To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This study examines how community participation and empowerment processes are shaped and fostered in practice in the context of community health centres (CHCs) in Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
Background:
European health care systems are encouraged to make their primary health care more people centred. With the introduction of CHCs, Italy is promoting this development. In this context, community participation and empowerment represent important features.
Methods:
This qualitative study draws on the experiences of practitioners and stakeholders working in the field of community participation and empowerment in CHCs. We conducted 19 in-depth interviews and our interviewees provided descriptions from 14 good-practice CHCs. The examples were organized according to different levels of participation, thus highlighting four themes: a) connecting with the community by informing, meeting, and proposing activities; b) consulting with the community to identify its needs; c) collaborating with the community (including prior consultation); and d) the community as the leader of the process.
Findings:
In terms of the four themes and the extent of involvement, we identified a variety of processes aimed at supporting community participation and empowerment and provided various examples. We described the different goals of community participation and empowerment (e.g., the appropriateness, accessibility and visibility of CHC services; improved health; the mobilization of community resources; the construction of supportive networks; and the creation of spaces for capacity-building), the interviewees’ reported potential benefits; the community participation methods used (e.g., world cafés, workshops) and the different target groups addressed (e.g., specific disadvantaged groups or entire local community).
‘Engaging’ well in psychological therapy is generally associated with more positive clinical outcomes. However, the literature shows little agreement on how to define, conceptualise and measure engagement. Few studies focus primarily on engagement, and those that include engagement measures within other designs rely mainly on single behavioural indicators, such as whether between-session tasks (e.g. ‘homework’ in cognitive behavioural therapy) were completed, or the number of sessions attended. Although pragmatic, I suggest these indicators do not capture the full sense of what engagement means and that taking a broader perspective is likely to be helpful in advancing research and clinical practice. I present a conceptual model of engagement in psychological therapy that aims to draw together relevant theoretical ideas and combine them with observations from clinical practice. This proposes that engagement can be understood as three distinct facets: engagement with the therapist, engagement with the therapy approach, and the practical, behavioural indicators of engagement. I suggest this offers a comprehensive way to conceptualise and understand engagement that may prove helpful for clinicians and researchers. I aim to advocate for further research in this area and for applying the ‘empirically grounded clinical interventions’ approach to therapy processes, not just therapy content. This could help further our understanding of the engagement process, which may play a critical role in driving successful therapy outcomes.
Voluntary mental health support services play an important role in public health. However, long-term retention of volunteers is a major challenge. The present study aimed to understand the reasons for reduced volunteer engagement and retention loss in a UK mental health charity. Twenty-two participants from two populations (new volunteers and leavers) were engaged in semi-structured interviews to (1) longitudinally explore new volunteers’ expectations and experiences in their new role; and (2) explore reasons for stopping volunteering. Using constructivist grounded theory, we found key barriers to engagement among volunteers in this sector: unmet needs and values, unclear or demanding commitments, and reduced confidence in the role. Addressing these barriers through clearer expectations, stronger social connection, and processes that build confidence and coping (e.g., additional training) may enhance engagement and retention. Our findings suggest areas where targeted adjustments could enhance volunteer engagement and retention.
Chapter 2 examines motivation as the foundational driver of consumer behavior, showing how needs initiate and sustain consumption. It surveys major theories of needs, such as Maslow’s hierarchy, to explain a process in which unfulfilled needs create tension, trigger goal formation, and guide behaviors to buy and consume, while marketing often amplifies this cycle into insatiability, with ever new or higher needs. In contrast, the chapter introduces authentic needs, realized through mindfulness, that are inherently self-fulfilling and foster a steadier sense of contentment. They also encourage deeper engagement, where consumption becomes an opportunity for full awareness of self and surroundings, leading to a transformative experience that illuminates the transient nature of possessions, status, and emotions, thereby loosening the compulsion to chase more and opening space for a freer, more sufficient relationship to consumption.
Chapter 7 develops a multidimensional typology of investor stewardship, offering a framework to interpret its expanding scope and practice across the investment ecosystem. It identifies five dimensions: levels of intervention (micro, portfolio, system, and macro); stewardship actors (direct and indirect, across the investment chain); targeted assets (extending beyond public equity to debt, infrastructure, and real assets); motivations (financial value, ESG risk, and sustainability goals); and operational means (capital allocation, engagement, collaboration, and escalation). The chapter introduces the concept of blended stewardship to capture how institutional investors increasingly operate across levels and strategies to address complex, systemic challenges. Drawing on qualitative insights from the second-generation UK Stewardship Code disclosures, it shows how stewardship is diversifying in form, focus, and asset class. Framing stewardship as a pluralistic and relational practice – shaped by institutional roles, market structures, and normative expectations – the chapter provides the analytical foundations for rethinking how stewardship can meet the governance demands of the twenty-first century.
Chapter 5 traces the regulatory evolution of shareholder – and more broadly, investor – stewardship in the UK, from early investor-led initiatives to the UK Stewardship Code 2020. It begins with the Institutional Shareholders’ Committee, whose statements between 1991 and 2009 gradually reframed activism as stewardship. It then examines the shift to regulator-led stewardship, marked by the Financial Reporting Council’s first-generation UK Stewardship Code (2010/2012), which aimed to foster a market for engagement but remained rooted in shareholder oversight of listed equities. The chapter next assesses the second-generation code (2020), which moves beyond shareholder engagement towards a broader model of investor stewardship. This redefenition embeds ESG considerations, systemic risk, and sustainable value within a principles-based, narrative-driven regime. The analysis also considers the institutional mechanisms supporting implementation and the code’s influence as a global benchmark. While the UK regime has pushed the regulatory frontier, key tensions persist – particularly around enforcement, the translation of normative goals into practice, and the limits of soft law in governing investor conduct.
This chapter reflects on my experience as the Director of the ACT Parks and Conservation Service, highlighting my involvement in the Mulligans Flat-Goorooyarroo Woodland Experiment at Mulligans Flat Woodland Sanctuary (MFGO) from 2004 to 2022. It discusses the evolution of the Experiment, a long-term initiative aimed at woodland restoration, and its impact on the ACT Parks and Conservation Service. The experiment not only provided valuable insights into woodland management, but also fostered innovation and community engagement.
The chapter emphasises the creation of a predator-proof fence at Mulligans Flat, collaboration with academic researchers, and the integration of evidence-based management practices. Key challenges, such as reallocation of staff and developing specialised knowledge, are explored, as well as the transformation of conservation efforts in the ACT. The Experiment and MFWS has become a model for adaptive conservation, highlighting the importance of partnerships between government, researchers and the community in promoting biodiversity conservation and sustainable land management practices.
Chapter 2 focuses on the role and potential of technology in the mathematics classroom. You will be introduced to the TPACK and SAMR frameworks, which support effective planning and teaching with digital tools. This chapter demonstrates how technology can enhance engagement, feedback, personalisation, and collaboration, while providing guidance on selecting high-quality digital resources aligned with the cross-curriculum priorities. The integration of technology is framed to enrich pedagogical practice and support diverse learners.
In this chapter, the lives of a few older persons living in the Vineyard region are presented. After explaining how interviews were carried out and the life stories collected and analysed, and sketching the sociocultural environment of the Vineyard region, the chapter presents six short case studies, that of three women, two men and a married couple, that is, seven persons. For each person, I present their current situations and living arrangements and the transformation of their convoy of care during two and a half years. On this basis, I characterise their unique developmental trajectory: where do they come from, what did they live through? What ruptures and transitions did they experience, what resources did they find and what did they learn from them? What are their interest and engagements and how did they evolve with time? How much do they remember and imagine? What can we say about their domains of conduct and their reconfiguration over time? How, from there, can we see a unique life trajectory, a singular melody emerging from each of these lives, unfolding in the same region?
Sociocultural psychology of the lifecourse, which examines the development of the persons in their changing environments, offers here the frame for our exploration of development in older age. Although it has largely addressed the development of children, youth and adults, it has only recently started to approach the specificities of developing with age. This chapter retraces the ontological and epistemological foundation of this approach. It then further explores three sets of concepts of foremost importance when approaching development in the lifecourse into older age: those related to dynamics of distancing and imagining, core when examining semiotic processes in human development; those of interests and engagements, which emphasise sense-making and affects; and what regards the domains of conduct in which people engage. The chapter then sketches the specificities of development in older age within people’s material, social and symbolic environment.
The chapter addresses: 1. Overview of the Personalization Principle. 2. Theoretical Rationale for the Personalization Principle. 3. Empirical Rationale for the Personalization Principle. 4. Boundary Conditions for the Personalization Principle. 5. Applications of the Personalization Principle
This chapter leverages the lived experiences and reflections of practitioners who have engaged in collaboration at the watershed level. Through survey data and open-ended responses, the chapter explores as well as elucidates respondents’ self-reported values, goals, operational choices, and reported relationships within collaborative arrangements, stakeholders, and organizations. Results reveal that organizational characteristics, systems, perceptions of legitimacy, and other contextual factors play key roles in influencing revealed and perceived collaborative outputs and outcomes. The chapter also highlights the centrality of trust, fairness, and scientific understanding in contributing to effective partnerships. The chapter also highlights specific impediments and challenges to effective collaboration such as resource constraints, fragmented governance and institutions, and that stakeholders often held varying levels of scientific capacity. The chapter concludes by emphasizing trust-building, adaptive learning, and institutional support as important drivers of successful collaboration.
Smartphone-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) programs offer accessible interventions for subthreshold depression, yet engagement needed for meaningful benefit remains unclear. We examined how lesson and worksheet engagement relate to depressive symptom improvements in a behavioral activation (BA) intervention, accounting for time-varying confounders.
Methods
This secondary analysis included 298 adults assigned to the BA arm of the RESiLIENT trial, a randomized controlled trial in Japan. Lesson and worksheet completion were treated as time-varying exposures, each yielding four engagement patterns: minimal (Few-Few), early (Many-Few), late (Few-Many), and consistently high (Many-Many). Outcomes were depressive symptom changes measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at weeks 6 and 26. We applied the parametric g-formula to estimate counterfactual PHQ-9 changes under each pattern, adjusting for baseline and time-varying confounders.
Results
Early lesson engagement during weeks 0–3 was associated with larger PHQ-9 reductions at both weeks 6 and 26, even when later engagement declined (Many-Few vs. Few-Few: week 6: −1.47 [95% CI −2.52 to −0.53]; week 26: −1.27 [−2.53 to −0.17]). In contrast, higher worksheet engagement was linked to improved PHQ-9 at week 6, with maximal benefit among consistently high engagers (Many-Many vs. Few-Few: −1.25 [−2.17 to −0.44]) and late engagers (Few-Many vs. Few-Few: −1.18 [−2.20 to −0.08]), but not persist to week 26.
Conclusions
Greater engagement with smartphone-delivered BA is associated with larger symptom reductions. Early lesson engagement drives sustained benefit, whereas worksheet engagement did not persist. These findings may guide digital CBT design by emphasizing early lesson completion alongside concurrent skill practice.
With alcohol use disorder rising in England, evaluating the impact of interventions used in services is important. This evaluation was conducted in a third sector drug and alcohol service within South England. It aimed to explore the association of a structured cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) group and engagement for service users in early recovery from alcohol use disorder, comparing outcomes with a previously unstructured psychosocial group. A mixed-methods approach compared the groups. Both groups lasted 12 sessions. Self-reported alcohol consumption, psychological health, physical health, and quality of life were measured using the Treatment Outcomes Profile (TOPs; Marsden et al., 2008). Quantitative data were analysed from 47 service users in the unstructured group and 43 in the structured CBT group. Qualitative analysis explored four service users’ feedback from the structured CBT group through interviews, using thematic analysis. Significantly more participants completed the structured CBT group (93.02% vs 74.47%). Structured group participants, on average, attended 50.97% of sessions, compared with 25.53% in the unstructured group. Mixed-model ANOVAs (repeated measures and between subjects) showed an improvement in psychological health, quality of life, and physical health regardless of the intervention type. Both groups also reduced alcohol consumption. Qualitative analysis identified two emerging themes, accessibility and a sense of belonging, alongside several subthemes. While both groups improved treatment outcomes, findings suggest a structured CBT group may be associated with more engagement and facilitate greater retention in treatment.
Key learning aims
(1) To understand how engagement and treatment outcomes differ between a structured CBT group and an unstructured psychosocial group in the treatment of alcohol use disorder.
(2) To identify potential mechanisms in a structured group which may influence engagement and treatment outcomes in the treatment of alcohol use disorder.
(3) To reflect on differing ways to measure effectiveness of a group in community drug and alcohol services.
This study tested the hypothesis that caregiver scaffolding and child engagement are tightly coupled during shared book reading’s word-learning moments. It also examined whether this coupling is consistent or variable across print and digital reading media. Word-learning episodes were coded from a corpus of videorecorded shared-reading interactions between caregiver–child dyads (N = 78, children’s age range = 4;0–5;11). Results support the prediction that scaffolding and engagement are coupled during word-learning moments. This coupling was robust across reading media. Further, child age was a significant predictor of engagement. These findings confirm that engagement is a critical social interaction mechanism involved in the scaffolding process that supports word learning.
Funders increasingly emphasize the ethical imperative to return research results, yet researchers often lack training and clear strategies for effectively sharing findings with lay audiences. While publishing in academic journals is standard practice for dissemination, little guidance exists on translating findings for communities, particularly in rural areas. This qualitative community-guided pilot project aimed to explore and strengthen strategies for sharing study results in accessible ways.
Methods:
The Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute conducted six semi-structured focus groups in Fall 2023 with geographically dispersed Pennsylvanians. Focus groups introduced participants with and without prior research experience to evidence-based and novel dissemination methods – such as lay summaries and data walks – to gather feedback on preferences and experiences. Data were coded and analyzed using MAXQDA, achieving strong interrater reliability (kappa > 0.70). Themes were developed inductively.
Results:
Focus group participants (N = 45) were predominantly women (N = 39, mean age = 56); 10% identified as Black/African American. Geographically, 49% were rural, 44% suburban, and 7% urban. Major themes included lack of effective communication in the research process, poor representation, and limited access to results. Most participants had never received study findings. Participants preferred receiving easy-to-understand summaries shared by individuals with established community relationships. They also found data walks, where researchers bring key findings printed on posters to community events, to be especially engaging and valuable.
Conclusion:
Community-informed dissemination approaches can increase research transparency, engagement, and results translation in communities, particularly in rural areas where accessibility is limited.
Working with a national U.S. sample and data collected from our work with the nonprofit bridging organization Living Room Conversations, we counter the assertions of conflict profiteers. People in the U.S. are far less polarized than imagined, there is a great deal of trust in the election system, and a subsequent “reveal” strategy of this common ground thus becomes as, if not more, important than the need to “bridge” imagined chasms between citizens. With this strategy in place, those interested in or involved with bridging can further set the conditions for democratic dialogue by designing interventions that involve more and different kinds of people in their work, focusing on long-term impacts, and stretching definitions of participation from dialogue to civic action.
Emerging evidence describes the experiences of individuals participating in health research, but insights into the barriers and motivations around research participation in rural communities are limited. We developed and administered a human-centered, evidence-informed survey to assess motivators and barriers to research participation among adults in Pennsylvania.
Methods:
The online survey captured differences between individuals with and without prior research participation and living in rural and urban settings. We hypothesized that individuals with prior research experience would report different motivators and barriers than those who had never participated in research. We also anticipated that rural and urban respondents would differ in their reported motivators and barriers to participation.
Results:
Participants (n = 284, 75% female, 63% urban, 73% with prior research) completed the survey in spring of 2025. Overall top motivators to research participation included a willingness to “contribute to knowledge and medicine,” to “help others,” to “make a difference,” “because the research was personally important,” and “financial compensation.” Top barriers included an “inconvenient research site,” “limited transportation access,” and “time/work constraints.” A variety of motivators and barriers differed by prior research experience. There were no significant differences between the proportion of rural and urban prior research participants who endorsed any of the motivators or barriers. Rural, non-research participants drew greater motivation from “family influence” and “volunteering commitment.”
Conclusion:
The results of this work can inform the development of targeted strategies to improve research engagement, particularly among rural populations.
The display of ancestral human remains in museums is a contentious ethical issue, raising concerns around the dignity and respect for ancestral lived lives versus the role of remains for education and scientific enquiry. Against the backdrop of recent debates sparked by the deinstallation of ancestral remains at several museums (e.g., the removal of the Shuar tsantsas at the Pitt Rivers Museum) and revisions of national and international ethics codes, this essay explores the role of two methodologies – a trial and interactive workshop – in producing inclusive spaces to support ethical decision making and practice. Digital participation technologies were used to support an accessible mode of participation that was anonymous – allowing attendees to express opinions about emotive and challenging subjects, such as ancestral human remains. For both examples, attendees and participants identified key priority and action areas for the sector and within their places of work. The activities will contribute to a wider research project that is investigating value and ethical disagreements and polarization within museums.
This study conducted an approximate replication of Teravainen-Goff (2023) to validate the Intensity and Perceived Quality of Engagement Scale for university students in the Japanese EFL context. Teravainen-Goff (2023) developed this scale based on an action-oriented definition of engagement and proposed a novel approach to measuring engagement among secondary school language learners in the UK. The study identified an 18-item, five-factor structure from a pool of 36 items through exploratory factor analysis (EFA). In this replication, we examined the validity and reliability of Teravainen-Goff’s scale in a different context, focusing on the replicability of the EFA results. We undertook this replication because engagement is context-dependent and EFA results can vary across samples. We compared the factorial structure with that of the initial study while modifying the target language and participant demographic. Results revealed a 22-item, six-factor structure with good fit. Although the same underlying factors emerged, several notable differences were observed. This approximate replication provided stronger evidence for the psychometric properties of the scale in a new context. Transparent documentation of modifications to the initial study and systematic comparison offered a promising approach to building robust evidence for engagement research and improving the rigour of questionnaire-based research overall.