To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Greece’s politics were dominated by renewed mobilisation over the 2023 Tempi rail disaster and by the Payment and Control Agency for Guidance and Guarantee Community Aid (OPEKEPE) agricultural subsidies scandal. The government survived a March no-confidence vote but faced sustained pressure over accountability, rule-of-law concerns and corruption. Konstantinos Tasoulas, New Democracy’s former President of the Parliament, was elected President of the Republic in February, while a March Cabinet reshuffle brought Kyriakos Pierrakakis to the Finance Ministry; in December he was elected Eurogroup President. The opposition remained fragmented. PASOK-KINAL retained its main opposition status but failed to capitalise decisively, SYRIZA continued to decline, and Alexis Tsipras resigned his parliamentary seat amid return speculation. Seismic activity on Santorini, a destructive wildfire season, a controversial labour law allowing 13-hour workdays under certain conditions, farmers’ blockades and persistent cost-of-living pressures reinforced a broader picture of governmental turbulence. By year-end, opinion polls pointed to a potential ungovernability scenario after the next parliamentary elections.
This study provides the first comprehensive analysis of morbidity and mortality in Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus and Great White Pelican P. onocrotalus in Greece. Data were collected over a 24-year period (1998–2021), using specific questionnaires to highlight the temporospatial, age and aetiological causes of morbidity and mortality to advance conservation efforts. Overall, 316 incidents of morbidity/mortality and 23 mass mortality events were recorded while the two species differed significantly in all parameters of morbidity/mortality. Annual rate of mortality was higher in Dalmatian Pelican (44.5 deaths per annum) than the Great White Pelican (2.4 deaths per annum). Dalmatian Pelican mortality tended to occur more during late winter/early spring and late summer/autumn, while Great White Pelican mortality occurred during autumn, matching with the presence of pre-migratory concentrations and migration. Dalmatian Pelican tended to be found dead in areas where pelicans congregated (e.g. colonies, feeding, wintering) while Great White Pelican were equally found in both areas with and without pelican congregations. A total of 30% of Great White Pelican mortality/morbidity happened in south Greece away from pelican areas and along the migration route whilst adult Dalmatian Pelicans and juvenile Great White Pelicans were the prevalent age groups. In Dalmatian Pelicans, 70% of mortality accumulated in the mass mortality events, while the sympatric Great White Pelican was unaffected during these events. Dalmatian Pelican mortality was mostly attributed to environmental (biotoxin) and infectious (viral/avian influenza) causes, while Great White Pelican mostly to anthropogenic (trauma/illegal shooting). Specific causes in Dalmatian Pelican mortality showed significant seasonal variation with viral causes in spring, biotoxin and entrapment in autumn, and illegal shooting and emaciation in winter. In Great White Pelicans, illegal shooting tended to occur in spring. A total of 25% of rescued Dalmatian Pelicans were released. Limitations of this study were that only 1% of the dead pelicans underwent a veterinary post-mortem investigation, in 26% of the dead pelicans the cause was completely unknown, the sex was not determined, and the age remained unidentified in a high percentage (43-46%) of individuals. In future, more veterinary input and a national preparedness plan for mass mortality events are needed.
‘Constantly commending Hellas’ is a metaphorical expression coined by Mao Zedong to label Soviet-backed party rivals as ‘philhellenic’ during the 1941 party purge, reinforcing his leadership under the guise of the Sinification of Marxism. Following the communist conquest of China in 1949, the metaphor remained central to debates over ‘Westernization versus Sinification’. It highlights tensions between philhellenism and mishellenism and provides a valuable lens to explore the intersection of classical reception and modern Chinese thought. This article traces ‘Hellenomania’ in China from the mid-19th-century colonial period to the post-Mao era and addresses issues of nationalism, ideological interpretation and intellectual autonomy. It argues that ‘Hellenomania’, which served as a historical resource for China’s transition from a dynastic empire to a nation-state, has its roots in the intellectual tendency to view Euro-American modernity as descended from classical antiquity. Through five case studies of phil- or mishellenists, including Liang Qichao (1873–1929), Mao Zedong (1893–1976), Xiao Jun (1907–1988), Gu Zhun (1915–1974) and Lin Zhichun (1910–2007), the article explores their roles within the frameworks of classical reception and intellectual history.
This article contextualizes the unique display of two colossal Roman copies of Hellenistic sculptures at the lavish villa of Herodes Atticus at Loukou, located in Arcadia (Peloponnese, Greece). The estate at Loukou is notable for its extensive decorative program, including elaborate mosaics and a large sculpture collection that juxtaposed bespoke copies of famous works with others that were already antiquities at the time of their display in the 2nd c. CE. Both sculptural compositions discussed here belong to the former category and depict two mythological figures in interlocking arrangements (symplegma). The choice of these two sculptures and their unique display at Loukou reflects the preferences of their patron: the sophist, politician, and cosmopolitan benefactor Herodes Atticus. This paper argues that the two paired colossal groups formed the crux of Herodes’s custom decorative program at Loukou, where he fostered elite discourse around themes of conflict and loss.
This chapter offers the first comprehensive study of the relationship between music and politics in Greece during periods when the country was under political regimes with a fascist profile. In this context, the study focuses on the Metaxas dictatorship (1936-41), the period of the Axis Occupation (1941-44) and the Junta period (1967-74). The chapter focuses on the particular ideological and cultural factors that affected musical practice and creation, the restrictions that were imposed in each case (and the means used to implement them), as well as the ways in which the musical world reacted to the political conditions at each time. Through the sequential examination of musical life during these periods, both continuities and discontinuities emerge, regarding the ways in which music was influenced by politics. Although particular emphasis is placed on Western art music, the analysis also includes some aspects of popular music, mainly with regard to rebetiko.
This article examines the role of children’s homes in socialist Czechoslovakia as temporary humanitarian spaces for child refugees fleeing the Greek Civil War (1946–1949) or the Korean War (1950–1953). It challenges the conventional ideological framing of socialist residential care as a tool of social engineering. Instead, it examines the everyday agency of refugee children, as manifest through their experience of space and time. The analysis draws on archival materials, oral interviews, and refugee literature to illuminate the personal choices and coping strategies of these children in the context of socialist education. The refugee children’s homes are conceptualized as socially constructed spaces that required a healthy political and physical environment for the children’s presumed successful development. By situating these facilities geographically and spatially and contextualizing them historically within a broader continuum of care, the analysis elucidates the underlying issues associated with the postwar reconstruction process.
The introduction opens with a fictive case study to frame the book’s central question: how non-Muslim courts interpret and frame Muslim Family Law (MFL) disputes, shaping reform, legitimacy, and minority trust. The case shows how narrative incohesion arises when courts justify identical legal outcomes through competing judicial narratives, producing uncertainty about the law’s foundations, meaning, and authority. Narratival incohesion erodes the rule of law and public confidence in the judiciary. Comparing Ghana, Israel, Greece, and India, the chapter identifies four modalities of narrative (in)cohesion – exclusion, alignment, conflict, and dissonance – showing how ideological unity or fragmentation within judiciaries produces narratival cohesion or incohesion. It also clarifies the theological and empirical foundations of MFLs in non-Muslim contexts, addressing questions of legitimacy, authenticity, and human rights. Finally, the chapter outlines the comparative qualitative methodology underpinning the study and argues that narrative is not merely interpretive but a transformative medium through which courts construct meaning, mediate between law and faith, and influence reform.
This chapter examines narratival conflict within Greek courts over the legitimacy and scope of Muslim Family Law (MFL) in Thrace – the only European jurisdiction formally recognizing Islamic law. It identifies three competing judicial narratives: the Protective Narrative, which upholds the mufti’s jurisdiction as a treaty-based obligation; the Restrictive Narrative, which narrows that jurisdiction under constitutional and human-rights principles; and the Liberative Choice Narrative, which affirms minority exit rights and voluntary recourse to civil law. Drawing on content analysis of case law and extensive fieldwork, the chapter demonstrates how narratival incohesion between higher and lower courts has produced chronic legal ambiguity, undermined procedural justice, and eroded minority trust. It argues that Greece’s securitized approach to Islamic law – shaped by historical tensions with Turkey – has stifled harmonization and prevented internal reform within the mufti system. Ultimately, narratival conflict, rather than fostering pluralism, has entrenched uncertainty, alienation, and the double failure of both religious and civil justice.
Judging Through Narrative explores the normative frames, or judicial narratives, that non-Muslim courts construct when adjudicating Muslim Family Law disputes. The book examines how these narratives shape the rule of law, gender reform, and public trust in the justice system. Drawing on over 400 interviews with judges, lawyers, and litigants, and an analysis of nearly 3,000 judicial decisions from Ghana, India, Israel, and Greece, the book reveals how coherence and fragmentation in judicial storytelling influences legal legitimacy and reform. Introducing the concept of 'narratival (in)cohesion', this work offers a new framework for understanding how courts mediate between religion, rights, and state authority. Bridging law, political science, and socio-legal studies, it is an essential resource for scholars, policymakers, and practitioners seeking to understand how judicial narratives shape the lived experience of law in diverse, multi-religious societies. This title is also available as open access on Cambridge Core.
This study aims to analyze how two popular television series, Famagusta (produced in Greece) and Bir Zamanlar Kıbrıs (Once Upon a Time in Cyprus, produced in Turkey), reflect the political approaches of Greece and Turkey toward the Cyprus issue. Television series are often powerful media for national narrative building, and both Famagusta and Bir Zamanlar Kıbrıs series demonstrate the ways historical events are selectively portrayed to reinforce contemporary political perspectives regarding Cyprus. Beyond simply retelling historical events, both series are used to reflect the ongoing efforts of Greece and Turkey to assert rights over Cyprus, a geopolitically significant island with a complex colonial past. This study will analyze how these series engage in narrative framing to legitimize national claims over a distant territory, using television series as a medium for both national narratives and colonial continuity. The study will explore the underlying messages, rhetorical tools, and symbolic elements that each series uses to shape the public perception about the Cyprus issue, drawing on concepts from media studies and international relations.
I present historical background, contemporary status, and potential future development of the psychology of religion (PoR) in Greece, beginning with its origins: the formative people, places, and various intellectual schools of thought. Writing about the current state of the topic, I reflect on influential factors that are either facilitating or inhibiting the study of PoR, including publication options, topical emphases, practitioners, orientations, methodologies, and professional organizations.
I offer opinions concerning future development topics that are emerging as important in the immediate future and/or are perennially important in order to stimulate creative and useful research including Western theoretical relevance, the extent to which Western PoR theories may or may not contain reasonable expectations and concepts for this region, contextual nuances, Indigenous theoretical concerns, collaborative research opportunities, and common faux pas – reflections on what people unfamiliar with this region commonly and incorrectly assume about conducting PoR work in this context.
The Balkans Wars (1912–13) reshaped the European political order before the First World War. The victory of the Balkan League posed a particular challenge to Austria-Hungary. Berchtold sought to manage Serbian expansion through closer economic relations, but Belgrade rebuffed his proposal. Lacking the tools of economic statecraft to manage political change in the Balkans, Austro-Hungarian leaders began to turn towards the use of militarised diplomacy, ultimatums baced by threats of force, in 1913. The costs of the Balkan Wars opened the space for competition between French and German financial diplomacy. Despite some bankers’ efforts to collaborate, French and German governments directed loans towards their favoured states in the Balkans. The Balkan states also challenged international transport conventions in the name of nation-state sovereingty. The result of the Balkan Wars was a hardening of the alliance blocks, the instrumentalisation of economic interdependence for diplomatic and security interests, and the weakening of Austria-Hungary, whose political leaders increasingly saw military force as a solution to challenges in the Balkans.
The chapter begins with the basic nomenclature of our periodization and asks the question: what is Protogeometric? From there it tackles the issue of where were mechanically drawn circles first invented – which is now clearly somewhere in the north Aegean – but stresses that determining the place where circles were first invented probably does not matter a great deal when formulating broader conclusions of political, social, economic, or ethnic importance, and it leaves open the possibility that although Athens was not the first place to invent mechanically drawn circles, it may have been the place that gave rise to the Protogeometric style of pottery. The conventional periodization of Protogeometric is reviewed, as is the issue of regional styles of Protogeometric pottery in the Greek world, before the thorny issue of the relative and absolute chronology of Protogeometric is tackled. The chapter ends by asking whether we can speak of a Protogemetric Aegean, and the conclusion is that this is not really possible. A coda discusses doing away with the highly problematic notion of a “dark age.”
Before 324 the dominant emperors in the Balkan and eastern provinces were Galerius, Maximinus, and Licinius. In honor of their benefactions, cities erected dedications and statues. Inscriptions also indicated that the senior emperors introduced new honorific titles to placate dissatisfied junior emperors. In Asia Minor some epitaphs celebrated Christian notables and their families.
Once considered a period of poverty and isolation, devoid of impressive material culture, the Iron Age is now regarded as a pivotal era. It witnessed how the ancient Greeks lost and regained literacy, created lifelike figural representations and monumental architecture, and eventually established new and complex civic polities. The Companion to the Greek Iron Age offers an up to date account of this critical epoch of Greek antiquity. Including archaeological surveys of different regions, it presents focused discussions of the Early Iron Age cultures and states with which Greek regions had contacts and which are integral for understanding cultural developments in this formative period. They include Cyprus, Syro-Anatolia, Italy, and Egypt, regions in which, as in Greece, the Early Iron Age is diverse and unevenly documented. Offering a synthesis of the key developments, The Companion to the Greek Iron Age also demonstrates how new archaeological and theoretical approaches have enlarged and clarified our understanding of this seminal period.
The Tennessee Centennial Exposition of 1897 celebrated the centennial of Tennessee’s admission to the United States. This chapter argues that the use of Greek and Grecian architecture at Nashville was connected to Nashville’s reputation as a city of learning and culture. During the nineteenth century, Nashville was known as the Athens of the South and of the West. A life-sized replica of the Parthenon was the fair’s premier building. Archaeological accuracy and color were also essential to creating the fair’s Parthenon. Other buildings incorporated classical motifs from different periods, demonstrating the flexibility and fluidity of ancient architecture and embodying the neo-antique. This classical architecture embodied Nashville’s arrival as a city, but it also celebrated the New South and reflected the codification of the racist Jim Crow laws. Thus, the appropriation of classical architecture to justify institutional racism is examined. Egyptian architecture played a prominent role here. Shelby County erected a pyramid for its pavilion, which was an exceptional use of Egyptian architecture at United States fairs. The chapter concludes with a consideration of the enduring importance of the rebuilt Nashville Parthenon (and its Athena statue) as a symbol of culture and democracy for the city.
The Greek tragedy that unfolded during the eurozone crisis (2010–15) was the height of a period of ‘high neoliberalism’ that has been particularly prevalent since 1992. This dynamic has been visible in Europe in four specific areas, namely 1) the global rise of neoliberalism (including in internet regulation), 2) the Single Market (with the liberalisation of the football market, the Bolkestein directive, the role of the Court of Justice, and legislative Darwinism), 3) competition policy (with merger control, state aid control, and the liberalisation of new sectors), and 4) the monetary union, from its miraculous beginnings to the Greek tragedy of the eurozone crisis. However, neoliberalism was not exclusive. The epic debates surrounding the Bolkestein directive led to the protection of services of general interest. The eurozone crisis triggered a belated redistribution. In competition policy as well, the older approach of ‘public interest’(which struck a balance between liberty, solidarity and community) has made a comeback in a new guise under Commissioner Vestager, in what could be called an ‘excess of market power’ approach.
In a time of polycrisis, internal contestation, and strained transatlantic relations, European identity is timelier and more relevant than ever. Do EU public policies operating in a multilevel governance system contribute to European identity-building, and what can jeopardise the process of identity formation at the level of policy elites? The article adopts a social constructivist and discursive approach and brings to the fore the lacking process of EU socialisation via discursive practices as a key reason leading to failed identity-building. Focusing on EU Cohesion Policy in Wales (UK), Crete (Greece), and Silesia (Poland), the analysis employs primary data and grey literature sources, along with 64 semistructured elite interviews, to show that, despite key differences among the three cases, Cohesion Policy has not contributed significantly to European identity-building among policy elites at different government levels and among the public. This is because the coordinative discourse about EU policies is dominated by ideas about economic goals and practical aspects of policy-making, while the respective communicative discourse is controlled by domestic political elites and the media and is ultimately determined by broader national/regional political cultures about the purpose and limitations of EU membership. Overall, the article contributes to the literature on European identity-building, EU socialisation, and discourse by arguing that the way EU public policies are designed, implemented, and communicated do not favour the achievement of political goals, such as the cultivation of a shared European identity.
Golden Dawn (GD), Greece’s most prominent far-right political organization, strategically utilized antisemitism as its core ideological principle rather than a marginal prejudice or rhetorical device. This article argues that antisemitism served primarily as an epistemological conspiratorial framework central to GD’s ideological worldview, providing a coherent interpretive lens through which all political, economic, and social phenomena were explained as elements of a singular Jewish-orchestrated plot. Drawing on qualitative discourse analysis of over 10,300 GD publications spanning 1993 to 2020, the study illustrates how this epistemological master frame enabled the party to unify diverse domestic and international issues, from foreign policy tensions and immigration debates to economic crises, under a consistent antisemitic narrative. Additionally, by explicitly employing Holocaust denial, endorsing Nazi symbolism, and openly propagating antisemitic conspiracies, GD deliberately violated post-Holocaust European norms. This normative transgression was integral to the party’s identity, positioning it in overt defiance of mainstream moral and political boundaries. The article thus demonstrates how GD’s antisemitism functioned not merely as a rhetorical provocation but as the foundation of a comprehensive ideological system that consciously challenged established European taboos. These findings also suggest broader implications for understanding the role and adaptability of conspiratorial antisemitism and normative transgression in other extremist ideologies beyond the Greek context.
Recent literature argues that with ever‐increasing levels of supranational constraints governments have less ‘room to manoeuvre’; therefore, voters will place less weight on policy outcomes in their voting decisions. The question that remains less explored is how voters fill this accountability gap. We argue that, in this context, voters may move away from outcome‐ to input‐oriented voting. Fulfilling their promises becomes less vital for incumbents as long as they exhibit effort to overturn an unpopular policy framework. We test this argument against a survey experiment conducted in the run‐up to the September 2015 election in Greece, where we find a positive impact of the incumbent's exerted effort to challenge the status quo of austerity on vote intention for SYRIZA – the senior coalition government partner at the time – despite the failed outcome of the government's bailout negotiations.