forest classifiers (RFCs).
Results
At follow-up, 484 patients (54.6%) had recovered from anxiety disorders. RFCs achieved a cross-validated area-under-the-receiving-operator-characteristic-curve (AUC) of 0.67 when using the combination of all predictor domains (sensitivity: 62.0%, specificity 62.8%) for predicting recovery from anxiety disorders. Classification of recovery from CMDs yielded an AUC of 0.70 (sensitivity: 64.6%, specificity: 62.3%) when using all domains. In both cases, the clinical domain alone provided comparable performances. Feature analysis showed that prediction of recovery from anxiety disorders was primarily driven by anxiety features, whereas recovery from CMDs was primarily driven by depression features.
Conclusions
The current study showed moderate performance in predicting recovery from anxiety disorders over a 2-year follow-up for individual patients and indicates that anxiety features are most indicative for anxiety improvement and depression features for improvement in general.
This study aimed to evaluate the discriminative validity of MINI-SPIN (MS) as a screening tool for social anxiety disorder (SAD) in a group of Brazilian university students.
Method
SPIN was collectively applied to 2320 university students. Among them, 656 individuals who fulfilled the criteria for positive MS (N = 473) and negative MS (N = 183) were selected and divided into two groups. The selected subjects were interviewed by telephone using the SAD module of the SCID-IV, used as the gold standard. In order to check interrater reliability, a group of university students (N = 57) was reinterviewed by telephone by a second rater, and another group (N = 100) participated in a face-to-face interview.
Results
The Kappa coefficient among the telephone interviews was 0.80, and a coefficient of 0.84 (P < 0.001) was obtained between the telephone interview and the face-to-face one. For a cut-off score of 6, suggested in the original English version of the instrument, sensitivity was 0.94, specificity 0.46, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 0.58, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 0.92. For a cut-off score of 7, we observed an increase in the specificity and in the PPV (0.68 and 0.65) while the sensitivity and NPV (0.78 and 0.80) remained high.
Discussion/Conclusion
MS showed quite satisfactory psychometric qualities. The cut-off score of 6 seemed to be the most suitable to attest the tracking value of the tool. However, the cut-off score of 7 was the most suitable as a minimum parameter for the studied group, with psychometric values more similar to those of the original study.
This naturalistic, prospective investigation examined the role of fear of negative evaluation and the personality trait of harm avoidance in the anxiety levels of treated social phobia patients. One hundred and fifty-seven patients with DSM-IV social phobia were assessed before starting treatment and were then followed for up to two years. As expected, greater fear of negative evaluation and higher scores of harm avoidance were associated with greater anxiety at the 6 month follow-up, and harm avoidance remained a significant predictor at 24 months. However, no evidence was found for an interaction between the personality and cognitive variables examined. The findings are discussed in terms of the relative independence of these factors, as well as their potential implications for the treatment of this disorder.
Although panic disorder has been ranked as an ‘anxiety disorder', its close relationship to depression has been suggested in pharmacological and clinical studies. Validation of this hypothesis of similarity between panic and depression requires that their common psychological characteristics be clearly evidenced, especially from the cognitive/emotional standpoint. We assessed 13 depressive themes from Beck's Cognition Checklist, to explore negative automatic thoughts in three groups of patients defined,according to DSM III-R criteria, as: major depression (n = 16), panic disorder (n = 19), social phobia (n = 11). We found a strong similarity in the ordering and regrouping of the depressive themes, between depressive and panic disorder patients, and no similarity with social phobics. These results suggest that panic disorder cognitions may be closer to depressive cognition than social phobia cognition.
In the DSM system social phobia and avoidant personality have been conceptualized as independent entities. Each had separate, if overlapping diagnostic criteria. The specific inclusion and exclusion criteria provided by DSM allowed empirical research to guide future revisions. This review evaluates the empirical literature and evolution of the concepts of these diagnoses from DSM-III to DSM-IIR to DSM-IV. The empirical evidence leads us to the conclusion that there is no dividing line between social phobia and avoidant personality disorder. In addition to their being no dividing line diagnostically between the disorders, there appears to be no separation of the two by treatment techniques. This raises interesting questions about how we differentiate Axis I from Axis II disorders. Suggestions for revisions of the social phobia and avoidant personality disorder categories are given.
The recent epidemiologic studies report extremely varied rates for social phobia (SP). One of the reasons for this may be the difficulty in diagnosing SP, the boundaries of which are uncertain. A community survey was carried out using doctors with experience in clinical psychiatry as interviewers, and a clinical diagnostic instrument. Two thousand three hundred and fifty-five people (out of the 2,500 randomly selected from the population) living in Sesto Fiorentino, a suburb of Florence, Italy, were interviewed by their own general practitioner, using the MINI plus six additional questions. Six hundred and ten of the 623 subjects that were found positive for any form of psychopathology at the screening interview, and 57 negative subjects, were re-interviewed by residents in psychiatry using the Florence Psychiatric Interview (FPI). The FPI is a validated composite instrument that has the format of a structured clinical research record. It was found that 6.58% of subjects showed social anxiety not attributable to other psychiatric or medical conditions during their life. Social or occupational impairments meeting DSM-IV diagnostic requirements for SP was detected in 76 subjects (lifetime prevalence = 3.27%). Correction for age raises the lifetime expected prevalence to 4%. Sex ratio was approximately (F:M) 2:1. The most common fear was speaking in public (89.4%), followed by entering a room occupied by others (63.1%) and meeting with strangers (47.3%). Eighty-six point nine percent of subjects with SP complained of more than one fear. The mean age of onset (when the subjects first fully met DSM-IV criteria for SP) was 28.8 years, but the first symptoms of SP usually occurred much earlier, with a mean age of onset at 15.5 years. Ninety-two percent of cases with SP also showed at least one other co-morbid psychiatric disorder during their life. Lifetime prevalence of avoidant personality disorder (APD) was 3.6%. Forty-two point nine percent of cases with SP also had APD, whereas 37.9% of cases with APD developed SP.
To perform a psychometric analysis of the Brazilian version of the Brief Social Phobia Scale (BSPS).
Materials and methods
Hundred and seventy-eight university students of both genders aged on average 21.2 years and identified as Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) cases and non-cases was studied, with the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV being used as a parameter. The different instruments were applied in an individual manner in the presence of a rater and of an observer.
Results
The BSPS showed adequate internal consistency (0.48–0.88) and concurrent and divergent validity with the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) (0.21–0.62), Social Phobia Inventory (0.24–0.82) and Self Statements During Public Speaking Scale (SSPS) (0.23–0.31). Discriminative validity revealed a sensitivity of 0.88–0.90 and a specificity of 0.81(0.83 for cut-off notes of 18/19. Factorial analysis demonstrated the presence of six factors that jointly explained 71.79% of data variance. Construct validity indicated some limits of the scale regarding the diagnosis of SAD. Inter-rater reliability was strong (0.86–1.00, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
The BSPS is adequate for use with university students, although further studies in different cultures, samples and contexts are still necessary.
Both psychodynamic group therapy (PGT) and clonazepam are used as treatment strategies in reducing symptoms of generalized social anxiety disorder (GSAD). However, many individuals remain symptomatic after treatment with PGT or clonazepam.
Method
Fifty-eight adult outpatients with a diagnosis of GSAD according to DSM-IV were randomized to 12 weeks PGT plus clonazepam or clonazepam. The Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale was the primary efficacy measure. Secondary efficacy measures included the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) total score, the World Health Organization Instrument to Assess Quality of Life—Brief (WHOQOL-Bref) Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).
Results
CGI-I data from 57 patients (intent-to-treat population) showed that patients who received PGT plus clonazepam presented significantly greater improvement than those who received clonazepam (P = 0.033). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the secondary efficacy measures.
Conclusions
Our study suggests that the combination of PGT with clonazepam may be a promising strategy for the treatment of GSAD, regarding gains in the global functioning. However the present study failed to detect more specific changes in social anxiety symptomatology between the two groups.
To investigate associations between social anxiety and smoking behaviour in order to explore whether social anxiety predicts the first onset of cigarette smoking, regular smoking and the development of nicotine dependence.
Baseline and four-year follow-up data from the Early Developmental Stages of Psychopathology Study (EDSP), a prospective-longitudinal community study of 3,021 adolescents and young adults, are used. Smoking behaviour and psychopathology were assessed with the M-CIDI and its DSM-IV algorithms. At baseline, 35.7% of the sample were regular smokers, and 18.7% fulfilled criteria for DSM-IV nicotine dependence. Twenty-seven point two percent reported at least one social fear, and 7.2% met criteria for DSM-IV social phobia, most of whom reported first onset of social fear problems clearly prior to smoking initiation. Cross-sectional retrospective baseline analyses based on retrospective reports revealed that social fears and DSM-IV social phobia were both significantly associated with higher rates of nicotine dependence. Prospective-longitudinal analyses that were conducted in an attempt to confirm cross-sectional retrospective results showed that baseline non-users with social fears (OR = 3.85) and baseline non-dependent users with social fears (OR = 1.5) had an increased risk of onset of nicotine dependence during the follow-up period of four years. These findings remained significant even when controlling for co-morbid depressive disorders. Social anxiety was found to be significantly associated with nicotine dependence in both cross-sectional retrospective and prospective-longitudinal analyses. It is suggested that social fears could lead to heavy tobacco use as smoking is a socially acceptable behaviour that relieves anxiety in social situations. Possible differential effects of social anxiety on the early stages of smoking behaviour compared to effects on nicotine dependence are discussed. These findings should stimulate a continued search into potentially causal links between social fear symptoms and the development of tobacco consumption and nicotine dependence in adolescence.